Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

邮发代号 80-968

2019 Impact Factor: 1.68

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering  2023, Vol. 17 Issue (9): 1370-1386   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-023-0947-0
  本期目录
Field and laboratory experimental studies on hard-rock tunnel excavation based on disc cutter coupled with high-pressure waterjet
He FEI1,2, Yiqiang LU2,3(), Jinliang ZHANG4, Xingchen LUO1, Yimin XIA1
1. College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
2. China Railway Engineering Equipment Group Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou 450016, China
3. College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
4. Yellow River Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou 450003, China
 全文: PDF(9105 KB)   HTML
Abstract

The tunnel boring machine (TBM) is typically used in hard-rock tunnel excavation. Owing to the unsatisfactory adaptability of TBM to the surrounding rock, when crossing high-strength and high-wear strata, the TBM can easily cause defects, such as abnormal wear on cutters and overload damage to bearings, thus affecting the construction efficiency and cost. Therefore, high-pressure waterjet technology should be applied to assist in rock breaking for efficient TBM tunneling. In this study, the effects of water pressure, nozzle diameter, and nozzle speed on cutting are investigated via laboratory experiments of cutting hard rock using high-pressure waterjets. The penetration performance of the TBM under different water pressures is investigated via a field industrial penetration test. The results show that high-pressure waterjets are highly efficient for rock breaking and are suitable for industrial applications, as they can accommodate the advancing speed of the TBM and achieve high-efficiency rock breaking. However, during the operation of high-pressure waterjets, the ambient temperature and waterjet temperature in the tunnel increase significantly, which weakens the cooling effect of the cutterhead and decreases the construction efficiency of the TBM. Therefore, temperature control and cooling measures for high-pressure waterjets during their long-term operation must be identified. This study provides a useful reference for the design and construction of high-pressure water-jet-assisted cutterheads for breaking road headers.

Key wordstunnel boring machine    hard-rock cutting    free face    disc cutter    rock-cutting efficiency
收稿日期: 2022-08-23      出版日期: 2023-12-21
Corresponding Author(s): Yiqiang LU   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2023, 17(9): 1370-1386.
He FEI, Yiqiang LU, Jinliang ZHANG, Xingchen LUO, Yimin XIA. Field and laboratory experimental studies on hard-rock tunnel excavation based on disc cutter coupled with high-pressure waterjet. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(9): 1370-1386.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/10.1007/s11709-023-0947-0
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/Y2023/V17/I9/1370
Fig.1  
water pressure (MPa)nozzle diameter (mm)nozzle speed (m/s)
1400.330.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5
0.530.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5
0.740.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5
0.970.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5
2800.330.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5
0.530.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5
0.740.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5
0.970.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5
Tab.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
Fig.8  
propertyparametervalue
particle-based material parametersball density (kg/m3)2610
ball radius (mm)0.5 ± 0.1
porosity0.1
effective modulus, emod (GPa)20
normal-to-shear stiffness ratio, kratio1.2
bond-based material parameterseffective modulus, pb_emod (GPa)20
normal-to-shear stiffness ratio pb_kratio1.2
tensile strength, pb_ten (MPa)intragranular90 ± 9
intergranular70 ± 7
cohesion, pb_coh (MPa)intragranular90 ± 9
intergranular90 ± 9
friction coefficient0.5
average grain size (mm2)3.2
Tab.2  
parametersimulationtesterror (%)
Young’s modulus, E (GPa)40.138.63.9
Poisson’s ratio, υ0.16970.1700.2
UCS (MPa)176.8177.90.6
BTS (MPa)1212.32.4
Tab.3  
Fig.9  
Fig.10  
Fig.11  
Fig.12  
Fig.13  
Fig.14  
Fig.15  
Fig.16  
experimental variabledriving condition Idriving condition IIdriving condition IIIdriving condition IVdriving condition V
water pressure (MPa)150200240280280
driving distance (mm)400400400700rotating for 3 min without driving
Tab.4  
Fig.17  
Fig.18  
Fig.19  
Fig.20  
Fig.21  
Fig.22  
Fig.23  
water pressure (MPa)ambient temperature in the tunnel (°C)rock chip temperature at the interface of #1 and #2 belt conveyors (°C)high-pressure water temperature at nozzle (°C)
interface of #1 and #2 belt conveyorshigh-pressure pump unit area
028.63242.545
15031.63844.669
20032.54046.179
24033.14150.485
28033.34657.390
Tab.5  
1 E Farrokh, J Rostami, C Laughton. Study of various models for estimation of penetration rate of hard rock TBMs. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2012, 30: 110–123
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2012.02.012
2 E Farrokh, D Y Kim. A discussion on hard rock TBM cutter wear and cutterhead intervention interval length evaluation. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 81(11): 336–357
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.07.017
3 J Rostami. Study of pressure distribution within the crushed zone in the contact area between rock and disc cutters. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2013, 57: 172–186
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.07.031
4 L Wang, Y Kang, X Zhao, Q Zhang. Disc cutter wear prediction for a hard rock TBM cutterhead based on energy analysis. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2015, 50(8): 324–333
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.08.003
5 S Yagiz. Utilizing rock mass properties for predicting TBM performance in hard rock condition. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2008, 23(3): 326–339
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2007.04.011
6 J L Zhang, Y M Gao, X Liu, Z A Zhang, Y Yuan, H A Mang. Tunnelling and underground space technology incorporating trenchless technology research—Invited editorial. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2022, 128: 104605
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.104605
7 Q S Liu, Y C Pan, J P Liu, X X Kong, K Shi. Comparison and discussion on fragmentation behavior of soft rock in multi-indentation tests by a single TBM disc cutter. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 57(8): 151–161
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2016.02.021
8 S Liu, J Chen, X Liu. Rock breaking by conical pick assisted with high pressure water jet. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2014, 6(1): 868041
https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/868041
9 F Rui, G Zhao. Experimental and numerical investigation of laser-induced rock damage and the implications for laser-assisted rock cutting. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2021, 139(3): 104653
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2021.104653
10 S Zhang, Z Huang, H Wang, G Li, C Hong. Experimental study on the rock-breaking characteristics of abrasive liquid nitrogen jet for hot dry rock. Journal of Petroleum Science Engineering, 2019, 181(10): 106166
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.06.030
11 M D Samir, H Rafezi, F Hassani, M Kermani, A P Sasmito. Experimental investigation on the effects of microwave irradiation on kimberlite and granite rocks. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 13(2): 267–274
12 L Qin, J Dai, P Teng. Study on the effect of microwave irradiation on rock strength. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review, 2015, 8(4): 91–96
https://doi.org/10.25103/jestr.083.13
13 N BilginH CopurC Balci. Mechanical Excavation in Mining and Civil Industries. Boca Raton: CRC, 2013, 1–10
14 J Zeng, T J Kim. An erosion model of polycrystalline ceramics in abrasive waterjet cutting. Wear, 1996, 193(2): 207–217
https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(95)06721-3
15 J L Cheng, Z H Jiang, W F Han, M L Li, Y X Wang. Breakage mechanism of hard-rock penetration by TBM disc cutter after high pressure water jet precutting. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2020, 240: 107320
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107320
16 R Ciccu, B Grosso. Improvement of disc cutter performance by water jet assistance. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2014, 47(2): 733–744
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-013-0433-4
17 O Fenn. The use of water jets to assist free-rolling cutters in the excavation of hard rock. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 1989, 4(3): 409–417
https://doi.org/10.1016/0886-7798(89)90085-0
18 A W Khair, V B Achanti. Current trends in water jet assisted cutting applications to geotechnical industry in USA. Review of High Pressure Science and Technology, 1998, 7: 1459–1465
https://doi.org/10.4131/jshpreview.7.1459
19 Sult D B, Schwoebel J J. US Patent, 6755480, 2004-06-29
20 J C Fair. Development of high-pressure abrasive-jet drilling. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1981, 33(8): 1379–1388
https://doi.org/10.2118/8442-PA
21 T Kinoshita. Effect of High Speed Water Jet Stream on Rock Breaking: Potential Application in Tunneling Operation (2nd Report). Quarterly Report of Rtri, 1973, 14
22 W KnickmeyerL Baumann. High-pressure water jet-assisted tunneling techniques. In: Proceedings of the 2nd US Water Jet Conference. Rolla Missouri, 1983, 346–356
23 K Z SongD YuanM Wang. Study review on the interaction between disk cutter and rock. Journal of Railway Engineering Socirty, 2005, (6): 66−69 (in Chinese)
24 L J Yin, Q M Gong, H S Ma, J Zhao, X B Zhao. Use of indentation tests to study the influence of confining stress on rock fragmentation by a TBM cutter. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2014, 72(12): 261–276
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.07.022
25 T Moon, J Oh. A study of optimal rock-cutting conditions for hard rock TBM using the discrete element method. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2011, 45(5): 837–849
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-011-0180-3
26 X P Zhang, P Q Ji, Q S Liu, Q Liu, Q Zhang, Z H Peng. Physical and numerical studies of rock fragmentation subject to wedge cutter indentation in the mixed ground. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 71: 354–365
27 H Bejari, J K Hamidi. Simultaneous effects of joint spacing and orientation on TBM cutting efficiency in jointed rock masses. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2013, 46(4): 897–907
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-012-0314-2
28 X F Li, H B Li, Y Q Liu, Q C Zhou, X Xia. Numerical simulation of rock fragmentation mechanisms subject to wedge penetration for TBMs. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 53: 96–108
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.12.010
29 Q M Gong, Y Y Jiao, J Zhao. Numerical modelling of the effects of joint spacing on rock fragmentation by TBM cutters. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2006, 21(1): 46–55
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2005.06.004
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed