Geometric and amino acid type determinants for protein-protein interaction interfaces

doi:10.1007/s40484-018-0138-5

Quantitative Biology

2018, Vol. 6

Issue (2): 163-174 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40484-018-0138-5

本期目录

Geometric and amino acid type determinants for protein-protein interaction interfaces

Yongxiao Yang¹, Wei Wang², Yuan Lou¹, Jianxin Yin², Xinqi Gong¹(

)

¹. Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
². School of Statistics, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China

全文: PDF(1634 KB) HTML

Abstract：

Background: Protein-protein interactions are essential to many biological processes. The binding site information of protein-protein complexes is extremely useful to obtain their structures from biochemical experiments. Geometric description of protein structures is the precondition of protein binding site prediction and protein-protein interaction analysis. The previous description of protein surface residues is incomplete, and little attention are paid to the implication of residue types for binding site prediction.

Methods: Here, we found three new geometric features to characterize protein surface residues which are very effective for protein-protein interface residue prediction. The new features and several commonly used descriptors were employed to train millions of residue type-nonspecific or specific protein binding site predictors.

Results: The amino acid type-specific predictors are superior to the models without distinction of amino acid types. The performances of the best predictors are much better than those of the sophisticated methods developed before.

Conclusions: The results demonstrate that the geometric properties and amino acid types are very likely to determine if a protein surface residue would become an interface one when the protein binds to its partner.

Key words： protein-protein interaction protein-protein complex interface geometry feature residue type binding site

收稿日期: 2017-09-11 出版日期: 2018-06-11

Corresponding Author(s): Xinqi Gong

引用本文:

. [J]. Quantitative Biology, 2018, 6(2): 163-174.
Yongxiao Yang, Wei Wang, Yuan Lou, Jianxin Yin, Xinqi Gong. Geometric and amino acid type determinants for protein-protein interaction interfaces. Quant. Biol., 2018, 6(2): 163-174.

链接本文:

https://academic.hep.com.cn/qb/CN/10.1007/s40484-018-0138-5
https://academic.hep.com.cn/qb/CN/Y2018/V6/I2/163

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Tab.1

Tab.2

Tab.3

Tab.4

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

1	Gao, M. and Skolnick, J. (2010) Structural space of protein-protein interfaces is degenerate, close to complete, and highly connected. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 22517–22522 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1012820107 pmid: 21149688
2	Chothia, C. and Janin, J. (1975) Principles of protein-protein recognition. Nature, 256, 705–708 https://doi.org/10.1038/256705a0 pmid: 1153006
3	Jones, S. and Thornton, J. M. (1996) Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 13–20 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.1.13 pmid: 8552589
4	Keskin, O., Gursoy, A., Ma, B. and Nussinov, R. (2008) Principles of protein-protein interactions: what are the preferred ways for proteins to interact? Chem. Rev., 108, 1225–1244 https://doi.org/10.1021/cr040409x pmid: 18355092
5	Koshland, D. E. (1995) The key-lock theroy and the induced fit theroy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 33, 2375–2378 https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.199423751
6	Teichmann, S. A. (2002) Principles of protein-protein interactions. Bioinformatics, 18, S249 https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/18.suppl_2.S249 pmid: 12386009
7	Zhang, Q. C., Petrey, D., Norel, R. and Honig, B. H. (2010) Protein interface conservation across structure space. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 10896–10901 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1005894107 pmid: 20534496
8	Aumentado-Armstrong, T. T., Istrate, B. and Murgita, R. A. (2015) Algorithmic approaches to protein-protein interaction site prediction. Algorithms Mol. Biol., 10, 7 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13015-015-0033-9 pmid: 25713596
9	Esmaielbeiki, R., Krawczyk, K., Knapp, B., Nebel, J. C. and Deane, C. M. (2016) Progress and challenges in predicting protein interfaces. Brief. Bioinformatics, 17, 117–131 pmid: 25971595
10	Maheshwari, S. and Brylinski, M. (2015) Predicting protein interface residues using easily accessible on-line resources. Brief. Bioinform., 16, 1025–1034 https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbv009 pmid: 25797794
11	Xue, L. C., Dobbs, D., Bonvin, A. M. and Honavar, V. (2015) Computational prediction of protein interfaces: a review of data driven methods. FEBS Lett., 589, 3516–3526 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2015.10.003 pmid: 26460190
12	Pintar, A., Carugo, O. and Pongor, S. (2002) CX, an algorithm that identifies protruding atoms in proteins. Bioinformatics, 18, 980–984 https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/18.7.980 pmid: 12117796
13	de Moraes, F. R., Neshich, I. A., Mazoni, I., Yano, I. H., Pereira, J. G., Salim, J. A., Jardine, J. G. and Neshich, G. (2014) Improving predictions of protein-protein interfaces by combining amino acid-specific classifiers based on structural and physicochemical descriptors with their weighted neighbor averages. PLoS One, 9, e87107 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087107 pmid: 24489849
14	Qin, S. and Zhou, H. X. (2007) meta-PPISP: a meta web server for protein-protein interaction site prediction. Bioinformatics, 23, 3386–3387 https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm434 pmid: 17895276
15	Segura, J., Jones, P. F. and Fernandez-Fuentes, N. (2011) Improving the prediction of protein binding sites by combining heterogeneous data and Voronoi diagrams. BMC Bioinformatics, 12, 352 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-352 pmid: 21861881
16	Zhang, Q. C., Deng, L., Fisher, M., Guan, J., Honig, B. and Petrey, D. (2011) PredUs: a web server for predicting protein interfaces using structural neighbors. Nucleic Acids Res., 39, W283–W287 https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr311 pmid: 21609948
17	Wang, L., Wang, Y. and Chang, Q. (2016) Feature selection methods for big data bioinformatics: a survey from the search perspective. Methods, 111, 21–31 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.08.014 pmid: 27592382
18	Vreven, T., Moal, I. H., Vangone, A., Pierce, B. G., Kastritis, P. L., Torchala, M., Chaleil, R., Jimenez-Garcia, B., Bates, P. A., Fernandez-Recio, J., Bonvin, A. M. and Weng, Z. (2015) Updates to the integrated protein-protein interaction benchmarks: docking benchmark version 5 and affinity benchmark version 2. J. Mol. Biol. 427, 3031–3041 https://doi.org/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022283615004180
19	Hwang, H., Vreven, T., Janin, J. and Weng, Z. (2010) Protein-protein docking benchmark version 4.0. Proteins, 78, 3111–3114 https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.22830 pmid: 20806234
20	Hwang, H., Pierce, B., Mintseris, J., Janin, J. and Weng, Z. (2008) Protein-protein docking benchmark version 3.0. Proteins, 73, 705–709 https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.22106 pmid: 18491384
21	Hubbard, S.J. and Thornton, M. (1993) Naccess Version 2.1.1. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University College, London
22	Fischer, T. B., Holmes, J. B., Miller, I. R., Parsons, J. R., Tung, L., Hu, J. C. and Tsai, J. (2006) Assessing methods for identifying pair-wise atomic contacts across binding interfaces. J. Struct. Biol., 153, 103–112 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2005.11.005 pmid: 16377205
23	Eisenberg, D. (1984) Three-dimensional structure of membrane and surface proteins. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 53, 595–623 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bi.53.070184.003115 pmid: 6383201
24	Kyte, J. and Doolittle, R. F. (1982) A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J. Mol. Biol., 157, 105–132 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(82)90515-0 pmid: 7108955
25	Olsson, M. H., Søndergaard, C. R., Rostkowski, M. and Jensen, J. H. (2011) PROPKA3: consistent treatment of internal and surface residues in empirical pKa predictions. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 7, 525–537 https://doi.org/10.1021/ct100578z pmid: 26596171
26	Møller, M. F. (1993) A scaled conjugate gradient algorithm for fast supervised learning. Neural Netw., 6, 525–533 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-6080(05)80056-5
27	Kishore, R. and Kaur, M. T. (2012) Backpropagation algorithm: an artificial neural network approach for pattern recognition. Inter. J. Sci. & Engin.Res ., 3, 1–4
28	Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E. and Williams, R. J. (1986) Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature, 323, 533–536 https://doi.org/10.1038/323533a0

[1]		Download
[2]		Download
[3]		Download
[4]		Download
[5]		Download

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed