Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Agriculture in China

ISSN 1673-7334

ISSN 1673-744X(Online)

CN 11-5729/S

Front Agric Chin    2011, Vol. 5 Issue (1) : 94-101    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11703-010-1066-y
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Effects of early feed restriction programs on production performance and hormone level in plasma of broiler chickens
Lanhui LI, Guoxian ZHAO(), Zhiyou REN, Lei DUAN, Huiqin ZHENG, Jianping WANG, Yongkang HE
College of Animal Science and Technology, Agricultural University of Hebei, Baoding 071000, China
 Download: PDF(139 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Age, duration and intensity of feed restriction of broiler chickens were studied by L9(34) orthogonal experiment. Broiler production performance and meat color were measured to evaluate the effects of feed restriction and explore the superior FR program. A total of 250 1-day-old Ross 308 chicks were selected and randomly allocated to ten groups, including one feed ad libitum (AL) group and nine feed restriction (FR) groups; each group had 5 pens with 5 chickens each. Broilers (T5D7I90), feed-restricted to 90% from day 5 to day 11, had the highest body weight (BW), carcass weight, eviscerated weight, leg muscle weight and breast muscle weight, as well as muscle ratio. While broilers (T5D14I70), feed-restricted to 70% from day 5 to day 18, had the lowest. Triiodothyronine (T3) and growth hormone (GH) decreased while thyroxine (T4) and the ratio of T4/T3 increased in FR broilers. Feed conversion ratio, abdominal fat ratio, whole eviscerated weight ratio and lightness (BoldItalic*) and yellow/blue (BoldItalic*) value of leg muscle color increased in FR broilers (BoldItalic>0.05). T5D14I70 had the lowest red/green (BoldItalic*) color value of leg muscle and the highest BoldItalic* and BoldItalic* color values of breast muscle (BoldItalic>0.05). FR groups except T10D14I90 had lower a* color value of breast muscle than AL. FR program of T5D7I90 resulted in superior production performance and higher capability of meat production. Broilers feed-restricted T5D14I70 were stunted with the lowest muscle growth capability and deteriorated in the breast muscle color. FR improved leg muscle color and increased broiler byproduct production. Lower T3 and GH concentration and higher T4/T3 ratio in plasma were related with the increased feed conversion rate and fat deposition in FR broilers; however, they had no relation with meat production and growth rate.

Keywords feed restriction      broiler      production performance      meat color      hormone level     
Corresponding Author(s): ZHAO Guoxian,Email:zgx959@163.com   
Issue Date: 05 March 2011
 Cite this article:   
Lanhui LI,Zhiyou REN,Lei DUAN, et al. Effects of early feed restriction programs on production performance and hormone level in plasma of broiler chickens[J]. Front Agric Chin, 2011, 5(1): 94-101.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fag/EN/10.1007/s11703-010-1066-y
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fag/EN/Y2011/V5/I1/94
groupage/dduration/dintensity/%
FRT5D7I905790
T5D10I8051080
T5D14I7051470
T7D7I707770
T7D10I9071090
T7D14I8071480
T10D7I8010780
T10D10I70101070
T10D14I90101490
AL00100
Tab.1  L(3) orthogonal experiment design of feed restriction
groupbody weightcarcass weightwhole eviscerated weight
24th day 36th day 42nd day 24th day 42nd day 24th day 42nd day
FRT5D7I90744.0±12.0e1445.8±19.6cd1865.3±67.8c683.3±15.7g1694.3±59.4d460.5±6.76g1250.5±45.4c
T5D10I80689.4±20.0cd1413.5±33.8bcd1633.5±35.2b633.8±32.1def1488.8±34.2bc431.0±33.2efg1093.8±28.5b
T5D14I70606.6±16.1a1225.6±75.3a1421.0±52.3a529.0±19.6a1250.3±27.4a334.0±24.5a941.6±42.2a
T7D7I70672.0±27.5bc1384.8±36.1bcd1635.8±51.0b558.0±66.8ab1481.0±31.3bc381.3±23.1bc1081.3±28.4b
T7D10I90723.0±11.8de1397.5±37.1bcd1678.5±33.6b647.6±26.4efg1510.5±30.2bc433.6±23.2efg1092.4±20.7b
T7D14I80635.4±16.2ab1324.4±7.5ab1634.0±61.9b575.8±32.9bc1476.8±66.3bc378.6±22.9b1029.0±44.6ab
T10D7I80728.2±14.0de1397.8±37.1bcd1676.5±63.1b669.2±13.7fg1466.5±41.2bc441.6±33.5fg1111.0±38.8b
T10D10I70657.6±11.6bc1403.5±38.9bcd1662.3±58.6b600.8±24.0cd1450.8±44.5bc398.8±17.6bcd1098.6±47.4b
T10D14I90685.2±17.7bcd1349.2±29.0bc1648.5±76.8b620.2±27.4de1402.0±52.5b415.8±25.0cde1065.2±44.7b
AL730.8±22.0de1457.5±25.4d1724.0±30.1bc651.5±12.5efg1565.0±28.1c447.8±19.9fg1131.4±33.6b
Tab.2  Body weight, carcass weight and whole eviscerated weight of every group ()
groupRCRWRBRLRARM
24th day 42nd day 24th day 42nd day 24th day 42nd day 24th day 42nd day 24th day 42nd day 24th day 42nd day
FRT5D7I9091.1±1.290.4±0.961.7±0.867.1±0.725.4±0.426.2±1.819.8±0.623.9±1.11.6±0.32.4±0. 345.2±1.250.2±1.5
T5D10I8089.9±0.990.5±1.461.1±0.666.2±0.623.7±0.925.6±1.320.9±0.421.4±1.41.7±0.22.4±0.344.6±1.347.0±1.4
T5D14I7089.9±1.188.7±1.956.8±1.863.8±0.924.1±0.823.9±1.420.0±0.822.9±1.31.2±0.42.4±0.444.0±1.446.8±1.2
T7D7I7086.3±3.488.5±2.359.2±1.364.2±0.723.5±0.325.4±0.920.5±0.722.4±1.21.1±0.21.9±0.243.9±1.147.8±1.5
T7D10I9089.6±1.590.3±0.360.0±1.166.5±0.524.7±0.723.7±0.720.8±1.123.1±3.51.3±0.31.9±0.345.5±1.446.8±1.0
T7D14I8090.6±0.789.6±0.759.6±1.264.8±0.722.6±0.624.4±0.619.6±0.522.7±1.21.3±0.41.9±0.342.1±1.247.1±0.9
T10D7I8092.0±0.991.6±1.160.6±1.467.6±0.624.7±0.726.8±1.220.9±0.821.1±1.81.6±0.12.2±0.445.6±1.448.2±1.7
T10D10I7091.4±0.491.8±1.260.6±0.567.5±0.923.3±0.525.3±1.320.0±0.824.6±1.21.0±0.42.3±0.243.3±1.749.8±1.4
T10D14I9090.6±1.390.3±0.660.7±0.966.5±0.825.7±0.925.5±2.021.0±0.723.6±0.81.3±0.22.3±0.246.7±1.849.3±1.0
AL91.1±0.891.3±1.261.4±0.767.7±0.525.1±0.626.0±1.120.9±0.622.5±0.91.3±0.41.7±0.446.0±1.248.4±1.1
Tab.3  Production performance of every group ()
groupleg musclebreast muscleabdominal fat
day 24day 42day 24day 42day 24day 42
FRT5D7I9090.8±3.2bc299.6±20.2d116.4±1.3f328.4±29.4c7.37±0.9030.42±3.78
T5D10I8090.6±4.0bc239.0±12.3abc100.5±5.4cd267.2±16.1ab7.17±0.8825.55±3.87
T5D14I7068.8±4.2a216.4±16.2a82.8±4.3a225.6±15.8a4.34±0.7021.92±3.15
T7D7I7075.2±7.6a236.0±4.1abc89.6±4.0ab269.2±14.8ab4.50±0.6520.31±2.49
T7D10I9090.8±6.8bc252.8±5.9bc106.8±3.3de258.4±10.1ab5.70±0.7320.97±3.77
T7D14I8074.1±2.6a233.6±12.6ab85.2±3.5ab251.2±13.5ab4.75±0.6719.75±3.84
T10D7I8092.3±2.6c238.2±11.6abc108.8±1.4def297.6±17.7bc6.61±1.3824.87±4.10
T10D10I7079.6±2.2ab269.6±14.0cd92.8±4.2bc278.1±16.9bc3.90±0.1825.95±2.76
T10D14I9091.6±6.8bc250.8±12.2abc110.1±3.7ef274.4±27.4ab5.52±1.0624.35±2.77
AL93.6±3.6c254.4±13.7bc112.4±2.2ef293.6±13.2bc5.73±0.9120.08±5.70
Tab.4  Weight of leg muscle, breast muscle and abdominal fat ()
groupleg musclebreast muscle
L*a*b*L*a*b*
FRT5D7I9041.7±1.719.5±1.213.7±0.651.2±0.910.6±0.816.0±0.9
T5D10I8039.8±1.917.7±0.713.8±0.752.0±1.711.3±0.918.2±0.8
T5D14I7040.6±1.516.3±1.813.6±0.553.7±0.911.5±2.818.4±0.2
T7D7I7042.2±1.617.3±0.614.6±0.949.7±1.512.1±0.715.3±1.1
T7D10I9042.4±0.518.6±0.613.5±1.250.6±0.811.1±0.516.3±0.2
T7D14I8041.4±0.718.0±0.412.9±0.451.9±1.39.3±1.216.2±0.0
T10D7I8042.2±1.617.1±0.314.0±0.552.4±5.011.5±0.517.6±3.4
T10D10I7050.4±1.211.9±0.917.2±1.0
T10D14I9041.4±3.620.9±0.914.3±1.750.8±4.513.1±0.516.5±1.7
AL45.8±1.118.3±1.016.2±0.851.0±0.912.6±0.717.2±0.5
Tab.5  Leg muscle and breast muscle color on day 42 ()
groupDFI1-23/(g·d-1)ADG1-23/(g·d-1)DFI 24-35/(g·d-1)ADG24-35/(g·d-1)DFI 36-42/(g·d-1)ADG36-42/(g·d-1)FCR
FRT5D7I9051.730.2102.658.579.860.01.85
T5D10I8051.227.993.059.373.936.71.86
T5D14I7046.024.491.151.681.732.61.86
T7D7I7050.327.286.059.473.841.81.81
T7D10I9051.329.494.656.276.946.81.80
T7D14I8045.325.694.557.472.651.61.82
T10D7I8051.529.694.855.880.546.51.82
T10D10I7040.326.596.862.281.443.11.83
T10D14I9046.327.795.855.380.149.91.81
AL53.429.791.860.682.344.41.87
Tab.6  DFI, ADG and FCR during the feeding period
groupT3T4 T4/T3GH
24th day 42nd day 24th day 42nd day 24th day 42nd day 24th day 42nd day
T5D7I900.60±0.040.47±0.0547.5±2.625.0±1.680.1±6.553.9±6.10.15±0.030.18±0.05
T5D14I700.55±0.040.51±0.0548.3±3.829.6±2.688.5±17.857.0±8.00.10±0.050.24±0.07
AL0.63±0.030.55±0.0744.5±2.725.6±2.871.6±14.946.9±6.60.27±0.080.31±0.05
Tab.7  Levels of T, T and GH and T/T on day 24 and d 42 ()
1 Andrea G, Ahmed S, Attila Z, Vilmos L F, Eddy D, Tibor B (2009). Effects of energy restriction on thyroid hormone metabolism in chickens. Acta Veterinaria Hungarica , 57(2): 319-330
doi: 10.1556/AVet.57.2009.2.12
2 Baghbanzadeh A, Decuypere E (2008). Ascites syndrome in broilers: physiological and nutritional perspectives. Avian Pathol , 37(2): 117-126
doi: 10.1080/03079450801902062
3 Bruggeman V, Vanmontfort D, Renaville R, Portetelle D, Decuypere E (1997). The effect of food intake from two weeks of age to sexual maturity on plasma growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor-I, insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins, and thyroid hormones in female broiler breeder chickens. Gen Comp Endocrinol , 107(2): 212-220
doi: 10.1006/gcen.1997.6917
4 Buyse J, Decuypere E, Sharp P J, Huybrechts L M, Kuhn E R, Whitehead C (1987). Effect of corticosterone on circulating concentrations of corticosterone, prolactin, thyroid hormones and somatomedin C and on fattening in broilers selected for high or low fat content. J Endocrinol , 112: 229-237
doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1120229
5 Camacho M A, Suárez M E, Herrera J G, Cuca J M, Garc?′a-Bojalil C M (2004). Effect of Age of Feed Restriction and Microelement Supplementation to Control Ascites on Production and Carcass Characteristics of Broilers. Poultry Science , 83: 526-532
6 Govaerts T, Room G, Buyse J, Lippens M, De Groote G, Decuypere E (2000). Early and temporary quantitative food restriction of broiler chickens. 2. Effects on allometric growth and growth hormone secretion. British Poultry Science , 41: 355-362
doi: 10.1080/713654923
7 Hornick J L, Van Eenaeme C, Gérard O, Dufrasne I, Istasse L (2000). Mechanisms of reduced and compensatory growth. Domest Anim Endocrinol , 19(2): 121-132
doi: 10.1016/S0739-7240(00)00072-2
8 Li Y, Yuan L, Yang X, Ni Y D, Xia D, Barth S, Grossmann R, Zhao R Q (2007). Effect of early feed restriction on myofibre types and expression of growth-related genes in the gastrocnemius muscle of crossbred broiler chickens. British Journal of Nutrition , 98: 310-319
doi: 10.1017/S0007114507699383
9 Lippens M, Room G, De Groote G, Decuypere E (2000). Early and temporary quantitative food restriction of broiler chickens—Effects on performance characteristics, mortality and meat quality. British Poultry Science , 41: 343-354
doi: 10.1080/713654926
10 Mahmood S, Ahmad F, Masood A, Kausar R (2007). Effects of feed restriction during starter phase on subsequent growth performance, dressing percentage, relative organ weights and immune response of broilers. Pakistan Vet J , 27(3): 137-141
11 Marek R, Marián J, Dalma L, Mariana M, Monika S, ?ubor K, Daniela J, Pavel V (2006). The effects of feed restriction on plasma biochemistry in growing meat type chickens (Gallus gallus). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology- Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology , 145: 363-371
doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.07.004
12 Mcmurtry J P, Plavnik I, Rosebrough R W, Steele N C, Proudman J A (1988). Effect of early feed restriction in male broiler chicks on plasma metabolic hormones during feed restriction and accelerated growth. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology , 91(1): 67-70
doi: 10.1016/0300-9629(88)91593-9
13 Onba?lar E E, Yal??n S, Torlak E, ?zdemir P (2009). Effects of early FR on live performance, carcass characteristics, meat and liver composition, some blood parameters, heterophil-lymphocyte ratio, antibody production and tonic immobility duration. Trop Anim Health Prod , 41(7): 1513-1519
doi: 10.1007/s11250-009-9341-8
14 Richards M P, Poch S M, Coon C N, Rosebrough R W, Ashwell C M, McMurtry J P (2003). Feed restriction significantly alters lipogenic gene expression in broiler breeder chickens. J Nutr , 133: 707-715
15 Scanes C G (2009). Perspectives on the endocrinology of poultry growth and metabolism. General and Comparative Endocrinology , 163: 24-32
doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2009.04.013
16 Sun J M, Richards M P, Rosebrough R W, Ashwell C M, McMurtry J P, Coon C N (2006). The relationship of body composition, feed intake, and metabolic hormones for broiler breeder females. Poultry Science , 85: 1173-1184
17 T?mová E, Sk?ivan M, Sk?ivanová V, Kacerovská L (2002). Effect of early FR on growth in broiler chickens, turkeys and rabbits. Czech J Anim Sci , 47(10): 418-428
18 Vadaszova A, Zacharova G, Machacova K, Jirmanova I, Soukup T (2004). Influence of thyroid status on the differentiation of slow and fast muscle phenotypes. Physiol Res , Suppl 1: S57-S61
19 Vasilatos-Younken R, Zhou Y, Wang X, McMurtry J P, Rosebrough R W, Decuypere E, Buys N, Darras V M, Van der Geyten S, Tomas F (2000). Altered chicken thyroid hormone metabolism with chronic GH enhancement in vivo: consequences for skeletal muscle growth. Journal of Endocrinology , 166: 609-620
20 Wang X, Carré W, Saxton A M, Cogburn L A (2007). Manipulation of thyroid status and/or GH injection alters hepatic gene expression in the juvenile chicken. Cytogenet Genome Res . 117: 174-188
doi: 10.1159/000103178
21 Wang X, Day J R, Zhou Y, Beard J L, Vasilatos-Younken R (2000). Evidence of a role for neuropeptide Y and monoamines in mediating the appetite-suppressive effect of GH. Journal of Endocrinology , 166: 621-630
doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1660621
22 Yang Y X, Guo J, Yoon S Y, Jin Z, Choi J Y, Piao X S, Kim B W, Ohh S J, Wang M H, Chae B J (2009). Early energy and protein reduction: effects on growth, blood profiles and expression of genes related to protein and fat metabolism in broilers. British Poultry Science , 50(2): 218-227
doi: 10.1080/00071660902736706
23 Yu M W, Robinson F E (1992). The application of short-term feed restriction to broiler chicken production: a review. J Appl Poultry Res , 1: 147-153
24 Zhan X A, Wang M, Ren H, Zhao R Q, Li J X, Tan Z L (2007). Effect of early FR on metabolic programming and compensatory growth in broiler chickens. Poultry Science , 86: 654-660
[1] Baojiang CHEN, Yong WANG, Huimin YU, Qing XU. Effects of aflatoxin-detoxifizyme on growth performance and liver biochemical indices of broilers fed with aflatoxin B1[J]. Front Agric Chin, 2011, 5(4): 594-597.
[2] Aituan MA, Wanyu SHI, Xiaofei NIU, Meng WANG, Xiuhui ZHONG, . Effects of Echinacea purpurea extract on the immunological response to infectious bursal disease vaccine in broilers[J]. Front. Agric. China, 2009, 3(4): 452-456.
[3] Yaodi NI, Xiuhui ZHONG, Haifeng WANG, Li XU, Shupeng WEI. Effects of microbial agents on small intestinal structure and the quantity of cecal microorganisms in broilers[J]. Front Agric Chin, 2009, 3(1): 84-88.
[4] SUN Bin, ZHANG Keying, ZENG Qiufeng, WANG Cairong. Effects of ascites syndrome in broilers on their growth performances and the availability of energy and nutrients[J]. Front. Agric. China, 2007, 1(2): 220-223.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed