Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-7505

ISSN 2095-977X(Online)

CN 10-1204/S

Postal Subscription Code 80-906

Front. Agr. Sci. Eng.    2024, Vol. 11 Issue (1) : 140-154    https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2023533
Toward to agricultural green development by multi-objective zoning and nitrogen nutrient management: a case study in the Baiyangdian Basin, China
Xiaomeng ZHANG1, Xiangwen FAN2(), Wenqi MA1(), Zhaohai BAI2, Jiafa LUO3, Jing YANG2, Ling LIU2, Jianjie ZHANG1, Lin MA2
1. College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071000, China
2. Center for Agricultural Resources Research, Institute of Genetic and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050022, China
3. Ruakura Research Centre, AgResearch Limited, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand
 Download: PDF(9774 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

● Development of a novel multi-indicator partition optimization method of nitrogen nutrient management.

● Calculation of multi-indicator environmental thresholds for ammonia volatilization, nitrogen surplus and soil carrying capacity in various regions within the basin.

● Recommendation of various regional spatial optimization methods to enhance nutrient management in crop–livestock systems.

Although China has achieved great advancements toward national food security, the country is still confronted with a range of challenges, including natural resource stress, imbalanced diets and environmental pollution. Optimized management of crop–livestock systems is the key measure to realize agricultural green transformation. However, optimized management of crop–livestock systems that use multi-objective zoning is lacking. This study employed a multi-objective zoning management approach to comprehensively analyze four indicators: ammonia volatilization, nitrogen surplus, soil carrying capacity and ecological red line area. With its significant ecological integrity and a strong emphasis on sustainability, the Baiyangdian Basin serves as a unique and suitable test case for conducting analyses on multi-objective nutrient optimization management, with the aim to facilitate the agricultural green transformation. This study finds that less than 8% of the area in the Baiyangdian Basin meet the acceptable environmental indicator standard, whereas around 50% of the area that had both nitrogen surplus and ammonia volatilization exceeded the threshold. Implementation of unified management, that is, the same management technique across the study areas, could result in an increase of areas meeting environmental indicator thresholds to 21.1%. This project developed a novel multi-indicator partition optimization method, in which distinct measures are tailored for different areas to satisfy multiple environmental indicators. Implementation of this method, could potentially bring more than 50% area below the threshold, and areas with ammonia emissions and nitrogen surplus could be reduced to 15.8%. The multi-indicators partition optimization method represents a more advanced and efficiency-oriented management approach when compared to unified management. This approach could be regarded as the best available option to help China achieve agricultural transformation to improve efficient production and reduce environmental pollution. It is recommended that current policies aimed at nutrient management toward sustainable agricultural development should shift toward the application of multi-indicators partition optimization.

Keywords Agricultural green development      Baiyangdian Basin      environmental emission threshold      partition management     
Corresponding Author(s): Xiangwen FAN,Wenqi MA   
Just Accepted Date: 26 December 2023   Online First Date: 24 January 2024    Issue Date: 08 March 2024
 Cite this article:   
Xiaomeng ZHANG,Xiangwen FAN,Wenqi MA, et al. Toward to agricultural green development by multi-objective zoning and nitrogen nutrient management: a case study in the Baiyangdian Basin, China[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2024, 11(1): 140-154.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fase/EN/10.15302/J-FASE-2023533
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fase/EN/Y2024/V11/I1/140
Fig.1  Conceptual framework of transformed agriculture.
RegionPopulation density (person·km–2)Ammonia emission threshold (kg·ha–1)
NH3 emission sensitive regionsHigh density> 100024
Medium density500?100027.5
Low density1?50031
Non-sensitive regions?31
Tab.1  Threshold of ammonia volatilization in different grade regions
RegionSlope (° )Distance (m)Surplus N threshold (t)
Subbasin 1 (Baigouyin River)Subbasin 5 (Fu River)Subbasin 7 (Xiaoyi River)
Steep, close> 3≤ 20001.49 ×105??
Slow, close≤ 3≤ 20002.47 × 1042.12 × 1032.74 × 102
Steep, far> 3> 20001.50 × 1055.1 × 101?
Slow, far≤ 3> 20003.38 × 1051.77 × 1034.47 × 102
Total basin??6.61 × 1053.94 × 1037.21 × 102
Tab.2  Threshold of surplus nitrogen in different grade regions
Fig.2  Level of indicators in different zones (low, below the threshold; high, exceeding the threshold; A, safe zone; B, overloaded zone; C, high ammonia zone; D, high ammonia overload zone; E, high surplus zone; F, high surplus overload zone; G, high ammonia and surplus nitrogen zone; H, high-risk zone, and O, ecological red line area).
ScenarioZoneEmission reduction technology
UTB–HBalanced nutrient supply and demand
ZMBRemove part of the livestock population
CFrequent manure removal technique, covered storage, and reactor composting
EImprovement of fertilization methods, application of new-type fertilizers, and integration of water and fertilizer
FRemove part of the livestock population
GThe whole chain emission reduction technology of crop–livestock systems
HRemove part of the livestock population
Tab.3  Emission reduction technologies in different zones
Fig.3  Proportion distribution of environmental indicators in the Baiyangdian Basin (%): (a) ammonia emission, (b) surplus N, and (c) soil carrying capacity.
Fig.4  Environmental zoning for the crop–livestock systems in the Baiyangdian Basin (A–O represents the meaning as shown in Fig. 2).
Zone and indexcharacteristics A (Surplus N low; ammonia emission low; non-overload) B(Surplus N low; ammonia emission low; overload) C(Surplus N low; ammonia emission high; non-overload) E(Surplus N high; ammonia emission low; non-overload) F(Surplus N high; ammonia emission low; overload) G(Surplus N high; ammonia emission high; non-overload) H(Surplus N high; ammonia emission high; overload) O(Prohibited cultivation)
TopographyMountain15718163141611
Plain5?1810?66?1
BasinBaigouyin River??13610441413
Ping River??7??849?
Bao River??5??60332
Cao River??1??751410
Fu River??6??93?1
Tang River??1122?45175
Xiaoyi River??238?60??
Zhulong River5?179?52134
Tab.4  Area proportion of different environmental zones in the crop–livestock systems of Baiyangdian Basin (%)
Fig.5  Changes of environmental indicators under different scenarios: (a) ammonia emission, (b) surplus N, (c) soil carrying capacity.
Fig.6  Proportion of different regions in different scenarios (%) (A–H represents the meaning as shown in Fig.2).
1 S Q, Jin K Y, Niu D M Han . The path of agricultural green development and its policy orientation in the 14th five-year plan period. Reform, 2020, (2): 30−39 (in Chinese)
2 A, Chaudhary D, Gustafson A Mathys . Multi-indicator sustainability assessment of global food systems. Nature Communications, 2018, 9(1): 848
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03308-7
3 W Q, Ma L, Ma J J, Zhang F S Zhang . Theoretical framework and realization pathway of agricultural green development. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2020, 28(8): 1103−1112 (in Chinese)
4 J, Shen Q, Zhu X, Jiao H, Ying H, Wang X, Wen W, Xu T, Li W, Cong X, Liu Y, Hou Z, Cui O, Oenema W J, Davies F Zhang . Agriculture Green Development: a model for China and the world. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2020, 7(1): 5–13
https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2019300
5 X, Jiao Y, Lyu X, Wu H, Li L, Cheng C, Zhang L, Yuan R, Jiang B, Jiang Z, Rengel F, Zhang W J, Davies J Shen . Grain production versus resource and environmental costs: towards increasing sustainability of nutrient use in China. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2016, 67(17): 4935–4949
https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw282
6 R F, Follett J L Hatfield . Nitrogen in the Environment: Sources, Problems, and Management. Elsevier Science, 2001
7 L, Liu W, Xu X, Lu B, Zhong Y, Guo X, Lu Y, Zhao W, He S, Wang X, Zhang X, Liu P Vitousek . Exploring global changes in agricultural ammonia emissions and their contribution to nitrogen deposition since 1980. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022, 119(14): e2121998119
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2121998119
8 P, Groenendijk M, Heinen G, Klammler J, Fank H, Kupfersberger V, Pisinaras A, Gemitzi S, Peña-Haro A, García-Prats M, Pulido-Velazquez A, Perego M, Acutis M Trevisan . Performance assessment of nitrate leaching models for highly vulnerable soils used in low-input farming based on lysimeter data. Science of the Total Environment, 2014, 499: 463–480
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.07.002
9 O, Oenema A, Bleeker N A, Braathen M, Budňáková K, Bull P, Čermák M, Geupel K, Hicks R, Hoft N, Kozlova A, Leip T, Spranger L, Valli G, Velthof W Winiwarter . Nitrogen in current European policies. In: Sutton M A, Howard C M, Erisman J W, Billen G, Bleeker A, Grennfelt P, van Grinsven H, Grizzetti B, eds. The European Nitrogen Assessment: Sources, Effects and Policy Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011, 62–81
10 E Stokstad . Nitrogen crisis threatens Dutch environment-and economy. Science, 2019, 366(6470): 1180–1181
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.366.6470.1180
11 X, Liu W, Xu Z, Sha Y, Zhang Z, Wen J, Wang F, Zhang K Goulding . A green eco-environment for sustainable development: framework and action. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2020, 7(1): 67–74
https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2019297
12 Y, Lu D, Norse D Powlson . Agriculture Green Development in China and the UK: common objectives and converging policy pathways. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2020, 7(1): 98–105
https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2019298
13 F S, Zhang W C, Dong J Q Li . Creating a new university-education system to promote Agriculture Green Development. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2020, 7(1): 114–116
https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2019319
14 X P, Jin L, Ma J J, Zhang W Q, Ma F S Zhang . Systematic research and quantitative approach for assessing agricultural green development. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2020, 28(8): 1127−1140 (in Chinese)
15 N, Razi M Shourian . Watershed-scale optimum livestock distribution and crop pattern planning constrained to the minimum nitrogen and phosphorus load in the runoff. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2022, 194(9): 655
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10333-z
16 J D, Pérez-Gutiérrez S Kumar . Simulating the influence of integrated crop–livestock systems on water yield at watershed scale. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 239: 385–394
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.068
17 P, Li D, Wang W, Li L Liu . Sustainable water resources development and management in large river basins: an introduction. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2022, 81(6): 179
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10298-9
18 X P, Jin Z H, Bai L Ma . Regional nitrogen and phosphorus leaching mitigation strategies based on nutrient losses vulnerable zones in China. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2021, 29(1): 217−229 (in Chinese)
19 X P, Jin Z H, Bai O, Oenema W, Winiwarter G, Velthof X, Chen L Ma . Spatial planning needed to drastically reduce nitrogen and phosphorus surpluses in China’s agriculture. Environmental Science & Technology, 2020, 54(19): 11894–11904
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c00781
20 Y, Han H Bu . The impact of climate change on the water quality of Baiyangdian Lake (China) in the past 30 years (1991–2020). Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 870: 161957
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161957
21 X, Guan X, Ren Y, Tao X, Chang B Li . Study of the water environment risk assessment of the upper reaches of the Baiyangdian Lake, China. Water, 2022, 14(16): 2557
https://doi.org/10.3390/w14162557
22 W B, Yang J, Yang Z Q, Zhao J J, Zhang J Wei . Temporal and spatial characteristics of nutrient flow and losses of the crop–livestock system in Baiyangdian Basin. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2022, 30(11): 1722−1736 (in Chinese)
23 J, Yang M, Strokal C, Kroeze M, Wang J, Wang Y, Wu Z, Bai L Ma . Nutrient losses to surface waters in Hai He basin: a case study of Guanting reservoir and Baiyangdian Lake. Agricultural Water Management, 2019, 213: 62–75
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.09.022
24 H X, Zhao Y T, Zhang W C, Li W Q, Ma L M, Zhai X H, Ju H T, Chen R, Kang Z M, Sun B, Xi H B Liu . Spatial characteristic and its factors of nitrogen surplus of crop and livestock production in the core area of the Baiyangdian Basin. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 118–128
25 State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China The . China’s Food Security. Beijing: The State Council Information Office (SCIO) of the People’s Republic of China, 2019. Available at SCIO website on December 4, 2023 (in Chinese)
26 L, Ma W Q, Ma G L, Velthof F H, Wang W, Qin F S, Zhang O Oenema . Modeling nutrient flows in the food chain of China. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2010, 39(4): 1279–1289
https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2009.0403
27 J, Lelieveld J S, Evans M, Fnais D, Giannadaki A Pozzer . The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature, 2015, 525(7569): 367–371
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15371
28 Y, Wu B, Gu J W, Erisman S, Reis Y, Fang X, Lu X Zhang . PM2.5 pollution is substantially affected by ammonia emissions in China. Environmental Pollution, 2016, 218: 86–94
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.08.027
29 Z, Bai X, Wang X, Wu W, Wang L, Liu X, Zhang X, Fan L Ma . China requires region-specific manure treatment and recycling technologies. Circular Agricultural Systems, 2021, 1(1): 1–7
https://doi.org/10.48130/CAS-2021-0001
30 J, Yang M, Strokal C, Kroeze L, Ma Z, Bai S, Teurlincx A B G Janssen . What is the pollution limit? Comparing nutrient loads with thresholds to improve water quality in Lake Baiyangdian. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 807(Pt 2): 50710
31 W, Steffen K, Richardson J, Rockström S E, Cornell I, Fetzer E M, Bennett R, Biggs S R, Carpenter Vries W, de Wit C A, de C, Folke D, Gerten J, Heinke G M, Mace L M, Persson V, Ramanathan B, Reyers S Sörlin . Sustainability. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 2015, 347(6223): 1259855
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855
32 K, Richardson W, Steffen W, Lucht J, Bendtsen S E, Cornell J F, Donges M, Drüke I, Fetzer G, Bala Bloh W, von G, Feulner S, Fiedler D, Gerten T, Gleeson M, Hofmann W, Huiskamp M, Kummu C, Mohan D, Nogués-Bravo S, Petri M, Porkka S, Rahmstorf S, Schaphoff K, Thonicke A, Tobian V, Virkki L, Wang-Erlandsson L, Weber J Rockström . Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries. Science Advances, 2023, 9(37): eadh2458
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adh2458
33 L F, Schulte-Uebbing A H W, Beusen A F, Bouwman Vries W de . From planetary to regional boundaries for agricultural nitrogen pollution. Nature, 2022, 610(7932): 507–512
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05158-2
34 J, Jiang J, Li Z, Wang X, Wu C, Lai X Chen . Effects of different cropping systems on ammonia nitrogen load in a typical agricultural watershed of South China. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2022, 246: 103963
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2022.103963
35 F, Wu Y, Fang M, Feng Z, Xie L, Zhu J Feng . Developing ecological thresholds for nitrogen and phosphorus in the Haihe River Basin in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, 19(24): 16951
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416951
36 Vries W, de L, Schulte-Uebbing H, Kros J C, Voogd G Louwagie . Spatially explicit boundaries for agricultural nitrogen inputs in the European Union to meet air and water quality targets. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 786: 147283
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147283
37 Z, Feng L, Wang Q, Peng J, Li T Liang . Effect of environmental factors on soil properties under different land use types in a typical basin of the North China Plain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 344: 131084
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131084
38 X, Zhang B, Gu Grinsven H, van S K, Lam X, Liang M, Bai D Chen . Societal benefits of halving agricultural ammonia emissions in China far exceed the abatement costs. Nature Communications, 2020, 11(1): 4357
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18196-z
39 D R, Chadwick J R, Williams Y, Lu L, Ma Z, Bai Y, Hou X, Chen T H Misselbrook . Strategies to reduce nutrient pollution from manure management in China. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2020, 7(1): 45–55
https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2019293
40 T, Li Z, Wang C, Wang J, Huang Y, Feng W, Shen M, Zhou L Yang . Ammonia volatilization mitigation in crop farming: a review of fertilizer amendment technologies and mechanisms. Chemosphere, 2022, 303(Pt 1): 134944
41 Y, Ma L, Zhang Z, Bai R, Jiang Y, Hou L Ma . Nutrient use efficiency and loss of industrial farms and mixed smallholdings: lessons from the North China Plain. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2021, 8(1): 58
https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2020371
42 C, Zhang S, Liu S, Wu S, Jin S, Reis H, Liu B Gu . Rebuilding the linkage between livestock and cropland to mitigate agricultural pollution in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2019, 144: 65–73
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.011
43 A, Svanbäck M L, McCrackin D P, Swaney H, Linefur B G, Gustafsson R W, Howarth C Humborg . Reducing agricultural nutrient surpluses in a large catchment—Links to livestock density. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 648: 1549–1559
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.194
44 T, Zhao Y, Cheng Y, Fan X Fan . Functional tradeoffs and feature recognition of rural production–living–ecological spaces. Land, 2022, 11(7): 1103
https://doi.org/10.3390/land11071103
45 P, Xiao J, Xu C Zhao . Conflict identification and zoning optimization of “production–living–ecological” space. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, 19(13): 7990
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137990
46 T, Meng S Fan . Transforming Chinese food and agriculture: a systems perspective. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2023, 10(1): 4–15
47 Y, Yin K, He Z, Chen Y, Li F, Ren Z, Wang Y, Wang H, Gong Q, ZHU J, Shen X, Liu Z Cui . Agriculture Green Development to achieve food security and carbon reduction in the context of China’s dual carbon goals. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2023, 10(2): 262–267
[1] Xiangwen FAN, Xiaomeng ZHANG, Xiaofei WU, Wenqi MA, Zhaohai BAI, Lin MA. Toward sustainable food systems: global initiatives and innovations[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2024, 11(1): 197-209.
[2] Jianjie ZHANG, Xiangwen FAN, Ling LIU, Lin MA, Zhaohai BAI, Wenqi MA. Comparison of indicators for agricultural green development and the Sustainable Development Goals, and mapping the way forward[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2024, 11(1): 69-82.
[3] Shenggen FAN. Sustainable intensification of agriculture is key to feeding Africa in the 21st century[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2020, 7(4): 366-370.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed