Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng.    2019, Vol. 13 Issue (1) : 14    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-019-1097-4
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Removal of tetrachlorobisphenol A and the effects on bacterial communities in a hybrid sequencing biofilm batch reactor-constructed wetland system
Xiaohui Wang1, Shuai Du1, Tao Ya1, Zhiqiang Shen2, Jing Dong3, Xiaobiao Zhu1()
1. 1Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, College of Chemical Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China
2. 2State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
3. 3Beijing Municipal Research Institute of Environmental Protection, Beijing 100037, China
 Download: PDF(1212 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

SBBR-CW system was proposed to effectively treat wastewater containing TCBPA.

CW unit contributed more than SBBR to the removal of TCBPA.

TCBPA changed the composition and structure of bacterial community in the system.

GAOs massively grew in SBBR, but did not deteriorate TP removal efficiency.

Tetrachlorobisphenol A (TCBPA) released into the sewage may cause environmental pollution and health risk to human beings. The objective of this study was to investigate the removal of TCBPA and bacterial community structures in a laboratory-scale hybrid sequencing biofilm batch reactor (SBBR)-constructed wetland (CW) system. The results showed that the removal efficiency of chemical oxidation demand (COD), ammonia, total nitrogen and total phosphorus in the SBBR-CW system was 96.7%, 97.3%, 94.4%, and 88.6%, respectively. At the stable operation stage, the system obtained a 71.7%±1.8% of TCBPA removal efficiency with the influent concentration at 200 mg/L. Illumina MiSeq sequencing of 16S rRNA gene revealed that the presence of TCBPA not only reduced the bacterial diversity in the SBBR-CW system, but also altered the composition and structure of bacterial community. After the addition of TCBPA, Proteobacteria increased from 31.3% to 38.7%, while Acidobacteria and Parcubacteria decreased greatly in the SBBR. In contrast, Acidobacteria replaced Proteobacteria as the dominant phylum in the upper soils of CW. The results indicated that TCBPA stimulated the growth of GAOs in the SBBR without deteriorating the phosphorus removal due to the presence of sufficient carbon sources. The ammonia oxidizing bacteria, Nitrosomonas, and denitrification bacteria, Hyphomicrobium and Pseudomonas, were inhibited by TCBPA, resulting in a decreasing the removal efficiency of TN and ammonia.

Keywords SBBR      Constructed wetland      Tetrachlorobisphenol A      Microbial community structure     
Corresponding Author(s): Xiaobiao Zhu   
Issue Date: 18 December 2018
 Cite this article:   
Xiaohui Wang,Shuai Du,Tao Ya, et al. Removal of tetrachlorobisphenol A and the effects on bacterial communities in a hybrid sequencing biofilm batch reactor-constructed wetland system[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(1): 14.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-019-1097-4
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y2019/V13/I1/14
Fig.1  Diagrammatic  sketch of the hybrid SBBR-CW process. 1-Sludge discharger; 2-Pump; 3-Air blower; 4-Carbon fiber; 5-Heater rod; 6-DO detector; 7-Pump; 8- Ceramsite; 9-Gravel; 10-Zeolite; 11-Natural soil; 12-Plants.
Fig.2  The  removal of (a) COD, (b) TN, (c) NH3-N and (d) TP in the SBBR-CW hybrid system. The dash line indicated that TCBPA was added on the 20th day.
Fig.3  The  removal of TCBPA in the hybrid SBBR-CW system.
Samples No. of sequences No. of OTUs Ace Chao Shannon–Wiener Coverage/%
F 30462 732 857 881 5.08 99.44
S 42615 1705 1830 1888 6.53 99.23
C 33376 1450 1571 1583 5.91 99.25
F* 30757 641 750 795 4.80 99.47
S* 42181 1574 1714 1741 6.41 99.29
C* 39173 1598 1728 1735 6.18 99.30
Tab.1  Changes of the alpha-diversity indices of the bacterial community. The OTUs were defined based on a sequence similarity of 97%
Fig.4  The  variation of (a) bacterial phyla and (b) classes in Proteobacteria before and after the addition of TCBPA.
Fig.5  The  heatmap of major bacterial genera in the hybrid SBBR-CW system.
Species F S C F* S* C*
Nitrosomonas 0.080 0.049 0.004 0.083 0.006 0.003
Nitrospira 3.379 3.657 0.812 3.062 5.232 0.839
Hyphomicrobium 0.212 0.255 1.750 0.055 0.137 1.906
Pseudomonas 0.046 0.640 0.927 0.007 0.333 0.206
Denitratisoma 1.152 0.003 0.000 0.739 0.268 0.000
Thiobacillus 0.057 0.003 0.013 0.016 0.131 0.029
Rhodobacter 0.053 0.222 0.095 0.007 0.013 0.127
Tab.2  Relative  distribution of species contributing to nitrification and denitrification in 6 samples
1 APHA AWWA, WEF (1998). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 20th ed. Washington: American Public Health Association
2 D MArias, E Uggetti, M J García-Galán, J García (2017). Cultivation and selection of cyanobacteria in a closed photobioreactor used for secondary effluent and digestate treatment. Science of the Total Environment, 587-588: 157–167
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.097 pmid: 28238436
3 VAruoja, M Sihtmäe, H CDubourguier, AKahru (2011). Toxicity of 58 substituted anilines and phenols to algae Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata and bacteria Vibrio fischeri: Comparison with published data and QSARs. Chemosphere, 84(10): 1310–1320
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.05.023 pmid: 21664645
4 MCarvalheira, A Oehmen, GCarvalho, MEusébio, M A MReis (2014a). The impact of aeration on the competition between polyphosphate accumulating organisms and glycogen accumulating organisms. Water Research, 66: 296–307
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.08.033 pmid: 25222333
5 MCarvalheira, A Oehmen, GCarvalho, M A MReis (2014b). Survival strategies of polyphosphate accumulating organisms and glycogen accumulating organisms under conditions of low organic loading. Bioresource Technology, 172: 290–296
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.09.059 pmid: 25270044
6 B VChang, J H Liu, C S Liao (2014). Aerobic degradation of bisphenol-A and its derivatives in river sediment. Environmental Technology, 35(1-4): 416–424
https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2013.831111 pmid: 24600882
7 MChen, Z Fan, FZhao, FGao, D Mu, YZhou, HShen, J Hu (2016). Occurrence and maternal transfer of chlorinated bisphenol A and nonylphenol in pregnant women and their matching embryos. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(2): 970–977
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04130 pmid: 26691760
8 G RCrocetti, J F Banfield, J Keller, P LBond, L LBlackall (2002). Glycogen-accumulating organisms in laboratory-scale and full-scale wastewater treatment processes. Microbiology, 148(Pt 11): 3353–3364
https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-148-11-3353 pmid: 12427927
9 GGe, J Zhao, AChen, BHu, Y Chen, KGao, XLi, X Ding (2018). Nitrogen removal and nitrous oxide emission in an anaerobic/oxic/anoxic sequencing biofilm batch reactor. Environmental Engineering Science, 35(1): 19–26
https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2016.0453
10 SHorikoshi, T Miura, MKajitani, NHorikoshi, NSerpone (2008). Photodegradation of tetrahalobisphenol-A (X= Cl, Br) flame retardants and delineation of factors affecting the process. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 84(3–4): 797–802
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2008.06.023
11 ZHu, R A Ferraina, J F Ericson, A A Mackay, B F Smets (2005). Biomass characteristics in three sequencing batch reactors treating a wastewater containing synthetic organic chemicals. Water Research, 39(4): 710–720
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.11.018 pmid: 15707644
12 YMao, Y Xia, TZhang (2013). Characterization of Thauera-dominated hydrogen-oxidizing autotrophic denitrifying microbial communities by using high-throughput sequencing. Bioresource Technology, 128: 703–710
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.106 pmid: 23247099
13 SMcIlroy, R J Seviour (2009). Elucidating further phylogenetic diversity among the Defluviicoccus-related glycogen-accumulating organisms in activated sludge. Environmental Microbiology Reports, 1(6): 563–568
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-2229.2009.00082.x pmid: 23765935
14 S JMcIlroy, M Albertsen, E KAndresen, A MSaunders, RKristiansen, MStokholm-Bjerregaard, K LNielsen, P HNielsen (2014). ‘Candidatus Competibacter’-lineage genomes retrieved from metagenomes reveal functional metabolic diversity. ISME Journal, 8(3): 613–624
https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.162 pmid: 24173461
15 LMiao, Q Zhang, SWang, BLi, Z Wang, SZhang, MZhang, YPeng (2018). Characterization of EPS compositions and microbial community in an Anammox SBBR system treating landfill leachate. Bioresource Technology, 249: 108–116
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.151 pmid: 29040843
16 J MMolina-Molina, EAmaya, MGrimaldi, J MSáenz, MReal, M F Fernández, PBalaguer, NOlea (2013). In vitro study on the agonistic and antagonistic activities of bisphenol-S and other bisphenol-A congeners and derivatives via nuclear receptors. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 272(1): 127–136
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2013.05.015 pmid: 23714657
17 JPhilips, P J Haest, D Springael, ESmolders (2013). Inhibition of Geobacter dechlorinators at elevated trichloroethene concentrations is explained by a reduced activity rather than by an enhanced cell decay. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(3): 1510–1517
pmid: 23281888
18 ARiu, A le Maire, MGrimaldi, MAudebert, AHillenweck, WBourguet, PBalaguer, DZalko (2011). Characterization of novel ligands of ERa, Erb, and PPARg: the case of halogenated bisphenol A and their conjugated metabolites. Toxicological Sciences, 122(2): 372–382
https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfr132 pmid: 21622942
19 ZRonen, A Abeliovich (2000). Anaerobic-aerobic process for microbial degradation of tetrabromobisphenol A. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66(6): 2372–2377
https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.6.2372-2377.2000 pmid: 10831413
20 FRosenkranz, L Cabrol, MCarballa, ADonoso-Bravo, LCruz, G Ruiz-Filippi, RChamy, J MLema (2013). Relationship between phenol degradation efficiency and microbial community structure in an anaerobic SBR. Water Research, 47(17): 6739–6749
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.09.004 pmid: 24083853
21 USellström, J Bo (1995). Analysis of tetrabromobisphenol A in a product and environmental samples. Chemosphere, 31(4): 3085–3092
https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-6535(95)00167-7
22 M ISimon, R J Seviour (2009). Elucidating further phylogenetic diversity among the Defluviicoccus-related glycogen-accumulating organisms in activated sludge. Environmental Microbiology Reports, 1(6): 563–568
23 MSingh, R K Srivastava (2011). Sequencing batch reactor technology for biological wastewater treatment: A review. Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering, 6(1): 3–13
https://doi.org/10.1002/apj.490
24 MSong, D Liang, YLiang, MChen, F Wang, HWang, GJiang (2014). Assessing developmental toxicity and estrogenic activity of halogenated bisphenol A on zebrafish (Danio rerio). Chemosphere, 112: 275–281
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.04.084 pmid: 25048916
25 ESpieck, C Hartwig, IMcCormack, FMaixner, MWagner, ALipski, HDaims (2006). Selective enrichment and molecular characterization of a previously uncultured Nitrospira-like bacterium from activated sludge. Environmental Microbiology, 8(3): 405–415
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00905.x pmid: 16478447
26 HSun, O X Shen, X R Wang, L Zhou, S QZhen, X DChen (2009). Anti-thyroid hormone activity of bisphenol A, tetrabromobisphenol A and tetrachlorobisphenol A in an improved reporter gene assay. Toxicology In Vitro, 23(5): 950–954
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2009.05.004 pmid: 19457453
27 C CTang, Y Tian, HLiang, WZuo, Z W Wang, J Zhang, Z WHe (2018). Enhanced nitrogen and phosphorus removal from domestic wastewater via algae-assisted sequencing batch biofilm reactor. Bioresource Technology, 250: 185–190
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.11.028 pmid: 29172182
28 MTerasaki, K Kosaka, SKunikane, MMakino, FShiraishi (2011). Assessment of thyroid hormone activity of halogenated bisphenol A using a yeast two-hybrid assay. Chemosphere, 84(10): 1527–1530
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.04.045 pmid: 21550628
29 CThomsen, E Lundanes, GBecher (2015). A simplified method for determination of tetrabromobisphenol A and polybrominated diphenyl ethers in human plasma and serum. Journal of Separation Science, 24(4): 282–290
https://doi.org/10.1002/1615-9314(20010401)24:4<282::AID-JSSC282>3.0.CO;2-D
30 YYang, L Lu, JZhang, YYang, Y Wu, BShao (2014). Simultaneous determination of seven bisphenols in environmental water and solid samples by liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography. A, 1328: 26–34
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2013.12.074 pmid: 24411090
31 YYang, L Zhang, JCheng, SZhang, XLi, Y Peng (2018). Microbial community evolution in partial nitritation/anammox process: From sidestream to mainstream. Bioresource Technology, 251: 327–333
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.12.079 pmid: 29289877
32 GYe, Y Chen, H OWang, TYe, Y Lin, QHuang, YChi, S Dong (2016). Metabolomics approach reveals metabolic disorders and potential biomarkers associated with the developmental toxicity of tetrabromobisphenol A and tetrachlorobisphenol A. Scientific Reports, 6(1): 35257
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35257 pmid: 27734936
33 NYin, S Liang, SLiang, RYang, B Hu, ZQin, ALiu, F Faiola (2018). TBBPA and its alternatives disturb the early stages of neural development by interfering with the NOTCH and WNT pathways. Environmental Science & Technology, 52(9): 5459–5468
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00414 pmid: 29608295
34 S YYuan, S J Chen, B V Chang (2011). Anaerobic degradation of tetrachlorobisphenol-A in river sediment. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 65(1): 185–190
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2010.11.001
35 R JZeng, M C van Loosdrecht, Z Yuan, JKeller (2003). Metabolic model for glycogen-accumulating organisms in anaerobic/aerobic activated sludge systems. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 81(1): 92–105
https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.10455 pmid: 12432585
36 JZhang, S C Liu, L L Li, Y Ren, C HFeng, C HWei, Y PLi, Z LHuang (2017). Anaerobic dechlorination of tetrachlorobisphenol A in river sediment and associated changes in bacterial communities. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 228(2): 78
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-017-3254-3
37 TZhang, Y Liu, H H PFang (2005). Effect of pH change on the performance and microbial community of enhanced biological phosphate removal process. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 92(2): 173–182
https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.20589 pmid: 15962340
38 YZhang, J Cong, HLu, GLi, Y Qu, XSu, JZhou, D Li (2014). Community structure and elevational diversity patterns of soil Acidobacteria. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 26(8): 1717–1724
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2014.06.012 pmid: 25108728
39 DZheng, Q Chang, MGao, ZShe, C Jin, LGuo, YZhao, S Wang, XWang (2016). Performance evaluation and microbial community of a sequencing batch biofilm reactor (SBBR) treating mariculture wastewater at different chlortetracycline concentrations. Journal of Environmental Management, 182: 496–504
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.003 pmid: 27526087
[1] FSE-19005-OF-WXH_suppl_1 Download
[1] Weichuan Qiao, Rong Li, Tianhao Tang, Achuo Anitta Zuh. Removal, distribution and plant uptake of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) in a simulated constructed wetland system[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(2): 20-.
[2] Wenrui Guo, Yue Wen, Yi Chen, Qi Zhou. Sulfur cycle as an electron mediator between carbon and nitrate in a constructed wetland microcosm[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(4): 57-.
[3] Yuhan Zheng, Zhiguo Su, Tianjiao Dai, Feifei Li, Bei Huang, Qinglin Mu, Chuanping Feng, Donghui Wen. Identifying human-induced influence on microbial community: A comparative study in the effluent-receiving areas in Hangzhou Bay[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(6): 90-.
[4] Zhenfeng Han, Ying Miao, Jing Dong, Zhiqiang Shen, Yuexi Zhou, Shan Liu, Chunping Yang. Enhanced nitrogen removal and microbial analysis in partially saturated constructed wetland for treating anaerobically digested swine wastewater[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(4): 52-.
[5] Yonglei Wang, Baozhen Liu, Kefeng Zhang, Yongjian Liu, Xuexin Xu, Junqi Jia. Investigate of in situ sludge reduction in sequencing batch biofilm reactor: Performances, mechanisms and comparison of different carriers[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(5): 5-.
[6] Zechong Guo, Lei Gao, Ling Wang, Wenzong Liu, Aijie Wang. Enhanced methane recovery and exoelectrogen-methanogen evolution from low-strength wastewater in an up-flow biofilm reactor with conductive granular graphite fillers[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(4): 13-.
[7] Liguo Zhang, Qiaoying Ban, Jianzheng Li. Microbial community dynamics at high organic loading rates revealed by pyrosequencing during sugar refinery wastewater treatment in a UASB reactor[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(4): 4-.
[8] Jiaxuan YANG, Jun MA, Dan SONG, Xuedong ZHAI, Xiujuan KONG. Impact of preozonation on the bioactivity and biodiversity of subsequent biofilters under low temperature conditions—A pilot study[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(4): 5-.
[9] Yonghua CHEN, Xiaofu WU, Mingli CHEN, Kelin LI, Jing PENG, Peng ZHAN. Decontamination efficiency and root structure change in the plant-intercropping model in vertical-flow constructed wetlands[J]. Front Envir Sci Eng, 2013, 7(6): 906-912.
[10] Hongjing LI, Mengli HAO, Jingxian LIU, Chen CHEN, Zhengqiu FAN, Xiangrong WANG. Effect of pH on biologic degradation of Microcystis aeruginosa by alga-lysing bacteria in sequencing batch biofilm reactors[J]. Front Envir Sci Eng, 2012, 6(2): 224-230.
[11] Yue WEN, Chao XU, Gang LIU, Yi CHEN, Qi ZHOU. Enhanced nitrogen removal reliability and efficiency in integrated constructed wetland microcosms using zeolite[J]. Front Envir Sci Eng, 2012, 6(1): 140-147.
[12] Juan WU, Jian ZHANG, Wenlin JIA, Huijun XIE, Bo ZHANG. Relationships of nitrous oxide fluxes with water quality parameters in free water surface constructed wetlands[J]. Front Envir Sci Eng Chin, 2009, 3(2): 241-247.
[13] ZHANG Jian, Lu Yifeng, JING Yuming, ZHANG Bo, ZHANG Chenglu, MENG Fei, ZHANG Huayong. Ecological assessment of lakeshore wetland rehabilitation on eastern route of South-to-North Water Transfer Project[J]. Front.Environ.Sci.Eng., 2008, 2(3): 306-310.
[14] ZHANG Rongshe, LI Guanghe, ZHANG Xu, ZHOU Qi. Relationships between loading rates and nitrogen removal effectiveness in subsurface flow constructed wetlands[J]. Front.Environ.Sci.Eng., 2008, 2(1): 89-93.
[15] ZHAO Yangguo, WANG Aijie, REN Nanqi, ZHAO Yan. Microbial community structure in different wastewater treatment processes characterized by single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) technique[J]. Front.Environ.Sci.Eng., 2008, 2(1): 116-121.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed