Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

邮发代号 80-968

2019 Impact Factor: 1.68

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering  2024, Vol. 18 Issue (3): 380-392   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-024-1072-4
  本期目录
Tensile strength behavior of cement-stabilized dredged sediment reinforced by polypropylene fiber
Lei LANG1,2, Jiangshan LI1,2(), Xin CHEN1,3, Lijun HAN1,3, Ping WANG1,2
1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanic, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China
2. Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory of Contaminated Sludge and Soil Science and Engineering, Wuhan 430071, China
3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
 全文: PDF(18803 KB)   HTML
Abstract

This study evaluated the feasibility of using polypropylene fiber (PF) as reinforcement in improving tensile strength behavior of cement-stabilized dredged sediment (CDS). The effects of cement content, water content, PF content and length on the tensile strength and stress–strain behavioral evolutions were evaluated by conducting splitting tensile strength tests. Furthermore, the micro-mechanisms characterizing the tensile strength behavior inside PF-reinforced CDS (CPFDS) were clarified via analyzing macro failure and microstructure images. The results indicate that the highest tensile strengths of 7, 28, 60, and 90 d CPFDS were reached at PF contents of 0.6%, 1.0%, 1.0%, and 1.0%, exhibiting values 5.96%, 65.16%, 34.10%, and 35.83% higher than those of CDS, respectively. Short, 3 mm, PF of showed the best reinforcement efficiency. The CPFDS exhibited obvious tensile strain-hardening characteristic, and also had better ductility than CDS. The mix factor (CCa/Cwb) and time parameter (qt0(t)) of CDS, and the reinforcement index (kt-PF) of CPFDS were used to establish the tensile strength prediction models of CDS and CPFDS, considering multiple factors. The PF “bridge effect” and associated cementation-reinforcement coupling actions inside CPFDS were mainly responsible for tensile strength behavior improvement. The key findings contribute to the use of CPFDS as recycled engineering soils.

Key wordsdredged sediment    chemical stabilization    fiber reinforcement    splitting tensile strength    micro-mechanisms
收稿日期: 2022-10-20      出版日期: 2024-06-12
Corresponding Author(s): Jiangshan LI   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2024, 18(3): 380-392.
Lei LANG, Jiangshan LI, Xin CHEN, Lijun HAN, Ping WANG. Tensile strength behavior of cement-stabilized dredged sediment reinforced by polypropylene fiber. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2024, 18(3): 380-392.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/10.1007/s11709-024-1072-4
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/Y2024/V18/I3/380
Property Result
Initial water content (%) 49.5
Liquid limit (%) 55.2
Plastic limit (%) 29.3
Plasticity index (%) 25.9
Specific gravity 2.58
Optimum water content (%) 20.7
Maximum dry density (g/cm3) 1.65
Tab.1  
Fig.1  
Oxides CaO SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 K2O Na2O MgO Others
DS 3.90 65.45 16.28 5.51 3.00 1.48 2.66 1.72
PC 64.44 21.60 4.13 4.57 0.56 0.11 1.06 0.76
Tab.2  
Fig.2  
Property Result
Fiber type single fiber
Average diameter (mm) 0.025–0.045
Length (mm) 3–15
Tensile strength (MPa) 250
Modulus of elasticity (MPa) 3500
Density (g/cm3) 0.90
Tab.3  
Mix PC content (%) PF content (%) PF length (mm) Water content (%) Curing time (d)
CDS 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 7, 28, 60, 90
CPFDS 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 50, 60, 70, 80, 90
Control 20 0.6 9 70
Tab.4  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
Fig.8  
Fig.9  
Fig.10  
Mix CC (%) CPF (%) LPF (mm) Cw (%) t (d) Test type
CPFDS 12, 18 0.45, 0.65 9 65, 75 7, 28 STS
Tab.5  
Fig.11  
Fig.12  
Fig.13  
1 J Wu, Z Xu, H Li, P Li, M Wang, L Xiong, J Zhang. Long-term effect of water diversion and CSOs on the remediation of heavy metals and microbial community in river sediments. Water Science and Technology, 2019, 79(12): 2395–2406
https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2019.242
2 J KvasnickaG A J BurtonJ SemrauO Jolliet. Dredging contaminated sediments: Is it worth the risks? Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2020, 39(3): 515–516
3 S Lirer, B Liguori, I Capasso, A Flora, D Caputo. Mechanical and chemical properties of composite materials made of dredged sediments in a fly-ash based geopolymer. Journal of Environmental Management, 2017, 191: 1–7
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.01.001
4 M E Bates, C Fox-Lent, L Seymour, B A Wender, I Linkov. Life cycle assessment for dredged sediment placement strategies. Science of the Total Environment, 2015, 511: 309–318
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.11.003
5 Y Zhang, Y J Ong, Y Yi. Comparison between CaO- and MgO-activated ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS) for stabilization/solidification of Zn-contaminated clay slurry. Chemosphere, 2022, 286: 131860
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131860
6 L Lang, N Liu, B Chen. Strength development of solidified dredged sludge containing humic acid with cement, lime and nano-SiO2. Construction & Building Materials, 2020, 230: 116971
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116971
7 L Lang, B Chen, J Li. High-efficiency stabilization of dredged sediment using nano-modified and chemical-activated binary cement. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 15(8): 2117–2131
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.12.007
8 D Wang, H Wang, S Larsson, M Benzerzour, W Maherzi, M Amar. Effect of basalt fiber inclusion on the mechanical properties and microstructure of cement-solidified kaolinite. Construction & Building Materials, 2020, 241: 118085
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118085
9 H R Akbari, H Sharafi, A R Goodarzi. Effect of polypropylene fiber inclusion in kaolin clay stabilized with lime and nano-zeolite considering temperature of 20 and 40 °C. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2021, 80(2): 1841–1855
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-02028-x
10 P V Divya, B V S Viswanadham, J P Gourc. Evaluation of tensile strength-strain characteristics of fiber-reinforced soil through laboratory tests. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2014, 26(1): 14–23
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000772
11 C S Tang, D Y Wang, Y J Cui, B Shi, J Li. Tensile strength of fiber-reinforced soil. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2016, 28(7): 04016031
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001546
12 A A S Correia, P J V Oliveira, D G Custodio. Effect of polypropylene fibres on the compressive and tensile strength of a soft soil, artificially stabilised with binders. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2015, 43(2): 97–106
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2014.11.008
13 J Li, C Tang, D Wang, X Pei, B Shi. Effect of discrete fibre reinforcement on soil tensile strength. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 6(2): 133–137
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2014.01.003
14 M R Abdi, A Ghalandarzadeh, L S Chafi. An investigation into the effects of lime on compressive and shear strength characteristics of fiber-reinforced clays. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 13(4): 885–898
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2020.11.008
15 S B Tamrakar, Y Toyosawa, T Mitachi, K Itoh. Tensile strength of compacted and saturated soils using newly developed tensile strength measuring apparatus. Soil and Foundation, 2005, 45(6): 103–110
https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.45.103
16 B V S Viswanadham, B K Jha, S N Pawar. Experimental study on flexural testing of compacted soil beams. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2010, 22(5): 460–468
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000045
17 T H Kim, T H Kim, G C Kang, L Ge. Factors influencing crack-induced tensile strength of compacted soil. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2012, 24(3): 315–320
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000380
18 A Boz, A Sezer. Influence of fiber type and content on freeze–thaw resistance of fiber reinforced lime stabilized clay. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2018, 151: 359–366
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2018.03.026
19 H R Akbari, H Sharafi, A R Goodarzi. Effect of polypropylene fiber and nano-zeolite on stabilized soft soil under wet–dry cycles. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2021, 49(6): 1470–1482
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2021.06.001
20 C Tang, B Shi, W Gao, F Chen, Y Cai. Strength and mechanical behavior of short polypropylene fiber reinforced and cement stabilized clayey soil. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2007, 25(3): 194–202
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2006.11.002
21 C Liu, Y Lv, X Yu, X Wu. Effects of freeze–thaw cycles on the unconfined compressive strength of straw fiber-reinforced soil. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2020, 48(4): 581–590
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2020.03.004
22 C Lv, C Zhu, C S Tang, Q Cheng, L Y Yin, B Shi. Effect of fiber reinforcement on the mechanical behavior of bio-cemented sand. Geosynthetics International, 2021, 28(2): 195–205
https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.20.00037
23 L Lang, B Chen. Strength properties of cement-stabilized dredged sludge incorporating nano-SiO2 and straw fiber. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2021, 21(7): 04021119
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002096
24 H GüllüA Khudir. Effect of freeze–thaw on unconfined compressive strength of fine-grained soil treated with jute fiber, steel fiber and lime. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2014, 106–107: 55-65
25 Y X Wang, P P Guo, W X Ren, B X Yuan, H P Yuan, Y L Zhao, S B Shan, P Cao. Laboratory investigation on strength characteristics of expansive soil treated with jute fiber reinforcement. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2017, 17(11): 04017101
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000998
26 M Valipour, P T Shourijeh, A Mohammadinia. Application of recycled tire polymer fibers and glass fibers for clay reinforcement. Transportation Geotechnics, 2021, 27: 100474
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100474
27 L Lang, B Chen, D Li. Effect of nano-modification and fiber-reinforcement on mechanical behavior of cement-stabilized dredged sediment. Marine Georesources and Geotechnology, 2022, 40(8): 936–952
https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2021.1954112
28 H S Wang, C S Tang, K Gu, B Shi, H I Inyang. Mechanical behavior of fiber-reinforced, chemical stabilized dredged sludge. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2020, 79(2): 629–643
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01580-5
29 F Changizi, A Haddad. Strength properties of soft clay treated with mixture of nano-SiO2 and recycled polyester fiber. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 7(4): 367–378
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2015.03.013
30 Y Xiao, X He, T M Evans, A W Stuedlein, H Liu. Unconfined compressive and splitting tensile strength of basalt fiber-reinforced biocemented sand. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2019, 145(9): 04019048
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002108
31 N C Consoil, L Festugato, G D Miguel, E B Moreira, H C S Filho. Fatigue life of green stabilized fiber-reinforced sulfate-rich dispersive soil. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2021, 33(9): 04021249
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003842
32 J S Yadav, S K Tiwari. Evaluation on failure of fiber-reinforced sand. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2017, 139(1): 95–106
33 N Cristelo, V M C F Cunha, A T Gomes, N Araujo, T Miranda. Influence of fibre reinforcement on the post-cracking behaviour of a cement-stabilised sandy-clay subjected to indirect tensile stress. Construction & Building Materials, 2017, 138: 163–173
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.010
34 Y Zhao, Z Xiao, C Fan, W Shen, Q Wang, P Liu. Comparative mechanical behaviors of four fiber-reinforced sand cemented by microbially induced carbonate precipitation. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2020, 79(6): 3075–3086
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-01756-4
35 H Xiao, Y Liu. A prediction model for the tensile strength of cement-admixed clay with randomly orientated fibres. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 2018, 22(9): 1131–1145
https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2016.1232662
36 L Festugato, A P Silva, A Diambra, N C Consoil, E Ibraim. Modelling tensile/compressive strength ratio of fibre reinforced cemented soils. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2018, 46(2): 155–165
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.11.003
37 50123 GB/T-2019. Standard for Soil Test Method. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2019 (in Chinese)
38 C496-2011 ASTM. Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens. PA: ASTM International, 2011
39 Y Wang, P Guo, S Shan, H Yuan, B Yuan. Study on strength influence mechanism of fiber-reinforced expansive soil using jute. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2016, 34(4): 1079–1088
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-0028-4
40 S Wang, Q Xue, W Ma, K Zhao, Z Wu. Experimental study on mechanical properties of fiber-reinforced and geopolymer-stabilized clay soil. Construction & Building Materials, 2021, 272: 121914
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121914
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed