Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng.    2019, Vol. 13 Issue (4) : 52    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-019-1133-4
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Enhanced nitrogen removal and microbial analysis in partially saturated constructed wetland for treating anaerobically digested swine wastewater
Zhenfeng Han1,2, Ying Miao3, Jing Dong4, Zhiqiang Shen1(), Yuexi Zhou1(), Shan Liu3, Chunping Yang2
1. State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
2. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hunan University and Key Laboratory of Environmental Biology and Pollution Control (Hunan University), Ministry of Education, Changsha 410082, China
3. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710061, China
4. Beijing Municipal Research Institute of Environmental Protection, Beijing 100037, China
 Download: PDF(1088 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Anaerobically digested swine wastewater was treated by a novel constructed wetland.

Tidal operation was better for total nitrogen removal than intermittent flow.

Mechanism of nitrogen removal by biozeolite-based constructed wetland was discussed.

Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification were determined in zeolite layer.

Nitrogen removal of wastewater containing high-strength ammonium by the constructed wetlands (CWs) has been paid much attention. In this study, the ability of a partially saturated CW to treat anaerobically-digested decentralized swine wastewater under varying operating parameters from summer to winter was investigated. The partially saturated CW achieved better NH4+-N and TN removal by tidal flow than intermittent flow. With surface loading rates of 0.108, 0.027, and 0.029 kg/(m2·d) for COD, NH4+-N, and TN, the partially saturated CW by tidal operation achieved corresponding removal efficiencies of 85.94%, 61.20%, and 57.41%, respectively, even at 10°C. When the rapid-adsorption of NH4+-N and the bioregeneration of zeolites reached dynamically stable, the simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in the aerobic zeolite layer was observed and accounted for 58.82% of the total denitrification of CW. The results of Illumina high-throughput sequencing also indicated that nitrifiers (Nitrospira and Rhizomicrobium) and denitrifiers (Rhodanobacter and Thauera) simultaneously existed in the zeolite layer. The dominant existence of versatile organic degraders and nitrifiers/denitrifiers in the zeolite layer was related to the removal of most COD and nitrogen in this zone. The contribution of the possible nitrogen removal pathways in the CW was as follows: nitrification-denitrification (86.55%)>substrate adsorption (11.70%)>plant uptake (1.15%)>microbial assimilation (0.60%).

Keywords Constructed wetland      Decentralized swine wastewater      Biozeolite      Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification      Nitrogen removal pathway     
Corresponding Author(s): Zhiqiang Shen,Yuexi Zhou   
Issue Date: 06 May 2019
 Cite this article:   
Zhenfeng Han,Ying Miao,Jing Dong, et al. Enhanced nitrogen removal and microbial analysis in partially saturated constructed wetland for treating anaerobically digested swine wastewater[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(4): 52.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-019-1133-4
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y2019/V13/I4/52
Fig.1  Schematic configuration of partially saturated CW (all the values in mm).
Fig.2  Performances of the CW (a) COD, (b) ammonium, (c) oxidized nitrogen in effluent, (d) TN.
Fig.3  ORPs at different depths in the zeolite layer
Nitrogen species Amount (g)
NH4+-N removed in the CW 137.25
Effluent NOx?-N from the ZL 66.65
Nitrogen denitrified in ZL 70.60
Nitrogen denitrified in the whole CW 120.02
Tab.1  The amount of nitrogen in the CW in phase 2
Nitrogen removal pathways The amount of TN removed (g) Fraction (%)
Substrate adsorption 239.51 11.70
Plant uptake 23.54 1.15
Microbial assimilation 12.25 0.60
Nitrification-denitrification 1771.17 86.55
Tab.2  Fractions of possible nitrogen removal pathways
Fig.4  Microbial composition at the phylum level.
Fig.5  Microbial composition at the genus level.
1 PArroyo, L E Saenz, G Ansola (2015). Influence of environmental variables on the structure and composition of soil bacterial communities in natural and constructed wetlands. Science of the Total Environment, 506: 380–390
2 JCardinali-Rezende, Z LPereira, J LSanz, EChartone-Souza, A MNascimento (2012). Bacterial and archaeal phylogenetic diversity associated with swine sludge from an anaerobic treatment lagoon. World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 28: 3187–3195
3 CChen, X J Xu, P Xie, YYuan, XZhou, A J Wang, D J Lee, N Q Ren (2017). Pyrosequencing reveals microbial community dynamics in integrated simultaneous desulfurization and denitrification process at different influent nitrate concentrations. Chemosphere, 171: 294–301
4 YChen, Y Wen, QZhou, JVymazal (2014). Effects of plant biomass on nitrogen transformation in subsurface-batch constructed wetlands: A stable isotope and mass balance assessment. Water Research, 63: 158–167
5 CCheng, H Xie, EYang, XShen, P Dai, JZhang (2016). Nutrient removal and microbial mechanisms in constructed wetland microcosms treating high nitrate/nitrite polluted river water. RSC Advances, 75: 70848–70854
6 JCheng, Y Chen, THe, RLiao, R Liu, MYi, LHuang, ZYang, T Fu, XLi (2017). Soil nitrogen leaching decreases as biogas slurry DOC/N ratio increases. Applied Soil Ecology, 111: 105–113
7 YHu, Y Zhao, ARymszewicz (2014). Robust biological nitrogen removal by creating multiple tides in a single bed tidal flow constructed wetland. Science of the Total Environment, 470–471: 1197–1204
8 XHuang, W Dong, HWang, SJiang (2017a). Biological nutrient removal and molecular biological characteristics in an anaerobic-multistage anaerobic/oxic (A-MAO) process to treat municipal wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 241: 969–978
9 XHuang, J Zheng, CLiu, LLiu, Y Liu, HFan, TZhang (2017b). Performance and bacterial community dynamics of vertical flow constructed wetlands during the treatment of antibiotics-enriched swine wastewater. Chemical Engineering Journal, 316: 727–735
10 MJetten, L V Niftrik , M, Strous B, Kartal J K, Keltjens H Op den Camp (2009). Biochemistry and molecular biology of anammox bacteria. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 44(2–3): 65–84
11 J YJung, Y C Chung, H S Shin, D H Son (2004). Enhanced ammonia nitrogen removal using consistent biological regeneration and ammonium exchange of zeoite in modified SBR process. Water Research, 38: 347–354
12 TKindaichi, S Yamaoka, RUehara, NOzaki, AOhashi, MAlbertsen, P HNielsen, J LNielsen (2016). Phylogenetic diversity and ecophysiology of Candidate phylum Saccharibacteria in activated sludge. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 92(6): fiw078
13 R LKnight, V W E P Jr, R E Borer, R A C Jr, J H Pries (2000). Constructed wetlands for livestock wastewater management. Ecological Engineering, 15: 41–55
14 CKyongmi, K Yunah, N IChang, CJaeweon, OKedem, MWilf (2015). Evaluating wastewater stabilizing constructed wetland, through diversity and abundance of the nitrite reductase gene nirS, with regard to nitrogen control. Desalination, 264(3): 201–205
15 SLee, M C Maniquiz-Redillas, J Choi, L HKim (2014). Nitrogen mass balance in a constructed wetland treating piggery wastewater effluent. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 26(6): 1260–1266
16 XLi, M Zhang, FLiu, LChen, Y Li, YLi, RXiao, J Wu (2017). Seasonality distribution of the abundance and activity of nitrification and denitrification microorganisms in sediments of surface flow constructed wetlands planted with Myriophyllum elatinoides during swine wastewater treatment. Bioresoure Technology, 248(Part B): 89–97
17 MLiu, S Wu, LChen, RDong (2014). How substrate influences nitrogen transformations in tidal flow constructed wetlands treating high ammonium wastewater? Ecological Engineering, 73: 478–486
18 RLiu, Y Zhao, LDoherty, YHu, X Hao (2015). A review of incorporation of constructed wetland with other treatment processes. Chemical Engineering Journal, 279: 220–230
19 LLuo, H He, CYang, SWen, G Zeng, MWu, ZZhou, W Lou (2016). Nutrient removal and lipid production by Coelastrella sp. in anaerobically and aerobically treated swine wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 216: 135–141
20 WLuo, C Yang, HHe, GZeng, S Yan, YCheng (2014). Novel two-stage vertical flow biofilter system for efficient treatment of decentralized domestic wastewater. Ecological Engineering, 64: 415–423
21 N BMartínez, ATejeda, ADel Toro, M PSánchez, FZurita (2018). Nitrogen removal in pilot-scale partially saturated vertical wetlands with and without an internal source of carbon. Science of the Total Environment, 645: 524–532
22 JMeng, J Li, JLi, KSun, P Antwi, KDeng, CWang, G Buelna (2016). Efficiency and bacterial populations related to pollutant removal in an upflow microaerobic sludge reactor treating manure-free piggery wastewater with low COD/TN ratio. Bioresource Technology, 201: 166–173
23 CPelissari, M Guivernau, M,Vinas J, Garcia M,Velasco, S S, Souza P H Sezerino,, C Avila(2018). Effects of partially saturated conditions on the metabolically active microbiome and on nitrogen removal in vertical subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Water Research, 141: 185–195
24 SPrigent, J Paing, YAndres, FChazarenc (2013). Effects of a saturated layer and recirculation on nitrogen treatment performances of a single stage Vertical Flow Constructed Wetland (VFCW). Water Science and Technology, 68(7): 1461–1467
25 NRemmas, P Melidis, IZerva, J BKristoffersen, SNikolaki, GTsiamis, SNtougias (2017b). Dominance of candidate Saccharibacteria in a membrane bioreactor treating medium age landfill leachate: Effects of organic load on microbial communities, hydrolytic potential and extracellular polymeric substances. Bioresource Technology, 238: 48–56
26 TSaeed, G Sun (2017). Pollutant removals employing unsaturated and partially saturated vertical flow wetlands: A comparative study. Chemical Engineering Journal, 325: 332–341
27 D DSilveira, P B Filho, L S Philippi, B Kim, PMolle (2015). Influence of partial saturation on total nitrogen removal in a single-stage French constructed wetland treating raw domestic wastewater. Ecological Engineering, 77: 257–264
28 State Environmental Protection Administration of China (SEPA) (2002). Monitoring and Analysis Methods of Water and Wastewater, 4th ed. China Environtal Science Press, Beijing
29 JVymazal (2007). Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands. Science of the Total Environment, 380: 48–65
30 XWang, S Du, TYa, ZShen, J Dong, XZhu (2019). Removal of tetrachlorobisphenol and the effects on bacterial communities in a hybrid sequencing biofilm batch reactor-constructed wetland system. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 13(1): 14
31 YWen, X U Chao, G Liu, YChen, QZhou (2012). Enhanced nitrogen removal reliability and efficiency in integrated constructed wetland microcosms using zeolite. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 6(1): 140–147
32 JWu, R G Joergensen, B Pommerening, RChaussod, P CBrookes (1990). Measurement of soil microbial biomass C by fumigation-extraction-an automated procedure. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 22(8): 1167–1169
33 QYang, P Xiong, PDing, LChu, J Wang (2015). Treatment of petrochemical wastewater by microaerobic hydrolysis and anoxic/oxic processes and analysis of bacterial diversity. Bioresource Technology, 196: 169–175
34 GYu, H Peng, YFu, XYan, C Du, HChen (2019). Enhanced nitrogen removal of low C/N wastewater in constructed wetlands with co-immobilizing solid carbon source and denitrifying bacteria. Bioresource Technology, 280: 337–344
35 TZhang, M F Shao, L Ye (2012). 454 pyrosequencing reveals bacterial diversity of activated sludge from 14 sewage treatment plants. ISME Journal, 6: 1137–1147
36 WZhang, Z Zhou, YAn, SDu, D Ruan, CZhao, NRen, X Tian (2017). Optimization for zeolite regeneration and nitrogen removal performance of a hypochlorite-chloride regenerant. Chemosphere, 178: 565–572
37 WZhang, Q Lei, Z Li, HHan (2016).Temporal variation of nitrogen balance within constructed wetlands treating slightly polluted water using a stable nitrogen isotope experiment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 23: 2677–2683
38 YZhang, Y Cheng, CYang, WLuo, G Zeng, LLu (2015). Performance of system consisting of vertical flow trickling filter and horizontal flow multi-soil-layering reactor for treatment of rural wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 193: 424–432
39 WZhi, G Ji (2014). Quantitative response relationships between nitrogen transformation rates and nitrogen functional genes in a tidal flow constructed wetland under C/N ratio constraints. Water Research, 64: 32–41
40 ZZhong, X Wu, LGao, XLu, B Zhang (2016). Efficient and microbial communities for pollutant removal in a distributed-inflow biological reactor (DBR) for treating piggery wastewater. RSC Advances, 98: 95987–95998
[1] Weichuan Qiao, Rong Li, Tianhao Tang, Achuo Anitta Zuh. Removal, distribution and plant uptake of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) in a simulated constructed wetland system[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(2): 20-.
[2] Wenrui Guo, Yue Wen, Yi Chen, Qi Zhou. Sulfur cycle as an electron mediator between carbon and nitrate in a constructed wetland microcosm[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(4): 57-.
[3] Xiaohui Wang, Shuai Du, Tao Ya, Zhiqiang Shen, Jing Dong, Xiaobiao Zhu. Removal of tetrachlorobisphenol A and the effects on bacterial communities in a hybrid sequencing biofilm batch reactor-constructed wetland system[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(1): 14-.
[4] Yonghua CHEN, Xiaofu WU, Mingli CHEN, Kelin LI, Jing PENG, Peng ZHAN. Decontamination efficiency and root structure change in the plant-intercropping model in vertical-flow constructed wetlands[J]. Front Envir Sci Eng, 2013, 7(6): 906-912.
[5] Shijian GE, Yongzhen PENG, Congcong LU, Shuying WANG. Practical consideration for design and optimization of the step feed process[J]. Front Envir Sci Eng, 2013, 7(1): 135-142.
[6] Yue WEN, Chao XU, Gang LIU, Yi CHEN, Qi ZHOU. Enhanced nitrogen removal reliability and efficiency in integrated constructed wetland microcosms using zeolite[J]. Front Envir Sci Eng, 2012, 6(1): 140-147.
[7] Juan WU, Jian ZHANG, Wenlin JIA, Huijun XIE, Bo ZHANG. Relationships of nitrous oxide fluxes with water quality parameters in free water surface constructed wetlands[J]. Front Envir Sci Eng Chin, 2009, 3(2): 241-247.
[8] ZHANG Jian, Lu Yifeng, JING Yuming, ZHANG Bo, ZHANG Chenglu, MENG Fei, ZHANG Huayong. Ecological assessment of lakeshore wetland rehabilitation on eastern route of South-to-North Water Transfer Project[J]. Front.Environ.Sci.Eng., 2008, 2(3): 306-310.
[9] ZHANG Rongshe, LI Guanghe, ZHANG Xu, ZHOU Qi. Relationships between loading rates and nitrogen removal effectiveness in subsurface flow constructed wetlands[J]. Front.Environ.Sci.Eng., 2008, 2(1): 89-93.
[10] WANG Fang, YANG Fenglin, QI Aijiu. Nitrifying and denitrifying bacteria in aerobic granules formed in sequencing batch airlift reactors[J]. Front.Environ.Sci.Eng., 2007, 1(2): 184-189.
[11] LI Jun, GU Guowei, PENG Yongzhen, WEI Su. Factors affecting simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in an SBBR treating domestic wastewater[J]. Front.Environ.Sci.Eng., 2007, 1(2): 246-250.
[12] ZHANG Peng, ZHOU Qi. Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in activated sludge system under low oxygen concentration[J]. Front.Environ.Sci.Eng., 2007, 1(1): 49-52.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed