Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-0179

ISSN 2095-0187(Online)

CN 11-5981/TQ

Postal Subscription Code 80-969

2018 Impact Factor: 2.809

Front. Chem. Sci. Eng.    2015, Vol. 9 Issue (2) : 232-241    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-015-1511-9
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Rheological behavior of mixed system of ionic liquid [C8mim]Br and sodium oleate in water
Zimeng HE,Ling YUE,Meng LI,Yazhuo SHANG(),Honglai LIU
State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering and Department of Chemistry, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China
 Download: PDF(1532 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

We report on the rheological behavior of wormlike micelles constructed by ionic liquid surfactant [C8mim]Br (1-octyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide) and anionic surfactant sodium oleate (NaOA) in aqueous solution. The effects of surfactant composition, total surfactant concentration, added salts, and temperature were investigated. The prevailing surfactant effect at lower concentration and the leading cosolvent effect at higher concentration of [C8mim]Br may be the main reasons for appearance of well-established maximum in key rheological parameters with variation of surfactant composition and total surfactant concentration. The Cole-Cole plots demonstrate that the systems (total surfactant concentration falls within 0.17–0.35 mol·L-1 and molar ratio 0.33≤R≤0.50) fit the Maxwell’s mechanical model as linear viscoelastic fluid. The addition of NaBr or sodium salicylate decreases significantly the viscosity and the relaxation time of the wormlike micelle solution but cannot change the value of plateau modulus G0. The present system has low rheological tolerance to temperature. The increase of temperature decreases the average contour length and viscosity of wormlike micelles and thus strengthens the relaxation progress of diffusion and weakens the relaxation progress of reptation. Increasing the temperature also decreases the value of plateau modulus G0 and shifts the minimum value of the loss modulus Gmin to higher frequencies.

Keywords rheological behavior      ionic liquid surfactant      sodium oleate      wormlike micelles      viscoelasticity     
Corresponding Author(s): Yazhuo SHANG   
Online First Date: 26 May 2015    Issue Date: 14 July 2015
 Cite this article:   
Zimeng HE,Ling YUE,Meng LI, et al. Rheological behavior of mixed system of ionic liquid [C8mim]Br and sodium oleate in water[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2015, 9(2): 232-241.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/10.1007/s11705-015-1511-9
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/Y2015/V9/I2/232
Fig.1  Chemical structures of NaOA and [C8mim]Br

(A) NaOA (B) [C8mim]Br

Fig.2  Steady rheological behaviors for [C8mim]Br/NaOA aqueous solutions. (A) The molar ratio of [C8mim]Br to NaOA is varied from 0.10 to 0.80. The insert shows the zero-shear viscosity as a function of [C8mim]Br/NaOA ratio (the lines are simply to guide the eye). (B) Steady rheological behaviors for pure NaOA, and pure [C8mim]Br as well as the mixed systems with different molar ratios (0.10, 0.60, 0.80). The total surfactant concentration is kept constant at 0.2 mol·L-1 (40 °C).
Fig.3  Effect of varying the ratio of [C8mim]Br to NaOA on the dynamic frequency response. The total surfactant concentration is kept constant at 0.2 mol·L-1 (40 °C). Storage modulus G′ are shown by open symbols; loss modulus G′′ are shown by filled symbols
Fig.4  Cole-Cole plots for [C8mim]Br/NaOA solutions with different molar ratios at 40 °C. The total surfactant concentration is kept constant at 0.2 mol·L-1.
Fig.5  Steady rheological behavior for [C8mim]Br/NaOA aqueous solutions. Total surfactant concentration is varied from 0.12 to 0.40 mol·L-1. The insert shows the zero-shear viscosity as a function of total surfactant concentration (The lines are simply to guide the eye). The molar ratio of [C8mim]Br/NaOA solutions is kept constant at 0.36 (40 °C).
Fig.6  Effect of total surfactant concentration on the dynamic frequency response. The molar ratio of [C8 mim]Br/NaOA is kept constant at 0.36 (40 °C). Storage modulus G′ are shown by open symbols; loss modulus G′′ are shown by filled symbols
Fig.7  Cole-Cole plots for [C8 mim]Br/NaOA solutions with different total surfactant concentrations at 40 °C. The molar ratio of [C8mim]Br/NaOA solutions is kept constant at 0.36
Fig.8  Zero shear viscosity as a function of the concentration of added salts in 0.2 mol·L-1 [C8mim]Br/NaOA solutions at 40 °C. The molar ratio of [C8mim]Br to NaOA was 0.36
Fig.9  Effect of salt concentration (A: NaBr, B: NaSal) on the dynamic frequency spectra of 0.2 mol·L-1 [C8mim]Br/NaOA system (R = 0.36, 40 °C). Storage modulus G′ are shown by open symbols; loss modulus G′′ are shown by filled symbols
Fig.10  η0versus 1/T for the 0.2 mol·L-1 [C8mim]Br/NaOA solutions. The molar ratio of [C8mim]Br to NaOA was 0.36
Fig.11  Steady rheological behavior for 0.2 mol·L-1 [C8mim]Br/NaOA solutions at different temperature. The molar ratio of [C8mim]Br to NaOA was 0.36
Fig.12  Effect of temperature on the dynamic frequency response. The total surfactant concentration is kept constant at 0.2 mol·L-1. The molar ratio of [C8mim]Br to NaOA was 0.36. Storage modulus G′ are shown by open symbols; loss modulus G′′ are shown by filled symbols
Fig.13  The ratio of G0 to G m i n ' ' as a function of temperature for 0.2 mol·L-1 [C8mim]Br/NaOA solutions. The molar ratio of [C8mim]Br to NaOA was 0.36.
1 Helgeson M E, Hodgdon T K, Kaler E W, Wagner N J, Vethamuthu M, Ananthapadmanabhan K P. Formation and rheology of viscoelastic “double networks” in wormlike micelle-nanoparticle mixtures. Langmuir, 2010, 26(11): 8049-8060
2 Wang X, Wang R, Zheng Y, Sun L, Yu L, Jiao J, Wang R. Interaction between zwitterionic surface activity ionic liquid and anionic surfactant: Na+-driven wormlike micelles. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2013, 117(6): 1886-1895
3 Yin H, Lin Y, Huang J. Microstructures and rheological dynamics of viscoelastic solutions in a catanionic surfactant system. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2009, 338(1): 177-183
4 Garcia-Perez A, da Silva M A, Eriksson J, Gonzalez-Gaitano G, Valero M, Dreiss C A. Remarkable viscoelasticity in mixtures of cyclodextrins and nonionic surfactants. Langmuir, 2014, 30(39): 11552-11562
5 Chandler H D. Activation energy and entropy for viscosity of wormlike micelle solutions. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2013, 409: 98-103
6 Lu H, Shi Q, Huang Z. pH-responsive anionic wormlike micelle based on sodium oleate induced by NaCl. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2014, 118(43): 12511-12517
7 Davies T S, Ketner A M, Raghavan S R. Self-assembly of surfactant vesicles that transform into viscoelastic wormlike micelles upon heating. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2006, 128(20): 6669-6675
8 Yang J, Yang Z, Lu Y, Chen J, Qin W. Rheological properties of zwitterionic wormlike micelle in presence of solvents and cosurfactant at high temperature. Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology, 2013, 34(8): 1124-1129
9 Dreiss C A. Wormlike micelles: where do we stand? Recent developments, linear rheology and scattering techniques. Soft Matter, 2007, 3(8): 956-970
10 Acharya D P, Kunieda H. Wormlike micelles in mixed surfactant solutions. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2006, 123 - 126: 401-413
11 Yang J. Viscoelastic wormlike micelles and their applications. Colloid & Interface Science, 2002, 7(5,6): 276-281
12 Maitland G C. Oil and gas production. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, 2000, 5(5,6): 301-311
13 Zakin J L, Lu B, Bewersdorff H. Surfactant drag reduction. Reviews in Chemical Engineering, 1998, 14(4-5): 253-320
14 Tian M, Zhu L, Yu D, Wang Y, Sun S, Wang Y. Aggregate transitions in mixtures of anionic sulfonate gemini surfactant with cationic ammonium single-chain surfactant. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2013, 117(1): 433-440
15 Aikawa S, Shrestha R G, Ohmori T, Fukukita Y, Tezuka Y, Endo T, Torigoe K, Tsuchiya K, Sakamoto K, Sakai K, Abe M, Sakai H. Photorheological response of aqueous wormlike micelles with photocleavable surfactant. Langmuir, 2013, 29(19): 5668-5676
16 Tang M, Carter W C. Branching mechanisms in surfactant micellar growth. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2013, 117(10): 2898-2905
17 Kusano T, Iwase H, Yoshimura T, Shibayama M. Structural and rheological studies on growth of salt-free wormlike micelles formed by star-type trimeric surfactants. Langmuir, 2012, 28(49): 16798-16806
18 Brinchi L, Germani R, Di Profio P, Marte L, Savelli G, Oda R, Berti D. Viscoelastic solutions formed by worm-like micelles of amine oxide surfactant. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2010, 346(1): 100-106
19 Pei X, Zhao J, Wei X. Wormlike micelles formed by mixed cationic and anionic gemini surfactants in aqueous solution. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2011, 356(1): 176-181
20 Shrestha R G, Shrestha L K, Aramaki K. Rheology of wormlike micelles in aqueous systems of a mixed amino acid-based anionic surfactant and cationic surfactant. Colloid & Polymer Science, 2009, 287(11): 1305-1315
21 Shrestha R G, Sharma S C, Sakai K, Sakai H, Abe M. Polyoxyethylene cholesteryl ether-based aqueous wormlike micelles. Colloid & Polymer Science, 2012, 290(4): 339-348
22 Sarmiento-Gomez E, Lopez-Diaz D, Castillo R. Microrheology and characteristic lengths in wormlike micelles made of a zwitterionic surfactant and SDS in brine. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2010, 114(38): 12193-12202
23 Lu Y, Zhou T, Fan Q, Dong J, Li X. Light-responsive viscoelastic fluids based on anionic wormlike micelles. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2013, 412: 107-111
24 Mei Y, Han Y, Wang H, Xie L, Zhou H. Electrostatic effect on synergism of wormlike micelles and hydrophobically modified polyacrylic acid. Journal of Surfactants and Detergents, 2014, 17(2): 323-330
25 Han Y, Wei Y, Wang H, Mei Y, Zhou H. Contrasting the effects of hydrophobicity and counterion size on anionic wormlike micelle growth. Journal of Surfactants and Detergents, 2013, 16(1): 139-145
26 Koshy P, Aswal V K, Venkatesh M, Hassan P A. Unusual scaling in the rheology of branched wormlike micelles formed by cetyltrimethylammonium bromide and sodium oleate. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2011, 115(37): 10817-10825
27 Li X P, Yu L, Ji Y Q, Wu B, Li G Z, Zheng L Q. New type flooding systems in enhanced oil recovery. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2009, 20(10): 1251-1254
28 Ziserman L, Abezgauz L, Ramon O, Raghavan S R, Danino D. Origins of the viscosity peak in wormlike micellar solutions. Mixed cataionic surfactants. A cryo-transmission electron microscopy study. Langmuir, 2009, 25(18): 10483-10489
29 Raghavan S R, Fritz G, Kaler E W. Wormlike micelles formed by synergistic self-assembly in mixtures of anionic and cationic surfactants. Langmuir, 2002, 18(10): 3797-3803
30 Cao Q, Yu L, Zheng L Q, Li G Z, Ding Y H, Xiao J H. Rheological properties of wormlike micelles in sodium oleate solution induced by sodium ion. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2008, 312(1): 32-38
31 Griffin P J, Holt A P, Wang Y, Novikov V N, Sangoro J R, Kremer F, Sokolov A P. Interplay between hydrophobic aggregation and charge transport in the ionic liquid methyltrioctylammonium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2014, 118(3): 783-790
32 Guo P, Guo R. Ionic liquid induced transition from wormlike to rod or spherical micelles in mixed nonionic surfactant systems. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2010, 55(9): 3590-3597
33 Smith J A, Webber G B, Warr G G, Atkin R. Rheology of protic ionic liquids and their mixtures. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2013, 117(44): 13930-13935
34 Lopez-Barron C R, Wagner N J. Structural transitions of CTAB micelles in a protic ionic liquid. Langmuir, 2012, 28(35): 12722-12730
35 Page M G, Warr G G. Structure and dynamics of self-assembling aluminum didodecyl phosphate organogels. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2004, 108(43): 16983-16989
36 Comelles F, Ribosa I, Gonzalez J J, Garcia M T. Micellization of sodium laurylethoxysulfate (SLES) and short chain imidazolium ionic liquids in aqueous solution. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2014, 425: 44-51
37 Francisco K R, da Silva M A, Sabadini E, Karlsson G, Dreiss C A. Effect of monomeric and polymeric co-solutes on cetyltrimethylammonium bromide wormlike micelles: Rheology, Cryo-TEM and small-angle neutron scattering. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2010, 345(2): 351-359
38 Geng X F, Hu X Q, Jia X C, Luo L J. Effects of sodium salicylate on the microstructure of a novel zwitterionic gemini surfactant and its rheological responses. Colloid & Polymer Science, 2014, 292(4): 915-921
39 Shrestha R G, Shrestha L K, Matsunaga T, Shibayama M, Aramaki K. Lipophilic tail architecture and molecular structure of neutralizing agent for the controlled rheology of viscoelastic fluid in amino acid-based anionic surfactant system. Langmuir, 2011, 27(6): 2229-2236
40 Zhang Y, Luo Y, Wang Y, Zhang J, Feng Y. Single-component wormlike micellar system formed by a carboxylbetaine surfactant with C22 saturated tail. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2013, 436: 71-79
41 Li L, Yang Y, Dong J, Li X. Azobenzene dye induced micelle to vesicle transition in cationic surfactant aqueous solutions. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2010, 343(2): 504-509
[1] WEI Shanshan, LIU Yuejun, LI Xianggang, HUANG Yugang, WANG Xiayu, ZHANG Ping. Preparation and rheological behaviors of PA6/SiO2 nanocompiste[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2007, 1(4): 332-337.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed