Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-7505

ISSN 2095-977X(Online)

CN 10-1204/S

Postal Subscription Code 80-906

Front. Agr. Sci. Eng.    2023, Vol. 10 Issue (3) : 363-373    https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2023510
RESEARCH ARTICLE
DEVELOPMENT OF AN AUTOMATIC WEIGHING PLATFORM FOR MONITORING BODYWEIGHT OF BROILER CHICKENS IN COMMERCIAL PRODUCTION
Danni ZHOU1,2,3, Yi ZHOU4, Pengguang HE1,2,3, Lin YU4, Jinming PAN1,2,3,4, Lilong CHAI5, Hongjian LIN1,2,3,4()
1. College of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
2. Key Laboratory of Equipment and Informatization in Environment Controlled Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hangzhou 310058, China
3. Key Laboratory of Intelligent Equipment and Robotics for Agriculture of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310058, China
4. Joint Research Center of Zhejiang University and Hefei Shenmu Information Science & Technology Company, Hefei 230601, China
5. Department of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
 Download: PDF(6181 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

● An automatic weighing system for monitoring bodyweight of broilers was developed.

● The new system was compared to the established live-bird sales weighing system data and tested in various conditions.

● The system demonstrated superior accuracy and stability for commercial houses.

Bodyweight is a key indicator of broiler production as it measures the production efficiency and indicates the health of a flock. Currently, broiler weight (i.e., bodyweight) is primarily weighed manually, which is time-consuming and labor-intensive, and tends to create stress in birds. This study aimed to develop an automatic and stress-free weighing platform for monitoring the weight of floor-reared broiler chickens in commercial production. The developed system consists of a weighing platform, a real-time communication terminal, computer software and a smart phone applet user-interface. The system collected weight data of chickens on the weighing platform at intervals of 6 s, followed by filtering of outliers and repeating readings. The performance and stability of this system was systematically evaluated under commercial production conditions. With the adoption of data preprocessing protocol, the average error of the new automatic weighing system was only 10.3 g, with an average accuracy 99.5% with the standard deviation of 2.3%. Further regression analysis showed a strong agreement between estimated weight and the standard weight obtained by the established live-bird sales system. The variance (an indicator of flock uniformity) of broiler weight estimated using automatic weighing platforms was in accordance with the standard weight. The weighing system demonstrated superior stability for different growth stages, rearing seasons, growth rate types (medium- and slow-growing chickens) and sexes. The system is applicable for daily weight monitoring in floor-reared broiler houses to improve feeding management, growth monitoring and finishing day prediction. Its application in commercial farms would improve the sustainability of poultry industry.

Keywords automatic weighing      weight monitoring      floor housing      uniformity      precision poultry farming     
Corresponding Author(s): Hongjian LIN   
Just Accepted Date: 04 July 2023   Online First Date: 26 July 2023    Issue Date: 20 September 2023
 Cite this article:   
Danni ZHOU,Yi ZHOU,Pengguang HE, et al. DEVELOPMENT OF AN AUTOMATIC WEIGHING PLATFORM FOR MONITORING BODYWEIGHT OF BROILER CHICKENS IN COMMERCIAL PRODUCTION[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2023, 10(3): 363-373.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fase/EN/10.15302/J-FASE-2023510
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fase/EN/Y2023/V10/I3/363
Fig.1  Weighing platform (a) and communication terminal (b) of the broiler weighing system.
Fig.2  Weighing system workflow (a) and screenshots of data display on the user interface (b).
Fig.3  The installation of weighing platform (a) and communication terminal (b) in real applications.
Fig.4  Histograms of automatic weighing platform data before (a–c) and after (d–f) POWRI preprocessing protocol for three broiler houses (a and d, b and e, and c and f for the same house, respectively).
Fig.5  Average weight estimation according to the raw data, data after PORWI, and data from the live-bird sales system. Note: the error bars represent the estimated standard deviations.
Standard average weight Estimated weight Absolute value of error
Standard average weight 1 0.990** 0.201*
Estimated weight 0.990** 1 0.155
Absolute value of error 0.201* 0.155 1
Tab.1  Pearson’s correlation of standard average weight, estimated weight, and absolute value of error
Fig.6  Scatter plots of standard average weight vs estimated weight (a), absolute value of error vs standard average weight (b), and absolute value of error vs estimated weight (c).
Fig.7  Number of effective weight readings (a), growth curve (b), and daily weight gain (c) of a broiler flock monitored over 29 days.
Variables Standard average weight mean (SD) (g) Estimated weight mean (SD) (g) Absolute error (g) Relative error (%)
Season (p = 0.658) Spring 1883 (259) 1879 (260) –4 –0.21
Summer 1623 (322) 1613 (305) –10 –0.62
Autumn 1561 (134) 1554 (134) –7 –0.45
Winter 1751 (191) 1750 (188) –1 –0.06
Growth rate type (p < 0.001) Medium-growing 1864 (376) 1837 (370) –27 –1.45
Slow-growing 1644 (202) 1642 (203) –2 –0.12
Sex (p = 0.442) Hen 1616 (153) 1606 (153) –10 –0.62
Cock 1738 (305) 1734 (305) –4 –0.23
Tab.2  The standard average weight, estimated weight, absolute error and relative error in different production conditions of rearing season, breed and sex
Products Lumina 47 Fancom 747 Swing 20 Swing 100 DWS-3-ZW DWS-4-ZW PS1 and BAT2
Manufacturer Fancom Fancom Big Dutchman Big Dutchman Hotraco Agri Hotraco Agri DACS and Veit
Poultry types Broilers, turkeys Broilers, turkeys Broilers, ducks, turkeys Turkeys Turkeys Broiler hens and roosters Broilers, turkeys
Weight range Up to 150 kg Up to 150 kg Up to 20 kg Up to 100 kg Up to 100 kg Up to 12 kg Up to 50 or 100 kg
Installation Consisting of a control computer with 2 scales Consisting of a control computer with a maximum of 8 scales Consisting of a load cell and a platform made of plastic material; adjustably suspended from ceiling Consisting of a 1 m × 1 m plastic plate that is attached directly to the load cell by suspension ropes Consisting of a 1 m × 1 m × 1.5 m cage and suspended in the poultry house Consisting of hooks, chains, a load cell and a platform Memory capacity up to 1 year for the number of weighed heads, the average weight, the standard deviation, CV, uniformity, daily increment and sex
Accuracy 97% 97% Not available Not available Not available Not available 99.9%
Tab.3  Comparison of existing products
Fig.8  Common chicken weighing scales: (a) Lumina 47; (b) turkey weighing scales (a part of Lumina 47 and 747 weighing system); (c) turkey weighing scales in a house for turkey production; (d) Swing 100 in a house for turkey production; (e) Swing 20 in a broiler house; (f) Swing 20 in a house for duck production; (g) DWS-3-ZW; (h) DWS-4-ZW; and (i) BAT 2 GSM.
1 C G Hao . How to monitor the growth of broiler breeders. Poultry Husbandry and Disease Control, 2018, (9): 28−30 (in Chinese)
2 Z X Li . The significance and measures to improve the uniformity of broiler slaughter weight. Poultry Husbandry and Disease Control, 2019, (6): 22−24 (in Chinese)
3 H Y Ji . Reasons and solutions for slow growth of broiler chickens. Modern Animal Husbandry Science & Technology, 2020, (5): 24−25 (in Chinese)
4 H H, Kristensen C Cornou . Automatic detection of deviations in activity levels in groups of broiler chickens—A pilot study. Biosystems Engineering, 2011, 109(4): 369–376
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2011.05.002
5 J, Flees E, Greene B, Ganguly S Dridi . Phytogenic feed- and water-additives improve feed efficiency in broilers via modulation of (an)orexigenic hypothalamic neuropeptide expression. Neuropeptides, 2020, 81: 102005
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npep.2020.102005
6 H, Xin K Liu . Precision livestock farming in egg production. Animal Frontiers, 2017, 7(1): 24–31
https://doi.org/10.2527/af.2017.0105
7 Wet L, De E, Vranken A, Chedad J M, Aerts J, Ceunen D Berckmans . Computer-assisted image analysis to quantify daily growth rates of broiler chickens. British Poultry Science, 2003, 44(4): 524–532
https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660310001616192
8 B L, Nielsen M, Litherland F Nøddegaard . Effects of qualitative and quantitative feed restriction on the activity of broiler chickens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2003, 83(4): 309–323
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(03)00137-0
9 H H, Kristensen J M, Aerts T, Leroy C M, Wathes D Berckmans . Modelling the dynamic activity of broiler chickens in response to step-wise changes in light intensity. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2006, 101(1−2): 125−143
10 M S, Dawkins R, Cain K, Merelie S J Roberts . In search of the behavioural correlates of optical flow patterns in the automated assessment of broiler chicken welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2013, 145(1−2): 44−50
11 I, Wolff S, Klein E, Rauch M, Erhard J, Mönch S, Härtle P, Schmidt H Louton . Harvesting-induced stress in broilers: comparison of a manual and a mechanical harvesting method under field conditions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2019, 221: 104877
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2019.104877
12 J M, Aerts Buggenhout S, Van E, Vranken M, Lippens J, Buyse E, Decuypere D Berckmans . Active control of the growth trajectory of broiler chickens based on online animal responses. Poultry Science, 2003, 82(12): 1853–1862
https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.12.1853
13 J M, Aerts M, Lippens Groote G, De J, Buyse E, Decuypere E, Vranken D Berckmans . Recursive prediction of broiler growth response to feed intake by using a time-variant parameter estimation method. Poultry Science, 2003, 82(1): 40–49
https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.1.40
14 O, Cangar J M, Aerts E, Vranken D Berckmans . End-weight prediction in broiler growth. British Poultry Science, 2006, 47(3): 330–335
https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660600741735
15 B D, Lott F N, Reece J L Mcnaughton . An automated weighing system for use in poultry research. Poultry Science, 1982, 61(2): 236–238
https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0610236
16 M J B, Turner P, Gurney J S W, Crowther J R Sharp . An automatic weighing system for poultry. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 1984, 29(1): 17–24
https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8634(84)90056-8
17 I, Doyle S Leeson . Automatic weighing of poultry reared on a litter floor. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 1989, 69(4): 1075–1081
https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas89-122
18 M B R, Mollah M A, Hasan M A, Salam M A Ali . Digital image analysis to estimate the live weight of broiler. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2010, 72(1): 48–52
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2010.02.002
19 A K, Mortensen P, Lisouski P Ahrendt . Weight prediction of broiler chickens using 3D computer vision. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2016, 123: 319–326
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2016.03.011
20 I, Fontana E, Tullo A, Butterworth M Guarino . An innovative approach to predict the growth in intensive poultry farming. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2015, 119: 178–183
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2015.10.001
21 K Wang . Perching behavior of chickens and development of an automated weighing system for weight monitoring of group housed chickens. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2020 (in Chinese)
22 R T, Seber Alencar Nääs I, De Moura D J, De Silva Lima N D Da . Classifier’s performance for detecting the pecking pattern of broilers during feeding. AgriEngineering, 2022, 4(3): 789–800
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering4030051
23 J E, Doornweerd G, Kootstra R F, Veerkamp Klerk B, de I, Fodor der Sluis M, van A C, Bouwman E D Ellen . Passive radio frequency identification and video tracking for the determination of location and movement of broilers. Poultry Science, 2023, 102(3): 102412
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.102412
24 A D, England K, Gharib-Naseri S K, Kheravii S B Wu . Rearing broilers as mixed or single-sex: relevance to performance, coefficient of variation, and flock uniformity. Poultry Science, 2022, 101(12): 102176
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.102176
25 A, Chedad E, Vranken J M, Aerts D Berckmans . Behaviour of chickens towards automatic weighing systems. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 2000, 33(29): 207–212
26 A, Chedad J M, Aerts E, Vranken M, Lippens J, Zoons D Berckmans . Do heavy broiler chickens visit automatic weighing systems less than lighter birds. British Poultry Science, 2003, 44(5): 663–668
https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660310001643633
27 S, Amraei Mehdizadeh S, Abdanan S Salari . Broiler weight estimation based on machine vision and artificial neural network. British Poultry Science, 2017, 58(2): 200–205
https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2016.1259530
28 S, Amraei S A, Mehdizadeh I A Nääs . Development of a transfer function for weight prediction of live broiler chicken using machine vision. Engenharia Agrícola, 2018, 38(5): 776–782
https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v38n5p776-782/2018
29 W, Ma Q, Li J, Li L, Ding Q Yu . A method for weighing broiler chickens using improved amplitude-limiting filtering algorithm and BP neural networks. Information Processing in Agriculture, 2021, 8(2): 299–309
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2020.07.001
30 D, Liu E, Vranken Den Berg G, Van L, Carpentier Fernández A, Peña D, He T Norton . Separate weighing of male and female broiler breeders by electronic platform weigher using camera technologies. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2021, 182: 106009
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106009
31 Y, Peng Z, Zeng E, Lv X, He B, Zeng F, Wu J, Guo Z Li . A Real-Time automated system for monitoring individual feed intake and body weight of group-housed young chickens. Applied Sciences, 2022, 12(23): 12339
https://doi.org/10.3390/app122312339
32 K, Wang J, Pan X, Rao Y, Yang F, Wang R, Zheng Y Ying . An image-assisted rod-platform weighing system for weight information sampling of broilers. Transactions of the ASABE, 2018, 61(2): 631–640
https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.12312
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed