Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

邮发代号 80-968

2019 Impact Factor: 1.68

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering  2023, Vol. 17 Issue (8): 1249-1263   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-023-0974-x
  本期目录
Large-scale model test study on the water pressure resistance of construction joints of karst tunnel linings
Meng HUANG1, Mingli HUANG1(), Ze YANG2, Yuan SONG3, Zhien ZHANG1
1. School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
2. Enterprise Key Laboratory, Tianjin Municipal Engineering Design and Research Institute, Tianjin 300392, China
3. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China
 全文: PDF(7341 KB)   HTML
Abstract

Model tests and numerical calculations were adopted based on the New Yuanliangshan tunnel project to investigate the water pressure resistance of lining construction joints in high-pressure and water-rich karst tunnels. A large-scale model test was designed and conducted, innovatively transforming the external water pressure of the lining construction joint into internal water pressure. The effects of the embedded position and waterstop type on the water pressure resistance of the construction joint were analyzed, and the reliability of the model test was verified via numerical calculations. The results show that using waterstops can significantly improve the water pressure resistance of lining construction joints. The water pressure resistance of the lining construction joint is positively correlated with the lining thickness and embedded depth of the waterstop. In addition, the type of waterstop significantly influences the water pressure resistance of lining construction joints. The test results show that the water pressure resistance of the embedded transverse reinforced waterstop is similar to that of the steel plate waterstop, and both have more advantages than the rubber waterstop. The water pressure resistance of the construction joint determined via numerical calculations is similar to the model test results, indicating that the model test results have high accuracy and reliability. This study provides a reference for similar projects and has wide applications.

Key wordskarst tunnel    lining construction joint    water pressure resistance    large-scale model test    numerical calculations
收稿日期: 2022-10-02      出版日期: 2023-11-16
Corresponding Author(s): Mingli HUANG   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2023, 17(8): 1249-1263.
Meng HUANG, Mingli HUANG, Ze YANG, Yuan SONG, Zhien ZHANG. Large-scale model test study on the water pressure resistance of construction joints of karst tunnel linings. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(8): 1249-1263.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/10.1007/s11709-023-0974-x
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/Y2023/V17/I8/1249
initial setting time (min) final setting time (min) stability of cement compressive strength (MPa) bending strength (MPa)
3 d 28 d 3 d 28 d
150 200 qualified 26.6 47.7 4.7 7.6
Tab.1  
Fig.1  
test item value regulatory standard (GB 5749-2022)
total dissolved solids (mg/L) 405 < 1000
Cl (mg/L) 94 250
Fe (mg/L) 0.020 < 0.3
Al (mg/L) 0.0020 < 0.2
Mn (mg/L) 0.0031 < 0.1
pH value 7.36 6.5–8.5
Tab.2  
water (g) cement (g) aggregate (g) HRWR (g)
fine coarse
760 1440 2680 4480 10.08
Tab.3  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
specimen number type and buried depth of waterstop (cm)
1 steel plate waterstop (30)
2 no waterstop (60)
3 rubber waterstop (60)
4 steel plate waterstop (60)
5 steel plate waterstop (80)
6 transverse reinforced waterstop (30)
Tab.4  
Fig.7  
Fig.8  
Fig.9  
Fig.10  
Fig.11  
Fig.12  
Fig.13  
Fig.14  
Fig.15  
Fig.16  
parameter C40 concrete steel plate waterstop rubber waterstop construction joint surface of waterstop contact
elastic modulus (MPa) 32500 200000 10000 10000 10000
compressive strength (MPa) 40 200000 30 5 20
tension–compression ratio 10 1 1 10 10
percentage of residual strength (%) 0.1 1 1 0.1 0.1
permeability coefficient (m/d) 0.01 0.000000001 0.0001 0.1 0.1
homogeneity 100 100 100 10 10
Tab.5  
test condition pressure (MPa) stabilizing time (min) seepage condition
1 0.5 30 No seepage occurs.
2 1.0 30 No seepage occurs.
3 1.5 30 Seepage point #1 appears.
4 2.0 30 The penetration distance of seepage point #1 is increased.
5 2.5 30 The distance of seepage point #1 is increased, and seepage point #2 appears.
6 3.0 30 The seepage distances of seepage points #1 and #2 increase.
7 3.5 30 Seepage point #2 accelerates seepage, and distance of seepage point #1 increases.
8 4.0 30 Seepage points #1 and #2 are about to be penetrated.
9 4.5 30 Seepage points #1 and #2 have been penetrated.
10 5.0 30 When the pressure is increased to 5.0 MPa, there is no phenomenon that the seepage velocity of the crack is accelerated, and the leakage is stable.
Tab.6  
Fig.17  
Fig.18  
Fig.19  
specimen number type and buried depth of waterstop (cm) pressure of model test (MPa)
1 steel plate waterstop (30) 1.5
2 no waterstop (60) 1.0
3 rubber waterstop (60) 2.1
4 steel plate waterstop (60) 4.0
5 steel plate waterstop (80) > 6.0
6 transverse reinforced waterstop (30) 1.5
Tab.7  
working condition numerical calculation results large-scale model test results
no waterstop 1.0 1.0
buried depth of waterstop: 30 cm 1.4 1.5
Tab.8  
Fig.20  
Fig.21  
1 Y Liu, Y N Feng, M Xu, Y Zhang, H Long, H Zhu. Effect of an incremental change in external water pressure on tunnel lining: A case study from the Tongxi karst tunnel. Natural Hazards, 2019, 98(2): 343–377
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03692-3
2 C Gong, W Ding, K Soga, K M Mosalam. Failure mechanism of joint waterproofing in precast segmental tunnel linings. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 84: 334–352
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.11.003
3 F Y Wang, H W Huang. Theoretical analysis of the joint leakage in shield tunnel considering the typical deformation mode. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2020, 20(12): 04020218
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001861
4 G L Zhang, W J Zhang, H L Li, W Z Cao, B D Wang, W S Guo, P Gao. Waterproofing behavior of sealing gaskets for circumferential joints in shield tunnels: A full-scale experimental investigation. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2021, 108: 103682
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103682
5 S Y Liu, X F Zhang, X G Chen, C Wang, Y Chen. Exploratory research on drainage structure of highway tunnel based on reducing the risk of crystallization blockage. Processes, 2022, 10(7): 1319
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10071319
6 S S Du, J H Tang. State-of-the-art review on failure mechanism and waterproofing performance of linings for shield tunnels. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2022, 2022: 6104725
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6104725
7 H SunZ Shi J ShiZ Feng. Technology of waterproofing and drainage of Huashan tunnel in high cold region. In: Progress in Safety Science and Technology (Vol.IV) Part B—Proceedings of the 2004 International Symposium on Safety Science and Technology. Shanghai: Science Press, 2004, 6
8 Y Wang, Y Yang, F Su, L Wang. Multiscale analytical method and its parametric study for lining joint leakage of shield tunnel. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(23): 8528
https://doi.org/10.3390/app10238528
9 Y XieZ Lv P Liu. Optimization of waterproof construction technology for lining structural joints of water-rich mountain tunnel. Highway, 2020, 65(12): 151−155 (in Chinese)
10 Q LiuZ Tan H RenX Wang R Xu. Study on new water stop for near sea tunnel. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2016, 29(12): 116−123 (in Chinese)
11 K LvZ Ji C Ma. Improvements to back water stops for tunnel construction joints. Modern Tunneling Technology, 2012, 49(5): 39−43 (in Chinese)
12 K LvC Ma Z JiP Xu. Design of the X-type drainable waterstop for use at the construction joint of tunnel linings. Modern Tunneling Technology, 2011, 48(6): 23−26 (in Chinese)
13 M ZhangS LiJ Liu. Research and development of the embedded rubber waterstops reinforced with horizontally built-in steel plates. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2019, 56(6): 52−56 (in Chinese)
14 S K Ham, K H Jeong, S W Lee. Waterproofing performance evaluation according to the number of layer for shield TBM segment hydrophilic rubber waterstop. Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, 2020, 22(1): 47–58
https://doi.org/10.9711/KTAJ.2020.22.1.047
15 B H Cho, B H Nam, S Seo, J Kim, J An, H Youn. Waterproofing performance of waterstop with adhesive bonding used at joints of underground concrete structures. Construction & Building Materials, 2019, 221: 491–500
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.103
16 Z TanZ Li Z ZhouQ LiuZ Chen. Experiment study on waterproofing system of large section near sea tunnel. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2016, 29(12): 109−115 (in Chinese)
17 Z Zhou, Z Tan, Q Liu, J Zhao, Z Dong. Experimental investigation on mechanical characteristics of waterproof system for near-sea tunnel: A case study of the Gongbei tunnel. Symmetry, 2020, 12(9): 1524
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12091524
18 C Gong, W Ding, K M Mosalam. Performance-based design of joint waterproofing of segmental tunnel linings using hybrid computational/experimental procedures. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 96(C): 103172
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.103172
19 W Ding, C Gong, K M Mosalam, K Soga. Development and application of the integrated sealant test apparatus for sealing gaskets in tunnel segmental joints. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2017, 63: 54–68
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2016.12.008
20 X G Wu, X K Chen, S Y Yu, S Hong, T H K Kang. Experimental study on waterproofing properties of putty-based composite rubber strip for underground post-tensioned precast concrete structures. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 2019, 13(1): 1–12
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-018-0307-y
21 H B Fan, D P Zhao, J X Lai, Y Xie. Water pressure and stress characteristics of lining structure in water rich karst tunnel. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 2019, 218(1): 012122
https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/218/1/012122
22 C J Gong, Y Y Wang, Y C Peng, W Ding, M Lei, Z Da, C Shi. Three-dimensional coupled hydromechanical analysis of localized joint leakage in segmental tunnel linings. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2022, 130: 104726
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.104726
23 Z E Zhang, M L Huang, C L Wang, B Jiang, Q Guan. Analysis and calculation of lining water pressure of high water pressure karst tunnel. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 2020, 510(5): 052057
https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/510/5/052057
24 C TangY Zhang. Discussion on mechanism and evolution laws of fracture spacing in rock mass. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2008, 27(7): 1362−1369 (in Chinese)
25 G LiC Tang L LiZ Liang. Numerical simulation of 3D hydraulic fracturing process. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 32(12): 1875−1881 (in Chinese)
26 X MenC Tang T Ma. Numerical simulation on influence of rock mass parameters on fracture propagation during hydraulic fracturing. Journal of Northeastern University (Natural Science), 2013, 34(5): 700−703 (in Chinese)
27 Y LiM Huang B Jiang. Study on the Technology of Tunnel Expansion and Construction through Large Karst Cave Group with High Water Pressure. Beijing: China Communications Press Co., Ltd., 2022 (in Chinese)
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed