Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

邮发代号 80-968

2019 Impact Factor: 1.68

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering  2023, Vol. 17 Issue (11): 1675-1689   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-023-0994-6
  本期目录
Properties and printability evaluation of three-dimensional printing magnesium oxychloride cement by fully utilizing aeolian sand
Qinghua WANG1, Jinggang XU1, Duo FENG1, Wei LI2, Yuanyuan ZHOU2, Qiao WANG1,3()
1. School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China
2. Hebei Investigation Design & Research Institute of Water Conservancy & Hydropower, Tianjin 300240, China
3. Engineering Research Center on Construction 3D Printing of Hebei, Tianjin 300401, China
 全文: PDF(7940 KB)   HTML
Abstract

Three-dimensional concrete printing (3DCP) is increasingly being applied in harsh environments and isolated regions. However, the effective utilization of aeolian sand (AS) resources and by-products derived from arid zones for 3DCP is yet to be fully realized. This study developed a three-dimensional (3D) printing composite using AS and magnesium oxychloride cement (MOC) from local materials. The effects of the mole ratio of MgO/MgCl2 and sand/binder (S/B) ratio on the mechanical properties such as water resistance, drying shrinkage strain, rheology, and printability, were investigated systematically. The results indicated that the optimal mole ratio of MgO/MgCl2 was 8, which yielded the desired mechanical performance and water resistance. Furthermore, the S/B ratio can be increased to three within the desired printability to increase the AS utilization rate. The rheological recovery and buildability of the 3D-printed MOC with AS were verified. These findings provide a promising strategy for construction in remote deserts.

Key words3DCP    AS    magnesium oxychloride cement    mechanical behavior    drying shrinkage    rheological property
收稿日期: 2022-11-01      出版日期: 2024-01-24
Corresponding Author(s): Qiao WANG   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2023, 17(11): 1675-1689.
Qinghua WANG, Jinggang XU, Duo FENG, Wei LI, Yuanyuan ZHOU, Qiao WANG. Properties and printability evaluation of three-dimensional printing magnesium oxychloride cement by fully utilizing aeolian sand. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(11): 1675-1689.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/10.1007/s11709-023-0994-6
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/Y2023/V17/I11/1675
Fig.1  
componentmass ratio (%)
MgO69.84
SiO210.87
CaO9.75
Al2O35.86
Fe2O32.86
K2O0.33
TiO20.16
Tab.1  
componentmass ratio (%)
MgCl245.50
KCl0.20
NaCl0.60
CaCl20.03
MgSO40.06
B2O30.02
H2O53.50
Tab.2  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
No.SF (μm)FA (μm)
D102.0993.991
D507.42628.251
D9018.009126.191
Tab.3  
stageNo.mole ratioMgO (g)MgCl2·6H2O (g)AS (g)H2O (g)SF (g)FA (g)HPMC (%)S/B
1M44:1230.8205.39202160001.54
M66:1346.2205.39202160001.54
M88:1461.6205.39202160001.54
M1010:1577.0205.39202160001.54
2M8H8:1461.6205.392021669690.11.54
M8H1.258:1461.6205.3115021669690.11.92
M8H1.58:1461.6205.3138021669690.12.31
M8H1.758:1461.6205.3161021669690.12.69
M8H28:1461.6205.3184021669690.13.08
M8H2.258:1461.6205.3207021669690.13.46
Tab.4  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
Fig.8  
Fig.9  
Fig.10  
Fig.11  
Fig.12  
Fig.13  
Fig.14  
1 G Ma, Y Li, L Wang, J Zhang, Z Li. Real-time quantification of fresh and hardened mechanical property for 3D printing material by intellectualization with piezoelectric transducers. Construction & Building Materials, 2020, 241: 117982
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117982
2 Z Li, L Wang, G W Ma. Mechanical improvement of continuous steel microcable reinforced geopolymer composites for 3D printing subjected to different loading conditions. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2020, 187: 107796
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107796
3 Z Zuo, J Gong, Y Huang, Y Zhan, M Gong, L Zhang. Experimental research on transition from scale 3D printing to full-size printing in construction. Construction & Building Materials, 2019, 208: 350–360
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.171
4 Y W Weng, M Y Li, S Q Ruan, T N Wong, M J Tan, K L O Yeong, S Z Qian. Comparative economic, environmental and productivity assessment of a concrete bathroom unit fabricated through 3D printing and a precast approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 261: 121245
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121245
5 H Alhumayani, M Gomaa, V Soebarto, W Jabi. Environmental assessment of large-scale 3D printing in construction: A comparative study between cob and concrete. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 270: 122463
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122463
6 A O AfolabiR A OjelabiI O OmuhP F Tunji-Olayeni. 3D house printing: A sustainable housing solution for Nigeria’s housing needs. In: Adagunodo T A, Usikalu M R, Emetere M E, eds. The 3rd International Conference on Science and Sustainable Development (ICSSD). Bristol: IOP Publishing, 2019
7 V LojanicaV M Colic-DamjanovicN Jankovic. Housing of the future: Housing design of the fourth industrial revolution. In: 2018 the 5th International Symposium on Environment-Friendly Energies and Applications (EFEA). Rome: IEEE, 2018, 1–4
8 T PraterT KimM RomanR Mueller. NASA’s centennial challenge for 3D-printed habitat: Phase II outcomes and phase III competition overview. In: 2018 AIAA SPACE and Astronautics Forum and Exposition. Orlando, FL: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2018, 5405
9 T PraterM RomanT KimR Mueller. NASA’s centennial challenge: 3D-printed habitat. In: 2017 AIAA SPACE and Astronautics Forum and Exposition. Orlando, FL: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2017, 5279
10 S J Schuldt, J A Jagoda, A J Hoisington, J D Delorit. A systematic review and analysis of the viability of 3D-printed construction in remote environments. Automation in Construction, 2021, 125: 103642
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103642
11 J Xiao, G Ji, Y Zhang, G Ma, V Mechtcherine, J Pan, L Wang, T Ding, Z Duan, S Du. Large-scale 3D printing concrete technology: Current status and future opportunities. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2021, 122: 104115
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104115
12 Soto B G de, I Agustí-Juan, J Hunhevicz, S Joss, K Graser, G Habert, B T Adey. Productivity of digital fabrication in construction: Cost and time analysis of a robotically built wall. Automation in Construction, 2018, 92: 297–311
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.04.004
13 G Ma, R Buswell, W R L D Silva, L Wang, J Xu, S Z Jones. Technology readiness: A global snapshot of 3D concrete printing and the frontiers for development. Cement and Concrete Research, 2022, 156: 106774
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106774
14 Y Li, H Zhang, G Liu, D Hu, X Ma. Multi-scale study on mechanical property and strength prediction of aeolian sand concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2020, 247: 118538
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118538
15 J Kaufmann. Evaluation of the combination of desert sand and calcium sulfoaluminate cement for the production of concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2020, 243: 118281
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118281
16 S K AdekunleS AhmadM Maslehuddin. The effect of aggregate packing on the performance of SCC using dune sand. In: Proceedings of the Fifth North American Conference on the Design and Use of Self-Consolidating Concrete. Chicago, IL: SCC2013, 2013, 12–15
17 S Guettala, B Mezghiche. Compressive strength, and hydration with age of cement pastes containing dune sand powder. Construction & Building Materials, 2011, 25(3): 1263–1269
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.09.026
18 F J Luo, L He, Z Pan, W H Duan, X L Zhao, F Collins. Effect of very fine particles on workability and strength of concrete made with dune sand. Construction & Building Materials, 2013, 47: 131–137
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.005
19 J Y Jiang, T T Feng, H Y Chu, Y R Wu, F J Wang, W J Zhou, Z F Wang. Quasi-static and dynamic mechanical properties of eco-friendly ultra-high-performance concrete containing aeolian sand. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2019, 97: 369–378
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.01.011
20 L Li, B Wang, M H Hubler. Carbon nanofibers (CNFs) dispersed in ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC): Mechanical property, workability and permeability investigation. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2022, 131: 104592
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104592
21 W Meng, K H Khayat. Mechanical properties of ultra-high-performance concrete enhanced with graphite nanoplatelets and carbon nanofibers. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2016, 107: 113–122
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.069
22 N N Lam, L Van Hung. Mechanical and shrinkage behavior of basalt fiber reinforced ultra-high-performance concrete. GEOMATE Journal, 2021, 20(78): 28–35
https://doi.org/10.21660/2021.78.86151
23 H F Liu, X L Chen, J L Che, N Liu, M H Zhang. Mechanical performances of concrete produced with desert sand after elevated temperature. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 2020, 14(1): 26
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-020-00402-3
24 Z Damene, M S Goual, J Houessou, R M Dheilly, A Goullieux, M Quéneudec. The use of southern Algeria dune sand in cellular lightweight concrete manufacturing: Effect of lime and aluminium content on porosity, compressive strength and thermal conductivity of elaborated materials. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 2018, 22(10): 1273–1289
https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2016.1256233
25 B Benabed, L Azzouz, E H Kadri, S Kenai, A S E Belaidi. Effect of fine aggregate replacement with desert dune sand on fresh properties and strength of self-compacting mortars. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 2014, 28(21): 2182–2195
https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2014.950625
26 G P Padmakumar, K Srinivas, K V Uday, K R Iyer, P Pathak, S M Keshava, D N Singh. Characterization of aeolian sands from Indian desert. Engineering Geology, 2012, 139: 38–49
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.04.005
27 E Lee, S Park, Y Kim. Drying shrinkage cracking of concrete using dune sand and crushed sand. Construction & Building Materials, 2016, 126: 517–526
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.141
28 B Xu, H Ma, C Hu, S Yang, Z Li. Influence of curing regimes on mechanical properties of magnesium oxychloride cement-based composites. Construction & Building Materials, 2016, 102: 613–619
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.205
29 B W Xu, H Y Ma, C L Hu, Z J Li. Influence of cenospheres on properties of magnesium oxychloride cement-based composites. Materials and Structures, 2016, 49(4): 1319–1326
https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0578-6
30 C Chau, J Chan, Z Li. Influences of fly ash on magnesium oxychloride mortar. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2009, 31(4): 250–254
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.02.011
31 J K Zhong, P Liu, L W Mo, D Y Lu, S L Peng. Recycling MgO from the waste magnesium oxychloride cement (MOC): Properties, CO2 footprint and reuse in MOC. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 415: 137782
32 X L Huang, S Wang, Y Q Wu, J Wang, Y F Zuo. Preparation and characterization of high-strength and water-resistant waterborne epoxy resin/magnesium oxychloride composite based on cross-linked network structure. Construction & Building Materials, 2021, 285: 122902
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122902
33 Y N Tan, Y Liu, L Grover. Effect of phosphoric acid on the properties of magnesium oxychloride cement as a biomaterial. Cement and Concrete Research, 2014, 56: 69–74
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.11.001
34 J Wen, H F Yu, X Y Xiao, J M Dong. Influence of materials ratio on the hydration process of magnesium oxychloride cement. Materials Science Forum, 2015, 817: 180–184
35 C K Chau, Z J Li. Microstructures of magnesium oxychloride. Materials and Structures, 2008, 41(5): 853–862
https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-007-9289-y
36 Y Wang, L Wei, J Yu, K Yu. Mechanical properties of high ductile magnesium oxychloride cement-based composites after water soaking. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2019, 97: 248–258
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.12.028
37 Y Karimi, A Monshi. Effect of magnesium chloride concentrations on the properties of magnesium oxychloride cement for nano SiC composite purposes. Ceramics International, 2011, 37(7): 2405–2410
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2011.05.082
38 Z J Li, C K Chau. Influence of molar ratios on properties of magnesium oxychloride cement. Cement and Concrete Research, 2007, 37(6): 866–870
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.03.015
39 K Li, Y Wang, N Yao, A Zhang. Recent progress of magnesium oxychloride cement: Manufacture, curing, structure and performance. Construction & Building Materials, 2020, 255: 119381
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119381
40 P P He, C S Poon, D C W Tsang. Comparison of glass powder and pulverized fuel ash for improving the water resistance of magnesium oxychloride cement. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2018, 86: 98–109
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.11.010
41 Y Guo, Y Zhang, K Soe, M Pulham. Recent development in magnesium oxychloride cement. Structural Concrete, 2018, 19(5): 1290–1300
https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201800077
42 W Zhou, Q Ye, S Q Shi, Z Fang, Q Gao, J Z Li. A strong magnesium oxychloride cement wood adhesive via organic–inorganic hybrid. Construction & Building Materials, 2021, 297: 123776
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123776
43 Q Ye, Y Han, S Zhang, Q Gao, W Zhang, H Chen, S Gong, S Q Shi, C Xia, J Z Li. Bioinspired and biomineralized magnesium oxychloride cement with enhanced compressive strength and water resistance. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020, 383: 121099
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121099
44 T B Fan, Y F Hao, L X Li, F Q Zhao. Water resistance modification of magnesium oxychloride cement with H3PO4/Na2O·xSiO2·nH2O. Key Engineering Materials, 2019, 814: 393–398
45 X Guan, G Zhou, Y Cui, J Fei, Y B Fan. Effect of different-sizes of hydroxyapatite on the water resistance of magnesium oxychloride cement for bone repair. RSC Advances, 2019, 9(66): 38619–38628
https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA08200J
46 P P He, C S Poon, I G Richardson, D C W Tsang. The mechanism of supplementary cementitious materials enhancing the water resistance of magnesium oxychloride cement (MOC): A comparison between pulverized fuel ash and incinerated sewage sludge ash. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2020, 109: 103562
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103562
47 D X Wang, M Benzerzour, X Hu, B Huang, Z Chen, X Y Xu. Strength, permeability, and micromechanisms of industrial residue magnesium oxychloride cement solidified slurry. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2020, 20(7): 04020088
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001690
48 C L Hu, B W Xu, H Y Ma, B M Chen, Z J Li. Micromechanical investigation of magnesium oxychloride cement paste. Construction & Building Materials, 2016, 105: 496–502
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.182
49 F J Sánchez-Leal. Gradation chart for asphalt mixes: Development. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2007, 19(2): 185–197
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:2(185
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed