Oocyte-associated transcription factors in reprogramming after somatic cell nuclear transfer: a review

doi:10.15302/J-FASE-2014003

Front. Agr. Sci. Eng.

2014, Vol. 1

Issue (2) : 104-113 https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2014003

REVIEW

Oocyte-associated transcription factors in reprogramming after somatic cell nuclear transfer: a review

Fengxia YIN,Hui LIU,Shorgan BOU,Guangpeng LI(

)

The Key Laboratory of National Education Ministry for Mammalian Reproductive Biology and Biotechnology, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010070, China

Download: PDF(376 KB) HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

Abstract

Oocytes are unique cells with the inherent capability to reprogram nuclei. The reprogramming of the somatic nucleus from its original cellular state to a totipotent state is essential for term development after somatic cell nuclear transfer. The nuclear-associated factors contained within oocytes are critical for normal fertilization by sperm or for somatic cell nuclear reprogramming. The chromatin of somatic nuclei can be reprogrammed by factors in the egg cytoplasm whose natural function is to reprogram sperm chromatin. The oocyte first obtains its reprogramming capability in the early fetal follicle, and then its capacity is enriched in the late growth phase and reaches its highest capability for reprogramming as fully-grown germinal vesicle oocytes. The cytoplasmic milieu most likely contains all of the specific transcription and/or reprogramming factors necessary for cellular reprogramming. Certain transcription factors in the cytoplast may be critical as has been demonstrated for induced pluripotent stem cells. The maternal pronucleus exerts a predominant, transcription-dependent effect on embryo cytofragmentation, with a lesser effect imposed by the ooplasm and the paternal pronucleus. With deep analysis of transcriptomics in oocytes and early developmental stage embryos more maternal transcription factors inducing cellular reprogramming will be identified.

Keywords nuclear reprogramming somatic cell transcription factors transcriptomics

Corresponding Author(s): Guangpeng LI

Online First Date: 11 July 2014 Issue Date: 10 October 2014

Cite this article:

Fengxia YIN,Hui LIU,Shorgan BOU, et al. Oocyte-associated transcription factors in reprogramming after somatic cell nuclear transfer: a review[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2014, 1(2): 104-113.

URL:

https://academic.hep.com.cn/fase/EN/10.15302/J-FASE-2014003
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fase/EN/Y2014/V1/I2/104

Fig.1 The possible roles of transcription factors in oocyte maturation, fertilization, nuclear transfer and embryo development

1	Hochedlinger K, Plath K. Epigenetic reprogramming and induced pluripotency. Development, 2009, 136(4): 509-523 https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.020867 pmid: 19168672
2	Gurdon J B, Melton D A. Nuclear reprogramming in cells. Science, 2008, 322(5909): 1811-1815 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1160810 pmid: 19095934
3	Jaenisch R, Young R. Stem cells, the molecular circuitry of pluripotency and nuclear reprogramming. Cell, 2008, 132(4): 567-582 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.015 pmid: 18295576
4	Reik W, Dean W, Walter J. Epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Science, 2001, 293(5532): 1089-1093 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1063443 pmid: 11498579
5	Rideout W M 3rd, Eggan K, Jaenisch R. Nuclear cloning and epigenetic reprogramming of the genome. Science, 2001, 293(5532): 1093-1098 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1063206 pmid: 11498580
6	Briggs R, King T J. The transplantation of living nuclei from blastula cells into enucleated frogs’ eggs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1952.38(5): 455-463
7	Gurdon J B. The developmental capacity of nuclei taken from intestinal epithelium cells of feeding tadpoles. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology, 1962, 10: 622-640 pmid: 13951335
8	Wilmut I, Schnieke A E, McWhir J, Kind A J, Campbell K H. Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature, 1997, 385(6619): 810-813 https://doi.org/10.1038/385810a0 pmid: 9039911
9	Hanna J, Markoulaki S, Schorderet P, Carey B W, Beard C, Wernig M, Creyghton M P, Steine E J, Cassady J P, Foreman R, Lengner C J, Dausman J A, Jaenisch R. Direct reprogramming of terminally differentiated mature B lymphocytes to pluripotency. Cell, 2008, 133(2): 250-264 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.028 pmid: 18423197
10	Hill J R. Abnormal in utero development of cloned animals: implications for human cloning. Differentiation, 2002, 69(4-5): 174-178 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-0436.2002.690408.x pmid: 11841473
11	Wilmut I, Beaujean N, de Sousa P A, Dinnyes A, King T J, Paterson L A, Wells D N, Young L E. Somatic cell nuclear transfer. Nature, 2002, 419(6909): 583-587 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01079 pmid: 12374931
12	Pangas S A, Rajkovic A. Transcriptional regulation of early oogenesis: in search of masters. Human Reproduction Update, 2006, 12(1): 65-76 https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmi033 pmid: 16143663
13	McLaughlin E A, McIver S C. Awakening the oocyte: controlling primordial follicle development. Reproduction, 2009, 137(1): 1-11 https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-08-0118 pmid: 18827065
14	Nandedkar T, Dharma S, Modi D, Dsouza S. Differential gene expression in transition of primordial to preantral follicles in mouse ovary.Society of Reproduction and Fertility Supplement, 2007, 63: 57-67 pmid: 17566261
15	Bao S, Obata Y, Ono Y, Futatsumata N, Niimura S, Kono T. Nuclear competence for maturation and pronuclear formation in mouse oocytes.Human Reproduction, 2002, 17(5): 1311-1316 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.5.1311 pmid: 11980757
16	Eppig J J, Schultz R M, O’Brien M, Chesnel F. Relationship between the developmental programs controlling nuclear and cytoplasmic maturation of mouse oocytes. Developmental Biology, 1994, 164(1): 1-9 https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.1994.1175 pmid: 8026614
17	Motlík J. Cytoplasmic aspects of oocyte growth and maturation in mammals. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. Supplement, 1989, 38: 17-25 pmid: 2677346
18	Bao S, Obata Y, Carroll J, Domeki I, Kono T. Epigenetic modifications necessary for normal development are established during oocyte growth in mice. Biology of Reproduction, 2000, 62(3): 616-621 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod62.3.616 pmid: 10684802
19	Obata Y, Kaneko-Ishino T, Koide T, Takai Y, Ueda T, Domeki I, Shiroishi T, Ishino F, Kono T. Disruption of primary imprinting during oocyte growth leads to the modified expression of imprinted genes during embryogenesis. Development, 1998, 125(8): 1553-1560 pmid: 9502736
20	Tomizawa S, Nowacka-Woszuk J, Kelsey G. DNA methylation establishment during oocyte growth: mechanisms and significance. International Journal of Developmental Biology, 2012, 56(10-12): 867-875 https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.120152gk pmid: 23417409
21	Obata Y, Kono T, Hatada I. Oogenesis: maturation of mouse fetal germ cells in vitro. Nature, 2002, 418(6897): 497 https://doi.org/10.1038/418497a pmid: 12152066
22	Byrne J A, Simonsson S, Western P S, Gurdon J B. Nuclei of adult mammalian somatic cells are directly reprogrammed to oct-4 stem cell gene expression by amphibian oocytes. Current Biology, 2003, 13(14): 1206-1213 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00462-7 pmid: 12867031
23	Ba?akier H, Tarkowski A K. The role of germinal vesicle karyoplasm in the development of male pronucleus in the mouse. Experimental Cell Research, 1980, 128(1): 79-85 https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(80)90389-4 pmid: 7190927
24	Nakaki F, Hayashi K, Ohta H, Kurimoto K, Yabuta Y, Saitou M. Induction of mouse germ-cell fate by transcription factors in vitro. Nature, 2013, 501(7466): 222-226 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12417 pmid: 23913270
25	Laskey R A, Mills A D, Philpott A, Leno G H, Dilworth S M, Dingwall C, Lindquist S, Horwich A, Green N M, Gething M J, Neupert W, Ellis R J. The role of nucleoplasmin in chromatin assembly and disassembly. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 1993, 339(1289): 263-269, discussion 268-269 https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1993.0024 pmid: 8098530
26	Iwashita J, Hayano Y, Sagata N. Essential role of germinal vesicle material in the meiotic cell cycle of Xenopus oocytes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1998, 95(8): 4392-4397 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.8.4392
27	Choi T, Rulong S, Resau J, Fukasawa K, Matten W, Kuriyama R, Mansour S, Ahn N, Vande Woude C F. Mos/mitogen-activated protein kinase can induce early meiotic phenotypes in the absence of maturation-promoting factor: a novel system for analysing spindle formation during meiosis I. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1996, 93(10): 4730-4735 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.10.4730
28	Inoue M, Naito K, Nakayama T, Sato E. Mitogen-activated protein kinase translocates into the germinal vesicle and induces germinal vesicle breakdown in porcine oocytes. Biology of Reproduction, 1998, 58(1): 130-136 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod58.1.130 pmid: 9472933
29	Gurdon J B, Laskey R A, De Robertis E M, Partington G A. Reprogramming of transplanted nuclei in amphibia. International Review of Cytology. Supplement, 1979, 9(9): 161-178 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7696(08)60902-X pmid: 385535
30	Mohammed A A, Karasiewicz J, Kubacka J, Greda P, Modliński J A. Enucleated GV oocytes as recipients of embryonic nuclei in the G1, S, or G2 stages of the cell cycle. Cell Reprogram, 2010, 12(4): 427-435 https://doi.org/10.1089/cell.2009.0107 pmid: 20698781
31	Bui H T, Kwon D N, Kang M H, Oh M H, Park M R, Park W J, Paik S S, Van Thuan N, Kim J H. Epigenetic reprogramming in somatic cells induced by extract from germinal vesicle stage pig oocytes. Development, 2012, 139(23): 4330-4340 https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.086116 pmid: 23132243
32	Polanski Z, Hoffmann S, Tsurumi C. Oocyte nucleus controls progression through meiotic maturation. Developmental Biology, 2005, 281(2): 184-195 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.02.024 pmid: 15893972
33	Greda P, Karasiewicz J, Modliński J A. Mouse zygotes as recipients in embryo cloning. Reproduction, 2006, 132(5): 741-748 https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.1.01204 pmid: 17071775
34	Egli D, Rosains J, Birkhoff G, Eggan K. Developmental reprogramming after chromosome transfer into mitotic mouse zygotes. Nature, 2007, 447(7145): 679-685 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05879 pmid: 17554301
35	Tada M, Takahama Y, Abe K, Nakatsuji N, Tada T. Nuclear reprogramming of somatic cells by in vitro hybridization with ES cells. Current Biology, 2001, 11(19): 1553-1558 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00459-6 pmid: 11591326
36	Cowan C A, Atienza J, Melton D A, Eggan K. Nuclear reprogramming of somatic cells after fusion with human embryonic stem cells. Science, 2005, 309(5739): 1369-1373 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1116447 pmid: 16123299
37	Bui H T, Wakayama S, Kishigami S, Kim J H, Van Thuan N, Wakayama T. The cytoplasm of mouse germinal vesicle stage oocytes can enhance somatic cell nuclear reprogramming. Development, 2008, 135(23): 3935-3945 https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.023747 pmid: 18997114
38	Wang S, Kou Z, Jing Z, Zhang Y, Guo X, Dong M, Wilmut I, Gao S. Proteome of mouse oocytes at different developmental stages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010, 107(41): 17639-17644 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1013185107
39	Modliński J A. Transfer of embryonic nuclei to fertilised mouse eggs and development of tetraploid blastocysts. Nature, 1978, 273(5662): 466-467 PMID:566383 https://doi.org/10.1038/273466a0
40	McGrath J, Solter D. Completion of mouse embryogenesis requires both the maternal and paternal genomes. Cell, 1984, 37(1): 179-183 https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(84)90313-1 pmid: 6722870
41	Ogushi S, Palmieri C, Fulka H, Saitou M, Miyano T, Fulka J Jr. The maternal nucleolus is essential for early embryonic development in mammals. Science, 2008, 319(5863): 613-616 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151276 pmid: 18239124
42	Campbell K H S, Fisher P, Chen W C, Choi I, Kelly R D W, Lee J H, Xhu J. Somatic cell nuclear transfer: past, present and future perspectives. Theriogenology, 2007, 68(Suppl 1): S214-S231 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.05.059 pmid: 17610946
43	Li G P, White K L, Bunch T D. Review of enucleation methods and procedures used in animal cloning: state of the art. Cloning and Stem Cells, 2004, 6(1): 5-13 https://doi.org/10.1089/15362300460743781 pmid: 15107241
44	Collas P, Pinto-Correia C, Ponce de Leon F A, Robl J M. Effect of donor cell cycle stage on chromatin and spindle morphology in nuclear transplant rabbit embryos. Biology of Reproduction, 1992, 46(3): 501-511 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod46.3.501 pmid: 1617022
45	Lee J H, Campbell K H. Effects of enucleation and caffeine on maturation-promoting factor (MPF) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activities in ovine oocytes used as recipient cytoplasts for nuclear transfer. Biology of Reproduction, 2006, 74(4): 691-698 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.105.043885 pmid: 16371593
46	Czo?owska R, Modliński J A, Tarkowski A K. Behaviour of thymocyte nuclei in non-activated and activated mouse oocytes. Journal of Cell Science, 1984, 69: 19-34 pmid: 6386837
47	Tani T, Kato Y, Tsunoda Y. Reprogramming of bovine somatic cell nuclei is not directly regulated by maturation promoting factor or mitogen-activated protein kinase activity. Biology of Reproduction, 2003, 69(6): 1890-1894 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.103.018945 pmid: 12904315
48	Chung Y G, Ratnam S, Chaillet J R, Latham K E. Abnormal regulation of DNA methyltransferase expression in cloned mouse embryos. Biology of Reproduction, 2003, 69(1): 146-153 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.102.014076 pmid: 12606374
49	Mann M R, Chung Y G, Nolen L D, Verona R I, Latham K E, Bartolomei M S. Disruption of imprinted gene methylation and expression in cloned preimplantation stage mouse embryos. Biology of Reproduction, 2003, 69(3): 902-914 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.103.017293 pmid: 12748125
50	Shi W, Haaf T. Aberrant methylation patterns at the two-cell stage as an indicator of early developmental failure. Molecular Reproduction and Development, 2002, 63(3): 329-334 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.90016 pmid: 12237948
51	Bordignon V, Clarke H J, Smith L C. Factors controlling the loss of immunoreactive somatic histone H1 from blastomere nuclei in oocyte cytoplasm: a potential marker of nuclear reprogramming. Developmental Biology, 2001, 233(1): 192-203 https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.2001.0215 pmid: 11319868
52	Dean W, Santos F, Stojkovic M, Zakhartchenko V, Walter J, Wolf E, Reik W. Conservation of methylation reprogramming in mammalian development: aberrant reprogramming in cloned embryos. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2001, 98(24): 13734-13738 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.241522698
53	Kang Y K, Park J S, Koo D B, Choi Y H, Kim S U, Lee K K, Han Y M. Limited demethylation leaves mosaic-type methylation states in cloned bovine pre-implantation embryos. The EMBO Journal, 2002, 21(5): 1092-1100 https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/21.5.1092 pmid: 11867537
54	Wu X. li Y, Li G P, Yang D S, Yue Y L, Wang L L, Li K H, Xin P H, Bou S, Yu H Q. Trichostatin A reduced genome DNA methylation of transgenic cells but not improved subsequent cloned embryo development. Animal Biotechnology, 2008, 19(4): 211-224 https://doi.org/10.1080/10495390802271482 pmid: 18855246
55	Wu X, Li Y, Wang L, Yue Y, Li K, Bao S, Li G P, Yu H. Multiple sites modifications of histone in somatic cell nuclear transfer and in vitro fertilized embryos in bovine. Zygote, 2010, 8: 1-15
56	Enright B P, Kubota C, Yang X, Tian X C. Epigenetic characteristics and development of embryos cloned from donor cells treated by trichostatin A or 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine. Biology of Reproduction, 2003, 69(3): 896-901 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.103.017954 pmid: 12748129
57	Santos F, Zakhartchenko V, Stojkovic M, Peters A, Jenuwein T, Wolf E, Reik W, Dean W. Epigenetic marking correlates with developmental potential in cloned bovine preimplantation embryos. Current Biology, 2003, 13(13): 1116-1121 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00419-6 pmid: 12842010
58	Aston K I, Li G P, Hicks B A, Sessions B R, Pate B J, Hammon D, Bunch T D, White K L. Effect of the time interval between fusion and activation on nuclear state and development in vitro and in vivo of bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos. Reproduction, 2006, 131(1): 45-51 https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.1.00714 pmid: 16388008
59	Shi W, Hoeflich A, Flaswinkel H, Stojkovic M, Wolf E, Zakhartchenko V. Induction of a senescent-like phenotype does not confer the ability of bovine immortal cells to support the development of nuclear transfer embryos. Biology of Reproduction, 2003, 69(1): 301-309 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.102.012112 pmid: 12646489
60	Bilodeau-Goeseels S, Panich P. Effects of oocyte quality on development and transcriptional activity in early bovine embryos. Animal Reproduction Science, 2002, 71(3-4): 143-155 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(01)00188-9 pmid: 12047924
61	Dominko T, Chan A, Simerly C, Luetjens C M, Hewitson L, Martinovich C, Schatten G. Dynamic imaging of the metaphase II spindle and maternal chromosomesin bovine oocytes: implications for enucleation efficiency verification, avoidanceof parthenogenesis, and successful embryogenesis. Biology of Reproduction, 2000, 62(1): 150-154 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod62.1.150 pmid: 10611079
62	Meng Q, Bai C, Liu Y, Wu X, Bunch T D, Li G P. In vitro development and chromosomal configuration of bovine somatic cloned embryos with nonenucleated metaphase II oocytes. Cellular Reprogramming, 2010, 12(4): 481-490 https://doi.org/10.1089/cell.2009.0114 pmid: 20698786
63	Yang H, Shi L, Zhang S, Ling J, Jiang J, Li J. High-efficiency somatic reprogramming induced by intact MII oocytes. Cell Research, 2010, 20(9): 1034-1042 https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2010.97 pmid: 20603641
64	Fulka J Jr, First N L, Moor R M. Nuclear transplantation in mammals: remodelling of transplanted nuclei under the influence of maturation promoting factor. BioEssays, 1996, 18(10): 835-840 https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.950181010 pmid: 8885721
65	Sung L Y, Shen P C, Jeong B S, Xu J, Chang C C, Cheng W T, Wu J S, Lee S N, Broek D, Faber D, Tian X C, Yang X, Du F. Premature chromosome condensation is not essential for nuclear reprogramming in bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer.Biology of Reproduction,2007, 76(2): 232-240 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.106.053561 pmid: 17108336
66	Bian Y, Alberio R, Allegrucci C, Campbell K H, Johnson A D. Epigenetic marks in somatic chromatin are remodelled to resemble pluripotent nuclei by amphibian oocyte extracts. Epigenetics, 2009, 4(3): 194-202 https://doi.org/10.4161/epi.4.3.8787 pmid: 19440040
67	Ji G, Ruan W, Liu K, Wang F, Sakellariou D, Chen J, Yang Y, Okuka M, Han J, Liu Z, Lai L, Gagos S, Xiao L, Deng H, Li N, Liu L. Telomere reprogramming and maintenance in porcine iPS cells. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8(9): e74202 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074202 pmid: 24098638
68	Ruan W, Han J, Li P, Cao S, An Y, Lim B, Li N. A novel strategy to derive iPS cells from porcine fibroblasts. Science China Life Sciences, 2011, 54(6): 553-559 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-011-4179-5 pmid: 21706416
69	Miyamoto K, Tsukiyama T, Yang Y, Li N, Minami N, Yamada M, Imai H. Cell-free extracts from mammalian oocytes partially induce nuclear reprogramming in somatic cells. Biology of Reproduction, 2009, 80(5): 935-943 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.108.073676 pmid: 19164171
70	Kanka J, Nemcova L, Toralova T, Vodickova-Kepkova K, Vodicka P, Jeseta M, Machatkova M. Association of the transcription profile of bovine oocytes and embryos with developmental potential.Animal Reproduction Science, 2012(1-2): 29-35http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.08.008
71	Labrecque R, Sirard M A. The study of mammalian oocyte competence by transcriptome analysis: progress and challenges. Molucular Human Reproduction, 2014, 20(2): 103-116 https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gat082
72	Jiao Z X, Woodruff T K. Detection and quantification of maternal-effect gene transcripts in mouse second polar bodies: potential markers of embryo developmental competence.Fertility and Sterility, 2013, 99(7): 2055-2061
73	Antczak M, Van Blerkom J. Temporal and spatial aspects of fragmentation in early human embryos: possible effects on developmental competence and association with the differential elimination of regulatory proteins from polarized domains. Human Reproduction, 1999, 14(2): 429-447 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/14.2.429 pmid: 10099991
74	Hardy K, Spanos S, Becker D, Iannelli P, Winston R M, Stark J. From cell death to embryo arrest: mathematical models of human preimplantation embryo development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2001, 98(4): 1655-1660 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.4.1655
75	Hawes S M, Gie Chung Y, Latham K E. Genetic and epigenetic factors affecting blastomere fragmentation in two-cell stage mouse embryos. Biology of Reproduction, 2001, 65(4): 1050-1056 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod65.4.1050 pmid: 11566725
76	Jurisicova A, Latham K E, Casper R F, Varmuza S L. Expression and regulation of genes associated with cell death during murine preimplantation embryo development. Molecular Reproduction and Development, 1998, 51(3): 243-253 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199811)51:3<243::AID-MRD3>3.0.CO;2-P pmid: 9771644
77	Han Z, Chung Y G, Gao S, Latham K E. Maternal factors controlling blastomere fragmentation in early mouse embryos. Biology of Reproduction, 2005, 72(3): 612-618 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.104.035444 pmid: 15537860
78	Han Z, Mtango N R, Zhong Z, Vassena R, Latham K E. Early transcription from the maternal genome controlling blastomere integrity in mouse two-cell-stage embryos. American Journal of Physiology. Cell Physiology, 2010, 298(5): C1235-C1244 https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00393.2009 pmid: 20107036
79	Aoki F, Worrad D M, Schultz R M. Regulation of transcriptional activity during the first and second cell cycles in the preimplantation mouse embryo. Developmental Biology, 1997, 181(2): 296-307 https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.1996.8466 pmid: 9013938
80	Bouniol C, Nguyen E, Debey P. Endogenous transcription occurs at the 1-cell stage in the mouse embryo. Experimental Cell Research, 1995, 218(1): 57-62 https://doi.org/10.1006/excr.1995.1130 pmid: 7537698
81	Schultz R M. The molecular foundations of the maternal to zygotic transition in the preimplantation embryo. Human Reproduction Update, 2002, 8(4): 323-331 https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/8.4.323 pmid: 12206467
82	Sun F, Fang H, Li R, Gao T, Zheng J, Chen X, Ying W, Sheng H Z. Nuclear reprogramming: the zygotic transcription program is established through an “erase-and-rebuild” strategy. Cell Research, 2007, 17(2): 117-134 https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2007.1 pmid: 17287829
83	Gao T, Zheng J, Xing F, Fang H, Sun F, Yan A, Gong X, Ding H, Tang F, Sheng H Z. Nuclear reprogramming: the strategy used in normal development is also used in somatic cell nuclear transfer and parthenogenesis. Cell Research, 2007, 17(2): 135-150 https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2007.2 pmid: 17287828
84	Surani M A. Nuclear reprogramming by human embryonic stem cells. Cell, 2005, 122(5): 653-654 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.023 pmid: 16143098
85	Gurdon J B, Byrne J A. The first half-century of nuclear transplantation. Bioscience Reports, 2004, 24(4-5): 545-557 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10540-005-2744-5 pmid: 16134025
86	Mattson B A, Albertini D F. Oogenesis: chromatin and microtubule dynamics during meiotic prophase. Molecular Reproduction and Development, 1990, 25(4): 374-383 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1080250411 pmid: 1691651
87	Zuccotti M, Piccinelli A, Giorgi Rossi P, Garagna S, Redi C A. Chromatin organization during mouse oocyte growth. Molecular Reproduction and Development, 1995, 41(4): 479-485 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1080410410 pmid: 7576615
88	Torres-Padilla M E, Zernicka-Goetz M. Role of TIF1α as a modulator of embryonic transcription in the mouse zygote. TheJournal of Cell Biology, 2006, 174(3): 329-338 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200603146 pmid: 16880268
89	Gurdon J B. Nuclear transplantation in eggs and oocytes. Journal of Cell Science. Supplement, 1986, 4: 287-318 https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.1986.Supplement_4.17 pmid: 3528196
90	Aoi T, Yae K, Nakagawa M, Ichisaka T, Okita K, Takahashi K, Chiba T, Yamanaka S. Generation of pluripotent stem cells from adult mouse liver and stomach cells.Science, 2008, 321(5889): 699-702 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1154884 pmid: 18276851
91	Inoue K, Kohda T, Sugimoto M, Sado T, Ogonuki N, Matoba S, Shiura H, Ikeda R, Mochida K, Fujii T, Sawai K, Otte A P, Tian X C, Yang X, Ishino F, Abe K, Ogura A. Impeding Xist expression from the active X chromosome improves mouse somatic cell nuclear transfer. Science, 2010, 330(6003): 496-499 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1194174 pmid: 20847234
92	Xue Z, Huang K, Cai C, Cai L, Jiang C, Feng Y, Liu Z, Zeng Q, Cheng L, Sun Y E. Liu J, Horvath S, Fan G. hereditary programs in human and mouse early embryos revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing. Nature, 2013, 500(7464): 593-597 PMID:23892778 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12364
93	Graf A, Krebs S, Zakhartchenko V, Schwalb B, Blum H, Wolf E. Fine mapping of genome activation in bovine embryos by RNA sequencing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014, 111(11): 4139-4144 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1321569111
94	Pikulkaew S, Benato F, Celeghin A, Zucal C, Skobo T, Colombo L, Dalla Valle L. The knockdown of maternal glucocorticoid receptor mRNA alters embryo development in zebrafish. Developmental Dynamics, 2011, 240(4): 874-889 https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.22586 pmid: 21360790
95	Tashiro F, Kanai-Azuma M, Miyazaki S, Kato M, Tanaka T, Toyoda S, Yamato E, Kawakami H, Miyazaki T, Miyazaki J. Maternal-effect gene Ces5/Ooep/Moep19/Floped is essential for oocyte cytoplasmic lattice formation and embryonic development at the maternal-zygotic stage transition. Genes to Cells, 2010, 15(8): 813-828 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2443.2010.01420.x pmid: 20590823
96	Tesfaye D, Regassa A, Rings F, Ghanem N, Phatsara C, Tholen E, Herwig R, Un C, Schellander K, Hoelker M. Suppression of the transcription factor MSX1 gene delays bovine preimplantation embryo development in vitro. Reproduction, 2010, 139(5): 857-870 https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-09-0312 pmid: 20176746
97	Paranjpe S S, Jacobi U G, van Heeringen S J, C Veenstra G J. A genome-wide survey of maternal and embryonic transcripts during Xenopus tropicalis development. BMC Genomics, 2013, 14(1): 762 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-762 pmid: 24195446
98	Mondou E, Dufort I, Gohin M, Fournier E, Sirard M A. Analysis of microRNAs and their precursors in bovine early embryonic development. Molecular Human Reproduction, 2012, 18(9): 425-434 https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gas015 pmid: 22491901
99	Maekawa M, Yamaguchi K, Nakamura T, Shibukawa R, Kodanaka I, Ichisaka T, Kawamura Y, Mochizuki H, Goshima N, Yamanaka S. Direct reprogramming of somatic cells is promoted by maternal transcription factor Glis1. Nature, 2011, 474(7350): 225-229 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10106 pmid: 21654807
100	Meissner A, Jaenisch R. Mammalian nuclear transfer. Developmental Dynamics, 2006, 235(9): 2460-2469 https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.20915 pmid: 16881069

[1]	Yong JIN, Manling ZHANG, Xinrong JU, Shuang LIANG, Qiang XIONG, Lihua ZHAO, Xiaowei NIE, Daorong HOU, Qiang LIU, Junzheng WANG, Chenyu WANG, Xiaokang LI, Lining ZHANG, Xiaorui LIU, Ying WANG, Haiyuan YANG, Yifan DAI, Rongfeng LI. Factors influencing the somatic cell nuclear transfer efficiency in pigs[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2019, 6(1): 73-80.
[2]	Yanna DANG, Kun ZHANG. Factors affecting early embryonic development in cattle: relevance for bovine cloning[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2019, 6(1): 33-41.
[3]	Zhiqiang XIA,Xin CHEN,Cheng LU,Meiling ZOU,Shujuan WANG,Yang ZHANG,Kun PAN,Xincheng ZHOU,Haiyan WANG,Wenquan WANG. *Comparative transcriptomics revealed enhanced light responses, energy transport and storage in domestication of cassava (Manihot esculenta)*[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2016, 3(4): 295-307.
[4]	Xinxin LI,Huijuan WANG,Guanghua SU,Zhuying WEI,Chunling BAI,Wuni-MENGHE,Yanhui HOU,Changqing YU,Shorgan BOU,Guangpeng LI. The ecological adaptability of cloned sheep to free-grazing in the Tengger Desert of Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2014, 1(3): 191-200.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed