Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-0179

ISSN 2095-0187(Online)

CN 11-5981/TQ

Postal Subscription Code 80-969

2018 Impact Factor: 2.809

Front Chem Sci Eng    2012, Vol. 6 Issue (2) : 224-231    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-012-1280-7
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Preparation of hemicellulolic oligosaccharides from Chamaecyparis obtuse (Hinoki) slurry using commercial enzymes
Yuya KUMAGAI1, Hirokazu USUKI1,2, Yukihiro YAMAMOTO1, Akihiro YAMASATO3, Takafumi MUKAIHARA1, Tadashi HATANAKA1()
1. Okayama Prefectural Technology Center for Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Research Institute for Biological Sciences (RIBS), Okayama 716-1241, Japan; 2. Research Fellow of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), Japan; 3. Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan
 Download: PDF(230 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Wood biomass is anticipated to serve as a substitute for carbon source, which has no feedstock competition with foods. Biomass is commonly used for the production of bio-ethanol by a series of processes such as pretreatment, enzymatic degradation, and fermentation. Hemicellulose, constituting 20 wt-% – 40 wt-% of biomass materials, contains various kinds of saccharides known to be bioactive substrates. Practical usage of hemicellulose is generally limited to its conversion to bio-ethanol. Here, we aimed to prepare hemicellulolic oligosaccharides, more valuable products other than ethanol. Therefore, the Hinoki slurry was treated with lime at room temperature for 3 h, and then neutralized with HCl. The resulting sample was treated with 13 types of commercial enzymes, and the saccharides produced in the supernatant were evaluated. The result showed that the commercial enzyme Cellulase SS (Nagase & Co., LTD.) effectively degraded the slurry to produce disaccharides and trisaccharides. Analysis of sugar components by liquid chromatography/mass spectrography (LC/MS) after the derivation with ethyl 4-aminobenzoate (ABEE) showed that mannobiose, mannotriose, and cellobiose were the major oligosaccharides. These results indicate valuable oligosaccharides can be successfully produced from Hinoki softwood slurry.

Keywords hemicellulolic oligosaccharides      Chamaecyparis obtuse (Hinoki)      commercial enzyme      manno-oligosaccharide      cello-oligosaccharide     
Corresponding Author(s): HATANAKA Tadashi,Email:hatanaka@bio-ribs.com   
Issue Date: 05 June 2012
 Cite this article:   
Yuya KUMAGAI,Hirokazu USUKI,Yukihiro YAMAMOTO, et al. Preparation of hemicellulolic oligosaccharides from Chamaecyparis obtuse (Hinoki) slurry using commercial enzymes[J]. Front Chem Sci Eng, 2012, 6(2): 224-231.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/10.1007/s11705-012-1280-7
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/Y2012/V6/I2/224
GlucoseMannoseXyloseArabinoseGalactoseGlucuronicacidGalacturonicacidTotal sugar
Slurry /(g·kg-1)303±6120±446±2109±383±325±218±3702±42
Tab.1  Sugar composition of Hinoki slurry
Enzymes/substrateCMCXylanMannanpNPGlupNPXynpNPArapNPAce
Cellulase Nagase36±340±38±1.41.4±0.50.4±0.020.3±0.030N.D.
Supitase XP-4042.1±0.24±0.215±1N.D.N.D.N.D.N.D.
Cellulase XP-42538±1248±21.4±0.348±31.2±0.3N.D.N.D.
Cellulase XL53121±3182±12N.D.34±316±13.8±0.40N.D.
Cellulase SS45±1239±42.2±0.322±57.9±13.6±0.30N.D.
Cellulosin HC10028±3986±31.2±0.350±21.1±0.34.2±1.10N.D.
Cellulosin TP2546±51464±331.4±0.5204±3103±43.6±0.80N.D.
Cellulosin GM548±4116±2162±796±117±23.2±0.40N.D.
Sumizyme SNX90±3972±12N.D.220±31.5±0.20.8±0.30N.D.
Sumizyme X66±41652±2326±740±26.7±0.40.4±0.02N.D.
Sumizyme ACH32±3248±862±14119±59.7±0.31.2±0.2N.D.
Optimase48±6405±123.2±0.438±42.4±0.80.4±0.07N.D.
a) Average±standard deviation (n = 3); N.D.: not detected
Tab.2  Evaluation of commercial enzymes
Fig.1  Evaluation of sugar productivity.
(a), (b), (c), and (d) showed the results under pretreatment with 0.5 mol?L NaOH, 0.05 mol?L NaOH, 0.25 mol?LCa(OH), and 0.025 mol?L Ca(OH), respectively. Sample numbers are indicated as follows: 1, control (HO); 2, Cellulase Nagase; 3, Supitase XP-404; 4, Cellulase XP-425; 5, Cellulase XL-531; 6, Cellulase SS; 7, Cellulosin HC100; 8, Cellulosin TP25; 9, Cellulosin GM5; 10, Sumizyme SNX; 11, Sumizyme X; 12, Sumizyme ACH; and 13, Optimase. The reaction was performed in 50 mg/mL slurry in addition to 0.5 mg/mL of each enzyme (liquid enzyme solution, above No. 5, 6, and 13, were 0.5% (v/v)) at 200 stroke or 200 rpm, 50°C, and pH 5.0 for 24 h except for optimase. In the case of optimase, pH was adjusted at 7.0. The main activities of these enzymes are listed in Table 2. The sugar (%) indicates total sugar in slurry (100% sugar corresponds to 40 g /57 g solid in slurry). The blank bar, white bar, and dark bar represent total sugar, reducing sugar, and glucose, respectively
Fig.2  Optimization of enzymatic degradation.
The slurry was degraded by a combination of a 0.025 mol?LCa(OH) pretreatment and Cellulase SS. (a), (b), and (c) showed the effects of incubation temperature, enzyme amount, and reaction time on the resultant sugar (%), respectively. The value of 100% of total sugar corresponds to 40 g/57 g solid
Fig.3  Analysis of hydrolysis products by gel filtration.
Hinoki oligosaccharides produced by a combination of 0.025 mol?L Ca(OH) pretreatment and Cellulase SS were separated by HiLoad 26/60 Superdex 30 prep-grade gel filtration chromatography. The samples were eluted at flow rate of 1 mL/min and collected at 8 mL/fraction. The sugar concentration was determined by a phenol-sulfate method using glucose as a standard
Fig.4  Analysis of hydrolysis products by LC/MS.
Analysis of hydrolysis products by LC/MS. The sugars separated by gel filtration were derivatized with ABEE and analyzed by LC/MS equipped with an AQUALITY UPLC BEH C18 column. The samples were eluted as follows: elution buffer, 10% acetonitrile containing 0.1% TFA; flow rate, 0.3 mL/min; and column temperature, 30°C. The eluted sugars were detected by UV absorption at 305 nm and the mass spectrum () ranged between 200 and 1000. The asterisk shows excess reagent ABEE. Symbols used are as follows: X1, xylose; G1, glucose or mannose; G2, cellobiose; M2 mannobiose; M3, mannotriose; H2, unknown hexobiose
1 Nishiyama Y, Johnson G P, French A D, Forsyth V T, Langan P. Neutron crystallography, molecular dynamics, and quantum mechanics studies of the nature of hydrogen bonding in cellulose I beta. Biomacromolecules , 2008, 9(11): 3133–3140
doi: 10.1021/bm800726v
2 Shrestha P, Khanal S K, Pometto A L III, Leeuwen J V. Ethanol production via in situ fungal saccharification and fermentation of mild alkali and steam pretreated corn fiber. Bioresource Technology , 2010, 101: 8698–8705
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.089
3 Cervero J M, Skovgaard P A, Felby C, Sorensen H R, Jorgensen H. Enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation of palm kernel press cake for production of bioethanol. Enzyme and Microbial Technology , 2010, 46(3–4): 177–184
doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2009.10.012
4 Luo X, Zhan H, Chai X S, Fu S, Liu J. A novel method for determination of aromatic aldehyde monomers in lignin degradation liquor. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research , 2009, 48(5): 2713–2716
doi: 10.1021/ie801734n
5 Voitl T, Rohr P R V. Demonstration of a process for the conversion of kraft lignin into vanillin and methyl vanillate by acidic oxidation in aqueous methanol. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research , 2010, 49(2): 520–525
doi: 10.1021/ie901293p
6 Jin Y, Cheng X, Zheng Z. Preparation and characterization of phenol-formaldehyde adhesives modified with enzymatic hydrolysis lignin. Bioresource Technology , 2010, 101(6): 2046–2048
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.09.085
7 Madhavan A, Tamalampudi S, Ushida K, Kanai D, Katahira S, Srivastava A, Fukuda H, Bisaria V S, Kondo A. Xylose isomerase from polycentric fungus Orpinomyces: gene sequencing, cloning, and expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for bioconversion of xylose to ethanol. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology , 2009, 82(6): 1067–1078
doi: 10.1007/s00253-008-1794-6
8 Matsushika A, Inoue H, Kodaki T, Sawayama S. Ethanol production from xylose in engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiaestrains: current state and perspectives. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology , 2009, 84(1): 37–53
doi: 10.1007/s00253-009-2101-x
9 Kabel M A, Kortenoeven L, Schols H A, Voragen A G J. In vitro fermentability of differently substituted xylo-oligosaccharides. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry , 2002, 50(21): 6205–6210
doi: 10.1021/jf020220r
10 Zhao Z, Egashira Y, Sanada H. Digestion and absorption of ferulic acid sugar esters in rat gastrointestinal tract. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry , 2003, 51(18): 5534–5539
doi: 10.1021/jf034455u
11 Bruzzese E, Volpicelli M, Squeglia V, Bruzzese D, Salvini F, Bisceglia M, Lionetti P, Cinquetti M, Lacono G, Amarri S, Guarino A. A formula containing galacto- and fructo-oligosaccharides prevents intestinal and extra-intestinal infections: An observational study. Clinical Nutrition (Edinburgh, Lothian) , 2009, 28(2): 156–161
doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.01.008
12 Kumar P, Barrett D M, Delwiche M J, Stroeve P. Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic baiomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research , 2009, 48(8): 3713–3729
13 Hendriks A T W M, Zeeman G. Pretreatments to enhance the digestilibity of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresource Technology , 2009, 100(1): 10–18
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.05.027
14 Sassner P, Martensson C G, Galbe M, Zacchi G. Steam pretreatment of H2SO4-impregnated Salixfor the production of bioethanol. Bioresource Technology , 2008, 99(1): 137–145
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.11.039
15 Lee S H, Doherty T V, Linhardt R J, Dordick J S. Ionic liquid-mediated selective extraction of lignin from wood leading to enhanced enzymatic cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnology and Bioengineering , 2009, 102(5): 1368–1376
doi: 10.1002/bit.22179
16 Samuel R, Pu Y, Raman B, Ragauskas A J. Structural characterization and comparison of switchgrass ball-milled lignin before and after dilute acid pretreatment. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology , 2009, 162(1): 62–74
doi: 10.1007/s12010-009-8749-y
17 Geddes C C, Peterson J J, Roslander C, Zacchi G, Mullinnix M T, Shanmugam K T, Ingram L O. Optimizing the saccharification of sugar cone bagasse using dilute phosphoric acid followed by fungal cellulases. Bioresource Technology , 2010, 101(6): 1851–1857
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.09.070
18 Gupta R, Lee Y Y. Investigation of biomass degradation mechanism in pretreatment of switchgrass by aqueous ammonia and sodium hydroxide. Bioresource Technology , 2010, 101(21): 8185–8191
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.05.039
19 Wang W T, Ledonne N C Jr, Ackerman B, Sweeley C C. Structural characterization of oligosaccharides by high-performance liquid chromatography, fast-atom bombardment-mass spectrometry, and exoglycosidase digestion. Analytical Biochemistry , 1984, 141(2): 366–381
doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(84)90057-5
20 Yasuno S, Kokubo K, Kamei M. New method for determining the sugar composition of glycoproteins, glycolipids, and oligosaccharides by high-performance liquid chromatography. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry , 1999, 63(8): 1353–1359
doi: 10.1271/bbb.63.1353
21 Miller G L. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Analytical Chemistry , 1959, 31(3): 426–428
doi: 10.1021/ac60147a030
22 Gupta H, Fan L S. Carbonation-calcination cycle using high reactivity calcium oxide for carbon dioxide separation from flue gas. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research , 2002, 41(16): 4035–4042
doi: 10.1021/ie010867l
23 Park J Y, Shiroma R, Al-Haq M I, Zhang Y, Ike M, Arai-Sanoh Y, Ida A, Kondo M, Tokuyasu K. A novel lime pretreatment for subsequent bioethanol production from rice straw-calcium capturing by carbonation (CaCCO) process. Bioresource Technology , 2010, 101(17): 6805–6811
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.098
24 Kumagai Y, Usuki H, Yamamoto Y, Yamasato A, Arima J, Mukaihara T, Hatanaka T. Characterization of calcium ion sensitive region for β-mannanase from Streptomyces thermolilacinus. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta , 2011, 1814(9): 1127–1133
doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2011.04.017
25 Biely P, Mackenzie C R, Puls J, Schneider H. Cooporativity of esterases and xylanases in the enzymatic degradation of acetylxylan. Nature Biotechnology , 1986, 4(8): 731–733
doi: 10.1038/nbt0886-731
26 Johnson K G, Harrison B A, Schneider H, MacKenzie C R, Fontana J D. Xylan-hydrolysing enzymes from Streptomyces spp. Enzyme and Microbial Technology , 1988, 10(7): 403–409
doi: 10.1016/0141-0229(88)90034-8
27 Clarke J H, Davidson K, Rixon J E, Halstead J R, Fransen M P, Gilbert H J, Hazlewood G P. A comparison of enzyme-aided bleaching of softwood paper pulp using combinations of xylanase, mannanase and α-galactosidase. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology , 2000, 53(6): 661–667
doi: 10.1007/s002530000344
28 Janardhana V, Broadway M M, Bruce M, Lowenthal J W, Geier M S, Hughes R J, Bean A G D. Prebiotics modulate immune responses in the gut-associated lymphoid tissue of chickens. Journal of Nutrition , 2009, 139(7): 1404–1409
doi: 10.3945/jn.109.105007
29 Chee S H, Iji P A, Choct M, Mikkelsen L L, Kocher A. Characterisation and response of intestinal microflora and mucins to manno-oligosaccharide and antibiotic supplementation in broiler chickens. British Poultry Science , 2010, 51(3): 368–380
doi: 10.1080/00071668.2010.503477
30 Ibuki M, Kovacs-Nolan J, Fukui K, Kanatani H, Mine Y. β-1–4 Mannobiose enhances Salmonella-killing activity and activates innate immune responses in chicken macrophages. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology , 2011, 139(2–4): 289–295
doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2010.10.011
31 Sanz M L, Gibson G R, Rastall R A. Influence of disaccharide structure on prebiotic selectivity in Vitro. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry , 2005, 53(13): 5192–5199
doi: 10.1021/jf050276w
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed