Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Education in China

ISSN 1673-341X

ISSN 1673-3533(Online)

CN 11-5741/G4

Postal Subscription Code 80-979

Front Educ Chin    2013, Vol. 8 Issue (2) : 198-213    https://doi.org/10.3868/s110-002-013-0015-0
research-article
The Same Term but Different Connotations: Cultural and Historical Perspectives on Studying the Academic Profession in China and Other Asian Countries
YAN Fengqiao()
School of Education, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
 Download: PDF(265 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Through experiencing and reviewing multiple-country endeavors in academic profession study and participating in a new project regarding the academic profession in Asia, the author pinpoints and anticipates the shortcomings of study alone or dominantly questionnaire-based and ignoring the broader social context. The author proposes a new perspective or methodology to mitigate these shortcomings. The traditional approach focuses on commonalities rather than differences of the academic profession in a variety of countries. By comparing identical questionnaires, it is easy to conclude that, according to some indicators, the academic profession in developing countries, a category in which most Asian countries belong, is inferior to that in developed countries by a certain magnitude. This research strategy will devalue the research efforts on the academic profession in Asia. The academic profession is a complicated phenomenon, and it requires a sophisticated research methodology. The characteristics of the academic profession in Asia can be induced by empirically studying its relationship with the institutional environments in which the academic profession is embedded. In addition, all developing countries in Asia are undergoing a process of modernization. This dynamic feature is valuable and deserves exploration. The institutional environments in Asia can be demonstrated and illustrated via cultural and historical lenses. The purpose of this paper is to review international projects and literature regarding the academic profession. This review tries to be both critical and constructive, and shed light on newly initiated projects in the Asian academic profession. Two major research questions are raised by the author: What is the scholarly value of the new project? What strategy can researchers employ for this endeavor? Past research is dominated by the structure-function paradigm and cross-sectional questionnaire method. This approach has both strengths and weaknesses. Historical and cultural perspectives are proposed to overcome the existing limitations and explore the potential value of the new academic effort.

Keywords academic profession      China      Asia      cultural and historical perspectives     
Corresponding Author(s): YAN Fengqiao,Email:fqyan@gse.pku.edu.cn   
Issue Date: 05 June 2013
 Cite this article:   
YAN Fengqiao. The Same Term but Different Connotations: Cultural and Historical Perspectives on Studying the Academic Profession in China and Other Asian Countries[J]. Front Educ Chin, 2013, 8(2): 198-213.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fed/EN/10.3868/s110-002-013-0015-0
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fed/EN/Y2013/V8/I2/198
[1] Jiehui ZHAO, Katerina BODOVSKI. The Effect of Family Background and Parental Expectations on Eighth Graders’ Academic Achievement in Rural and Urban China[J]. Front. Educ. China, 2020, 15(4): 647-677.
[2] Baoyan CHENG, Donghui ZHANG. Cultivating Citizens with Confucian Cosmopolitanism: Defining the Purpose of Liberal Arts Education in the Asian Context[J]. Front. Educ. China, 2020, 15(4): 564-587.
[3] LIU Dan. The Role of Social Capital/Guanxi in Students’ Decision-Making about Postgraduate Education in China: An Explorative Case Study[J]. Front. Educ. China, 2020, 15(3): 453-481.
[4] MA Kang, Robert TREVETHAN. Efficacy Perceptions of Preservice and Inservice Teachers in China: Insights Concerning Culture and Measurement[J]. Front. Educ. China, 2020, 15(2): 332-368.
[5] MA Kang, Robert TREVETHAN, LU Shuhong. Measuring Teacher Sense of Efficacy: Insights and Recommendations Concerning Scale Design and Data Analysis from Research with Preservice and Inservice Teachers in China[J]. Front. Educ. China, 2019, 14(4): 612-686.
[6] YUAN Hui, HUANG Xingfeng. China-England Mathematics Teacher Exchange and Its Impact[J]. Front. Educ. China, 2019, 14(3): 480-508.
[7] Peter Tze Ming NG. Resurgence of the Study of China’s Christian Higher Education since 1980s[J]. Front. Educ. China, 2019, 14(3): 364-386.
[8] Merve ZAYIM-KURTAY, Chang ZHU. Challenges of Chinese and European Universities in the Modernization and Global Context[J]. Front. Educ. China, 2019, 14(2): 284-308.
[9] Anthony WELCH, XU Xiuyan. Prospect and Limits of China-EU Relations in Higher Education: A Danish Case Study[J]. Front. Educ. China, 2019, 14(2): 257-283.
[10] Gaoming ZHENG. Deconstructing Doctoral Students’ Socialization from an Institutional Logics Perspective: A Qualitative Study of the Socialization of Chinese Doctoral Students in Finland[J]. Front. Educ. China, 2019, 14(2): 206-233.
[11] Yuzhuo CAI. China-Europe Higher Education Cooperation: Opportunities and Challenges[J]. Front. Educ. China, 2019, 14(2): 167-179.
[12] Peng LIU, WANG Xiaoyang, LIANG Xiaomeng. Understanding University President Leadership Research in China: A Review[J]. Front. Educ. China, 2019, 14(1): 138-160.
[13] Tao LI, Yisu ZHOU. Do Pay-for-Grades Programs Encourage Student Academic Cheating? Evidence from a Randomized Experiment[J]. Front. Educ. China, 2019, 14(1): 117-137.
[14] Ryan M. ALLEN. What Do Students Know about University Rankings? Testing Familiarity and Knowledge of Global and Domestic University League Tables in China[J]. Front. Educ. China, 2019, 14(1): 59-89.
[15] Michael Mitchell Omoruyi EHIZUELEN. Education and Skills Development in China-Africa Cooperation[J]. Front. Educ. China, 2018, 13(4): 553-600.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed