Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

邮发代号 80-968

2019 Impact Factor: 1.68

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering  2024, Vol. 18 Issue (9): 1321-1336   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-024-1100-4
  本期目录
A novel tunnel waterproof-drainage system based on double-bonded waterproofing materials and its seepage characteristics
Xiaohe SUN1, Chenghua SHI1(), Guoqing XIAO2, Yangyang GE3(), Chengyong CAO4
1. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
2. PowerChina ZhongNan Engineering Corporation Limited, Changsha 410014, China
3. State Key Laboratory of Special Functional Waterproof Materials, Beijing Oriental Yuhong Waterproof Technology Co. Ltd., Beijing 101111, China
4. College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
 全文: PDF(4238 KB)   HTML
Abstract

Double-bonded spray membrane waterproofing materials have excellent waterproofing performance and can improve the load-bearing capacity of tunnel linings, leading to an increasing global application. However, due to the double-bonded capability of spray membrane materials, traditional interlayer drainage methods cannot be applied. This limitation makes it difficult to use them in drainage-type tunnels, significantly restricting their range of applications. In this regard, a novel tunnel waterproof-drainage system based on double-bonded spray membrane materials was proposed in this paper. The proposed drainage system primarily comprises upper drainage sheets and bottom drainage blind pipes, both located in the tunnel circumferential direction, as well as longitudinal drainage pipes within the tunnel. Subsequently, numerical calculation methods are employed to analyze the seepage characteristics of this system, revealing the water pressure distribution around the tunnel. The results indicate that in the novel waterproof-drainage system, the water pressure in the secondary lining exhibits a “mushroom-shaped” distribution in the circumferential direction, while the water pressure in the longitudinal direction exhibits a “wave-like” distribution. Furthermore, comparative results with other waterproof-drainage systems indicate that under typical working conditions with a water head of 160 m and a rock permeability coefficient of 10−6 m/s, the maximum water pressure in the secondary lining of the novel waterproof-drainage system is 0.6 MPa. This represents a significant reduction compared to fully encapsulated waterproofing and traditional drainage systems, which respectively reduce the water pressure by 65% and 30%. The applicability analysis of the double-bonded waterproofing and drainage system reveals that it can reduce at least 40% of the static water pressure in any groundwater environments. The novel drainage system provides a valuable reference for the application of double-bonded spray membrane waterproofing materials in drainage-type tunnels.

Key wordstunnel drainage    spray-applied waterproofing membrane    numerical simulation    water pressure
收稿日期: 2023-10-12      出版日期: 2024-09-18
Corresponding Author(s): Chenghua SHI,Yangyang GE   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2024, 18(9): 1321-1336.
Xiaohe SUN, Chenghua SHI, Guoqing XIAO, Yangyang GE, Chengyong CAO. A novel tunnel waterproof-drainage system based on double-bonded waterproofing materials and its seepage characteristics. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2024, 18(9): 1321-1336.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/10.1007/s11709-024-1100-4
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/Y2024/V18/I9/1321
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Category Traditional scheme New scheme
Waterproofing layer non-bonded waterproof sheet double-bonded waterproofing membrane
Bottom drainage measures not included in ordinary tunnel/centralized drainage channel for high water pressure tunnels drainage blind tubes spaced at intervals
Upper drainage measures blind tubes + geotextile drainage sheets
Tab.1  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
Fig.8  
Fig.9  
Fig.10  
MaterialPermeability coefficient (m/s)
Primary lining1 × 10?7
Secondary lining (inverted arch)1 × 10?8
Secondary lining (upper part of tunnel)0
Surrounding rock1 × 10?6
Tab.2  
Fig.11  
Fig.12  
Work condition Scheme Longitudinal drainage pipe Upper drainage sheet Bottom drainage blind pipe
1 fully enclosed waterproof scheme × × ×
2 traditional drainage scheme ×
3 new drainage scheme considering double-bonded waterproofing materials
Tab.3  
Fig.13  
Fig.14  
Fig.15  
Fig.16  
Fig.17  
Fig.18  
1 C Gao, Z Zhou, W Yang, C Lin. , Lia L, Wang J. Model test and numerical simulation research of water leakage in operating tunnels passing through intersecting faults. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 94: 103134
2 C Liu, D Zhang, S Zhang. Characteristics and treatment measures of lining damage: A case study on a mountain tunnel. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2021, 128: 105595
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105595
3 S Xu, E Ma, J Lai, Y Yang, H Liu, C Yang, Q Hu. Diseases failures characteristics and countermeasures of expressway tunnel of water-rich strata: A case study. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2022, 134: 106056
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106056
4 Q Xu, S Zhang, P Li, C Liu, T Bao. Lining failure performance of highway tunnels induced by the drainage system deterioration. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2023, 149: 107236
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107236
5 S Zhang, T Bao, C Liu. Model tests and numerical modeling of the failure behavior of composite strata caused by tunneling under pipeline leakage conditions. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2023, 149: 107287
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107287
6 Y Jiang, B He, J Zhao, H Pei, J Liu, H Wang. Influence of novel polymer waterproofing membrane on mechanical properties of tunnel lining structure. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 360: 129579
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129579
7 D Coughlan, R Diez, C John, S Alfred. Crossrail project: Use of sprayed concrete tunnel linings on London’s Elizabeth line. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers—Civil Engineering, 2017, 170(5): 39–46
https://doi.org/10.1680/jcien.16.00026
8 Y Jiang, Q Yang, D Liu, C Sheng. Application and development of a sprayed waterproof membrane for tunnels. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2018, 55: 11–19
9 E SaraivaF ClementW Mahoney. The use of sprayable waterproofing membranes in underground structures-concept, design options, benefits and limitations. In: Proceedings of 15th Australasian Tunnelling Conference. Sydney: Engineers Australia and Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 2014, 323–331
10 A WuP CoppenhallA G DaviesD Traldi. Sprayed waterproofing membranes on recent SCL tunnelling projects in London. In: Proceedings of the World Tunnel Congress. Bergen: The Norwegian Tunnelling Society Norway, 2017
11 U Pelz, J Karlovšek. Spray-applied waterproofing membranes in tunnelling: A construction perspective. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2023, 142: 105409
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2023.105409
12 U Pelz, J Karlovšek. Spray-applied waterproofing membranes in tunnelling: Application and research directions in Australia. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2022, 122: 104364
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.104364
13 K G Holter. Performance of EVA-based membranes for SCL in hard rock. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2016, 49(4): 1329–1358
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-015-0844-5
14 J Su, A Bloodworth. Simulating composite behaviour in SCL tunnels with sprayed waterproofing membrane interface: A state-of-the-art review. Engineering Structures, 2019, 191: 698–710
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.04.067
15 Y Jiang, B He, J Zhao, J Liu, H Wang. Study on mechanical properties of tunnel lining structure with spray-applied waterproofing membrane. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2022, 59: 95–103
16 J Su. Adopting “less is more” principle for efficient design of composite SCL tunnels. In: Proceedings of the World Tunnel Congress 2022. Copenhagen: French Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, 2022
17 H JungF ClementA PillaiC WilsonD Traldi. Composite tunnel linings, allowing a more cost effective and sustainable tunnel design. In: Proceedings of the World Tunnel Congress 2017. Oslo: Norwegian Tunnelling Society, 2017: 516–525
18 International Tunnelling Association ITA/AITES. ITAtech Report No 2. Design Guidance for Spray Applied Waterproofing Membranes. International Tunnelling Association, 2013
19 Y JiangQ YangD LiuC Sheng. Discussion on application of spray-applied waterproofing in tunnels constructed by mining method based on spray-applied acrylate waterproof material. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2019, 41: 113–120 (in Chinese)
20 L Li, J Yang, J Fu, S Wang, C Zhang, M Xiang. Experimental investigation on the invert stability of operating railway tunnels with different drainage systems using 3D printing technology. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 14(5): 1470–1485
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.12.013
21 P Li, H Liu, Y Zhao, Z Li. A bottom-to-up drainage and water pressure reduction system for railway tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 81: 296–305
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.07.027
22 Z Li, Z Chen, C He, C Ma, C Duan. Seepage field distribution and water inflow laws of tunnels in water-rich regions. Journal of Mountain Science, 2022, 19(2): 591–605
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-020-6634-x
23 B He, H Li, X Zhang, J Xie. A novel analytical method incorporating valve pressure for the controlled drainage of transport tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 106: 103637
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103637
24 P LiD ZhangY ZhaoC Zhang. Study of distribution law of water pressure acting on composite lining and reasonable parameters of grouting circle for subsea tunnel. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(2): 280–288 (in Chinese)
25 D Zhao, H Fan, L Jia, Y Song. Research on waterproofing and drainage optimization scheme for karst tunnel lining in water-rich areas. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2021, 80(4): 150
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09466-0
26 3370.1 JTG-2018. Specifications for Design of Highway Tunnels Section 1 Civil Engineering. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2018
27 C Ma, W Ma, X Guo, Z Wang, X Xu, D Yu. Research on water discharge capacity of convex shell type waterproof and drainage board for the railway tunnel. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2020, 57: 204–208
28 M Shang. Study on face stability and drainage and waterproof system of tunnel in water-rich strata. Thesis for the Master’s Degree. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2015
29 P Bagnoli, M Bonfanti, G Della Vecchia, M Lualdi, L Sgambi. A method to estimate concrete hydraulic conductivity of underground tunnel to assess lining degradation. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2015, 50: 415–423
30 C Gokdemir, Y Rui, Y Rubin, X Li. A framework for assessing tunnel drainage-induced impact on terrestrial vegetation. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2023, 132: 104917
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.104917
31 X Wang, L Liu, R Fu, X Sun. Newly developed pressure adaptable concrete lining for high pressure hydraulic tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 105: 103570
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103570
32 Z Li. Discussions on ground water control technologies for tunneling in ground containing rich high-pressure water. Tunnel Construction, 2015, 35: 204–209
33 50487-2008 GB. Code for Engineering Geological Investigation of Water Resources and Hydropower. Beijing: China Planning Press, 2022
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed