Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-7505

ISSN 2095-977X(Online)

CN 10-1204/S

Postal Subscription Code 80-906

Front. Agr. Sci. Eng.    2024, Vol. 11 Issue (4) : 575-588    https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2024563
Effects of combined drip irrigation and mulching practices on the soil evaporation characteristics in a young apple orchard in arid northwestern China
Xinyu WANG1,2,3, Haijing WANG1,2,3, Xiao LI1,2,3, Di WANG1,2,3()
. State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Agricultural Water Resources, China Agricultural University,Beijing 100083, China
. College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
. National Field Scientific Observation and Research Station on Efficient Water Use of Oasis Agriculture,Wuwei 733009, China
 Download: PDF(3072 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Soil evaporation (SE) is a key component of regional hydrological balance, especially in arid areas. China has the largest area of apple orchards in the world, but the effects of mulching practices on SE dynamics and their controlling factors remain poorly understood in orchards using drip irrigation (DI). This study was conducted to address these issues by measuring SE, meteorological factors, soil temperature (ST), and soil water content (SWC) in young apple orchard under two mulching treatments during the growing season. Field experiments, which included three treatments—film mulching (FM) and maize straw mulching (SM), and clean tillage (TL) as a comparator—were conducted in 3-year-old apple orchard with DI in arid northwestern China. The results revealed that mulching significantly affected the daily SE dynamics of the young orchard (p < 0.05), and the daily mean SE under FM, SM, and TL treatments was about 1.3 ± 0.5, 1.3 ± 0.4, and 1.7 ± 0.4 mm·d−1, respectively. No significant differences were detected in the daily SE between FM and SM treatments (p > 0.05), whereas the daily SWC in the four soil layers to 120 cm were consistently greater under SM treatment than under FM and TL treatments (p < 0.05). Compared to the TL treatment, the daily SE under FM and SM treatments was more susceptible to meteorological factors. Stepwise regression analysis showed that the daily SE of the young orchard was mainly controlled by the vapor pressure deficit, reference evapotranspiration and solar radiation, regardless of the treatment. However, there was no significant relationship between the daily SE and wind speed under TL treatment (p > 0.05). This study highlighted the significant differences in SE losses and SWC dynamics of the mulching treatments. Overall, SM is considered to be a more effective mulching practice for reducing unproductive SE and improving SWC status in young apple orchards with DI in arid and similar climatic regions.

Keywords Drip irrigation      orchards soil evaporation      surface mulching      water-limited regions     
Corresponding Author(s): Di WANG   
Just Accepted Date: 28 April 2024   Online First Date: 28 May 2024    Issue Date: 12 November 2024
 Cite this article:   
Xinyu WANG,Haijing WANG,Xiao LI, et al. Effects of combined drip irrigation and mulching practices on the soil evaporation characteristics in a young apple orchard in arid northwestern China[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2024, 11(4): 575-588.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fase/EN/10.15302/J-FASE-2024563
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fase/EN/Y2024/V11/I4/575
Fig.1  Seasonal variations in precipitation (P) (a), solar radiation (SR) (b), air temperature (AT) (c), relative humidity (RH) (d), wind speed (WS) (e), vapor pressure deficit (VPD) (f), and reference evapotranspiration (ET0) (g) during the study period.
Fig.2  Daily soil water content (SWC) throughout the 120-cm soil profile under different treatments of film mulching (FM) with drip irrigation (DI) (a), maize straw mulching (SM) with DI (b), and clear tillage (TL) with DI (c) during the study period.
Fig.3  Daily soil temperature (ST) in the 0–30 cm soil layer under different treatments of film mulching (FM) with drip irrigation (DI) (a), maize straw mulching (SM) with DI (b), and clear tillage (TL) with DI (c) during the study period.
Fig.4  Dynamics of daily soil evaporation (SE) of a young apple orchard under different treatments of film mulching (FM) with drip irrigation (DI) (a), maize straw mulching (SM) with DI (b), and clear tillage (TL) with DI (c) during the study period.
Fig.5  Comparison of mean daily soil evaporation (SE) (a), tree height (TH) (b), and tree diameter (TD) (c) in a young apple orchard under different treatments of film mulching (FM) with drip irrigation (DI), maize straw mulching (SM) with DI, and clear tillage (TL) with DI during the study period. Bars with the letter are not significantly differences in daily SE, TH, and TD between treatments (p < 0.05).
Fig.6  Dynamics of tree height (TH) and tree diameter (TD) of a young apple orchard under different treatments of film mulching (FM) with drip irrigation (DI) (a and d), maize straw mulching (SM) with DI (b and e), and clear tillage (TL) with DI (c and f) during the study period.
Treatment Regression equation Adjust R2 F value
FM SE = 0.687VPD ? 0.700ET0 + 0.013SR ? 0.128 0.407 25.3**
SM SE = 0.668VPD ? 0.684ET0 + 0.013SR ? 0.112 0.416 22.4**
TL SE = 0.876VPD ? 0.837ET0 + 0.015SR + 0.021 0.418 19.4**
Tab.1  The stepwise regression equations between daily soil evaporation (SE) and the influencing factors under different treatments of film mulching (FM) with drip irrigation (DI), maize straw mulching (SM) with DI, and clear tillage (TL) with DI during the study period
Fig.7  Correlations between daily soil evaporation (SE) and the influencing factors under different treatments of film mulching (FM) with drip irrigation (DI) (a), maize straw mulching (SM) with DI (b), and clear tillage (TL) with DI (c). SR, AT, RH, WS, VPD, ET0, ST, and SWC are solar radiation, air temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, vapor pressure deficit, reference evapotranspiration, soil temperature, and soil water content, respectively. *Indicates significance at 0.05 level.
Fig.8  Comparison of mean daily soil temperature (ST) (a) and soil water content (SWC) (b) at different depths in a young apple orchard under different treatments of film mulching (FM) with drip irrigation (DI), maize straw mulching (SM) with DI, and clear tillage (TL) with DI. Bars with the same uppercase letter are significantly different in ST and SWC between treatments for the same depth (p < 0.05). Those with the same lowercase letters are not significantly different in ST and SWC between depths for the same treatment (p < 0.05).
Fig.9  Relationships between daily soil evaporation (SE) and soil temperature (ST) at different soil depths under three treatments of film mulching (FM) with drip irrigation (DI) (a), maize straw mulching (SM) with DI (b), and clear tillage (TL) with DI (c) during the study period.
1 M, Abdel-Sattar H R M Kotb . Nutritional status and productivity of Anna apple trees in the year following autumn irrigation determent. Agricultural Water Management, 2021, 252: 106882
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106882
2 F, Lecaros-Arellano E, Holzapfel E, Fereres D, Rivera N, Muñoz J Jara . Effects of the number of drip laterals on yield and quality of apples grown in two soil types. Agricultural Water Management, 2021, 248: 106781
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106781
3 and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Food . Production/Crops and Livestock Products—Metadata. FAO: 2023. Available at FAO website on June 22, 2023
4 D, Wang L Wang . Dynamics of evapotranspiration partitioning for apple trees of different ages in a semiarid region of Northwest China. Agricultural Water Management, 2017, 191: 1–15
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2017.05.010
5 S Q, Du S Z, Kang F S, Li T S Du . Water use efficiency is improved by alternate partial root-zone irrigation of apple in arid Northwest China. Agricultural Water Management, 2017, 179: 184–192
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.05.011
6 C W, Liu S Z, Kang F S, Li S E, Li T S, Du L Tong . Relationship between environmental factor and maximum daily stem shrinkage in apple tree in arid region of northwest China. Scientia Horticulturae, 2011, 130(1): 118–125
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2011.06.022
7 T Volschenk . Evapotranspiration and crop coefficients of Golden Delicious/M793 apple trees in the Koue Bokkeveld. Agricultural Water Management, 2017, 194: 184–191
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2017.09.002
8 X, Zhou R S, Wang F, Gao H J, Xiao H S, Xu D M Wang . Apple and maize physiological characteristics and water-use efficiency in an alley cropping system under water and fertilizer coupling in Loess Plateau, China. Agricultural Water Management, 2019, 221: 1–12
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.04.019
9 Z, Ntshidi S, Dzikiti D, Mazvimavi N T Mobe . Contribution of understorey vegetation to evapotranspiration partitioning in apple orchards under Mediterranean climatic conditions in South Africa. Agricultural Water Management, 2021, 245: 106627
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106627
10 N T, Mobe S, Dzikiti S F, Zirebwa S J E, Midgley Loeper W, von D, Mazvimavi Z, Ntshidi N Z Jovanovic . Estimating crop coefficients for apple orchards with varying canopy cover using measured data from twelve orchards in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. Agricultural Water Management, 2020, 233: 106103
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106103
11 Y H, Cai P T, Wu D L, Zhu L, Zhang X N, Zhao X D, Gao M S, Ge X L, Song Y, Wu Z G Dai . Subsurface irrigation with ceramic emitters: an effective method to improve apple yield and irrigation water use efficiency in the semiarid Loess Plateau. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2021, 313: 107404
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107404
12 M, Tudi L, Yang J, Yu B, Wei Y, Xue F, Wang L, Li Q J, Yu H D, Ruan Q, Li R, Sadler D Connell . Leaching characteristics and potential risk of heavy metals from drip irrigation pipes and mulch substrate in agricultural ecosystems. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 882: 163573
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163573
13 T B, Ren P F, Fan W B, Zuo Z Z, Liao F L, Wang Y W, Wei X J, Cai G S Liu . Biochar-based fertilizer under drip irrigation: more conducive to improving soil carbon pool and promoting nitrogen utilization. Ecological Indicators, 2023, 154: 110583
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110583
14 X L, Su P Z, Shi X Y, Yang L J, He S Z Kang . Water consumption variation and growth of apple trees under drip irrigation in Shiyanghe River basin of Gansu Province. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2005, 16(1): 19−23 (in Chinese)
15 M M, Li G Y, An Y, Guo Z Zhao . Effects of different irrigation patterns on soil water and WUE in Weibei apple orchard. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2011, 29(4): 174−179 (in Chinese)
16 X B, Shi Z W, Bao H L, Du W Y Ma . Experimental study on the soil evaporation under root-zone irrigation and drip irrigation in agricultural system in the downstream part of Tarim River. Water Saving Irrigation, 2012, (6): 17−21 (in Chinese)
17 S K, Patra R, Poddar S, Pramanik P, Bandopadhyay A, Gaber A Hossain . Growth, yield, water productivity and economics of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) in response to gravity drip irrigation under mulch and without-mulch conditions. Scientia Horticulturae, 2023, 321: 112327
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2023.112327
18 D, Kool N, Agam N, Lazarovitch J L, Heitman T J, Sauer A Bengal . A review of approaches for evapotranspiration partitioning. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2014, 184: 56–70
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.09.003
19 X M, Sun B P, Wilcox C B Zou . Evapotranspiration partitioning in dryland ecosystems: a global meta-analysis of in situ studies. Journal of Hydrology, 2019, 576: 123–136
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.022
20 D, Zanotelli L, Montagnani C, Andreotti M Tagliavini . Evapotranspiration and crop coefficient patterns of an apple orchard in a sub-humid environment. Agricultural Water Management, 2019, 226: 105756
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105756
21 W R, Żelazny M Licznar-Małańczuk . Soil quality and tree status in a twelve-year-old apple orchard under three mulch-based floor management systems. Soil & Tillage Research, 2018, 180: 250–258
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.03.010
22 F U, Ochege G P, Luo X L, Yuan G, Owusu C F, Li F M Justine . Simulated effects of plastic film-mulched soil on surface energy fluxes based on optimized TSEB model in a drip-irrigated cotton field. Agricultural Water Management, 2022, 262: 107394
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107394
23 Z, Liu C, Zhao P, Zhang Z K Jia . Long-term effects of plastic mulching on soil structure, organic carbon and yield of rainfed maize. Agricultural Water Management, 2023, 287: 108447
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108447
24 G D, Suo Y S, Xie Y, Zhang H Luo . Long-term effects of different surface mulching techniques on soil water and fruit yield in an apple orchard on the Loess Plateau of China. Scientia Horticulturae, 2019, 246: 643–651
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.11.028
25 Y, Liao H X, Cao X, Liu H T, Li Q Y, Hu W K Xue . By increasing infiltration and reducing evaporation, mulching can improve the soil water environment and apple yield of orchards in semiarid areas. Agricultural Water Management, 2021, 253: 106936
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106936
26 N, Di Y, Wang B, Clothier Y, Liu L M, Jia B Y, Xi H X Shi . Modeling soil evaporation and the response of the crop coefficient to leaf area index in mature Populus tomentosa plantations growing under different soil water availabilities. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2019, 264: 125–137
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.10.004
27 M L, Cavanaugh S A, Kurc R L Scott . Evapotranspiration partitioning in semiarid shrubland ecosystems: a two-site evaluation of soil moisture control on transpiration. Ecohydrology, 2011, 4(5): 671–681
https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.157
28 D, Wang L Wang . Characteristics of soil evaporation at two stages of growth in apple orchards with different ages in a semi-humid region. Agricultural Water Management, 2023, 280: 108233
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108233
29 C H, Zheng R S, Wang X, Zhou C N, Li X Y Dou . Effects of mulch and irrigation regimes on water distribution and root competition in an apple-soybean intercropping system in Loess Plateau, China. Agricultural Water Management, 2021, 246: 106656
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106656
30 Y, Liawo H X, Cao W K, Xue X Liu . Effects of the combination of mulching and deficit irrigation on the soil water and heat, growth and productivity of apples. Agricultural Water Management, 2021, 243: 106482
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106482
31 E, Nazari S, Besharat K, Zeinalzadeh A Mohammadi . Measurement and simulation of the water flow and root uptake in soil under subsurface drip irrigation of apple tree. Agricultural Water Management, 2021, 255: 106972
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106972
32 H, Guo S E, Li S Z, Kang T S, Du W F, Liu L, Tong X M, Hao R S Ding . The controlling factors of ecosystem water use efficiency in maize fields under drip and border irrigation systems in Northwest China. Agricultural Water Management, 2022, 272: 107839
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107839
33 S Q, Du L, Tong X T, Zhang S Z, Kang T S, Du S E, Li R S Ding . Signal intensity based on maximum daily stem shrinkage can reflect the water status of apple trees under alternate partial root-zone irrigation. Agricultural Water Management, 2017, 190: 21–30
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2017.05.004
34 G S, Campbell J M Norman . An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1998
35 R G, Allen L S, Pereira D, Raes M Smith . Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper, 1998, 56
36 X L, Song X D, Gao M, Dyck W, Zhang P T, Wu J, Yao X N Zhao . Soil water and root distribution of apple tree (Malus pumila Mill) stands in relation to stand age and rainwater collection and infiltration system (RWCI) in a hilly region of the Loess Plateau, China. Catena, 2018, 170: 324–334
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.06.026
37 J C, Villegas D D, Breshears C B, Zou D J Law . Ecohydrological controls of soil evaporation in deciduous drylands: How the hierarchical effects of litter, patch and vegetation mosaic cover interact with phenology and season. Journal of Arid Environments, 2010, 74(5): 595–602
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2009.09.028
38 D L, Flumignan R T Faria . Evapotranspiration components and dual crop coefficients of coffee trees during crop production. Agricultural Water Management, 2011, 98(5): 791–800
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2010.12.002
39 Y Q, Zhang S Z, Kang E J, Ward R S, Ding X, Zhang R Zheng . Evapotranspiration components determined by sap flow and microlysimetry techniques of a vineyard in Northwest China: dynamics and influential factors. Agricultural Water Management, 2011, 98(8): 1207–1214
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2011.03.006
40 T, Tugwell-Wootton G, Skrzypek S, Dogramaci J, McCallum P F Grierson . Soil moisture evaporative losses in response to wet-dry cycles in a semiarid climate. Journal of Hydrology, 2020, 590: 125533
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125533
41 D, Or P, Lehmann E, Shahraeeni N Shokri . Advances in soil evaporation physics—A review. Vadose Zone Journal, 2013, 12(4): 1–16
https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2012.0163
42 G Y, Gao D, Wang T S, Zha L X, Wang B J Fu . A global synthesis of transpiration rate and evapotranspiration partitioning in the shrub ecosystems. Journal of Hydrology, 2022, 606: 127417
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127417
43 T G, Poulsen T N, Li T J, Lu H Chen . Local-scale evaporation and water loss distribution in surface soil as related to near-surface wind conditions and surface geometry. European Journal of Soil Science, 2022, 73(1): e13199
https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13199
44 T G, Poulsen W L, Cai A Garg . Water evaporation from cracked soil under moist conditions as related to crack properties and near-surface wind speed. European Journal of Soil Science, 2020, 71(4): 627–640
https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12926
45 A, Amazirh O, Merlin S, Er-Raki E, Bouras A Chehbouni . Implementing a new texture-based soil evaporation reduction coefficient in the FAO dual crop coefficient method. Agricultural Water Management, 2021, 250: 106827
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106827
46 J F, Chen X, Xie X Q, Zheng J, Xue C Y, Miao Q, Du Y X Xu . Effects of sand-mulch thickness on soil evaporation during the freeze-thaw period. Hydrological Processes, 2020, 34(13): 2830–2842
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13766
47 H Y, Sun L W, Shao X W, Liu W F, Miao S Y, Chen X Y Zhang . Determination of water consumption and the water-saving potential of three mulching methods in a jujube orchard. European Journal of Agronomy, 2012, 43: 87–95
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2012.05.007
48 R, Thapa S B, Mirsky K L Tully . Cover crops reduce nitrate leaching in agroecosystems: a global meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2018, 47(6): 1400–1411
https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2018.03.0107
49 Y, Zhang Y S Xie . Effects of different patterns of surface mulching on soil hydrology in an apple orchard. Acta Prataculturea Sinica, 2011, 20(2): 85−92 (in Chinese)
50 G O, Awe J M, Reichert O O Wendroth . Temporal variability and covariance structures of soil temperature in a sugarcane field under different management practices in southern Brazil. Soil & Tillage Research, 2015, 150: 93–106
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2015.01.013
51 M, Unkovich J, Baldock R Farquharson . Field measurements of bare soil evaporation and crop transpiration, and transpiration efficiency, for rainfed grain crops in Australia—A review. Agricultural Water Management, 2018, 205: 72–80
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.04.016
52 O, Merlin L, Olivera-Guerra Hssaine B, Aït A, Amazirh Z, Rafi J, Ezzahar P, Gentine S, Khabba S, Gascoin S Er-Raki . A phenomenological model of soil evaporative efficiency using surface soil moisture and temperature data. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2018, 256−257: 501−515
53 T, Yamanaka M, Inoue I Kaihotsu . Effects of gravel mulch on water vapor transfer above and below the soil surface. Agricultural Water Management, 2004, 67(2): 145–155
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2004.01.002
54 T, Yamanaka A, Takeda F Sugita . A modified surface-resistance approach for representing bare-soil evaporation: wind tunnel experiments under various atmospheric conditions. Water Resources Research, 1997, 33(9): 2117–2128
https://doi.org/10.1029/97WR01639
55 F, Diaz C C, Jimenez M Tejedor . Influence of the thickness and grain size of tephra mulch on soil water evaporation. Agricultural Water Management, 2005, 74(1): 47–55
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2004.10.011
56 Neriah A, Ben S, Assouline U, Shavit N Weisbrod . Impact of ambient conditions on evaporation from porous media. Water Resources Research, 2014, 50(8): 6696–6712
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015523
57 W B, Zhu J X, Wei H L, Xiu S F, Jia A F Lv . Coupled and continuous estimation of soil moisture and evaporative fraction within the remotely sensed surface temperature-vegetation index framework. Journal of Hydrology, 2021, 592: 125827
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125827
58 E, Balugani M W, Lubczynski der Tol C, van K Metselaar . Testing three approaches to estimate soil evaporation through a dry soil layer in a semi-arid area. Journal of Hydrology, 2018, 567: 405–419
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.10.018
59 D, Pariva Q, Ashi B, Ruchi A H Syed . A review of the methods available for estimating soil moisture and its implications for water resource management. Journal of Hydrology, 2012, 458–459: 458–459
60 W P, Kustas J M Norman . Evaluation of soil and vegetation heat flux predictions using a simple two-source model with radiometric temperatures for partial canopy cover. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 1999, 94(1): 13–29
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(99)00005-2
61 Y J, Wu T S, Du R S, Ding Y S, Yuan S E, Li L Tong . An isotope method to quantify soil evaporation and evaluate water vapor movement under plastic film mulch. Agricultural Water Management, 2017, 184: 59–66
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2017.01.005
62 Y, Zhang P N, Mishra A Scheuermann . An improved evaporation quantification method: accounting for soil deformability and side evaporation effect. Journal of Hydrology, 2021, 598: 126486
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126486
63 P, Brunner H T, Li W, Kinzelbach W P, Li X G Dong . Extracting phreatic evaporation from remotely sensed maps of evapotranspiration. Water Resources Research, 2008, 44(8): 1291–1295
https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006063
64 D, Wang L, Wang R Zhang . Measurement and modeling of canopy interception losses by two differently aged apple orchards in a subhumid region of the Yellow River Basin. Agricultural Water Management, 2022, 269: 107667
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107667
65 Hayat M, Zha T S, Jia X, Iqbal S, Qian D, Bourque C P A, Khan A, Tian Y, Bai Y J, Liu P, Yang R Z. A multiple-temporal scale analysis of biophysical control of sap flow in Salix psammophila growing in a semiarid shrubland ecosystem of Northwest China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2020, 288–289: 107985
66 D, Wang G Y, Gao J R, Li C, Yuan Y H, Lü B J Fu . Sap flow dynamics of xerophytic shrubs differ significantly among rainfall categories in the Loess Plateau of China. Journal of Hydrology, 2020, 585: 124815
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124815
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed