Seismic performance of fabricated continuous girder bridge with grouting sleeve-prestressed tendon composite connections

doi:10.1007/s11709-023-0954-1

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

2023, Vol. 17

Issue (6): 827-854 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-023-0954-1

本期目录

Seismic performance of fabricated continuous girder bridge with grouting sleeve-prestressed tendon composite connections

Jin WANG¹, Weibing XU^2,³(

), Xiuli DU^2,³, Yanjiang CHEN^2,³, Mengjia DING², Rong FANG², Guang YANG²

¹. School of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
². Beijing Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Retrofit, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
³. Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of China Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China

全文: PDF(26441 KB) HTML

Abstract：

The seismic performance of a fully fabricated bridge is a key factor limiting its application. In this study, a fiber element model of a fabricated concrete pier with grouting sleeve-prestressed tendon composite connections was built and verified. A numerical analysis of three types of continuous girder bridges was conducted with different piers: a cast-in-place reinforced concrete pier, a grouting sleeve-fabricated pier, and a grouting sleeve-prestressed tendon composite fabricated pier. Furthermore, the seismic performance of the composite fabricated pier was investigated. The results show that the OpenSees fiber element model can successfully simulate the hysteresis behavior and failure mode of the grouted sleeve-fabricated pier. Under traditional non-near-fault ground motions, the pier top displacements of the grouting sleeve-fabricated pier and the composite fabricated pier were less than those of the cast-in-place reinforced concrete pier. The composite fabricated pier had a good self-centering capability. In addition, the plastic hinge zones of the grouting sleeve-fabricated pier and the composite fabricated pier shifted to the joint seam and upper edge of the grouting sleeve, respectively. The composite fabricated pier with optimal design parameters has good seismic performance and can be applied in high-intensity seismic areas; however, the influence of pile-soil interaction on its seismic performance should not be ignored.

Key words： seismic performance continuous girder bridge grouting sleeve-prestressed tendon composite connections grouted sleeve connection design parameters

收稿日期: 2022-02-18 出版日期: 2023-08-30

Corresponding Author(s): Weibing XU

引用本文:

. [J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2023, 17(6): 827-854.
Jin WANG, Weibing XU, Xiuli DU, Yanjiang CHEN, Mengjia DING, Rong FANG, Guang YANG. Seismic performance of fabricated continuous girder bridge with grouting sleeve-prestressed tendon composite connections. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(6): 827-854.

链接本文:

https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/10.1007/s11709-023-0954-1
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/Y2023/V17/I6/827

Fig.1

Tab.1

Tab.2

Fig.2

model	$σ y$ (MPa)	$σ u$ (MPa)	$S y$ (mm)	$S u$ (mm)	b	R
model pier	461	638.95	0.513	17.98	0.4	0.8
bridge pier	400	570.00	0.582	20.37	0.4	0.8

Tab.3

Fig.3

Fig.4

Tab.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Tab.5

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

Tab.6

Tab.7

Fig.12

Fig.13

Fig.14

Fig.15

Tab.8

Fig.16

Fig.17

Tab.9

Fig.18

Fig.19

Fig.20

Fig.21

Tab.10

Fig.22

Tab.11

Fig.23

soil type	soil parameter
soil type	$t (m)$	$m (k N ? m ? 4)$	$z (m)$	$C p (m)$	$k (k N ? m ? 1)$
coarse sand	4	30000	4.2	1.6875	850500.0
pebble soil	2	50000	7.2	1.6875	1215000.0
fully weathered sandstone	3.3	80000	9.85	1.6875	4388175.0
strong weathered sandstone	2.95	100000	12.975	1.6875	6459117.0
strong weathered sandstone	2.95	100000	15.925	1.6875	7927664.0
mid-weathered sandstone	2.96	120000	18.88	1.6875	11316672.0
mid-weathered sandstone	2.96	120000	21.84	1.6875	13090896.0
mid-weathered sandstone	2.96	120000	24.8	1.6875	14865120.0
mid-weathered sandstone	2.96	120000	27.76	1.6875	16639344.0
mid-weathered sandstone	2.96	120000	30.72	1.6875	18413568.0

Tab.12

Tab.13

Fig.24

Fig.25

Fig.26

Fig.27

Fig.28

Fig.29

Fig.30

Fig.31

1	M J Ameli, J E Parks, D N Brown, C P Pantelides. Seismic evaluation of grouted splice sleeve connections for reinforced precast concrete column-to-cap beam joints in accelerated bridge construction. PCI Journal, 2015, 60(2): 80–103 https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.03012015.80.103
2	Y C Kurama, S Sritharan, R B Fleischman, J I Restrepo, R S Henry, N M Cleland, S K Ghosh, P Bonelli. Seismic-resistant precast concrete structures: State of the art. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2018, 144(4): 03118001 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001972
3	R Al-Rousan. Behavior of prefabricated full-depth precast concrete bridge deck panel system: Optimum prestress level. Procedia Manufacturing, 2020, 44: 607–614 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.249
4	H Y Qu, T T Li, Z Q Wang, H Wei, J Shen, H Wang. Investigation and verification on seismic behavior of precast concrete frame piers used in real bridge structures: Experimental and numerical study. Engineering Structures, 2018, 154: 1–9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.069
5	T T Li, H Y Qu, Z Q Wang, H Wei, S Jiang. Seismic performance of precast concrete bridge columns with quasi-static cyclic shear test for high seismic zones. Engineering Structures, 2018, 166: 441–453 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.086
6	Z Q WangY B ZhangS C JiangH WeiX Yan. Experimental study of shear performance of precast segmental bridge piers with grouted splice sleeve. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2018, 46(6): 767–775
7	G T Xin, W B Xu, J Wang, X Yan, Y Chen, W Yan, J Li. Seismic performance of fabricated concrete piers with grouted sleeve joints and bearing-capacity estimation method. Structures, 2021, 33: 169–186 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.04.047
8	Z B Haber, K R Mackie, H M Al-Jelawy. Testing and analysis of precast columns with grouted sleeve connections and shifted plastic hinging. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2017, 22(10): 04017078 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001105
9	H M Al-Jelawy, K R Mackie, Z B Haber. Shifted plastic hinging for GS column connections. ACI Structural Journal, 2018, 115(4): 1101–1114 https://doi.org/10.14359/51702233
10	M Nishiyama, Y Wei. Effect of post-tensioning steel Anchorage location on seismic performance of exterior beam-to-column joints for precast, prestressed concrete members. PCI Journal, 2007, 52(2): 18–30 https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.03012007.18.30
11	C Li, H Hao, X H Zhang, K Bi. Experimental study of precast segmental columns with unbonded tendons under cyclic loading. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2018, 21(3): 319–334 https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433217717119
12	S J Wang, W B Xu, J Wang, G Xin, Y Chen, Z Zhao, Y Bai. Experimental research on anti-seismic reinforcement of fabricated concrete pier connected by grouting sleeve based on CFRP and PET materials. Engineering Structures, 2021, 245: 112838 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112838
13	Y C Ou, M Chiewanichakorn, A J Aref, G C Lee. Seismic performance of segmental precast unbonded posttensioned concrete bridge columns. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2007, 133(11): 1636–1647 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:11(1636
14	A Palermo, S Pampanin, D Marriott. Design, modeling, and experimental response of seismic resistant bridge piers with posttensioned dissipating connections. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2007, 133(11): 1648–1661 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:11(1648
15	J T Hewes. Seismic design and performance of precast concrete segmental bridge columns. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. San Diego: University of California, 2002
16	C C Chou, H J Chang, J T Hewes. Two-plastic-hinge and two dimensional finite element models for post-tensioned precast concrete segmental bridge columns. Engineering Structures, 2013, 46(Jan): 205–217 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.07.009
17	W L Han, Z Z Zhao, J R Qian, Y Cui, S Liu. Seismic behavior of precast columns with large-spacing and high-strength longitudinal rebars spliced by epoxy mortar-filled threaded couplers. Engineering Structures, 2018, 176: 349–360 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.09.007
18	C C Yang, P Okumus, R L Ren. A hysteretic model for self-centering precast concrete piers with varying shear-slip between segments. Engineering Structures, 2019, 188: 350–361 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.053
19	H T Liu, J N Chen, C S Xu, X Du. Seismic performance of precast column connected with grouted sleeve connectors. Journal of Building Engineering, 2020, 31: 101410 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101410
20	O I AbdelkarimA A GheniS AnumoluM A Elgawady. Hollow-core FRP-concrete-steel tubular columns subjected to seismic loading. In: Symposium on Towards Sustainable Infrastructure with Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites. Kansas: American Concrete Institute, 2014, 185–200
21	M A Elgawady, H M Dawood. Analysis of segmental piers consisted of concrete filled FRP tubes. Engineering Structures, 2012, 38: 142–152 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.01.001
22	H Dawood, M Elgawady, J Hewes. Behavior of segmental precast posttensioned bridge piers under lateral loads. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2012, 17(5): 735–746 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000252
23	Q Zhang, M S Alam. Evaluating the seismic behavior of segmental unbounded posttensioned concrete bridge piers using factorial analysis. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2016, 21(4): 04015073 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000851
24	Z Q Wang, J P Ge, H Y Wei. Seismic performance of precast hollow bridge piers with different construction details. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2014, 8(4): 399–413 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-014-0273-7
25	Y C Ou. Precast segmental post-tensioned concrete bridge columns for seismic regions. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Buffalo: State University of New York at Buffalo, 2007
26	M Tazarv, M S Saiidi. UHPC-filled duct connections for accelerated bridge construction of RC columns in high seismic zones. Engineering Structures, 2015, 99(sep.15): 413–422
27	W D Zhuo, T Tong, Z Liu. Analytical pushover method and hysteretic modeling of precast segmental bridge piers with high-strength bars based on cyclic loading test. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2019, 145(7): 04019050 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002318
28	J P Ge. Seismic performance analysis of a continuous girder bridge with precast segmental pier. In: 1st International Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture and Building Materials (CEABM 2011). Clausthal-Zellerfeld: Trans Tech Publications, 2011, 1966–1970
29	L F Zhao, K M Bi, H Hao, X Li. Numerical studies on the seismic responses of bridge structures with precast segmental columns. Engineering Structures, 2017, 151: 568–583 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.08.018
30	J B Royero, M S Saiidi, A Itani. Seismic performance analysis and assessment of a precast bridge computational model. Dyna (Medellín, Colombia), 2020, 87(212): 80–89
31	H T Liu, Z Y Wang, C S Xu, X Du. Influence of axial compression ratio on the seismic performance of precast columns with grouted sleeve connections. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2021, 147(12): 04021194 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003118
32	J Jia, K Zhang, M S Saiidi, Y Guo, S Wu, K Bi, X Du. Seismic evaluation of precast bridge columns with built-in elastomeric pads. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 128: 105868 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105868
33	Z Y Bu, Y C Ou, J W Song, N S Zhang, G C Lee. Cyclic loading test of unbonded and bonded posttensioned precast segmental bridge columns with circular section. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2016, 21(2): 04015043 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000807
34	X L WangL P YeX Z Lu. Numerical simulation for the hysteresis behavior of prestressed concrete structures under cyclic loads. Earthquake Resistant Engineering and Retrofitting, 2006, 6: 28–32 (in Chinese)
35	L L Song, T Guo, C Chen. Experimental and numerical study of a self-centering prestressed concrete moment resisting frame connection with bolted web friction devices. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2014, 43(4): 529–545 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2358
36	L J Hua, A B A Rahman, I S Ibrahim. Feasibility study of grouted splice connector under tensile load. Construction & Building Materials, 2014, 50: 530–539 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.10.010
37	J J Fan, D C Feng, G Wu, S Hou, Y Lu. Experimental study of prefabricated RC column-foundation assemblies with two different connection methods and using large-diameter reinforcing bars. Engineering Structures, 2020, 205: 110071–110075 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110075
38	H T Liu, Q Han, Y L Bai, C Xu, X Du. Connection performance of restrained deformed grouted sleeve splice. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2018, 21(3): 488–499 https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433217719987
39	J Zhao, S Sritharan. Modeling of strain penetration effects in fiber-based analysis of reinforced concrete structures. ACI Structural Journal, 2007, 104(2): 133–141
40	Task Group on Bond Models FIB. Bond of Reinforcement in Concrete. Lausanne: International Federation for Structural Concrete (fib), 2000
41	408-2013 JG/T. Cementitious Grout for Coupler of Rebar Splicing. China: Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China, 2013 (in Chinese)
42	Y N Ding, W B Xu, Y J Chen, J Wang, W Yan. Experimental research on seismic performance of precast cogging high-strength bolt composite joint and influence of its arrangement location. Engineering Structures, 2020, 225: 111294 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111294
43	A Mohebbi, M S Saiidi, A M Itani. Shake table studies and analysis of a precast two-column bent with advanced materials and pocket connections. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2018, 23(7): 04018041–04018046 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001247
44	2231-01-2020 JTG/T. Specifications for Seismic Design of Highway Bridges. China: Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China, 2019 (in Chinese)
45	3363-2019 JTG. Specifications for Design of Foundation of Highway Bridges and Culverts. China: Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China, 2019 (in Chinese)
46	W Xie, L M Sun. Assessment and mitigation on near-fault earthquake wave effects on seismic responses and pile-soil interactions of soil-pile-bridge model. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 143: 106596 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106596
47	S Li, F Zhang, J Q Wang, M S Alam, J Zhang. Seismic responses of super-span cable-stayed bridges induced by ground motions in different sites relative to fault rupture considering soil−structure interaction. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2017, 101: 295–310 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.07.016
48	J Z Zheng, T Takeda. Effects of soil−structure interaction on seismic response of PC cable-stayed bridge. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1995, 14(6): 427–437 https://doi.org/10.1016/0267-7261(95)00014-L
49	R A Khan, S Ahmad, T K Datta. Effect of soil−structure interaction on seismic risk of FAN type cable stayed bridges. Journal of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, 2004, 6(2): 47–56

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed