Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-7505

ISSN 2095-977X(Online)

CN 10-1204/S

Postal Subscription Code 80-906

Front. Agr. Sci. Eng.    2022, Vol. 9 Issue (4) : 511-522    https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2022463
REVIEW
CONSTRUCTION OF AN INDEX SYSTEM FOR SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT IN SMALLHOLDER FARMING SYSTEMS
Xiaoxia GUO, Chong WANG(), Fusuo ZHANG
College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, National Academy of Agriculture Green Development, Key Laboratory of Plant-Soil Interactions, Ministry of Education, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
 Download: PDF(3636 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

● A five-step process for quantifying smallholder farming system sustainability is proposed.

● Definition of system boundary, functional unit, and indicators depends on research issues.

● Weighting, conversion, and aggregation methods tightly relates to the validity of assessment results.

Smallholder farming systems are important for global food security, but these faces multiple environmental challenges hindering sustainable development. Although sustainable smallholder agriculture issues have been widely discussed and addressed by scientists globally, harmonized approaches in evaluating sustainability are still lacking. This paper proposes a five-step process for constructing a sustainability assessment method for smallholder farming systems, namely definition of system boundary, indicator selection, indicator weighting, indicator conversion, and indicator aggregation. The paper summarizes the state-of-art progresses in agricultural sustainability assessment at different stages, and systematically discussed the benefits and limitations of weighting and aggregation methods. Overall, this evaluation process should be useful by providing rational and comprehensive results for quantifying the sustainability of smallholder farming systems, and will contribute to practice by providing decision-makers with directions for improving sustainable strategies.

Keywords indicator aggregation      multi-indicator      smallholder agriculture      sustainability assessment      weighting method     
Corresponding Author(s): Chong WANG   
Just Accepted Date: 22 July 2022   Online First Date: 15 August 2022    Issue Date: 07 November 2022
 Cite this article:   
Xiaoxia GUO,Chong WANG,Fusuo ZHANG. CONSTRUCTION OF AN INDEX SYSTEM FOR SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT IN SMALLHOLDER FARMING SYSTEMS[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2022, 9(4): 511-522.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fase/EN/10.15302/J-FASE-2022463
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fase/EN/Y2022/V9/I4/511
Fig.1  Role of sustainability assessment in agricultural multi-objective development. Constructing a sustainable evaluation system would be helpful to evaluate the sustainable level when applying agricultural technology combinations to farmlands, and it can provide guidance for redesigning technology combination to achieve multi-objective development mode.
Fig.2  A five-step process for constructing a sustainability assessment method for smallholder farming systems, which includes the definition of system boundary & functional unit, indicator selection, indicator weighting, indicator conversion, and indicator aggregation.
Fig.3  System boundaries and functional unit of smallholder farming system. The system boundaries are set as extraction of minerals and fossil fuels through to crop harvest. Specifically, smallholder farming systems consist of agricultural material production subsystem and farming subsystem.
Dimensions Indicators
Agricultural productivity Yield, attainable yield, yield gap
Resource use and resource use efficiency Resource consumption, N use efficiency, water use efficiency, unit emergy value
Environmental sustainability Global warming potential, acidification potential, eutrophication potential, human toxicity, ecotoxicity, land use, soil health, biodiversity
Economic sustainability Gross margin, net profit, output/input ratio, labor productivity
Social sustainability Nutrition availability, rural poverty ratio, gender equity
Tab.1  Typical evaluation dimensions and indicators of agricultural sustainable assessment
Method name Formula Explanation Characteristic
Min-max normalization x i=xi min( xi)max(x i) m in(xi)( 10) x i=max(xi) xi max(x i) m in(xi)( 11) Equation (10) for positive indicators and Eq. (11) for negative indicators. Max(xi) and min(xi) represent the best performance and the worst performance of indicator values, respectively[79] It is a unity-based normalization method, and it is used to bring all values into the range [0, 1]
Z-score standardization x i= xμδ (12 ) In Eq. (12), μ represents the mean value, and δ represents the standard deviation Works well when populations are normally distributed
Tab.2  Common methods for indicator normalization
1 X, Zhang G, Yao S, Vishwakarma C, Dalin A M, Komarek D R, Kanter K F, Davis K, Pfeifer J, Zhao T, Zou P, D’Odorico C, Folberth F G, Rodriguez J, Fanzo L, Rosa W, Dennison M, Musumba A, Heyman E A Davidson. Quantitative assessment of agricultural sustainability reveals divergent priorities among nations. One Earth, 2021, 4( 9): 1262–1277
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.08.015
2 X P, Chen Z L, Cui P M, Vitousek K G, Cassman P A, Matson J S, Bai Q F, Meng P, Hou S C, Yue V, Römheld F S Zhang. Integrated soil-crop system management for food security. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011, 108( 16): 6399–6404
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1101419108 pmid: 21444818
3 Y, Yin R, Zhao Y, Yang Q, Meng H, Ying K G, Cassman W, Cong X, Tian K, He Y, Wang Z, Cui X, Chen F Zhang. A steady-state N balance approach for sustainable smallholder farming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021, 118( 39): e2106576118
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2106576118 pmid: 34556575
4 D R, Kanter A R, Bell S S Mcdermid. Precision agriculture for smallholder nitrogen management. One Earth, 2019, 1( 3): 281–284
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2019.10.015
5 J, Shen Q, Zhu X, Jiao H, Ying H, Wang X, Wen W, Xu T, Li W, Cong X, Liu Y, Hou Z, Cui O, Oenema W J, Davies F Zhang. Agriculture green development: a model for China and the world. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2020, 7( 1): 5–13
https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2019300
6 X Yu. Promoting agriculture green development to realize the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2020, 7( 1): 112–113
https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2019318
7 Z, Cui H, Zhang X, Chen C, Zhang W, Ma C, Huang W, Zhang G, Mi Y, Miao X, Li Q, Gao J, Yang Z, Wang Y, Ye S, Guo J, Lu J, Huang S, Lv Y, Sun Y, Liu X, Peng J, Ren S, Li X, Deng X, Shi Q, Zhang Z, Yang L, Tang C, Wei L, Jia J, Zhang M, He Y, Tong Q, Tang X, Zhong Z, Liu N, Cao C, Kou H, Ying Y, Yin X, Jiao Q, Zhang M, Fan R, Jiang F, Zhang Z Dou. Pursuing sustainable productivity with millions of smallholder farmers. Nature, 2018, 555( 7696): 363–366
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25785 pmid: 29513654
8 J F Morton. The impact of climate change on smallholder and subsistence agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007, 104( 50): 19680–19685
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701855104 pmid: 18077400
9 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). World food and agriculture-statistical yearbook 2020. Rome: FAO , 2020. Available at FAO website on June 22, 2022
10 W, Zhang G, Cao X, Li H, Zhang C, Wang Q, Liu X, Chen Z, Cui J, Shen R, Jiang G, Mi Y, Miao F, Zhang Z Dou. Closing yield gaps in China by empowering smallholder farmers. Nature, 2016, 537( 7622): 671–674
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19368 pmid: 27602513
11 J, Cui P, Sui D L, Wright D, Wang B, Sun M, Ran Y, Shen C, Li Y Chen. Carbon emission of maize-based cropping systems in the North China Plain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 213 : 300–308
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.174
12 Q, Zhang Y, Chu Y, Xue H, Ying X, Chen Y, Zhao W, Ma L, Ma J, Zhang Y, Yin Z Cui. Outlook of China’s agriculture transforming from smallholder operation to sustainable production. Global Food Security, 2020, 26 : 100444
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100444
13 J, Poore T Nemecek. Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science, 2018, 360( 6392): 987–992
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq0216 pmid: 29853680
14 A, Król-Badziak S H, Pishgar-Komleh S, Rozakis J Księżak. Environmental and socio-economic performance of different tillage systems in maize grain production: application of life cycle assessment and multi-criteria decision making. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 278 : 123792
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123792
15 A, Chaudhary D, Gustafson A Mathys. Multi-indicator sustainability assessment of global food systems. Nature Communications, 2018, 9( 1): 848
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03308-7 pmid: 29487286
16 Y, Chen C, Liu J, Chen N, Hu L Zhu. Evaluation on environmental consequences and sustainability of three rice-based rotation systems in Quanjiao, China by an integrated analysis of life cycle, emergy and economic assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 310 : 127493
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127493
17 R, Goswami S, Saha P Dasgupta. Sustainability assessment of smallholder farms in developing countries. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 2017, 41( 5): 546–569
https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2017.1290730
18 O Oenema. Toward agriculture green development. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2020, 7( 1): 110–111
https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2019314
19 M, Wang W, Wu W, Liu Y Bao. Life cycle assessment of the winter wheat-summer maize production system on the North China Plain. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 2007, 14( 4): 400–407
https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500709469740
20 L Liang. Environmental impact assessment of circular agriculture based on life cycle assessment: methods and case studies. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2009 ( in Chinese)
21 C, Wang X, Li T, Gong H Zhang. Life cycle assessment of wheat-maize rotation system emphasizing high crop yield and high resource use efficiency in Quzhou County. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014, 68 : 56–63
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.018
22 X, He Y, Qiao L, Liang M T, Knudsen F Martin. Environmental life cycle assessment of long-term organic rice production in subtropical China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 176 : 880–888
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.045
23 Y, Dong L, Xu Z, Yang H, Zheng L Chen. Aggravation of reactive nitrogen flow driven by human production and consumption in Guangzhou City, China. Nature Communications, 2020, 11( 1): 1209
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14699-x pmid: 32139678
24 W Y, Lam S, Sim M, Kulak Zelm R, van A M, Schipper M A J Huijbregts. Drivers of variability in greenhouse gas footprints of crop production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 315 : 128121
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128121
25 D, Zhang W Zhang. Low carbon agriculture and a review of calculation methods for crop production carbon foot print accounting. Resources Science, 2016, 38(7): 1395− 1405 ( in Chinese)
26 der Werf H M G, Van J Petit. Evaluation of the environmental impact of agriculture at the farm level: a comparison and analysis of 12 indicator-based methods. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2002, 93(1−3): 131− 145
27 D, Zhang J, Shen F, Zhang Y, Li W Zhang. Carbon footprint of grain production in China. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7( 1): 4126
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04182-x pmid: 28663590
28 K, Bartl F, Verones S Hellweg. Life cycle assessment based evaluation of regional impacts from agricultural production at the Peruvian coast. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46( 18): 9872–9880
https://doi.org/10.1021/es301644y pmid: 22894858
29 A, Smith S, Snapp R, Chikowo P, Thorne M, Bekunda J Glover. Measuring sustainable intensification in smallholder agroecosystems: a review. Global Food Security, 2017, 12 : 127–138
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2016.11.002
30 A, Hsu A, Johnson A Lloyd. Measuring progress: a practical guide from the developers of the Environmental Performance Index (EPI). New Haven: Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy, 2013
31 X, He Y, Qiao Y, Liu L, Dendler C, Yin F Martin. Environmental impact assessment of organic and conventional tomato production in urban greenhouses of Beijing city, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 134 : 251–258
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.004
32 J, Streimikis T Balezentis. Agricultural sustainability assessment framework integrating sustainable development goals and interlinked priorities of environmental, climate and agriculture policies. Sustainable Development, 2020, 28( 6): 1702–1712
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2118
33 X, Zhang E A, Davidson D L, Mauzerall T D, Searchinger P, Dumas Y Shen. Managing nitrogen for sustainable development. Nature, 2015, 528( 7580): 51–59
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15743 pmid: 26595273
34 Z, Quan X, Zhang Y, Fang E A Davidson. Different quantification approaches for nitrogen use efficiency lead to divergent estimates with varying advantages. Nature Food, 2021, 2( 4): 241–245
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00263-3
35 Z, Liu N, Yu J J, Camberato J, Gao P, Liu B, Zhao J Zhang. Crop production kept stable and sustainable with the decrease of nitrogen rate in North China Plain: an economic and environmental assessment over 8 years. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9( 1): 19335
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55913-1 pmid: 31852971
36 Z, Liu Z, Chen P, Ma Y, Meng J Zhou. Effects of tillage, mulching and N management on yield, water productivity, N uptake and residual soil nitrate in a long-term wheat-summer maize cropping system. Field Crops Research, 2017, 213 : 154–164
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.08.006
37 G, Xiao Z, Zhao L, Liang F, Meng W, Wu Y Guo. Improving nitrogen and water use efficiency in a wheat-maize rotation system in the North China Plain using optimized farming practices. Agricultural Water Management, 2019, 212 : 172–180
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.09.011
38 L X, Zhang S, Ulgiati Z F, Yang B Chen. Emergy evaluation and economic analysis of three wetland fish farming systems in Nansi Lake area, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 2011, 92( 3): 683–694
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.005 pmid: 20970243
39 H T Odum. Environmental Accounting—Emergy and Environmental Decision Making. New York: Wiley, 1996
40 F M, Pulselli N, Patrizi S Focardi. Calculation of the unit emergy value of water in an Italian watershed. Ecological Modelling, 2011, 222( 16): 2929–2938
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.04.021
41 X, Wang Y, Chen P, Sui W, Gao F, Qin J, Zhang X Wu. Emergy analysis of grain production systems on large-scale farms in the North China Plain based on LCA. Agricultural Systems, 2014, 128 : 66–78
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2014.03.005
42 M, Zhuang Y, Liu Y, Yang Q, Zhang H, Ying Y, Yin Z Cui. The sustainability of staple crops in China can be substantially improved through localized strategies. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2022, 154 : 111893
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111893
43 X, Zhang J, Shen Y, Wang Y, Qi W, Liao W, Shui L, Li H, Qi X Yu. An environmental sustainability assessment of China’s cement industry based on emergy. Ecological Indicators, 2017, 72 : 452–458
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.08.046
44 Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Intergovernmental. Climate Change 2013: the Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014
45 D, Xu Q, Zhu G, Ros Z, Cai S, Wen M, Xu F, Zhang Vries W de. Calculation of spatially explicit amounts and intervals of agricultural lime applications at county-level in China. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 806(Pt 4): 150955
46 X F, Chen X M, Chuai L Y Yang. Status quo,historical evolution and causes of eutrophication in lakes in typical lake regions of China. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2014, 30(4): 438− 443 ( 438)
47 Moal M, Le C, Gascuel-Odoux A, Ménesguen Y, Souchon C, Étrillard A, Levain F, Moatar A, Pannard P, Souchu A, Lefebvre G Pinay. Eutrophication: a new wine in an old bottle? Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 651(Pt 1): 1–11
48 O, Jolliet R, Rosenbaum T E, McKone M, Scheringer Straalen N, van F Wania. Establishing a framework for life cycle toxicity assessment. Findings of the Lausanne review workshop. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2006, 11( 3): 209–212
https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2006.03.002
49 C, Gentil C, Basset-Mens S, Manteaux C, Mottes E, Maillard Y, Biard P Fantke. Coupling pesticide emission and toxicity characterization models for LCA: application to open-field tomato production in Martinique. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 277 : 124099
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124099
50 J, Xu Z Zhang. Research on land sustainability evaluation indices in China for SDGs. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2020, 36(4): 77− 84 ( in Chinese)
51 C, Liu Y, Xu P, Sun J Liu. Progress and prospects of multi-functionality of land use research. Progress in Geography, 2016, 35(9): 1087− 1099 ( in Chinese)
52 J J, Wang Y Y, Jing C F, Zhang J H Zhao. Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2009, 13( 9): 2263–2278
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021
53 J, Zhang Y, Li Y, Li J, Zhang F Zhang. Advances in the indicator system and evaluation approaches of soil health. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2022, 59( 3): 603–616
https://doi.org/10.11766/trxb202102150097
54 J, Lehmann D A, Bossio I, Kögel-Knabner M C Rillig. The concept and future prospects of soil health. Nature Reviews: Earth & Environment, 2020, 1( 10): 544–553
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0080-8 pmid: 33015639
55 R, Xue C, Wang M, Liu D, Zhang K, Li N Li. A new method for soil health assessment based on Analytic Hierarchy Process and meta-analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 650(Pt 2): 2771–2777
56 X, Zheng Q Yang. Progress of agricultural biodiversity conservation in China. Biodiversity Science, 2021, 29(2): 167− 176 ( in Chinese)
57 Y, Sun X, Li H, Zhang B, Chen Y, Li Y, Liu Z Yu. Functions and countermeasures of biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes: a review. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2017, 25(7): 993− 1001 ( in Chinese)
58 F R Adler. The effects of intraspecific density dependence on species richness and species abundance distributions. Theoretical Ecology, 2011, 4( 2): 153–162
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-010-0108-7
59 I F, Spellerberg P J Fedor. A tribute to Claude Shannon (1916–2001) and a plea for more rigorous use of species richness, species diversity and the ‘Shannon-Wiener’ Index. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2003, 12( 3): 177–179
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-822X.2003.00015.x
60 Development and Reform Commission National. People’s Republic of China (NDRC). Compilation of National Cost-benefit Data of Agricultural Product-2019. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2019 ( in Chinese)
61 X, Qiang X, Zhou C, Li D, Guo Z, Liu J Zhang. Effect of liquid film mulching on growth and yield of summer maize under different soil moisture conditions. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2010, 26(1): 54− 60 ( in Chinese)
62 Z, Luo G, Huang L, Cai R, Zhang L, Li J Xie. Assessment indicators of soil quality in rain-fed areas of the Loess Plateau. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2012, 20(2): 127− 137 ( in Chinese)
63 J Cui. A revised integrated framework to evaluate the sustainability of given cropping systems. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2020 ( in Chinese)
64 L, Guillaumie O, Boiral A, Baghdadli G Mercille. Integrating sustainable nutrition into health-related institutions: a systematic review of the literature. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 2020, 111( 6): 845–861
https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-020-00394-3 pmid: 32959328
65 W, Willett J, Rockström B, Loken M, Springmann T, Lang S, Vermeulen T, Garnett D, Tilman F, DeClerck A, Wood M, Jonell M, Clark L J, Gordon J, Fanzo C, Hawkes R, Zurayk J A, Rivera Vries W, De Sibanda L, Majele A, Afshin A, Chaudhary M, Herrero R, Agustina F, Branca A, Lartey S, Fan B, Crona E, Fox V, Bignet M, Troell T, Lindahl S, Singh S E, Cornell Reddy K, Srinath S, Narain S, Nishtar C J L Murray. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet, 2019, 393( 10170): 447–492
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4 pmid: 30660336
66 J, Fanzo A L, Bellows M L, Spiker A L, Thorne-Lyman M W Bloem. The importance of food systems and the environment for nutrition. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2021, 113( 1): 7–16
https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqaa313 pmid: 34020447
67 I U H, Padda A Hameed. Estimating multidimensional poverty levels in rural Pakistan: a contribution to sustainable development policies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 197 : 435–442
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.224
68 Y, Liu J, Liu Y Zhou. Spatio-temporal patterns of rural poverty in China and targeted poverty alleviation strategies. Journal of Rural Studies, 2017, 52 : 66–75
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.04.002
69 J, Sachs G, Schmidt-Traub C, Kroll G, Lafortune G Fuller. Sustainable Development Report 2019. New York: Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN), 2019
70 R Liepins. Women in agriculture: advocates for a gendered sustainable agriculture. Australian Geographer, 1995, 26( 2): 118–126
https://doi.org/10.1080/00049189508703140
71 S, Ghosh L C, Sen S K, Mali M M, Islam J Bakchi. The role of rural women in household food security and nutrition management in Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 2021, 27( 3): 441–459
https://doi.org/10.1080/12259276.2021.1970351
72 Development Bank (ADB) Asian. Gender equality and food security: women’s empowerment as a tool against hunger. Manila: ADB, 2013
73 X, Gan I C, Fernandez J, Guo M, Wilson Y, Zhao B, Zhou J Wu. When to use what: Methods for weighting and aggregating sustainability indicators. Ecological Indicators, 2017, 81 : 491–502
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.068
74 J, Mikulic I, Kozic D Kresic. Weighting indicators of tourism sustainability: a critical note. Ecological Indicators, 2015, 48 : 312–314
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.026
75 W, Zhao J, Lin S F, Wang J L, Liu Z R, Chen W J Kou. Influence of human activities on groundwater environment based on coefficient variation method. Environmental Sciences, 2013, 34(4): 1277–1283 ( in Chinese)
76 J, Pena G, Napoles Y Salgueiro. Implicit and hybrid methods for attribute weighting in multi-attribute decision-making: a review study. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2021, 54( 5): 3817–3847
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-020-09941-3
77 Q, Liu X Wu. Review on the weighting methods of indexes in the multi-factor evaluation. Knowledge Management Forum, 2017, 2(6): 500− 510 ( in Chinese)
78 C L, Hwang K Yoon. Multiple attribute decision making-methods and application: a state-of-the-art survey. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin, 1981
79 L W, Liang Z B, Wang J X Li. The effect of urbanization on environmental pollution in rapidly developing urban agglomerations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 237 : 117649
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117649
[1] Jie YAN, Yize LIU, Rui ZHANG, Chenhui CUI, Yingying ZHENG, Minghao ZHUANG. TOWARD SUSTAINABLE MAIZE PRODUCTION FOR SMALLHOLDERS THROUGH OPTIMIZED STRATEGIES IN NORTH CHINA[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2022, 9(4): 547-557.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed