An efficient reliability-based design optimization method for the support structures of monopile offshore wind turbines is proposed herein. First, parametric finite element analysis (FEA) models of the support structure are established by considering stochastic variables. Subsequently, a surrogate model is constructed using a radial basis function (RBF) neural network to replace the time-consuming FEA. The uncertainties of loads, material properties, key sizes of structural components, and soil properties are considered. The uncertainty of soil properties is characterized by the variabilities of the unit weight, friction angle, and elastic modulus of soil. Structure reliability is determined via Monte Carlo simulation, and five limit states are considered, i.e., structural stresses, tower top displacements, mudline rotation, buckling, and natural frequency. Based on the RBF surrogate model and particle swarm optimization algorithm, an optimal design is established to minimize the volume. Results show that the proposed method can yield an optimal design that satisfies the target reliability and that the constructed RBF surrogate model significantly improves the optimization efficiency. Furthermore, the uncertainty of soil parameters significantly affects the optimization results, and increasing the monopile diameter is a cost-effective approach to cope with the uncertainty of soil parameters.
B HamiltonL BattenbergM BieleckiC BlochT DeckerL FrantzisJ PaidipatiA WicklessF Zhao. Offshore Wind Market and Economic Analysis: Annual Market Assessment. Navigant Consulting Inc. Technical Report. 2013
4
T Gentils, L Wang, A Kolios. Integrated structural optimisation of offshore wind turbine support structures based on finite element analysis and genetic algorithm. Applied Energy, 2017, 199: 187–204 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.009
5
X Tian, X Sun, G Liu, W Deng, H Wang, Z Li, D Li. Optimization design of the jacket support structure for offshore wind turbine using topology optimization method. Ocean Engineering, 2022, 243: 110084 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.110084
6
H G Kim, B J Kim. Design optimization of conical concrete support structure for offshore wind turbine. Energies, 2020, 13(18): 4876 https://doi.org/10.3390/en13184876
7
K O’Leary, V Pakrashi, D Kelliher. Optimization of composite material tower for offshore wind turbine structures. Renewable Energy, 2019, 140: 928–942 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.03.101
8
H Ghasemi, R Brighenti, X Zhuang, J Muthu, T Rabczuk. Optimal fiber content and distribution in fiber-reinforced solids using a reliability and NURBS based sequential optimization approach. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2015, 51(1): 99–112 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-014-1114-y
9
L Wang, A Kolios, X Liu, D Venetsanos, R Cai. Reliability of offshore wind turbine support structures: A state-of-the-art review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2022, 161: 112250 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112250
10
H Ghasemi, P Kerfriden, S P A Bordas, J Muthu, G Zi, T Rabczuk. Probabilistic multiconstraints optimization of cooling channels in ceramic matrix composites. Composites. Part B, Engineering, 2015, 81: 107–119 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.023
11
Y S Lee, B L Choi, J H Lee, S Y Kim, S Han. Reliability-based design optimization of monopile transition piece for offshore wind turbine system. Renewable Energy, 2014, 71: 729–741 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.06.017
12
H Yang, Y Zhu, Q Lu, J Zhang. Dynamic reliability based design optimization of the tripod sub-structure of offshore wind turbines. Renewable Energy, 2015, 78: 16–25 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.12.061
13
A Kamel, K Dammak, M Yangui, A E Hami, M B Jdidia, L Hammami, M Haddar. A Reliability optimization of a coupled soil structure interaction applied to an offshore wind turbine. Applied Ocean Research, 2021, 113: 102641 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2021.102641
14
K K Phoon, Z J Cao, J Ji, Y F Leung, S Najjar, T Shuku, C Tang, Z Y Yin, Y Ikumasa, J Y Ching. Geotechnical uncertainty, modeling, and decision making. Soil and Foundation, 2022, 62(5): 101189 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2022.101189
15
Y Huang, Z He, A Yashima, Z Chen, C Li. Multi-objective optimization design of pile-anchor structures for slopes based on reliability theory considering the spatial variability of soil properties. Computers and Geotechnics, 2022, 147: 104751 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104751
16
W Gong, H Huang, C H Juang, L Wang. Simplified-robust geotechnical design of soldier pile-anchor tieback shoring system for deep excavation. Marine Georesources and Geotechnology, 2017, 35(2): 157–169 https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2015.1120369
17
S Haldar, J Sharma, D Basu. Probabilistic analysis of monopile-supported offshore wind turbine in clay. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 105: 171–183 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.11.028
18
W Carswell, S R Arwade, D J DeGroot, M A Lackner. Soil−structure reliability of offshore wind turbine monopile foundations. Wind Energy, 2015, 18(3): 483–498 https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1710
19
K Y Oh, W Nam. A fast Monte−Carlo method to predict failure probability of offshore wind turbine caused by stochastic variations in soil. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 223: 108635 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108635
20
M Rabiei, A J Choobbasti. Innovative piled raft foundations design using artificial neural network. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2020, 14(1): 138–146 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-019-0585-8
21
N A Nariman, A M Ramadan, I I Mohammad. Application of coupled XFEM-BCQO in the structural optimization of a circular tunnel lining subjected to a ground motion. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2019, 13(6): 1495–1509 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-019-0574-y
22
P Ni, J Li, H Hao, H Zhou. Reliability based design optimization of bridges considering bridge-vehicle interaction by Kriging surrogate model. Engineering Structures, 2021, 246: 112989 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112989
23
X Liu, M Lu, Y Chai, J Tang, J Gao. A comprehensive framework for HSPF hydrological parameter sensitivity, optimization and uncertainty evaluation based on SVM surrogate model—A case study in Qinglong River watershed, China. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2021, 143: 105126 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105126
24
S Ozcanan, A O Atahan. RBF surrogate model and EN1317 collision safety-based optimization of two guardrails. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2019, 60(1): 343–362 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02203-z
25
Y Ji, Z Yang, J Ran, H Li. Multi-objective parameter optimization of turbine impeller based on RBF neural network and NSGA-II genetic algorithm. Energy Reports, 2021, 7: 584–593 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.10.003
26
K Xu, G Wang, L Zhang, L Wang, F Yun, W Sun, X Wang, X Chen. Multi-objective optimization of jet pump based on RBF neural network model. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2021, 9(2): 236 https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9020236
27
J F Herbert-Acero, O Probst, P E Réthoré, G C Larsen, K K Castillo-Villar. A review of methodological approaches for the design and optimization of wind farms. Energies, 2014, 7(11): 6930–7016 https://doi.org/10.3390/en7116930
28
J Chen, R Yang, R Ma, J Li. Design optimization of wind turbine tower with lattice-tubular hybrid structure using particle swarm algorithm. Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 2016, 25(15): 743–758 https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1281
29
Y Ma, A Zhang, L Yang, C Hu, Y Bai. Investigation on optimization design of offshore wind turbine blades based on particle swarm optimization. Energies, 2019, 12(10): 1972 https://doi.org/10.3390/en12101972
30
J JonkmanS ButterfieldW MusialG Scott. Definition of a 5-MW Reference Wind Turbine for Offshore System Development. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report (No. NREL/TP-500–38060). 2009
31
W Carswell, S R Arwade, J Johansson, D J DeGroot. Influence of foundation damping on offshore wind turbine monopile design loads. Marine Structures, 2022, 83: 103154 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2021.103154
32
F Liang, Z Yuan, X Liang, H Zhang. Seismic response of monopile-supported offshore wind turbines under combined wind, wave and hydrodynamic loads at scoured sites. Computers and Geotechnics, 2022, 144: 104640 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104640
33
61400-3: IEC. Wind Turbines-Part 3: Design Requirements for Offshore Wind Turbines. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission, 2009
34
K H Chew, K Tai, E Y K Ng, M Muskulus. Analytical gradient-based optimization of offshore wind turbine substructures under fatigue and extreme loads. Marine Structures, 2016, 47: 23–41 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2016.03.002
35
J M JonkmanJ M L Buhl. FAST User’s Guide Version 6.0. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report (No. NREL/EL-500-38230). 2005
36
B J Jonkman. TurbSim User’s Guide Version 1.50. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report (No. NREL/TP-500-46198). 2009
37
DNV-OS-J101: Design of Offshore Wind Turbine Structures. Oslo: Det Norske Veritas, 2014
38
DNV-RP-C205: Environmental Conditions and Environmental Loads. Oslo: Det Norske Veritas, 2010
39
G M Stewart, A Robertson, J Jonkman, M A Lackner. The creation of a comprehensive metocean data set for offshore wind turbine simulations. Wind Energy, 2016, 19(6): 1151–1159 https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1881
40
Y Yan, Y Yang, M Bashir, C Li, J Wang. Dynamic analysis of 10 MW offshore wind turbines with different support structures subjected to earthquake loadings. Renewable Energy, 2022, 193: 758–777 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.05.045
41
G Cao, Z Chen, C Wang, X Ding. Dynamic responses of offshore wind turbine considering soil nonlinearity and wind-wave load combinations. Ocean Engineering, 2020, 217: 108155 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108155
42
S Chen, J Xing, L Yang, H Zhang, Y Luan, H Chen, H Liu. Numerical modelling of new flap-gate type breakwater in regular and solitary waves using one-fluid formulation. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 240: 109967 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109967
43
Y Yan, C Li, Z Li. Buckling analysis of a 10 MW offshore wind turbine subjected to wind-wave-earthquake loadings. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 236: 109452 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109452
44
S Jung, S R Kim, A Patil, L C Hung. Effect of monopile foundation modeling on the structural response of a 5-MW offshore wind turbine tower. Ocean Engineering, 2015, 109: 479–488 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.09.033
45
M Kawa, I Baginska, M Wyjadlowski. Reliability analysis of sheet pile wall in spatially variable soil including CPTu test results. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 19(2): 598–613 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2018.10.007
46
R R DamianiH SongA N RobertsonJ M Jonkman. Assessing the importance of nonlinearities in the development of a substructure model for the wind turbine CAE tool FAST. In: Proceedings of OMAE 2013—32nd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2013, V008T09A093
47
S Al-Sanad, L Wang, J Parol, A Kolios. Reliability-based design optimisation framework for wind turbine towers. Renewable Energy, 2021, 167: 942–953 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.12.022
48
DNVGL-RP-C202: Buckling Strength of Shells. Oslo: Det Norske Veritas, 2017
