|
|
Using coalgebras and the Giry monad for interpreting game logics— a tutorial |
Ernst-Erich DOBERKAT( ) |
Math++ Software, Bochum 44879, Germany |
|
|
Abstract The stochastic interpretation of Parikh’s game logic should not follow the usual pattern of Kripke models, which in turn are based on the Kleisli morphisms for the Giry monad, rather, a specific and more general approach to probabilistic nondeterminism is required.We outline this approach together with its probabilistic and measure theoretic basis, introducing in a leisurely pace the Giry monad and its Kleisli morphisms together with important techniques for manipulating them. Proof establishing specific techniques are given, and pointers to the extant literature are provided. After working through this tutorial, the reader should find it easier to follow the original literature in this and related areas, and it should be possible for her or him to appreciate measure theoretic arguments for original work in the areas of Markov transition systems, and stochastic effectivity functions.
|
Keywords
coalgebras
modal logics
monads
Giry monad
upper closed monad
composition of monads
game logics
|
Corresponding Author(s):
Ernst-Erich DOBERKAT
|
Just Accepted Date: 05 July 2016
Online First Date: 17 October 2016
Issue Date: 07 December 2017
|
|
1 |
RuttenJ J M M. Universal coalgebra: a theory of systems. Theoretical Computer Science, 2000, 249(1): 3–80
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3975(00)00056-6
|
2 |
VenemaY. 6 Algebras and co-algebras. Studies in Logic and Practical Reasoning, 2007, 3: 331–426
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1570-2464(07)80009-7
|
3 |
JacobsB. Introduction to Coalgebra: Towards Mathematics of States and Observations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016
|
4 |
DoberkatE E. Special Topics in Mathematics for Computer Science: Sets, Categories, Topologies, Measures. Springer, 2015
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22750-4
|
5 |
DoberkatE E. Algebraic properties of stochastic effectivity functions. Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming, 2014, 83(3): 339–358
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlamp.2014.03.002
|
6 |
DoberkatE E. A stochastic interpretation of game logic. 2016, arXiv: 1403.7765
|
7 |
HennessyM, MilnerR. On observing nondeterminism and concurrency. In: Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming. 1980, 299–309
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-10003-2_79
|
8 |
DoberkatE E. A note on the coalgebraic interpretation of game logic. Rend.istit.mat.univ.trieste, 2010, 42: 191–203
|
9 |
DoberkatE E. Stochastic Coalgebraic Logic. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2009
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02995-0
|
10 |
SrivastavaS M. A Course on Borel Sets (Graduate Texts in Mathematics). New York: Springer-Verlag, 1998
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85473-6
|
11 |
TerrafP S. Unprovability of the logical characterization of bisimulation. Information and Computation, 2011, 209(7): 1048–1056
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ic.2011.02.003
|
12 |
DesharnaisJ, EdalatA, PanangadenP . Bisimulation of labelled Markov processes. Information and Computation, 2002, 179(2): 163–193
https://doi.org/10.1006/inco.2001.2962
|
13 |
EdalatA. Semi-pullbacks and bisimulations in categories of Markov processes. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, 1999, 9(5): 523–543
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960129599002819
|
14 |
DoberkatE E. Semi-pullbacks for stochastic relations over analytic spaces. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, 2005, 15(4): 647–670
https://doi.org/10.1017/S096012950500472X
|
15 |
DoberkatE E. Semi-pullbacks and bisimulations in categories of stochastic relations. In: Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming. 2003, 996–1007
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45061-0_77
|
16 |
ParikhR.The logic of games and its applications. North-Holland Mathematics Studies, 1985, 102: 111–139
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-0208(08)73078-0
|
17 |
PaulyM, ParikhR. Game logic—an overview. Studia Logica, 2003, 75(2): 165–182
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027354826364
|
18 |
Van BenthemJ. Logic games are complete for game logics. Studia Logica, 2003, 75(2): 183–203
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027306910434
|
19 |
PaulyM. Game Logic for Game Theorists.Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica, 2000
|
20 |
GoldblattR. Deduction systems for coalgebras over measurable spaces. Journal of Logic and Computation, 2010, 20(5): 1069–1100
https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exn092
|
21 |
MossL S. Coalgebraic logic. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 1999, 96(1): 277–317
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-0072(98)00042-6
|
22 |
SchröderL. Expressivity of coalgebraic modal logic: the limits and beyond. Theoretical Computer Science, 2008, 390(2): 230–247
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2007.09.023
|
23 |
D’argenioP R, Terraf P S, WolovickN . Bisimulations for nondeterministic labelled Markov processes. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, 2012, 22(1): 43–68
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960129511000454
|
24 |
DoberkatE E, TerrafP S. Stochastic non-determinism and effectivity functions. Journal of Logic and Computation, doi: 10.1093/logcom/ exv049 (arxiv: 1405.7141), 2015
|
25 |
JechT. Set Theory. 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2006
|
26 |
HalmosP R. Measure Theory (Graduate Texts in Mathematics). Springer Science & Business Media, 2007
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|