Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Computer Science

ISSN 2095-2228

ISSN 2095-2236(Online)

CN 10-1014/TP

Postal Subscription Code 80-970

2018 Impact Factor: 1.129

Front. Comput. Sci.    2021, Vol. 15 Issue (3) : 153401    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-020-9076-2
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Monotonic and nonmonotonic gentzen deduction systems for L3-valued propositional logic
Cungen CAO1, Lanxi HU1,2(), Yuefei SUI1,2
1. Key Laboratory of Intelligent Information Processing, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
2. School of Computer Science and Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
 Download: PDF(341 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

A sequent is a pair (Γ, Δ), which is true under an assignment if either some formula in Γ is false, or some formula in Δ is true. In L3-valued propositional logic, a multisequent is a triple Δ|Θ|Γ, which is true under an assignment if either some formula in Δ has truth-value t, or some formula in Θ has truth-value m, or some formula in Γ has truth-value f. Correspondingly there is a sound and complete Gentzen deduction system G for multisequents which is monotonic. Dually, a comultisequent is a triple Δ : Θ : Γ, which is valid if there is an assignment v in which each formula in Δ has truth-value≠t, each formula in Θ has truth-value≠m, and each formula in Γ has truth-value≠f. Correspondingly there is a sound and complete Gentzen deduction system G for co-multisequents which is nonmonotonic.

Keywords three-valued logic      multisequent      co-multisequent      monotonicity      Gentzen deduction system     
Corresponding Author(s): Lanxi HU   
Issue Date: 27 January 2021
 Cite this article:   
Cungen CAO,Lanxi HU,Yuefei SUI. Monotonic and nonmonotonic gentzen deduction systems for L3-valued propositional logic[J]. Front. Comput. Sci., 2021, 15(3): 153401.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcs/EN/10.1007/s11704-020-9076-2
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcs/EN/Y2021/V15/I3/153401
1 R Hähnle. Advanced many-valued logics. In: Gabbay D M, Guenthner F, eds. Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol.2. Springer, Netherlands, 2001, 297–395
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0452-6_5
2 G Malinowski. Many-valued logic and its philosophy. In: Gabbay D M, Woods J, eds. Handbook of The History of Logic, Vol.8, The Many Valued and Nonmonotonic Turn in Logic. Elsevier, 2009
3 D A Bochvar, M Bergmann. On a three-valued logical calculus and its application to the analysis of the paradoxes of the classical extended functional calculus. History and Philosophy of Logic, 1981, 2(1–2): 87–112
https://doi.org/10.1080/01445348108837023
4 J Łukasiewicz. Selected Works. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1970
5 B Sobocínski. Axiomatization of a partial system of three-value calculus of propositions. The Journal of Computing Systems, 1952, 1(1): 23–55
6 A Avron. Natural 3-valued logics-characterization and proof theory. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1991, 56(1): 276–294
https://doi.org/10.2307/2274919
7 H Wansing. The power of Belnap: sequent systems for SIXTEEN3. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2010, 39(4): 369–393
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-010-9139-1
8 A Avron. On the expressive power of three-valued and four-valued languages. Journal of Logic and Computation, 2000, 9(6): 977–994
https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/9.6.977
9 R Zach. Proof theory of finite-valued logics, Technical Report TUWE185.2- Z.1-93. Institut Für Computersprachen, Technische Universität Wien, 1993
10 D M Gabbay. Labelled Deductive Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996
11 MC Fitting. Many-valued modal logics. Fundamenta Informaticae, 1991, 15(3): 235–254
12 W Li, Y F Sui. Multisequent gentzen deduction systems for B22-valued first-order logic. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2018, 7(1): 53
https://doi.org/10.5430/air.v7n1p53
13 S Gottwald. A Treatise on Many-Valued Logics, Studies in Logic and Computation, Vol.9. Baldock: Research Studies Press Ltd., 2001
14 R Reiter. A logic for default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 1980, 13(1–2): 81–132
https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(80)90014-4
15 M L Ginsberg. Readings in Nonmonotonic Reasoning. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1987
16 K Clark. Negation as failure. In: Ginsberg M L, ed. Readings in Non monotonic Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1987, 311–325
17 G Takeuti. Proof theory. In: Barwise J, ed. Handbook of Mathematical Logic, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics. Amsterdam, NL: North-Holland, 1987
18 C Cao, B Chen, Y Sui. The B4-valued propositional Belnap-Dunn logic. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2015, 28: 2705–2713
https://doi.org/10.3233/IFS-151548
19 A Urquhart. Basic many-valued logic. In: Gabbay D M, Guenthner F, eds. Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol.2. Springer, Netherlands, 2001, 249–295
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0452-6_4
[1] Highlights Download
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed