Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-0179

ISSN 2095-0187(Online)

CN 11-5981/TQ

Postal Subscription Code 80-969

2018 Impact Factor: 2.809

Front. Chem. Sci. Eng.    2020, Vol. 14 Issue (2) : 288-303    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-019-1875-3
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Thermal and catalytic pyrolysis of a synthetic mixture representative of packaging plastics residue
Simona Colantonio1, Lorenzo Cafiero1, Doina De Angelis1, Nicolò M. Ippolito2, Riccardo Tuffi1(), Stefano Vecchio Ciprioti3
1. Department for Sustainability, ENEA—Casaccia Research Center, Rome 00123, Italy
2. Department of Chemical, Materials and Environmental Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome 00184, Italy
3. Department of SBAI, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome 00161, Italy
 Download: PDF(782 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

A synthetic mixture of real waste packaging plastics representative of the residue from a material recovery facility (plasmix) was submitted to thermal and catalytic pyrolysis. Preliminary thermogravimetry experiments coupled with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy were performed to evaluate the effects of the catalysts on the polymers’ degradation temperatures and to determine the main compounds produced during pyrolysis. The thermal and catalytic experiments were conducted at 370°C, 450°C and 650°C using a bench scale reactor. The oil, gas, and char yields were analyzed and the compositions of the reaction products were compared. The primary aim of this study was to understand the effects of zeolitic hydrogen ultra stable zeolite Y (HUSY) and hydrogen zeolite socony mobil-5 (HZSM5) catalysts with high silica content on the pyrolysis process and the products’ quality. Thermogravimetry showed that HUSY significantly reduces the degradation temperature of all the polymers—particularly the polyolefines. HZSM5 had a significant effect on the degradation of polyethylene due to its smaller pore size. Mass balance showed that oil is always the main product of pyrolysis, regardless of the process conditions. However, all pyrolysis runs performed at 370°C were incomplete. The use of either zeolites resulted in a decrease in the heavy oil fraction and the prevention of wax formation. HUSY has the best performance in terms of the total monoaromatic yield (29 wt-% at 450°C), while HZSM5 promoted the production of gases (41 wt-% at 650°C). Plasmix is a potential input material for pyrolysis that is positively affected by the presence of the two tested zeolites. A more effective separation of polyethylene terephthalate during the selection process could lead to higher quality pyrolysis products.

Keywords packaging plastics waste      plasmix      pyrolysis      zeolite catalyst      degradation temperature     
Corresponding Author(s): Riccardo Tuffi   
Just Accepted Date: 22 October 2019   Online First Date: 09 December 2019    Issue Date: 24 March 2020
 Cite this article:   
Simona Colantonio,Lorenzo Cafiero,Doina De Angelis, et al. Thermal and catalytic pyrolysis of a synthetic mixture representative of packaging plastics residue[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(2): 288-303.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/10.1007/s11705-019-1875-3
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/Y2020/V14/I2/288
C/wt-% H/wt-% N/wt-% S/wt-% O/wt-% Cl/wt-% Humidity/ wt-% Volatile matter/wt-% Fixed carbon/wt-% Ash/wt-% LHV/(MJ?kg?1)
85.5±0.2 12.4±0.1 n.d.a) n.d. 1.7±0.1 n.d. 0.05±0.01 98.6±0.2 0.85±0.03 0.37±0.06 41.5±0.1
Tab.1  Elemental analysis, proximate analysis, and LHV of CPCPW2 [5,25]
Zeolite SiO2/Al2O3 /(mol?mol?1) Pore size/Å Cation type Na2O/wt-% BET surface area/(m2?g?1) Form Particle size/mm Supplier company
HUSY 30 8 H+ 0.03 780 Powder ? Zeolyst International
HZSM-5 1500 5.8 H+ <0.05 310 Powder 10 Tosoh
Tab.2  Zeolites characteristics (supplier data)
Fig.1  System and operating conditions of pyrolysis experiments: a. N2 cylinder, b. upstream flowmeter, c. manometer, d. electric furnace, e. reactor containing the plastic sample or the plastic sample and the catalyst, f. flasks for collection of the condensed products (the second one works basically as a filter), g. cold trap, h. furnace section at constant temperature, i. freezing mixture trap, l. downstream flowmeter, m. gas sample bag.
Fig.2  Comparison of DTG curves of single polymers with CPCPW2 (with TG curves in the inner plot) at a heating rate of 10 °C?min–1 in a N2 atmosphere, both with and without catalyst. (a) PE film, (b) PP, (c) PS, (d) PET, (e) CPCPW2.
Sample No catalyst /Match %a) HUSY catalyst /Match % HZSM5 catalyst /Match %
I peak II peak
PE film 1-Heptene /89 or 1-hexene /89 2-Methylbutane /96 or pentane /94 Pentane /95 or
2-Methylbutane /94
2-Methyl-1-pentene /75
PP 2,3-Dimethyl-1-hexene /88 2,5-Dimethyl-2-hexene /96 2,5-Dimethyl-2-hexene /96 2-Methyl-1-pentene /75
PS Styrene /94 2-Methylbutane /78 or butane /76 Benzene /82 Styrene /68
PET Benzoic acid /88 Carbon dioxide /9 or
Ethanal /49
Ethanal /85b)
Carbon dioxide /75 or
Ethanal /37
Ethanal /80b)
Carbon dioxide /77 or
Ethanal /40
Ethanal /81b)
Tab.3  Identification of vapor the species evolved during the thermal degradation of CPCPW2 at the DTG peak temperature on the basis of the best match percentages between the FTIR spectra of the unknown vapor species and those selected from the database available from the FTIR instrument software
Fig.3  FTIR spectra of the vapor products evolved at (a) 447°C, 477°C (DTG peak) and 507°C for degradation of PE film without catalyst; (b) 265°C (first DTG peak), 350°C and 394°C (second DTG peak) for degradation of PE film with HUSY; (c) 395°C, 425°C (DTG peak) and 455°C for degradation of PE film with HZSM5.
Fig.4  FTIR spectra of the vapor products evolved at: (a) 381°C, 411°C (DTG peak), and 441°C for degradation of PS without a catalyst; (b) 228°C (first DTG peak), 316°C and 404°C (second DTG peak) for degradation of PS with HUSY; (c) 391°C, 421°C (DTG peak), and 451°C for degradation of PS with HZSM5.
Fig.5  FTIR spectra of the vapor products evolved at (a) 418°C (first DTG peak), 440°C and 461°C (second DTG peak) for degradation of CPCPW2 without catalyst; (b) 289°C (first DTG peak), 342°C and 395°C (second DTG peak) for degradation of CPCPW2 with HUSY; (c) 418°C (first DTG peak), 435°C and 452°C (second DTG peak) for degradation of CPCPW2 with HZSM5.
Pyrolysis Temperature/°C Light oil/wax (wt-%) Heavy oil/wt-% Gas/wt-% Char/wt-%
Thermal 370a) 14±2 6±2 14±2 11±1
HUSY 42±3 6±2 21±1 19±2
HZSM5 22±2 15±4 13±2 22±5
Thermal 450 58.5±0.1 23.9±0.2 16.2±0.4 1.4±0.3
HUSY 72.3±0.5 1.8±0.2 20.1±0.4 5.8±0.4
HZSM5 55.0±0.3 15.9±0.8 28.9±0.4 0.19±0.02
Thermal 650 82.7±0.4 1.0±0.2 15.3±0.3 1.0±0.2
HUSY 64.7±0.2 1.3±0.2 31.8±0.2 2.2±0.2
HZSM5 56.3±0.6 1.5±0.8 41.4±0.4 0.8±0.2
Tab.4  Product yields by thermal and catalytic pyrolysis of CPCPW2
Compounds Fractions Thermal HZSM5 HUSY
C5–C9 Linear aliphatics /area% 3.2 0.9 0.1
Branched aliphatics /area% 7.8 10.2 12.9
Aromatics /area% 13.1 28.6 22.5
Oxygenated compounds /area% n.d.a) n.d. n.d.
Total /area% 24.1 39.7 35.6
Total number of compounds 22 36 40
C10–C13 Linear aliphatics /area% 3.2 n.d. n.d.
Branched aliphatics /area% 1.4 1.3 3.9
Aromatics /area% 0.4 0.7 1.5
Oxygenated compounds /area% 2.02 1.12 n.d.
Total /area% 7.0 3.1 5.4
Total number of compounds 18 9 23
>C13 Linear aliphatics /area% 1.3 n.d. n.d.
Branched aliphatics /area% n.d. n.d. n.d.
Aromatics /area% 0.5 0.3 n.d.
Oxygenated compounds /area% 0.33 n.d. n.d.
Total /area% 2.1 0.3 n.d.
Total number of compounds 11 1 n.d.
Tab.5  Fractions of interest of the light oil/wax from thermal and catalytic pyrolysis at 450°C of CPCPW2 determined by GC-MS (relative area≥0.1% and similarity≥85%)
Fig.6  Yield percentages of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene meta, para xylene, and styrene and of their sum with respect to the weight of CPCPW2 pyrolyzed under different conditions.
Pyrolysis Temperature/°C H2 /v% CO/v% CH4/v% CO2/v% C2H2/v% C2H4/v% C2H6/v% LHV
/(MJ?kg?1)
Thermal 450 n.d. 23.8±0.3 13.9±0.3 7.1±0.2 5.8±0.1 16.2±0.3 33.3±0.5 33.5±0.7
HUSY n.d. 12.7±0.1 16.8±0.1 36.1±0.1 n.d. 8.6±0.1 25.9±0.1 20.2±0.1
HZSM5 n.d. 15.7±0.1 11.2±0.1 37.8±0.2 n.d. 12.3±0.1 23.0±0.1 18.8±0.2
Thermal 650 2.3±0.5 13.3±0.2 18.9±0.5 20.1±0.6 3.9±0.1 18.6±0.5 22.8±0.3 28.4±0.9
HUSY n.d. 16.7±0.1 28.5±0.1 28.2±0.1 n.d. 11.8±0.1 14.8±0.1 21.9±0.1
HZSM5 7.8±0.1 6.7±0.1 33.3±0.4 24.5±0.3 1.4±0.1 18.9±0.2 7.4±0.1 26.0±0.5
Tab.6  Gas composition and LHV of the gaseous mixtures produced during thermal and catalytic pyrolysis of CPCPW2 at 450°C and 650°C
Temperature/°C C/wt-% H/wt-% N/wt-% S/wt-% O/wt-% Humidity/wt-% Ash/wt-% LHV/ (MJ?kg?1)
450 87.6±0.7 6.3±0.8 n.d. n.d. 0.6±0.2 6±1 6±1 37±1
650 84.3±0.8 1.6±0.1 n.d. n.d. 2.0±0.4 5±1 12±1 29±1
Tab.7  Elemental analysis and LHV of char from thermal pyrolysis of CPCPW2 at 450°C and 650°C
1 Association of Plastics Manufacturers. Plastics—the facts 2018. An analysis of European latest plastics production, demand and waste data. Plastic Europe, 2018
2 C Q Wang, H Wang, J G Fu, Y N Liu. Flotation separation of waste plastics for recycling—A Review. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 2015, 41: 28–38
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.03.027
3 The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Directive 2018/852/EU amending Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste. 2018
4 A Adrados, I de Marco, B M Caballero, A López, M F Laresgoiti, A Torres. Pyrolysis of plastic packaging waste: A comparison of plastic residuals from material recovery facilities with simulated plastic waste. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 2012, 32(5): 826–832
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.06.016
5 R Tuffi, S D’Abramo, L M Cafiero, E Trinca, S Vecchio Ciprioti. Thermal behavior and pyrolytic degradation kinetics of polymeric mixtures from waste packaging plastics. Express Polymer Letters, 2018, 12(1): 82–99
https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2018.7
6 A K Panda, R K Singh, D K Mishra. Thermolysis of waste plastics to liquid fuel A suitable method for plastic waste management and manufacture of value-added products—A world prospective. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2010, 14(1): 233–248
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.07.005
7 N Kiran, E Ekinci, C E Snape. Recycling of plastics wastes via pyrolysis. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2000, 29(4): 273–283
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(00)00052-5
8 J Jamradloedluk, C Lertsatitthanakorn. Characterization and utilization of char derived from fast pyrolysis of plastic wastes. Procedia Engineering, 2014, 69: 1437–1442
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.03.139
9 T P Wampler. Applied Pyrolyis Handbook. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc., 1995, 77–96
10 N Grassie, G Scott. Polymer Degradation and Stabilization. 1st ed. London: Cambridge University Press, 1985, 23–34
11 D S Achilias, I Kanellopoulou, P Megalokonomos, E Antonakou, A Lappas. Chemical recycling of polystyrene by pyrolysis: Potential use of the liquid product for the reproduction of polymer. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering, 2007, 292(8): 923–934
https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.200700058
12 H J Lovink, L A Pine. Hydrocarbon Chemistry of FCC Naphtha Formation. Paris: Technip Editions, 1990, 165–172
13 R Miandad, M A Barakat, A S Aburiazaiza, M Rehan, A S Nizami. Catalytic pyrolysis of plastic waste: A review. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2016, 102: 822–838 doi:10.1016/j.psep.2016.06.022
14 W Zhao, S Hasegawa, J Fujita, F Yoshii, T Sasaki, K Makuuchi, J Sun, S Nishimoto. Effects of zeolites on the pyrolysis of polypropylene. Polymer Degradation & Stability, 1996, 53(1): 129–135
https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-3910(96)00080-8
15 D P Serrano, J Aguado, J M Escola. Developing advanced catalysts for the conversion of polyolefinic waste plastics into fuels and chemicals. ACS Catalysis, 2012, 2(9): 1924–1941
https://doi.org/10.1021/cs3003403
16 A G Buekens, H Huang. Catalytic plastics cracking for recovery of gasoline-range hydrocarbons from municipal plastic wastes. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 1998, 23(3): 163–181
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(98)00025-1
17 I de Marco, B M Caballero, A Lopez, M F Laresgoiti, A Torres, M J Chomon. Pyrolysis of the rejects of a waste packaging separation and classification plant. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2009, 85(1-2): 384–391
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2008.09.002
18 C Muhammad, J A Onwudili, P T Williams. Catalytic prolysis of waste plastic from electrical and electronc equipment. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2015, 113: 332–339
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2015.02.016
19 C Santella, L M Cafiero, D De Angelis, F La Marca, R Tuffi, S Vecchio Ciprioti. Thermal and catalytic pyrolysis of a mixture of plastics from small waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE). Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 2016, 54: 143–152
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.05.005
20 S M Al-Salem, A Antelava, A Constantinou, G Manos, A Dutta. A review on thermal and catalytic pyrolysis pf plastic solid waste (PSW). Journal of Environmental Management, 2017, 197: 177–198 doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.084
21 K H Lee. Feedstock Recycling and Pyrolysis of Waste Plastics. 1st ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2006, 129–157
22 T Faravelli, M Pinciroli, F Pisano, G Bozzano, M Dente, E Ranzi. Thermal degradation of polystyrene. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2001, 60(1): 103–121
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-2370(00)00159-5
23 A Demirbas. Pyrolysis of municipal plastic wastes for recovery of gasoline-range hydrocarbons. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2004, 72(1): 97–102
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2004.03.001
24 A Angyal, N Miskolczi, L Bartha. Petrochemical feedstock by thermal cracking of plastic waste. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2007, 79(1-2): 409–414
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2006.12.031
25 L M Cafiero, D Fabbri, E Trinca, R Tuffi, S Vecchio Ciprioti. Thermal and spectroscopic (TG/DCS-FTIR) characterization of mixed plastics for materials and energy recovery under pyrolytic conditions. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2015, 121(3): 1111–1119
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-015-4799-2
26 Y Seo, K Lee, D Shin. Investigation of catalytic degradation of high density polyethylene by hydrocarbon group type analysis. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2003, 70(2): 383–398
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-2370(02)00186-9
27 J A Onwudili, N Insura, P T Williams. Composition of products from the pyrolysis of polyethylene and polystyrene in a closed batch reactor: Effects of temperature and residence time. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2009, 86(2): 293–303
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2009.07.008
28 A López, I de Marco, B M Caballero, A Adrados, M F Laresgoiti. Deactivation and regeneration of ZSM-5 zeolite in catalytic pyrolysis of plastic wastes. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 2011, 31(8): 1852–1858
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.04.004
29 M Benedetti, L Cafiero, D De Angelis, A Dell’Era, M Pasquali, S Stendardo, R Tuffi, S V Ciprioti. Pyrolysis of WEEE plastics using catalysts produced from fly ash of coal gasification. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2017, 11(5): 11–21
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-017-0998-3
30 A J Kidany, W R Parrish. Fundamentals of Natural Gas Processing. 1st ed. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2006, 354–360
31 A Marcilla, A Gomez-Siurana, D Berenguer. Study of the influence of the characteristics of different acid solid in the catalytic pyrolysis of different polymers. Applied Catalysis, 2006, 301(2): 222–231
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2005.12.018
32 A Marcilla, A Gomez-Siurana, F Valdes. Catalytic pyrolysis of LDPE over H-beta and HZSM5 zeolites in dynamic conditions study of the evolution of the process. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2007, 79(1-2): 433–442
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2006.09.006
33 J Agullo, N Kumar, D Berenguer, D Kubicka, A Marcilla, A Gomez, T Salmi, D Y Murzin. Catalytic pyrolysis of low-density polyethylene over H-b, H-Y, H-Mordenite and H-Ferrierite zeolite catalysts: Influence of acidity and structures. Kinetics and Catalysis, 2007, 48(4): 535–540
https://doi.org/10.1134/S002315840704009X
34 G Manos, A Garforth, J Dwyer. Catalytic degradation of high-density polyethylene over different zeolitic structures. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2000, 39(5): 1198–1202
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie990512q
35 S M Csicsery. Catalysis by shape selective zeolites-science and technology. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 1986, 6(6): 841–856
https://doi.org/10.1351/pac198658060841
36 P T Williams, E Slaney. Analysis of products from the pyrolysis and liquefaction of single plastics and waste plastic mixtures. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2007, 51(4): 754–769
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.12.002
37 W Kaminsky, I J N Zorriqueta. Catalytical and thermal pyrolysis of polyolefins. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2007, 79(1-2): 368–374
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2006.11.005
38 F Ates, N Miskolczi, N Borsodi. Comparison of real waste (MSW and MPW) pyrolysis in batch reactor over different catalysts. Part I: product yields, gas and pyrolysis oil properties. Bioresource Technology, 2013, 133: 443–454
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.112
39 D W Green, R H Perry. Perry’s Chemical Engineers’ Handbook. 8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2007, 24–34
40 D P Serrano, J Aguado, J M Escola. Catalytic cracking of a polyolefin mixture over different acid solid catalysts. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2000, 39(5): 1177–1184 doi:10.1021/ie9906363
41 D P Serrano, J Aguado, J M Escola, J M Rodriguez, G San Miguel. An investigation into the catalytic cracking of LDPE using Py-GC/MS. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2005, 74(1-2): 370–378
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2004.11.026
42 D H Olson, G T Kokotailo, S L Lawton, W M Meler. Crystal structure and structure-related properties of ZSM-5. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1981, 85(15): 2238–2243
https://doi.org/10.1021/j150615a020
43 D P Serrano, J Aguado, J M Escola. Catalytic conversion of polystyrene over HMCM-41, HZSM-5 and amorphous SiO2-Al2O3: Comparison with thermal cracking. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2000, 25(2-3): 181–189
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-3373(99)00130-7
44 J Aguado, J L Sotelo, D P Serrano, J A Calles, J M Escola. Catalytic conversion of polyolefins into liquid fuels over MCM-41: Comparison with ZSM-5 and amorphous SiO2-Al2O3. Energy & Fuels, 1997, 11(6): 1225–1231
https://doi.org/10.1021/ef970055v
45 G Audisio, A Silvani, P L Beltrame, P Carniti. Catalytic thermal degradation of polymers: Degradation of polypropylene. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 1984, 7(1-2): 83–90
https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-2370(84)80042-X
46 J Tae, B Jang, J Kim, I Kim, D Park. Catalytic degradation of polystyrene using acid-treated halloysite clays. Solid State Ionics, 2004, 172(1-4): 129–133
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2004.05.013
47 A Marcilla, M I Beltran, R Navarro. Thermal and catalytic pyrolysis of polyethylene over HZSM5 and HUSY zeolites in a batch reactor under dynamic conditions. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2009, 86(1-2): 78–86
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2008.07.026
48 Z Zhang, T Hirose, S Nishio, Y Morioka, N Azuma, A Ueno, H Ohkita, M Okada. Chemical recycling of waste polystyrene into styrene over solid acids and bases. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1995, 34(12): 4514–4519
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie00039a044
49 H E Whyte, K Loubar, S Awad, M Tazerout. Pyrolytic oil production by catalytic pyrolysis of refuse-derived fuels: Investigation of low cost catalysts. Fuel Processing Technology, 2015, 140: 32–38 doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.08.022
50 D Murzin. Chemical Engineering for Renewable Conversion. 1st ed. Oxford: Academic Press, 2013, 76–132
51 T Imam, S Capareda. Characterization of bio-oil, syn-gas and bio-char from switchgrass pyrolysis at various temperatures. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2012, 93: 170–177
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2011.11.010
52 A Corma, A V Orchilles. Current views on the mechanism of catalytic cracking. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2000, 35-36: 21–30
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1387-1811(99)00205-X
53 E T C Vogt, B M Weckhuysen. Fluid catalytic cracking: Recent developments on the grand old lady of zeolite catalysis. Chemical Society Reviews, 2015, 44(20): 7342–7370
https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CS00376H
54 G Audisio, F Bertini, P Beltrame, P Carniti. Catalytic degradation of polymers: Part III. Degradation of polystyrene. Polymer Degradation & Stability, 1990, 29(2): 191–200
https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-3910(90)90030-B
[1] FCE-19027-OF-CS_suppl_1 Download
[1] Xiangchun Liu, Ping Cui, Qiang Ling, Zhigang Zhao, Ruilun Xie. A review on co-pyrolysis of coal and oil shale to produce coke[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(4): 504-512.
[2] Ying Yan, Peng Huang, Huiping Zhang. Preparation and characterization of novel carbon molecular sieve membrane/PSSF composite by pyrolysis method for toluene adsorption[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(4): 772-783.
[3] Vojtěch Turek, Bohuslav Kilkovský, Zdeněk Jegla, Petr Stehlík. Proposed EU legislation to force changes in sewage sludge disposal: A case study[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(4): 660-669.
[4] Attila Egedy, Lívia Gyurik, Tamás Varga, Jun Zou, Norbert Miskolczi, Haiping Yang. Kinetic-compartmental modelling of potassium-containing cellulose feedstock gasification[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(4): 708-717.
[5] Songbo He, Jeffrey Boom, Rolf van der Gaast, K. Seshan. Hydro-pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass over alumina supported Platinum, Mo2C and WC catalysts[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(1): 155-161.
[6] Liaoyuan Mao, Yanxin Li, Z. Conrad Zhang. Upgrading of derived pyrolysis vapors for the production of biofuels from corncobs[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(1): 50-58.
[7] Shaolong WAN,Yong WANG. A review on ex situ catalytic fast pyrolysis of biomass[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2014, 8(3): 280-294.
[8] W. Widiyastuti, Adhi Setiawan, Sugeng Winardi, Tantular Nurtono, Heru Setyawan. Particle formation of hydroxyapatite precursor containing two components in a spray pyrolysis process[J]. Front Chem Sci Eng, 2014, 8(1): 104-113.
[9] Quanyuan WEI, Yongshui QU, Tianwei TAN. Mass and heat balance calculations and economic evaluation of an innovative biomass pyrolysis project[J]. Front Chem Sci Eng, 2011, 5(3): 355-361.
[10] Rui LI, Baosheng JIN, Xiangru JIA, Zhaoping ZHONG, Gang XIAO, Xufeng FU. Research on combustion characteristics of bio-oil from sewage sludge[J]. Front Chem Eng Chin, 2009, 3(2): 161-166.
[11] WANG Shurong, LIU Qian, LUO Zhongyang, CEN Kefa, LIAO Yanfen. Experimental study of the influence of acid wash on cellulose pyrolysis[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2007, 1(1): 35-39.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed