Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Education in China

ISSN 1673-341X

ISSN 1673-3533(Online)

CN 11-5741/G4

Postal Subscription Code 80-979

Front. Educ. China    2014, Vol. 9 Issue (1) : 42-62    https://doi.org/10.3868/s110-003-014-0004-x
research-article
The “Beijing Consensus” and the Chinese Model of University Autonomy
Qiang ZHA1(),Ruth Hayhoe2
1. Faculty of Education, York University, Toronto, M3J 1P3, Canada
2. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, M5S 1V6, Canada
 Download: PDF(709 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

This paper attempts to address connections between the Chinese model for development or the “Beijing Consensus” and Chinese universities. Chinese universities seem to be caught between serving governmental agendas and pursuing their own goals as an academic community. Up until recently, they had become used to following the lead of the government, which often comes with rationales and approaches featuring pragmatism and utilitarianism. Drawing on the perspectives of social embeddedness and external control of organizations in higher education, we argue that the lack of dynamism and innovation that is hindering Chinese higher education’s development is largely owing to the political, social, and cultural factors prevailing in the environment in which the universities operate. Put in another way, Chinese universities are confronting a crisis, owing to the inbuilt constraints of China’s development model.

Keywords Beijing Consensus      Chinese university      crisis      autonomy     
Issue Date: 16 May 2014
 Cite this article:   
Qiang ZHA,Ruth Hayhoe. The “Beijing Consensus” and the Chinese Model of University Autonomy[J]. Front. Educ. China, 2014, 9(1): 42-62.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fed/EN/10.3868/s110-003-014-0004-x
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fed/EN/Y2014/V9/I1/42
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed