Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

邮发代号 80-968

2019 Impact Factor: 1.68

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering  2023, Vol. 17 Issue (8): 1281-1294   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-023-0975-9
  本期目录
Damage assessment and diagnosis of hydraulic concrete structures using optimization-based machine learning technology
Yantao ZHU1,2,3(), Qiangqiang JIA3,4, Kang ZHANG1,2, Yangtao LI1,2, Zhipeng LI1,2, Haoran WANG1,2
1. State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
2. College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
3. National Dam Safety Research Center, Wuhan 430010, China
4. Changjiang Institute of Survey, Planning, Design, and Research, Wuhan 430010, China
 全文: PDF(3629 KB)   HTML
Abstract

Concrete is widely used in various large construction projects owing to its high durability, compressive strength, and plasticity. However, the tensile strength of concrete is low, and concrete cracks easily. Changes in the concrete structure will result in changes in parameters such as the frequency mode and curvature mode, which allows one to effectively locate and evaluate structural damages. In this study, the characteristics of the curvature modes in concrete structures are analyzed and a method to obtain the curvature modes based on the strain and displacement modes is proposed. Subsequently, various indices for the damage diagnosis of concrete structures based on the curvature mode are introduced. A damage assessment method for concrete structures is established using an artificial bee colony backpropagation neural network algorithm. The proposed damage assessment method for dam concrete structures comprises various modal parameters, such as curvature and frequency. The feasibility and accuracy of the model are evaluated based on a case study of a concrete gravity dam. The results show that the damage assessment model can accurately evaluate the damage degree of concrete structures with a maximum error of less than 2%, which is within the required accuracy range of damage identification and assessment for most concrete structures.

Key wordshydraulic structure    curvature mode    damage detection    artifical neural network    artificial bee colony
收稿日期: 2022-10-04      出版日期: 2023-11-16
Corresponding Author(s): Yantao ZHU   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2023, 17(8): 1281-1294.
Yantao ZHU, Qiangqiang JIA, Kang ZHANG, Yangtao LI, Zhipeng LI, Haoran WANG. Damage assessment and diagnosis of hydraulic concrete structures using optimization-based machine learning technology. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(8): 1281-1294.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/10.1007/s11709-023-0975-9
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/Y2023/V17/I8/1281
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
node numbercurvature mode factornode numbercurvature mode factor
c1c2c3c1c2c3
2?58.72?239.04?196.342273.60436.96596.34
3?9.4485.76?32.012360.3246.08435.81
4141.60824.001354.0924358.40369.28?832.32
5280.641533.281956.7725164.80241.44?335.26
6350.241786.242477.4826160.00202.88?101.61
7358.241832.162224.4927140.00176.96?106.94
8354.401725.891953.3828156.32156.80?94.72
9323.841589.861700.5429133.74139.20?81.12
10311.041438.051479.9730143.2595.60?65.92
11283.361324.111308.5131140.2167.04?47.98
12278.401203.171119.5532142.1841.12?24.75
13256.321123.57983.5233135.8026.3724.96
14255.201014.88840.9934140.004.3880.50
15237.44964.00733.3735143.41?19.94190.01
16234.88845.28553.9436142.72?36.00321.42
17224.48750.40417.9037143.22?54.67525.53
18212.00697.66314.9838148.36?74.40777.78
19220.48576.00191.483973.60436.96596.34
20178.72493.4475.854060.3246.08435.81
21160.32428.00?38.38
Tab.1  
modal factorcalculated value
1/1Δω1Δω190.91
1/1Δω2Δω270.42
1/1Δω3Δω345.45
ω1/ω1Δω1Δω1399.38
ω2/ω2Δω2Δω2701.54
ω3/ω3Δω3Δω3545.32
Tab.2  
Fig.7  
actual damage degree (%)improved ABC-BP modelstandard BP model
assessment result (%)relative error (%)assessmentresult (%)relative error (%)
1212.181.4811.633.06
2222.100.4722.401.84
3232.050.1632.421.32
Tab.3  
node numbercurvature mode factornode numbercurvature mode factor
c1c2c3c1c2c3
2?160.16?220.16?180.462284.48451.36556.00
3?7.6866.8849.672393.76163.84256.03
4138.88841.121363.9424302.56386.08?582.10
5281.281511.521930.4525102.88215.524.67
6346.241802.562480.9326147.28201.60?27.53
7358.561809.122193.1727132.56186.72?71.94
8350.561742.541954.9128139.38169.44?83.60
9324.161565.941668.6929160.91158.00?108.75
10307.201456.031482.6630139.90143.20?82.74
11284.321298.981277.5731150.22132.80?53.25
12274.561223.571024.6332149.68109.60?43.65
13257.441096.30923.7333185.28?123.49?296.94
14251.681039.04795.2234?34.59303.63486.26
15238.40933.12652.3935193.54?136.42538.81
16232.00875.20531.6736129.57113.26215.03
17225.28798.88493.1237150.64152.78220.56
18210.24715.20408.6938156.26165.49287.73
19220.32644.00373.463984.48451.36556.00
20179.68576.56319.344093.76163.84256.03
21165.20517.92263.93
Tab.4  
Fig.8  
modal factorcalculated value
1/1Δω1Δω1 42.37
1/1Δω2Δω2 43.48
1/1Δω3Δω3 15.38
ω1/ω1Δω1Δω1195.24
ω2/ω2Δω2Δω2454.26
ω3/ω3Δω3Δω3193.55
Tab.5  
actual damage degree (%)improved ABC-BP modelstandard BP model
assessment result (%)relative error (%)assessment result (%)relative error (%)
12, 1211.86, 12.241.20, 1.9611.54, 11.573.84, 3.60
22, 2222.11, 21.910.48, 0.4021.68, 22.281.46, 1.28
32, 3232.22, 32.280.68, 0.8632.48, 31.641.51, 1.12
Tab.6  
methodsCgammarelative error (%)
ABC-SVM1.520.010.48
grid search-SVM1.080.0031.25
random search-SVM1.250.021.131
Tab.7  
1 D Zhuang, K Ma, C Tang, X Cui, G Yang. Study on crack formation and propagation in the galleries of the Dagangshan high arch dam in Southwest China based on microseismic monitoring and numerical simulation. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2019, 115: 157–172
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.11.016
2 Y Li, T Bao, X Shu, Z Gao, J Gong, K Zhang. Data-driven crack behavior anomaly identification method for concrete dams in long-term service using offline and online change point detection. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, 2021, 11(5): 1449–1460
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-021-00520-w
3 B S Wang, Z C He. Crack detection of arch dam using statistical neural network based on the reductions of natural frequencies. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2007, 302(4−5): 1037–1047
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2007.01.008
4 H Kim, E Ahn, M Shin, S H Sim. Crack and noncrack classification from concrete surface images using machine learning. Structural Health Nonitoring, 2019, 18(3): 725–738
https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921718768747
5 H Su, J Li, Z Wen, Z Guo, R Zhou. Integrated certainty and uncertainty evaluation approach for seepage control effectiveness of a gravity dam. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2019, 65: 1–22
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2018.07.004
6 L Yang, H Su, Z Wen. Improved PLS and PSO methods-based back analysis for elastic modulus of dam. Advances in Engineering Software, 2019, 131: 205–216
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2019.02.005
7 H Su, J Hu, H Li. Multi-scale performance simulation and effect analysis for hydraulic concrete submitted to leaching and frost. Engineering with Computers, 2018, 34(4): 821–842
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0575-9
8 Y Zhu, X Niu, J Wang, C Gu, E Zhao, L Huang. Inverse analysis of the partitioning deformation modulusof high-arch dams based on quantum genetic algorithm. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2020, 2020: 1–12
https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9842140
9 Y Zhu, X Niu, C Gu, B Dai, L Huang. A fuzzy clustering logic life loss risk evaluation model for dam-break floods. Complexity, 2021, 2021: 1–14
https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7093256
10 M Saadatmorad, R A J Talookolaei, M H Pashaei, S Khatir, M A Wahab. Pearson correlation and discrete wavelet transform for crack identification in steel beams. Mathematics, 2022, 10(15): 2689
https://doi.org/10.3390/math10152689
11 T Bao, J Li, J Zhao. Study of quantitative crack monitoring and POF layout of concrete dam based on POF-OTDR. Scientia Sinica Technologica, 2019, 49(3): 343–350
https://doi.org/10.1360/N092017-00350
12 L V Ho, T T Trinh, G De Roeck, T Bui-Tien, L Nguyen-Ngoc, M Abdel Wahab. An efficient stochastic-based coupled model for damage identification in plate structures. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2022, 131: 105866
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105866
13 B SevimA C AltuniiikA Bayraktar. Earthquake behavior of berke arch dam using ambient vibration test results. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2012, 26(6): 780−792
14 D Yuan, C Gu, X Qin, C Shao, J He. Performance-improved TSVR-based DHM model of super high arch dams using measured air temperature. Engineering Structures, 2022, 250: 113400
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113400
15 T Bao, J Li, Y Lu, C Gu. IDE-MLSSVR-based back analysis method for multiple mechanical parameters of concrete dams. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2020, 146(8): 04020155
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002602
16 J J Koenderink, A J Van Doorn. Surface shape and curvature scales. Image and Vision Computing, 1992, 10(8): 557–564
https://doi.org/10.1016/0262-8856(92)90076-F
17 A Jierula, T M Oh, S Wang, J H Lee, H Kim, J W Lee. Detection of damage locations and damage steps in pile foundations using acoustic emissions with deep learning technology. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2021, 15(2): 318–332
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0715-y
18 B Chiaia, G Marasco, S Aiello. Deep convolutional neural network for multi-level non-invasive tunnel lining assessment. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2022, 16(2): 214–223
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0800-2
19 P Savino, F Tondolo. Automated classification of civil structure defects based on convolutional neural network. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2021, 15(2): 305–317
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0725-9
20 H Federer. Curvature measures. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 1959, 93(3): 418–491
https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1959-0110078-1
21 S S Wang, Q W Ren. Dynamic response of gravity dam model with crack and damage detection. Science China Technological Sciences, 2011, 54(3): 541–546
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-010-4226-7
22 D Feng, M Q Feng. Computer vision for SHM of civil infrastructure: From dynamic response measurement to damage detection—Review. Engineering Structures, 2018, 156: 105–117
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.11.018
23 F Al Thobiani, S Khatir, B Benaissa, E Ghandourah, S Mirjalili, M Abdel Wahab. A hybrid PSO and Grey Wolf Optimization algorithm for static and dynamic crack identification. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2022, 118: 103213
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.103213
24 L V Ho, D H Nguyen, M Mousavi, G De Roeck, T Bui-Tien, A H Gandomi, M A Wahab. A hybrid computational intelligence approach for structural damage detection using marine predator algorithm and feedforward neural networks. Computers & Structures, 2021, 252: 106568
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2021.106568
25 X Li, X Chen, A P Jivkov, J Hu. Assessment of damage in hydraulic concrete by gray wolf optimization-support vector machine model and hierarchical clustering analysis of acoustic emission. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2022, 29(4): 1–22
https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2909
26 US ShanthamalluA Spanias. Neural Networks and Deep Learning. Determination Press, 2022, 43–57
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed