Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

邮发代号 80-968

2019 Impact Factor: 1.68

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering  2024, Vol. 18 Issue (8): 1281-1295   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-024-1046-6
  本期目录
Mechanical response of a tunnel subjected to strike-slip faulting processes, based on a multi-scale modeling method
Guoguo LIU1, Ping GENG1(), Tianqiang WANG1, Xiangyu GUO2, Jiaxiang WANG3, Ti DING1
1. Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering, Ministry of Education, Chengdu 610031, China
2. College of Civil Engineering, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021, China
3. China Railway Design Corporation, Tianjin 300308, China
 全文: PDF(4345 KB)   HTML
Abstract

The stick-slip action of strike-slip faults poses a significant threat to the safety and stability of underground structures. In this study, the north-east area of the Longmenshan fault, Sichuan, provides the geological background; the rheological characteristics of the crustal lithosphere and the nonlinear interactions between plates are described by Burger’s viscoelastic constitutive model and the friction constitutive model, respectively. A large-scale global numerical model for plate squeezing analysis is established, and the seemingly periodic stick-slip action of faults at different crust depths is simulated. For a second model at a smaller scale, a local finite element model (sub-model), the time history of displacement at a ground level location on the Longmenshan fault plane in a stick-slip action is considered as the displacement loading. The integration of these models, creating a multi-scale modeling method, is used to evaluate the crack propagation and mechanical response of a tunnel subjected to strike-slip faulting. The determinations of the recurrence interval of stick-slip action and the cracking characteristics of the tunnel are in substantial agreement with the previous field investigation and experimental results, validating the multi-scale modeling method. It can be concluded that, regardless of stratum stiffness, initial cracks first occur at the inverted arch of the tunnel in the footwall, on the squeezed side under strike-slip faulting. The smaller the stratum stiffness is, the smaller the included angle between the crack expansion and longitudinal direction of the tunnel, and the more extensive the crack expansion range. For the tunnel in a high stiffness stratum, both shear and bending failures occur on the lining under strike-slip faulting, while for that in the low stiffness stratum, only bending failure occurs on the lining.

Key wordsstick-slip action    plate squeezing analysis    multi-scale modeling method    lining cracking    mechanical response
收稿日期: 2021-01-12      出版日期: 2024-08-29
Corresponding Author(s): Ping GENG   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2024, 18(8): 1281-1295.
Guoguo LIU, Ping GENG, Tianqiang WANG, Xiangyu GUO, Jiaxiang WANG, Ti DING. Mechanical response of a tunnel subjected to strike-slip faulting processes, based on a multi-scale modeling method. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2024, 18(8): 1281-1295.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/10.1007/s11709-024-1046-6
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/Y2024/V18/I8/1281
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
Type Input parameters Output parameters (Abaqus)
E (GPa) η (kPa) ρ (kg/m3) υ g1 t1 g2 t2
Sichuan Basin (0 to −25 km) 50 1 × 1018 2550 0.277 0.723 7.639 × 109 0.276 5.236 × 1010
Xizang Plateau (0 to −25 km) 50 1 × 1018 2650 0.277 0.723 7.639 × 109 0.276 5.236 × 1010
Tab.1  
Crustal depth (km) Recurrence interval (year) Maximum acceleration (m·s−2) Maximum velocity (m·s−1) Maximum dislocation (m)
1 475 5.4 0.4 1.91
5 1744 21.1 1.62 9.21
10 2219 34.4 2.99 18.4
15 3234 50.6 4.47 28.8
Tab.2  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
Fig.8  
Material Elastic modulus (MPa) Poisson ratio Density (kg·m−3) Internal friction angle (° ) Cohesion (MPa)
Lining C35 31500 0.2 2500
Stratum I 10000 0.3 2300 40 1
Stratum II 1000 0.35 1800 25 0.1
Stratum III 50 0.3 2000 30 0.05
Tab.3  
Fig.9  
Fig.10  
Fig.11  
Fig.12  
Fig.13  
Fig.14  
Deformation indexesStratigraphic type Lj (m) βj (° ) Dj (cm)
Stratum I 35 60 9.60
Stratum II 54 57 21.46
Stratum III 88 37 24.12
Tab.4  
Fig.15  
1 V A Kontogianni, S C Stiros. Earthquakes and seismic faulting: Effects on tunnels. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 2003, 12(1): 153–156
2 J Liu-Zeng, Z Zhang, L Wen, P Tapponnier, J Sun, X Xing, G Hu, Q Xu, L Zeng, L Ding, C Ji, K W Hudnut, J van der Woerd. Co-seismic ruptures of the 12 May 2008, Ms 8. 0 Wenchuan earthquake, Sichuan: East–west crustal shortening on oblique, parallel thrusts along the eastern edge of Tibet. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2009, 286(3–4): 355–370
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2009.07.017
3 Z Huang, H Fu, J Zhang, W Chen, Y Shi. Structural damage evaluation method for metro shield tunnel. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2019, 33(1): 04018097
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001248
4 M Ranjbarnia, M Zaheri, D Dias. Three-dimensional finite difference analysis of shallow sprayed concrete tunnels crossing a reverse fault or a normal fault: A parametric study. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2020, 14(4): 998–1011
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-020-0621-8
5 M Sabagh, A Ghalandarzadeh. Centrifugal modeling of continuous shallow tunnels at active normal faults intersection. Transportation Geotechnics, 2020, 22: 100325
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100325
6 Q Wang, P Geng, J B Chen, C He. Dynamic discrimination method of seismic damage in tunnel portal based on improved wavelet packet transform coupled with Hilbert–Huang transform. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2023, 188: 110023
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.110023
7 Q Wang, P Geng, C J Chen, J B Chen, C He. Determination of seismic response of reinforced tunnel portal slope using shaking table tests. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2023, 136: 105072
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2023.105072
8 N M NewmarkW J Hall. Pipeline design to resist large fault displacement. In: Proceedings of US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Ann Arbor, MI: Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information, 1975, 416–425
9 Y F Qiao, J Tang, X D Zhang. Longitudinal mechanical response of tunnels under reverse faulting and its analytical solution. In: Proceedings of ISRM International Symposium-Asian Rock Mechanics Symposium. Beijing: ISRM, 2021, 861(2): 022015
10 M Kiani, T Akhlaghi, A Ghalandarzadeh. Experimental modeling of segmental shallow tunnels in alluvial affected by normal faults. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 51: 108–119
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.10.005
11 M Sabagh, A Ghalandarzadeh. Centrifuge experiments for shallow tunnels at active reverse fault intersection. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2020, 14(3): 731–745
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-020-0614-7
12 G Zhou, Q Sheng, Z Cui, T Wang, Y Ma. Investigating the deformation and failure mechanism of a submarine tunnel with flexible joints subjected to strike-slip faults. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2021, 9(12): 1412
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9121412
13 Y Qiao, J Tang, G Liu, M He. Longitudinal mechanical response of tunnels under active normal faulting. Underground Space, 2022, 7(4): 662–679
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.undsp.2021.12.002
14 Y Ma, Q Sheng, G Zhang, Z Cui. A 3D discrete-continuum coupling approach for investigating the deformation and failure mechanism of tunnels across an active fault: A case study of xianglushan tunnel. Applied Sciences, 2019, 9(11): 2318
https://doi.org/10.3390/app9112318
15 G Zeng, P Geng, X Guo, P Li, Q Wang, T Ding. An anti-fault study of basalt fiber reinforced concrete in tunnels crossing a strike-slip fault. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 148: 106687
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106687
16 X Liu, Y Wang. Three dimensional numerical analysis of underground bifurcated tunnel. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2010, 28(4): 447–455
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-010-9304-x
17 Y Cao, P Wang, X Jin, J Wang, Y Yang. Tunnel structure analysis using the multi-scale modeling method. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2012, 28: 124–134
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2011.10.004
18 L F Sun, Z L Chen, J C Li, X L Lv, Q Shang. Weld strength analysis of T-joint segments of the metro crossing passage by the shield method based sub-model. Materials Science Forum, 2019, 971: 27–35
19 X Zhang, P Fu, C Zhou, J Yin, W Lu. Construction of 3D geological model and multi-scale numerical analysis of in-situ stress field of long tunnel in fault development area. ISRM International Symposium-Asian Rock Mechanics Symposium, 2021, 861(6): 062053
20 V R Krishnan, C Y Hui, R Long. Finite strain crack tip fields in soft incompressible elastic solids. Langmuir, 2008, 24(24): 14245–14253
https://doi.org/10.1021/la802795e
21 T Lucht. Finite element analysis of three dimensional crack growth by the use of a boundary element sub model. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2009, 76(14): 2148–2162
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.03.007
22 B Meyer, P Tapponnier, L Bourjot, F Metivier, Y Gaudemer, G Peltzer, S M Guo, Z T Chen. Crustal thickening in Gansu–Qinghai, lithospheric mantle subduction, and oblique, strike-slip controlled growth of the Tibet plateau. Geophysical Journal International, 1998, 135(1): 1–47
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.1998.00567.x
23 E T BrownE Hoek. Underground Excavations in Rock. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1980
24 A HoechnerS V SobolevI EinarssonR Wang. Investigation on afterslip and steady state and transient rheology based on postseismic deformation and geoid change caused by the Sumatra 2004 earthquake. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 2011, 12(7): n/a
25 W N FindleyF A Davis. Creep and Relaxation of Nonlinear Viscoelastic Materials. Chelmsford: Courier Corporation, 2013
26 S Dassault. ABAQUS 6.14 analysis User’s Manual. Providence, RI: Dassault Systems, USA, 2014
27 M K Clark, L H Royden. Topographic ooze: Building the eastern margin of Tibet by lower crustal flow. Geology, 2000, 28(8): 703–706
https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(2000)28<703:TOBTEM>2.0.CO;2
28 J Hu, X Xu, H Yang, L Wen, G Li. S receiver function analysis of the crustal and lithospheric structures beneath eastern Tibet. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2011, 306(1–2): 77–85
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.03.034
29 C H Scholz. Earthquakes and friction laws. Nature, 1998, 391(6662): 37–42
https://doi.org/10.1038/34097
30 T H Heaton. Evidence for and implications of self-healing pulses of slip in earthquake rupture. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 1990, 64(1): 1–20
https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9201(90)90002-F
31 J M Carlson, J S Langer. Mechanical model of an earthquake fault. Physical Review A: General Physics, 1989, 40(11): 6470–6484
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.40.6470
32 B T Aagaard, J F Hall, T H Heaton. Characterization of near-source ground motions with earthquake simulations. Earthquake Spectra, 2001, 17(2): 177–207
https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586171
33 J Yuan, S B Zhu. FEM simulation of the dynamic processes of fault spontaneous rupture. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2014, 57(1): 138–156
34 L Ma, W Tao, Y Zhang, M Zeng, Q Zheng. The numerical simulation study of the earthquake cycles and the dynamic evolutionary processes on the Longmen Shan Fault. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2018, 61(5): 1824–1839
35 P Z ZhangX W XuX Z WenY K Ran. Slip rates and recurrence intervals of the Longmen Shan active fault zone, and tectonic implications for the mechanism of the May 12 Wenchuan earthquake, 2008, Sichuan, China. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2008, 51(4): 1066–1073 (in Chinese)
36 X Xu, X Wen, G Yu, G Chen, Y Klinger, J Hubbard, J Shaw. Coseismic reverse-and oblique-slip surface faulting generated by the 2008 Mw 7. 9 Wenchuan earthquake. China Geology, 2009, 37(6): 515–518
37 X Liu, X Li, Y Sang, L Lin. Experimental study on normal fault rupture propagation in loose strata and its impact on mountain tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2015, 49: 417–425
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.05.010
38 H Li, X Li, Y Yang, Y Liu, M Ma. Structural stress characteristics and joint deformation of shield tunnels crossing active faults. Applied Sciences, 2022, 12(7): 3229
https://doi.org/10.3390/app12073229
39 T Q Wang. Research on the forced influence of cross-active fault tunnel under strike-slip dislocation. Thesis for the Master’s Degree. Shenyang: Shenyang University of Technology, 2021 (in Chinese)
40 Standards Institution British. Code of Practice for Temporay Works Procedures and The Permssible Stress Design of Falsework: Incorporating Corrigendum No. 1. London: BSI, 2008
41 E Dadashi, A Noorzad, K Shahriar, K Goshtasbi. Hydro-mechanical interaction analysis of reinforced concrete lining in pressure tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2017, 69: 125–132
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.06.006
42 D70 JTG/T-2010. Guidelines For Design of Highway Tunnel. Beijing: Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China, 2010
43 E Giner, N Sukumar, J E Tarancón, F J Fuenmayor. An Abaqus implementation of the extended finite element method. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2009, 76(3): 347–368
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.10.015
44 B Min, C Zhang, X Zhang, H Wang, P Li, D Zhang. Cracking performance of asymmetric double-arch tunnels due to the voids behind linings. Thin-Walled Structures, 2020, 154: 106856
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2020.106856
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed