Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

邮发代号 80-968

2019 Impact Factor: 1.68

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering  2024, Vol. 18 Issue (5): 743-759   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-024-1016-z
  本期目录
Effect of recycled brick powder on the properties of self-compacting fiber reinforced mortars produced with different cement types
Serkan ETLI()
Department of Civil Engineering, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Kahramanmaraş 46040, Turkey
 全文: PDF(14254 KB)   HTML
Abstract

It is known that clay-based building materials such as bricks and tiles accumulate in landfills at the end of their useful lives. As an alternative, recycling clay-based building material can reduce the negative environmental impacts. Recycled brick powder (RBP) is obtained by grinding waste brick and tile collected from end-of-life landfills. Within the scope of the study, the use of self-compacting fiber reinforced mortars (SCFRMs) produced with RBP using CEM-I 42.5R and 52.5R class cements for two different cement classes was investigated. In accordance with EFNARC, a water binding ratio of 0.42 was used to control the workability and strength of the SCFRM. In the produced SCFRM, 1%, 2%, and 3% by weight binder Polypropylene (PP) fiber was added to the blends with 10%, 20%, and 30% RBP substitutes. A total of 32 SCFRM mixes were produced and tested. The flexural and compressive strengths at 7, 28, 56, and 90 d were evaluated on the produced samples. In addition, porosity and water absorbency values were examined since these are significant for durability properties. It was observed that the use of RBP increases durability, and the use of fiber can have positive effects in terms of both durability and strength.

Key wordscement strength    tile/brick dust    self-compacting fiberized mortar
收稿日期: 2022-10-15      出版日期: 2024-06-26
Corresponding Author(s): Serkan ETLI   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2024, 18(5): 743-759.
Serkan ETLI. Effect of recycled brick powder on the properties of self-compacting fiber reinforced mortars produced with different cement types. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2024, 18(5): 743-759.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/10.1007/s11709-024-1016-z
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/Y2024/V18/I5/743
Fig.1  
Chemical composition OPC (%) WPC (%) RBP (%)
SiO2 19.54 21.06 67.98
Al2O3 3.85 4.05 16.68
Fe2O3 4.15 0.26 6.93
CaO 63.57 65.7 0.52
MgO 3.20 1.30 1.52
K2O 0.82 0.35 2.83
Na2O 0.39 0.32 1.3
SO3 2.86 3.20
P2O5 0.08
TiO 0.14 1.03
Cr2O3 0.0033
Mn2O3 0.0033
MgO 1.21
Loss of ignition 1.62 3.54
Tab.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
Mix id RBP (%) PP fiber (%) Binder (kg/m3) w/b ratio Cement (kg/m3) RBP (kg/m3) Water (kg/m3) HRWR (kg/m3) Aggregate weight (kg/m3) PP fiber weight (kg/m3)
M1 0 0 600 0.42 600 0 252 7.5 1460.0 0
M2 10 0 600 0.42 540 60 252 8.76 1444.5 0
M3 20 0 600 0.42 480 120 252 9.51 1430.3 0
M4 30 0 600 0.42 420 180 252 11.1 1413.9 0
M5 0 1 600 0.42 600 0 252 7.88 1459.0 6
M6 10 1 600 0.42 540 60 252 9.2 1443.4 6
M7 20 1 600 0.42 480 120 252 9.99 1429.1 6
M8 30 1 600 0.42 420 180 252 11.66 1412.5 6
M9 0 2 600 0.42 600 0 252 8.28 1458.0 12
M10 10 2 600 0.42 540 60 252 9.67 1442.2 12
M11 20 2 600 0.42 480 120 252 10.5 1427.8 12
M12 30 2 600 0.42 420 180 252 12.26 1411.0 12
M13 0 3 600 0.42 600 0 252 9.51 1454.9 18
M14 10 3 600 0.42 540 60 252 9.51 1442.6 18
M15 20 3 600 0.42 480 120 252 11.4 1425.5 18
M16 30 3 600 0.42 420 180 252 12.5 1410.4 18
M17 0 0 600 0.42 600 0 252 7.88 1475.7 0
M18 10 0 600 0.42 540 60 252 9.2 1458.3 0
M19 20 0 600 0.42 480 120 252 9.99 1442.4 0
M20 30 0 600 0.42 420 180 252 11.66 1424.2 0
M21 0 1 600 0.42 600 0 252 8.28 1474.6 6
M22 10 1 600 0.42 540 60 252 9.67 1457.1 6
M23 20 1 600 0.42 480 120 252 10.5 1441.1 6
M24 30 1 600 0.42 420 180 252 12.26 1422.6 6
M25 0 2 600 0.42 600 0 252 8.71 1473.5 12
M26 10 2 600 0.42 540 60 252 10.18 1455.8 12
M27 20 2 600 0.42 480 120 252 11.05 1439.7 12
M28 30 2 600 0.42 420 180 252 12.91 1421.0 12
M29 0 3 600 0.42 600 0 252 10.01 1470.2 18
M30 10 3 600 0.42 540 60 252 10.02 1456.3 18
M31 20 3 600 0.42 480 120 252 12.01 1437.2 18
M32 30 3 600 0.42 420 180 252 13.17 1420.3 18
Tab.2  
Fig.4  
Mix property Prism for tensile and compressive strength test (ASTM C348 [31] and ASTM C349 [32]) Cube for sorptivity (ASTM C1585-13 [33])
Mix id RBP (%) PP fiber (%) 7-d 28-d 56-d 90-d Water (kg/m3)
M1 0 0 3 3 3 3 3
M2 10 0 3 3 3 3 3
M3 20 0 3 3 3 3 3
M4 30 0 3 3 3 3 3
M5 0 1 3 3 3 3 3
M6 10 1 3 3 3 3 3
M7 20 1 3 3 3 3 3
M8 30 1 3 3 3 3 3
M9 0 2 3 3 3 3 3
M10 10 2 3 3 3 3 3
M11 20 2 3 3 3 3 3
M12 30 2 3 3 3 3 3
M13 0 3 3 3 3 3 3
M14 10 3 3 3 3 3 3
M15 20 3 3 3 3 3 3
M16 30 3 3 3 3 3 3
M17 0 0 3 3 3 3 3
M18 10 0 3 3 3 3 3
M19 20 0 3 3 3 3 3
M20 30 0 3 3 3 3 3
M21 0 1 3 3 3 3 3
M22 10 1 3 3 3 3 3
M23 20 1 3 3 3 3 3
M24 30 1 3 3 3 3 3
M25 0 2 3 3 3 3 3
M26 10 2 3 3 3 3 3
M27 20 2 3 3 3 3 3
M28 30 2 3 3 3 3 3
M29 0 3 3 3 3 3 3
M30 10 3 3 3 3 3 3
M31 20 3 3 3 3 3 3
M32 30 3 3 3 3 3 3
Tab.3  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
Fig.8  
Fig.9  
Fig.10  
Fig.11  
Dependent variable Independent variable Sequential sum of squares Computed F P value Significance Contribution (%)
Slump-flow diameter (mm) RBP (%) 12.5 120 0 yes 3.21
PP fiber (%) 220.25 704.8 0 yes 56.47
cement type 154.75 495.2 0 yes 39.68
error 2.5 0.64
total 390
V-funnel time (sec) RBP (%) 0.0205 0.11 0.744 no 0.05
PP fiber (%) 32.5296 57.57 0 yes 75.04
cement type 6.28 11.11 0 yes 14.49
error 4.5205 10.43
total 43.3505
Tensile strength (MPa) (7-d) RBP (%) 5.3825 464.92 0 yes 85.99
PP fiber (%) 0.2523 7.26 0.001 yes 4.03
cement type 0.3469 9.99 0 yes 5.54
error 0.2779 4.44
total 6.2595
Tensile strength (MPa) (28-d) RBP (%) 1.8949 37.01 0 yes 46.92
PP fiber (%) 0.2137 1.39 0.27 no 5.29
cement type 0.7013 4.57 0.011 yes 17.36
error 1.2287 30.42
total 4.0386
Tensile strength (MPa) (56-d) RBP (%) 1.4412 82.84 0 yes 34.04
PP fiber (%) 0.4511 8.64 0 yes 10.65
cement type 1.924 36.86 0 yes 45.44
error 0.4175 10.34
total 4.2338
Tensile strength (MPa) (90-d) RBP (%) 0.2051 5.99 0.022 yes 5.08
PP fiber (%) 3.4109 33.21 0 yes 84.46
cement type 0.1116 1.09 0.374 no 2.76
error 0.8216 20.34
total 4.5492
Compressive strength (MPa) (7-d) RBP (%) 1464.76 206.23 0 yes 66.53
PP fiber (%) 564.1 26.47 0 yes 25.62
cement type 2.21 0.1 0.957 no 0.1
error 170.47 7.74
total 2201.54
Compressive strength (MPa) (28-d) RBP (%) 541.2 41.45 0 yes 36.1
PP fiber (%) 635.26 16.22 0 yes 42.37
cement type 9.35 0.24 0.869 no 0.62
error 313.4 20.9
total 1499.21
Compressive strength (MPa) (56-d) RBP (%) 399.03 24.5 0 yes 30.98
PP fiber (%) 400.04 8.19 0.001 yes 31.06
Compressive strength (MPa) (56-d) cement type 98.02 2.01 0.14 no 7.61
error 390.93 30.35
total 1288.02
Compressive strength (MPa) (90-d) RBP (%) 109.2 7.44 0.012 yes 9.21
PP fiber (%) 621.7 14.13 0 yes 52.45
cement type 102.5 2.33 0.1 no 8.65
error 352.1 29.7
total 1185.4
S value RBP (%) 0.000174 19.42 0 yes 11.08
PP fiber (%) 0.000179 19.96 0 yes 11.39
cement type 0.001147 384.44 0 yes 73.01
error 0.000072 4.58
total 0.001571
I0 value RBP (%) 0.005032 55.44 0 yes 79.41
PP fiber (%) 0.000578 6.37 0.002 yes 9.12
cement type 0.000002 0.06 0.812 no 0.03
error 0.000726 11.46
total 0.006337
Tab.4  
1 T Y Tu, Y Y Chen, C L Hwang. Properties of HPC with recycled aggregates. Cement and Concrete Research, 2006, 36(5): 943–950
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.11.022
2 G Külekçi. The effect of pozzolans and mineral wastes on alkali-silica reaction in recycled aggregated mortar. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 2021, 65: 741–750
3 A R Khaloo. Crushed tile coarse aggregate concrete. Cement, Concrete and Aggregates, 1995, 17(2): 119–125
https://doi.org/10.1520/CCA10137J
4 J Gołaszewski, T Ponikiewski, A Kostrzanowska-Siedlarz, P Miera. Technological aspects of usage of calcareous fly ash as a main constituent of cements. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 2021, 65: 619–637
https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.11164
5 T Esin, N Cosgun. A study conducted to reduce construction waste generation in Turkey. Building and Environment, 2007, 42(4): 1667–1674
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.02.008
6 A Al-Omari, O M Abdulkareem, A Aldaood, M Bouasker, A B Fraj, M Al-Mukhtar. Impact of tufa stone powder as a partial replacement of aggregate on the mechanical performance and durability of repair mortar. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 2022, 66(2): 433–444
https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.19146
7 S Etli, S Cemalgil, O Onat. Effect of pumice powder and artificial lightweight fine aggregate on self-compacting mortar. Computers and Concrete, 2021, 27: 241–252
8 Sáez P Villoria, C Porras-Amores, Río Merino M del. New quantification proposal for construction waste generation in new residential constructions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 102: 58–65
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.029
9 H Li, L Dong, Z Jiang, X Yang, Z Yang. Study on utilization of red brick waste powder in the production of cement-based red decorative plaster for walls. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 133: 1017–1026
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.149
10 Q Tang, Z Ma, H Wu, W Wang. The utilization of eco-friendly recycled powder from concrete and brick waste in new concrete: A critical review. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2020, 114: 103807
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103807
11 H Wu, J Zuo, G Zillante, J Wang, H Yuan. Construction and demolition waste research: A bibliometric analysis. Architectural Science Review, 2019, 62(4): 354–365
https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2018.1564646
12 A Khitab, M S Riaz, A Jalil, R B N Khan, W Anwar, R A Khan, M T Arshad, M S Kirgiz, Z Tariq, S Tayyab. Manufacturing of clayey bricks by synergistic use of waste brick and ceramic powders as partial replacement of clay. Sustainability, 2021, 13(18): 10214
https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810214
13 Gutiérrez R M de, L N Díaz, S Delvasto. Effect of pozzolans on the performance of fiber-reinforced mortars. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2005, 27(5): 593–598
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.09.010
14 L Schueremans, Ö Cizer, E Janssens, G Serré, K V Balen. Characterization of repair mortars for the assessment of their compatibility in restoration projects: Research and practice. Construction and Building Materials, 2011, 25(12): 4338–4350
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.01.008
15 K van Balen, I Papayianni, R van Hees, L Binda, A Waldum. Introduction to requirements for and functions and properties of repair mortars. Materials and Structures, 2005, 38(8): 781–785
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02479291
16 L G Li, Z H Lin, G M Chen, A K H Kwan. Reutilizing clay brick dust as paste substitution to produce environment-friendly durable mortar. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 274: 122787
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122787
17 J Shao, J Gao, Y Zhao, X Chen. Study on the pozzolanic reaction of clay brick powder in blended cement pastes. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 213: 209–215
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.307
18 R A Robayo-Salazar, J M Mejía-Arcila, de Gutiérrez R Mejía. Eco-efficient alkali-activated cement based on red clay brick wastes suitable for the manufacturing of building materials. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 166: 242–252
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.243
19 Filho R D Toledo, J P Gonçalves, B B Americano, E M R Fairbairn. Potential for use of crushed waste calcined-clay brick as a supplementary cementitious material in Brazil. Cement and Concrete Research, 2007, 37(9): 1357–1365
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.06.005
20 F Bektas, K Wang. Performance of ground clay brick in ASR-affected concrete: Effects on expansion, mechanical properties and ASR gel chemistry. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2012, 34(2): 273–278
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.09.012
21 P Zhu, X Mao, W Qu, Z Li, Z J Ma. Investigation of using recycled powder from waste of clay bricks and cement solids in reactive powder concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 113: 246–254
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.040
22 Y Zhao, J Gao, C Liu, X Chen, Z Xu. The particle-size effect of waste clay brick powder on its pozzolanic activity and properties of blended cement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 242: 118521
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118521
23 A Naceri, M C Hamina. Use of waste brick as a partial replacement of cement in mortar. Waste Management, 2009, 29(8): 2378–2384
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.03.026
24 A N S Beaty, G P Raymond. Concrete block road paving. Concrete International, 1995, 17: 36–41
25 H Jang, H Kang, S So. Color expression characteristics and physical properties of colored mortar using ground granulated blast furnace slag and white Portland cement. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2014, 18(4): 1125–1132
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0452-z
26 K K Veiga, A L G Gastaldini. Sulfate attack on a white Portland cement with activated slag. Construction and Building Materials, 2012, 34: 494–503
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.090
27 A Subaşı, M Emiroğlu. Effect of metakaolin substitution on physical, mechanical and hydration process of white Portland cement. Construction and Building Materials, 2015, 95: 257–268
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.125
28 Ü Özçay. Kiremit Sektöründeki Endüstriyel Atıkların Geri Kazanılması. Thesis for the Master’s Degree. İstanbul: Yıldız Technical University, 2010 (in Turkish)
29 EFNARC. The European Guidelines for Self-Compacting Concrete Specification, Production and Use. Flums: EFNARC, 2005
30 C305/C305-20 ASTM. Standard Practice for Mechanical Mixing of Hydraulic Cement Pastes and Mortars of Plastic Consistency. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2009
31 C348-02 ASTM. Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2002
32 C349-08 ASTM. Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic-Cement Mortars (Using Portions of Prisms Broken in Flexure). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2008
33 C1585-13 ASTM. Standard Test Method for Measurement of Rate of Absorption of Water by Hydraulic Cement Concretes. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2013
34 H Y Leung, J Kim, A Nadeem, J Jaganathan, M P Anwar. Sorptivity of self-compacting concrete containing fly ash and silica fume. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 113: 369–375
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.071
35 C Hall. Water sorptivity of mortars and concretes: A review. Magazine of Concrete Research, 1989, 41(147): 51–61
https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.1989.41.147.51
36 S Cemalgil, O Onat, M K Tanaydın, S Etli. Effect of waste textile dye adsorbed almond shell on self compacting mortar. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 300: 123978
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123978
37 M L Torres, P A García-Ruiz. Lightweight pozzolanic materials used in mortars: Evaluation of their influence on density, mechanical strength and water absorption. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2009, 31(2): 114–119
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.11.003
38 C642-97 ASTM. Standard Test Method for Density, Absorption, and Voids in Hardened Concrete. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 1997
39 C Gallé. Effect of drying on cement-based materials pore structure as identified by mercury intrusion porosimetry: A comparative study between oven-, vacuum-, and freeze-drying. Cement and Concrete Research, 2001, 31(10): 1467–1477
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00594-4
40 A Schackow, D Stringari, L Senff, S L Correia, A M Segadães. Influence of fired clay brick waste additions on the durability of mortars. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2015, 62: 82–89
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.04.019
41 M O’Farrell, S Wild, B B Sabir. Pore size distribution and compressive strength of waste clay brick mortar. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2001, 23(1): 81–91
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(00)00070-6
42 A A Aliabdo, A E M Abd-Elmoaty, H H Hassan. Utilization of crushed clay brick in concrete industry. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 2014, 53(1): 151–168
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2013.12.003
43 D P BentzC F FerrarisJ Wingpigler. Service Life Prediction for Concrete Pavements and Bridge Decks Exposed to Sulfate Attack and Freeze–Thaw Deterioration. Gaithersburg: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2001
44 M López, J T Castro. Effect of natural pozzolans on porosity and pore connectivity of concrete with time. Revista de Ingeniería de Construcción, 2010, 25: 419–431
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed