Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Front Envir Sci Eng    2012, Vol. 6 Issue (5) : 649-657    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-012-0426-7
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Characteristics of pollutants behavior in a stormwater constructed wetland during dry days
Jianghua YU1, Kisoo PARK2, Youngchul KIM2()
1. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China; 2. Department of Environment Engineering, Hanseo University, Seosan 356706, R. O. Korea
 Download: PDF(239 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

A stormwater wetland treating non-point source pollution (NPS) from a 64 ha agricultural watershed was monitored over a period of five months. The results indicated that pH and dissolved oxygen (DO) were increased in the wetland due to the algal growth. The highest total suspended solids (TSS) concentration was observed in the aeration pond due to the resuspension of solids, decreased in the wetland. The respective decreases in total nitrogen (TN) and total kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) were 15.9% and 28.7% on passing through the wetland. The nitrate and ammonia were increased by 45.4% and decreased by 79.9%, respectively. These variations provided strong evidence for the existence of nitrification. The total phosphorus (TP) and phosphate had respective reductions of 52.3% and 58.2% over the wetland. The total chemical oxygen demand (TCOD) and soluble chemical oxygen demand (SCOD) were also decreased. Generally, the TN, TP and phosphate removal efficiencies were positive. These positive removal efficiencies were mainly due to microbial activities, uptake by plants, and chemical precipitation at high pH. Negative removal efficiencies can be caused by continuous rainfall activities, with short antecedent dry days (ADDs) and unstable hydraulic conditions, some other biogeochemical transformations and algal growth also being important parameters.

Keywords constructed stormwater wetland      dry days      nitrification and denitrification      pollutants characteristic     
Corresponding Author(s): KIM Youngchul,Email:ykim@hanseo.ac.kr   
Issue Date: 01 October 2012
 Cite this article:   
Jianghua YU,Kisoo PARK,Youngchul KIM. Characteristics of pollutants behavior in a stormwater constructed wetland during dry days[J]. Front Envir Sci Eng, 2012, 6(5): 649-657.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-012-0426-7
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y2012/V6/I5/649
Fig.1  Sketch of the stormwater wetland
itemforebayaeration pondmarsh wetlandsettling pondtotal (average)
surface area/m228860018922433023
water depth/m1.11.21.41.51.3 (average)
volume/m335170825923734024
macrophytesparsleyphragmitesphragmiteslotus-
Tab.1  Physical characteristics and parameters of the wetland system
itemE1E2E3E4E5E6E7E8E9E10E11E12E13E14E15
ADD4.01.56.08.04.50.52.52.57.53.05.59.06.013.011.0
rainfall depth/mm5881311186242312315710772020
intensity/(mm·h-1)2.32.72.78.76.52.86.07.27.22.61.10.60.61.51.5
Tab.2  Weather information on the day of the monitoring work
Fig.2  Changes in the temperature (a), DO (b), and pH (c)
itemsInfluent concentration /(mg·L-1)effluent concentration /(mg·L-1)removal efficiency/%paired-samples t-test (p-value)Significant difference(p<0.05)
TSS24.4±9.239.3±12.8-87.1±101.60.061N
BOD511.9±7.516.2±6.8-110.2±224.20.226N
TCODa)56.4±45.643.8±13.71.3±38.60.359N
SCODb)35.6±21.115.8±10.559.1±11.70.015Y
ICOD30.4±32.232.8±5.2-156.2±259.10.854N
TN12.0±1.510.0±1.515.9±11.90.544N
TKNc)10.5±347.5±2.428.7±10.40.004Y
NO3--N0.81±0.601.16±1.05-45.4±48.90.018Y
NH4+-N2.87±1.500.41±0.6979.9±28.40.007Y
TP1.62±0.990.69±0.1752.3±12.10.028Y
PO43--P0.64±0.220.29±0.1658.2±13.50.001Y
Tab.3  Pollutant behaviors in the wetland
Fig.3  Changes in the TSS (a) and (b) in the wetland
Fig.4  Changes in and : (a) in the wetland; (b) in the wetland; (c) nitrogen species between the influent and effluent
itemNO3--N/%NH4+-N/%Org.-N/%
influenteffluentinfluenteffluentinfluenteffluent
mean±SD17.2±11.627.8±12.827.5±14.11.6±1.055.3±13.470.6±12.7
Tab.4  Percentages of the nitrogen species between the influent and effluent
Fig.5  Changes of dissolved total nitrogen and particulate total nitrogen in the wetland
Fig.6  Changes of phosphorus concentrations in the wetland: (a) TP and ; (b) DTP and PTP
Fig.7  Total chemical oxygen demand (a), soluble chemical oxygen demand (b), and insoluble chemical oxygen demand (c)
1 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Considerations in the Design of Treatment Best Management Practices (BMPs) to Improve Water Quality. EPA/600/R-03/103. Cincinnati, OH: USEPA, 2000
2 Ouyang Y, Luo S M, Cui L H. Estimation of nitrogen dynamics in a vertical-flow constructed wetland. Ecological Engineering , 2011, 37(3): 453-459
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.11.008
3 Li X, Chen M, Anderson B C. Design and performance of a water quality treatment wetland in a public park in Shanghai, China. Ecological Engineering , 2009, 35(1): 18-24
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.07.007
4 Yi Q, Yu J, Kim Y. Removal patterns of particulate and dissolved forms of pollutants in a stormwater wetland. Water Science & Technology , 2010, 61(8): 2083-2096
doi: 10.2166/wst.2010.159 pmid:20389007
5 Yates C R, Prasher S O. Phosphorus reduction from agricultural runoff in a pilot-scale surface-flow constructed wetland. Ecological Engineering , 2009, 35(12):1693-1701
6 Fink D F, Mitsch W J. Seasonal and storm event nutrient removal by a created wetland in an agricultural watershed. Ecological Engineering , 2004, 23(4-5): 313-325
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2004.11.004
7 Kadlec R H. Pond and wetland treatment. Water Science & Technology , 2003, 48(5): 1-8
pmid:14621141
8 Kadlec R H. Treatment Wetlands. New York: CRC Press, 2009
9 Fink D F, Mitsch W J. Hydrology and nutrient biogeochemistry in a created rive diversion oxbow wetland. Ecological Engineering , 2007, 30(2): 93-102
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.08.008
10 Carleton J N, Grizzard T J, Godrej A N, Post H E. Factors affecting the performance of stormwater treatment wetlands. Water Research , 2001, 35(6): 1552-1562
doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00416-4 pmid:11317903
11 Li Y, Deletic A, Fletcher T D. Modeling wet weather sediment removal by stormwater constructed wetlands: insights from a laboratory study. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam) , 2007, 338(3-4): 285-296
doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.03.001
12 Terzakis S, Fountoulakis M S, Georgaki I, Albantakis D, Sabathianakis I, Karathanasis A, Kalogerakis N, Manios T, Karathanasis A D, Kalogerakis N, Manios T. Constructed wetlands treating highway runoff in the central Mediterranean region. Chomosphere , 2008, 72(2): 141-149
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.02.044
13 Lu S T, Wu F C, Xiang C S, Jin C X. Phosphorus removal from agricultural runoff by constructed wetland. Ecological Engineering , 2009, 35(3): 402-409
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.10.002
14 APHA, AWWA, WEF. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 19th ed. Washington, DC: APHA/AWWA/WEF, 1995
15 Vymazal J. Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands. Science of the Total Environment , 2007, 380(1-3): 48-65
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.09.014 pmid:17078997
16 Bucksteeg K. German experiences with sewage treatment ponds. Water Science & Technology , 1987, 19(12): 17-23
17 Tchobanoglous G, Burton F L, Stensel H D. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse. New York: Mcgraw-Hill, 2003
18 Maltais-Landry G, Maranger R, Brisson J, Chazarenc F. Nitrogen transformations and retention in planted and artificially aerated constructed wetlands. Water Research , 2009, 43(2): 535-545
doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.10.040 pmid:19036399
19 Thorén A K, Legrand C, Tonderski K S. Temporal export of nitrogen from a constructed wetland: influence of hydrology and senescing submerged plants. Ecological Engineering , 2004, 23(4-5): 233-249
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2004.09.007
20 Braskerud B C. Factors affecting nitrogen retention in small constructed wetlands treating agricultural non-point source pollution. Ecological Engineering , 2002, 18(3): 351-370
doi: 10.1016/S0925-8574(01)00099-4
21 Nairn R W, Mitsch W J. Phosphorus removal in created wetland ponds receiving river overflow. Ecological Engineering , 1999, 14(1-2): 107-126
doi: 10.1016/S0925-8574(99)00023-3
22 Adey W H, Luckett C, Jensen K. Phosphorus removal from natural waters using controlled algal production. Restoration Ecology , 1993, 1(1): 29-39
doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.1993.tb00006.x
[1] Zhenfeng Han, Ying Miao, Jing Dong, Zhiqiang Shen, Yuexi Zhou, Shan Liu, Chunping Yang. Enhanced nitrogen removal and microbial analysis in partially saturated constructed wetland for treating anaerobically digested swine wastewater[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(4): 52-.
[2] Shijian GE, Yongzhen PENG, Congcong LU, Shuying WANG. Practical consideration for design and optimization of the step feed process[J]. Front Envir Sci Eng, 2013, 7(1): 135-142.
[3] WANG Fang, YANG Fenglin, QI Aijiu. Nitrifying and denitrifying bacteria in aerobic granules formed in sequencing batch airlift reactors[J]. Front.Environ.Sci.Eng., 2007, 1(2): 184-189.
[4] LI Jun, GU Guowei, PENG Yongzhen, WEI Su. Factors affecting simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in an SBBR treating domestic wastewater[J]. Front.Environ.Sci.Eng., 2007, 1(2): 246-250.
[5] ZHANG Peng, ZHOU Qi. Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in activated sludge system under low oxygen concentration[J]. Front.Environ.Sci.Eng., 2007, 1(1): 49-52.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed