Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-0179

ISSN 2095-0187(Online)

CN 11-5981/TQ

Postal Subscription Code 80-969

2018 Impact Factor: 2.809

Front. Chem. Sci. Eng.    2023, Vol. 17 Issue (5) : 594-605    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-022-2255-y
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Power-to-chemicals: sustainable liquefaction of food waste with plasma-electrolysis
Wenquan Xie1, Xianhui Zhang1(), Dengke Xi1, Rusen Zhou2, Size Yang1, Patrick Cullen2, Renwu Zhou2,3()
1. Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plasma and Magnetic Resonance, Fujian Engineering Research Center for EDA, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Wave Science and Detection Technology, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Multiphysics Electronic Information, Institute of Electromagnetics and Acoustics, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
2. School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia
3. State Key Laboratory of Electrical Insulation and Power Equipment, Centre for Plasma Biomedicine, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
 Download: PDF(2967 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The increasing amount of food waste from various industrial, agricultural, and household sources is an environmental burden if managed inappropriately. Numerous waste management approaches have been developed for the disposal of food waste, but still suffer from either high cost, production of toxic by-products, or secondary environmental pollutions. Herein, we report a new and sustainable plasma electrolysis biorefinery route for the rapid and efficient liquefaction of food waste. During the plasma electrolysis process, only the solvent is added to liquefy the waste, and anions in the waste can contribute to catalyzing the biowaste conversion. While liquefying the waste, the highly reactive species produced in the plasma electrolysis process can efficiently reduce the content of O, N, and Cl in the liquefied products and oxidize most of the metals into solid residues. Especially, the removal rate of Na and K elements was greater than 81%, which is significantly higher than using the traditional oil bath liquefaction, resulting in a relatively high-quality biocrude oil with a high heating value of 25.86 MJ·kg–1. Overall, this proposed strategy may provide a new sustainable and eco-friendly avenue for the power-to-chemicals valorization of food waste under benign conditions.

Keywords plasma electrolysis      food waste      liquefaction      resource recovery     
Corresponding Author(s): Xianhui Zhang,Renwu Zhou   
About author:

*These authors equally shared correspondence to this manuscript.

Just Accepted Date: 15 September 2022   Online First Date: 17 January 2023    Issue Date: 28 April 2023
 Cite this article:   
Wenquan Xie,Xianhui Zhang,Dengke Xi, et al. Power-to-chemicals: sustainable liquefaction of food waste with plasma-electrolysis[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(5): 594-605.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/10.1007/s11705-022-2255-y
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/Y2023/V17/I5/594
  Scheme1 Illustration of food waste management process by the PE. Green and sustainable solvents can be potentially produced from renewable biomass sources at large scales. This study reports a catalyst-free approach based on the electricity-driven in-liquid plasma discharges to convert the biomass and recycle resources from food wastes, nearing the ultimate carbon-neutral processes.
MaterialCrude fiberProteinFatCarbohydrateWater contentRef.
Rice1.44%2.91%3.55%26.32%65.12%[21]
Brassica chinensis L.4.70%2.01%15.74%72.89%[22]
Lean pork29.57%6.76%55.87%[23]
Egg15.8%26.43%3.58%52.65%[24]
Tofu0.10%15.70%8.60%4.30%69.80%[25]
Tab.1  Composition of leftovers
Fig.1  The CV and the voltage and current with time curves of PE. (a) The CV (voltage vs. current curve); (b) voltage and current vs. time in Phase 1; (c) voltage and current vs. time in Phase 2.
Fig.2  Influence of different amounts of water on (a) liquid yield and (b) temperature (polyethylene glycol (PEG 200)/glycerol: 3/1, liquid–solid ratio: 7/1, no catalyst added).
Fig.3  The effect of time on (a) the liquid yield and (b) temperature with different pH conditions (PEG 200/glycerol: 3/1 (volume ratio); liquid–solid ratio: 7/1 (mass ratio without water); pH control: 1.25% H2SO4, 1.25% NaOH (mass ratio)).
Fig.4  The effect of solution pH on liquid yield (PEG 200/glycerol: 3/1 (volume ratio), liquid–solid ratio: 7/1 (mass ratio without water); solution pH adjusted by the addition of H2SO4 and NaOH; treatment time: 6 min (acidic condition), 16 min (alkaline condition).
Liquid–solidratios/(wt %)Liquid yield/%
Acidic conditionAlkaline conditionNone
342.21 ± 1.2139.35 ± 1.0837.07 ± 1.75
467.11 ± 1.1345.64 ± 1.1142.75 ± 1.56
590.32 ± 0.7758.73 ± 0.7852.67 ± 0.68
691.59 ± 0.5872.46 ± 1.5964.18 ± 0.87
791.88 ± 0.8281.78 ± 1.8469.74 ± 0.37
891.73 ± 0.4782.83 ± 0.5870.86 ± 0.67
991.88 ± 0.6582.92 ± 0.4772.37 ± 0.47
Tab.2  The influence of liquid–solid ratios on the liquefactiona)
ElementLeftoversResidues (PE at the acidic condition)Residues (oil bath at the acidic condition)Residues (PE at the alkaline condition)Residues (oil bath at the alkaline condition)Residues (PE and none)Residues (oil bath only)
Na21.44%7.90%6.52%22.27%19.52%19.63%16.30%
K6.21%1.73%1.81%8.18%6.37%4.62%5.29%
Ca9.71%14.07%9.06%26.82%22.71%26.04%21.58%
Mg0.34%0.25%0.00%1.36%0.80%1.46%0.44%
Cl48.53%23.95%18.84%20.67%29.48%27.08%33.48%
Fe0.45%0.77%0.00%1.36%0.40%1.22%0.00%
Zn0.22%0.00%0.00%0.23%0.40%0.00%0.00%
Al0.01%0.00%0.00%0.23%0.40%0.00%0.00%
Si0.68%0.25%0.00%0.23%0.00%0.24%0.00%
P4.74%3.21%5.07%3.86%8.37%3.89%8.37%
S7.67%45.25%58.70%11.14%11.55%12.65%14.54%
W0.00%2.63%0.00%3.64%0.00%3.17%0.00%
Tab.3  Relative content of the elements in the leftovers and residues
Fig.5  Catalytic effect of anions under different pH conditions. (a) acidic; (b) neutral; (c) alkaline conditions.
Fig.6  Possible mechanisms of food waste (lignin, cellulose, protein and lipid) conversion in the PE process.
1 H S Ng, P E Kee, H S Yim, P T Chen, Y H Wei, J Chi-Wei Lan. Recent advances on the sustainable approaches for conversion and reutilization of food wastes to valuable bioproducts. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 302: 122889
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122889
2 E Chee, W Wong, X Wang. An integrated approach for machine-learning-based system identification of dynamical systems under control: application towards the model predictive control of a highly nonlinear reactor system. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2022, 16(2): 237–250
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-021-2058-6
3 L He, Y Chang, J Zhu, Y Bi, W An, Y Dong, J Liu, S Wang. A cytoprotective graphene oxide-polyelectrolytes nanoshell for single-cell encapsulation. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2021, 15(2): 410–420
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-020-1950-9
4 J Li, S Zhai, W Wu, Z Xu. Hydrophobic nanocellulose aerogels with high loading of metal–organic framework particles as floating and reusable oil absorbents. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2021, 15(5): 1158–1168
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-020-2021-z
5 R Salemdeeb, E K H J zu Ermgassen, M H Kim, A Balmford, A Al-Tabbaa. Environmental and health impacts of using food waste as animal feed: a comparative analysis of food waste management options. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 140: 871–880
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.049
6 P Sharma, V K Gaur, S H Kim, A Pandey. Microbial strategies for bio-transforming food waste into resources. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 299: 122580
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122580
7 J O’Connor, S A Hoang, L Bradney, S Dutta, X Xiong, D C W Tsang, K Ramadass, A Vinu, M B Kirkham, N S Bolan. A review on the valorization of food waste as a nutrient source and soil amendment. Environmental Pollution, 2021, 272: 115985
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115985
8 L Wang, Y Chi, D Shu, E Weiss-Hortala, A Nzihou, S Choi. Experimental studies of hydrothermal liquefaction of kitchen waste with H+, OH– and Fe3+ additives for bio-oil upgrading. Waste Management & Research, 2021, 39(1): 165–173
https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X20957408
9 D Xi, R Zhou, R Zhou, X Zhang, L Ye, J Li, C Jiang, Q Chen, G Sun, Q Liu, S Yang. Mechanism and optimization for plasma electrolytic liquefaction of sawdust. Bioresource Technology, 2017, 241: 545–551
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.05.132
10 R Zhou, R Zhou, S Wang, Z Lan, X Zhang, Y Yin, S Tu, S Yang, L Ye. Fast liquefaction of bamboo shoot shell with liquid-phase microplasma assisted technology. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 218: 1275–1278
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.07.042
11 C Jiang, S Liu, Z Feng, Z Fang, X Zhang, D Mei, D Xi, B Luan, X Wang, S Yang. Plasma electrolytic liquefaction of sawdust. Chinese Physics B, 2019, 28(4): 048803
https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/28/4/048803
12 D Xi, C Jiang, R Zhou, Z Fang, X Zhang, Y Liu, B Luan, Z Feng, G Chen, Z Chen, Q Liu, S Yang. The universality of lignocellulosic biomass liquefaction by plasma electrolysis under acidic conditions. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 268: 531–538
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.08.025
13 R Zhou, R Zhou, X Zhang, Z Fang, X Wang, R Speight, H Wang, W Doherty, P J Cullen, K Ostrikov, K Bazaka. High-performance plasma-enabled biorefining of microalgae to value-added products. ChemSusChem, 2019, 12(22): 4976–4985
https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201901772
14 Q Lu, J Zhang, X Zhu. Corrosion properties of bio-oil and its emulsions with diesel. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2008, 53(23): 3726–3734
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-008-0499-7
15 S Gaudino, C Galas, M Belli, S Barbizzi, P de Zorzi, R Jacimovic, Z Jeran, A Pati, U Sansone. The role of different soil sample digestion methods on trace elements analysis: a comparison of ICP-MS and INAA measurement results. Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2007, 12(2): 84–93
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-006-0238-1
16 M B S Osman, A Z Dakroury, M T Dessouky, M A Kenawy, A A ElSharkawy. Measurement of thermophysical properties of ammonium salts in the solid and molten states. Journal of Thermal Analysis, 1996, 46(6): 1697–1703
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01980775
17 B He, Y Ma, X Gong, Z Long, J Li, Q Xiong, H Liu, Q Chen, X Zhang, S Yang, Q H Liu. Simultaneous quantification of aqueous peroxide, nitrate, and nitrite during the plasma-liquid interactions by derivative absorption spectrophotometry. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2017, 50(44): 445207
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aa8819
18 P L Breuer, C A Sutcliffe, R L Meakin. Cyanide measurement by silver nitrate titration: comparison of rhodanine and potentiometric end-points. Hydrometallurgy, 2011, 106(3–4): 135–140
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2010.12.008
19 D Giustarini, R Rossi, A Milzani, I Dalle-Donne. Nitrite and nitrate measurement by griess reagent in human plasma: evaluation of interferences and standardization. Methods in Enzymology, 2008, 440: 361–380
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(07)00823-3
20 N A Savidov, Z A Alikulov, S H Lips. Identification of an endogenous NADPH-regenerating system coupled to nitrate reduction in vitro in plant and fungal crude extracts. Plant Science, 1998, 133(1): 33–45
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(98)00024-7
21 H Hoogenkamp, H Kumagai, J P D Wanasundara. Chapter 3—Rice protein and rice protein products. Sustainable Protein Sources, 2017, 47–65
22 L Zou, W K Tan, Y Du, H W Lee, X Liang, J Lei, L Striegel, N Weber, M Rychlik, C N Ong. Nutritional metabolites in Brassica rapa subsp. chinensis var. parachinensis (choy sum) at three different growth stages: microgreen, seedling and adult plant. Food Chemistry, 2021, 357(5): 129535
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129535
23 M M Murphy, J H Spungen, X Bi, L M Barraj. Fresh and fresh lean pork are substantial sources of key nutrients when these products are consumed by adults in the United States. Nutrition Research, 2011, 31(10): 776–783
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2011.09.006
24 K L Herron, M L Fernandez. Are the current dietary guidelines regarding egg consumption appropriate?. Journal of Nutrition, 2004, 134(1): 187–190
https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/134.1.187
25 S P Stanojevic, M B Barac, M B Pesic, B V Vucelic-Radovic. Protein composition and textural properties of inulin-enriched tofu produced by hydrothermal process. LWT, 2020, 126: 109309
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109309
26 B R Locke, M Sato, P Sunka, M R Hoffmann, J Chang. Electrohydraulic discharge and nonthermal plasma for water treatment. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2006, 45(3): 882–905
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie050981u
27 E Hontañón, J M Palomares, M Stein, X Guo, R Engeln, H Nirschl, F E Kruis. The transition from spark to arc discharge and its implications with respect to nanoparticle production. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2013, 15(9): 1957
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-013-1957-y
28 Y Li, C Zhao, W M Kwok, X Guan, P Zuo, D L Phillips. Observation of a HI leaving group following ultraviolet photolysis of CH2I2 in water and an ab initio investigation of the O–H insertion/HI elimination reactions of the CH2I–I isopolyhalomethane species with H2O and 2H2O. Journal of Chemical Physics, 2003, 119(9): 4671–4681
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1595636
29 I B Denysenko, S Xu, J D Long, P P Rutkevych, N A Azarenkov, K Ostrikov. Inductively coupled Ar/CH4/H2 plasmas for low-temperature deposition of ordered carbon nanostructures. Journal of Applied Physics, 2004, 95(5): 2713–2724
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1642762
30 T N Kleinert. Free radical reactions in UV irradiation of cellulose. Holzforschung, 1964, 18(1–2): 24–28
https://doi.org/10.1515/hfsg.1964.18.1-2.24
31 Y Nakamura, Y Ogiwara, G O Phillips. Free radical formation and degradation of cellulose by ionizing radiations. Polymer Photochemistry, 1985, 6(2): 135–159
https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-2880(85)90020-X
32 J McDougall. A hydro-bio-mechanical model for settlement and other behaviour in landfilled waste. Computers and Geotechnics, 2007, 34(4): 229–246
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2007.02.004
33 P N Amaniampong, A Karam, Q T Trinh, K Xu, H Hirao, F Jerome, G Chatel. Selective and catalyst-free oxidation of D-glucose to D-glucuronic acid induced by high-frequency ultrasound. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7(1): 40650
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40650
34 K M Schaich. Chapter 1—analysis of lipid and protein oxidation in fats, oils, and foods. Oxidative Stability and Shelf Life of Foods Containing Oils and Fats, 2016, 1–131
35 S Yin, Z Tan. Hydrothermal liquefaction of cellulose to bio-oil under acidic, neutral and alkaline conditions. Applied Energy, 2012, 92: 234–239
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.10.041
36 T Yamada, M Aratani, S Kubo, H Ono. Chemical analysis of the product in acid-catalyzed solvolysis of cellulose using polyethylene glycol and ethylene carbonate. Journal of Wood Science, 2007, 53(6): 487–493
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-007-0886-8
37 D Xi, S Wen, X Zhang, W Xie, Z Fang, R Zhou, D Wang, D Zhao, L Ye, S Yang, Ostrikov K (Ken). Plasma-electrolytic liquefaction of human waste for biofuels production and recovery of ammonium, chlorine and metals. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 433: 134581
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.134581
38 J Park, Z F Xu, M C Lin. Thermal decomposition of ethanol. II. A computational study of the kinetics and mechanism for the H + C2H5OH reaction. Journal of Chemical Physics, 2003, 118(22): 9990–9996
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1573182
39 Z F Xu, J Park, M C Lin. Thermal decomposition of ethanol. III. A computational study of the kinetics and mechanism for the CH3 + C2H5OH reaction. Journal of Chemical Physics, 2004, 120(14): 6593–6599
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1650832
40 J Chen, J H Lin, J C Xiao. Dehydroxylation of alcohols for nucleophilic substitution. Chemical Communications, 2018, 54(51): 7034–7037
https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CC03856B
41 D L Lewis, D K Gattie. Prediction of substrate removal rates of attached microorganisms and of relative contributions of attached and suspended communities at field sites. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1988, 54(2): 434–440
https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.54.2.434-440.1988
42 M Altarawneh, B Z Dlugogorski. A mechanistic and kinetic study on the decomposition of morpholine. Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2012, 116(29): 7703–7711
https://doi.org/10.1021/jp303463j
43 L J J Janssen, J G Hoogland. Electrolysis of acidic NaCl solution with a graphite anode—I. the graphite electrode. Electrochimica Acta, 1969, 14(11): 1097–1108
https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4686(69)80037-X
44 J L Navarro, M I Nadal, P Nieto, J Flores. Effect of nitrate and nitrite curing salts on the generation and oxidation of fatty acids in non-fermented sausages. European Food Research and Technology, 2001, 212(4): 421–425
https://doi.org/10.1007/s002170000275
45 F F Shih. Effect of anions on the deamidation of soy protein. Journal of Food Science, 1991, 56(2): 452–454
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1991.tb05301.x
46 Y S Son, K H Kim, K J Kim, J C Kim. Ammonia decomposition using electron beam. Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, 2013, 33(3): 617–629
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-013-9444-x
47 D Lopez-Gonzalez, M Puig-Gamero, F G Acien, F Garcia-Cuadra, J L Valverde, L Sanchez-Silva. Energetic, economic and environmental assessment of the pyrolysis and combustion of microalgae and their oils. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 51: 1752–1770
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.022
48 J Lu, J Zhang, Z Zhu, Y Zhang, Y Zhao, R Li, J Watson, B Li, Z Liu. Simultaneous production of biocrude oil and recovery of nutrients and metals from human feces via hydrothermal liquefaction. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, 134: 340–346
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.12.052
49 B Cantero-Tubilla, D A Cantero, C M Martinez, J W Tester, L P Walker, R Posmanik. Characterization of the solid products from hydrothermal liquefaction of waste feedstocks from food and agricultural industries. Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 2018, 133(2): 665–673
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2017.07.009
[1] FCE-22080-OF-XW_suppl_1 Download
[1] Tianyi Bao, Yuanyuan Shao, Haiping Zhang, Jesse Zhu. Nitrogen distribution in the products from the hydrothermal liquefaction of Chlorella sp. and Spirulina sp.[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(6): 985-995.
[2] Wang Li, Wen-Ying Li, Xing-Bao Wang, Jie Feng. Regulation of radicals by hydrogen-donor solvent in direct coal liquefaction[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(12): 1689-1699.
[3] Sen Wang, Shiyun Liu, Danhua Mei, Rusen Zhou, Congcong Jiang, Xianhui Zhang, Zhi Fang, Kostya (Ken) Ostrikov. Liquid discharge plasma for fast biomass liquefaction at mild conditions: The effects of homogeneous catalysts[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(5): 763-771.
[4] Chunyan Yang, Xiaoliang Yuan, Xueting Wang, Kejing Wu, Yingying Liu, Changjun Liu, Houfang Lu, Bin Liang. Ball milling promoted direct liquefaction of lignocellulosic biomass in supercritical ethanol[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(4): 605-613.
[5] Changwei HU, Yu YANG, Jia LUO, Pan PAN, Dongmei TONG, Guiying LI. Recent advances in the catalytic pyrolysis of biomass[J]. Front Chem Sci Eng, 2011, 5(2): 188-193.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed