Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Engineering Management

ISSN 2095-7513

ISSN 2096-0255(Online)

CN 10-1205/N

Postal Subscription Code 80-905

Front. Eng    2024, Vol. 11 Issue (3) : 516-527    https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-024-4072-0
Technology and Innovation Management
Roadmapping Roadmapping: Strategic planning for roadmapping systems
Robert PHAAL(), Clemens CHASKEL, Ricardo GONZALEZ Nakazawa, Jonathan ROSS
Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 0FS, UK
 Download: PDF(1980 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Roadmapping is a well-established technique in the context of innovation and strategy, with the potential to support organizations address the complex transformative challenges facing humanity in the 21st century. This is enabled by its systems-based architecture and visual form of roadmaps, supporting communication and reduction of information asymmetries in complex sociotechnical systems. This paper focuses on an adaptation of the roadmapping method to support strategic planning for roadmapping systems in organizations, addressing implementation challenges. This represents a novel application of roadmapping to business processes and systems, demonstrating the flexibility of the roadmapping approach. A workshop template (‘R2’) and process for supporting the roadmapping of roadmapping systems is presented, developed and refined through a series of six industrial cases, and illustrated with an application example in the additive manufacturing sector.

Keywords roadmapping      strategic planning      innovation management     
Corresponding Author(s): Robert PHAAL   
Just Accepted Date: 02 August 2024   Online First Date: 05 September 2024    Issue Date: 26 September 2024
 Cite this article:   
Robert PHAAL,Clemens CHASKEL,Ricardo GONZALEZ Nakazawa, et al. Roadmapping Roadmapping: Strategic planning for roadmapping systems[J]. Front. Eng, 2024, 11(3): 516-527.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fem/EN/10.1007/s42524-024-4072-0
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fem/EN/Y2024/V11/I3/516
Fig.1  Roadmap as dynamic systems framework and knowledge integrator (Phaal and Muller, 2009).
Fig.2  Example roadmap from the International Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG) for a mission scenario (NASA, 2018).
Fig.3  General form of roadmap framework, highlighting fundamental strategic questions that structure roadmaps as knowledge integrators.
Fig.4  Roadmapping Roadmapping (R2) workshop template, overlaid with reference process steps (green text in template); see Table 1 for process prompts (light gray text in template).
When? Past
Learning
Phase 1 (date)
Short-term needs and outputs
Phase 2 (date)
Medium-term needs and outputs
Vision
Long-term needs and outputs ('what does good look like?)
Why do it?
Business context, value proposition and strategic ambition, themes, needs, benefits and deliverables associated with roadmapping
Corporate; Business units; Products and services; Other
Past roadmapping, strategy and innovation management process investment?
Strengths and weaknesses?
Business needs that roadmapping will address?
Decisions and processes that roadmapping will enable?
Stakeholder needs, interest and engagement?
Where to focus first?
Changing strategic context and requirements?
Measure and demonstrate impact?
Alignment with needs and gaps in other business processes and systems?
Where to focus next?
Focus and scope of roadmapping?
Types of roadmaps for what purposes?
Demonstrate benefits to business?
Vision and goals for impact of roadmapping system?
Level of investment?
What to do?
Roadmapping and related activities for application in the business
Links to other business processes, tools and systems
Past roadmapping, strategy and innovation management processes, systems and tools?
Strengths and weaknesses?
Review / initiation of roadmapping process?
Process maturity?
Implementation status?
Process ownership?
Documentation?
Communications?
Links to decision-making processes?
(e.g. strategy, innovation)
Updating roadmaps?
Sustaining momentum?
Process learning and improvement?
Template and visual design?
Key roadmapping performance indicators?
What will the roadmapping process and system look like?
What will the roadmaps look like?
Who will be involved in what ways?
Relationships between roadmapping and other processes and tools?
Digital enablement?
How to do it?
Required capabilities and resources for roadmapping system
Past roadmapping, strategy and innovation management capabilities and resources?
Strengths and weaknesses?
Prior experience?
Perception of roadmapping in business?
Culture and organizational barriers and enablers?
Skills and capabilities?
Change management?
Process review and consolidation?
Exemplars and success stories?
Integration with and improvement of other business processes and tools?
Training, guidance and capability building?
External partners, suppliers, customers, technology providers?
Resources and capabilities?
Skills and competences?
Community of practice?
Organization and governance?
Templates and standards?
Software / ICT infrastructure?
Tab.1  Roadmapping Roadmapping (R2) template process prompts
Case Process prompts Sector Notes
Pilot 1 No Energy utility Training course
Pilot 2 No Water services Roadmap system review in conglomerate
Pilot 3 No Aerospace (supplier) Training course
Case A No Electronics (defense) Third party facilitator
Case B Yes Policy (energy) Third party facilitator
Case C Yes Precision engineering Roadmapping system review during corporate merger
Tab.2  Roadmapping Roadmapping (R2) template and cases
Case Participants Degree of completeness Consistency of output Quality of output Ease of use Overall utility
A 5 3.0 3.6 3.8 4.2 3.7
B 8 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.3 3.8
C 51 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.6 3.6
Benchmarka) 20 3.6 3.6 3.6 4.2 3.8
Tab.3  Roadmapping Roadmapping (R2) template average test results (5-point Likert scale)
Fig.5  Roadmapping roadmapping (R2) template test, Case C.
Fig.6  Representative participant comments received, Case C.
Fig.7  Use of R2 template in Star Rapid.
1 G R, Araújo H T, Kato Corso J M, Del (2022). Dynamic capabilities, strategic planning and performance: a virtuous and mutually reinforcing cycle. Journal of Management & Organization, 28( 5): 1116–1132
https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2022.33
2 W BennisB Nanus (1985). Leaders: the strategies t for taking charge. New York: Harper & Row
3 C, Chakraborty E J, Nijssen R, Valkenburg (2022). A systematic review of industry-level applications of technology roadmapping: Evaluation and design propositions for roadmapping practitioners. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179: 121141
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121141
4 R R, Cosner E J, Hynds A R, Fusfeld C V, Loweth C, Scouten R, Albright (2007). Integrating roadmapping into technical planning. Research Technology Management, 50( 6): 31–48
https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2007.11657471
5 B de LaatS McKibbin (2003). The effectiveness of technology road mapping - building a strategic vision. Technopolis. Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs
6 B, Ding Hernández X F, Ferràs (2023). Case study as a methodological foundation for technology roadmapping: Literature review and future research agenda. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 67: 101731
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2023.101731
7 D, Ellström J, Holtström E, Berg C, Josefsson (2022). Dynamic capabilities for digital transformation. Journal of Strategy and Management, 15( 2): 272–286
https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-04-2021-0089
8 F W, Geels J, Schot (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36( 3): 399–417
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003
9 N, Gerdsri R S, Vatananan S, Dansamasatid (2009). Dealing with the dynamics of technology roadmapping implementation: A case study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76( 1): 50–60
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.03.013
10 P, Groenveld (1997). Roadmapping integrates business and technology. Research Technology Management, 40( 5): 48–55
https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.1997.11671157
11 Y, Hirose R, Phaal C J, Farrukh N, Gerdsri S, Lee (2020). Characterizing maturity levels for organizational-wide roadmapping implementation. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 48( 4): 133–143
https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2020.3020547
12 C, Kerr (2023). The systems approach of strategic roadmapping: Framing challenges and contributions whilst flexing to changing conditions and circumstances. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 40( 4): 701–712
https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2953
13 C, Kerr R, Phaal (2015). Visualizing roadmaps: A design-driven approach. Research Technology Management, 58( 4): 45–54
https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308X5804253
14 C, Kerr R, Phaal (2020). Technology roadmapping: Industrial roots, forgotten history and unknown origins. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 155: 119967
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119967
15 C, Kerr R, Phaal (2022). Roadmapping and roadmaps: Definition and underpinning concepts. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69( 1): 6–16
https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3096012
16 C I V KerrR PhaalD R Probert (2013a). Roadmapping as a responsive mode to government policy: A goal-oriented approach to realising a vision. Technology roadmapping for strategy and innovation: charting the route to success, Ed. Moehrle MG, Isenmann R, Phaal R. Berlin: Springer-Verlag: 67–87
17 C I V, Kerr R, Phaal D R, Probert (2013b). Key principles for developing industrially relevant strategic management toolkits. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80( 6): 1050–1070
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.09.006
18 Society Kipling (2024). The Elephant’s Child. Available at the website of kiplingsociety.co.uk
19 R N, Kostoff R R, Schaller (2001). Science and technology roadmaps. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48( 2): 132–143
https://doi.org/10.1109/17.922473
20 S, Lee Y, Park (2005). Customization of technology roadmaps according to roadmapping purposes: overall process and detailed modules. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72( 5): 567–583
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2004.11.006
21 NASA (2018). The Global Exploration Roadmap. US National Aeronautics and Space Administration. NP-2018-01-2502-HQ
22 M G, Oliveira R, Phaal G H S, Mendes K M, Serrano C, Favoretto (2023). Dawn of digital roadmapping. Research Technology Management, 66( 1): 41–52
https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2022.2130626
23 E T Penrose (2009). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford University Press
24 R Phaal (2024a). Roadmapping roadmapping (R2) template. Available at the website of cambridgeroadmapping.net
25 R, Phaal (2024b). What they should tell you about roadmapping at business school. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 52( 3): 10–16
https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2024.3390160
26 R, Phaal C J P, Farrukh R, Mitchell D R, Probert (2003). Starting-up technology roadmapping fast. Research Technology Management, 46( 2): 52–59
https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2003.11671555
27 R, Phaal C J P, Farrukh D R, Probert (2004). Customizing roadmapping. Research Technology Management, 47( 2): 26–37
https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2004.11671616
28 R, Phaal C J P, Farrukh D R, Probert (2007). Strategic roadmapping: A workshop-based approach for identifying and exploring innovation issues and opportunities. Engineering Management Journal, 19( 1): 3–12
https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2007.11431716
29 R PhaalC KerrI IlevbareC FarrukhM Routley N Athanassopoulou (2018). On ‘self-facilitating’ templates for technology and innovation strategy workshops. Technology Roadmapping. Vol 2, Ed. Daim &, Oliver T, Phaal R. World Scientific: 355–382
30 R, Phaal G, Muller (2009). An architectural framework for roadmapping: Towards visual strategy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76( 1): 39–49
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.03.018
31 K W, Platts (1993). A process approach to researching manufacturing strategy. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 13( 8): 4–17
https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579310039533
32 M ReevesK HaanæsJ Sinha (2015). Your strategy needs a strategy – how to choose and execute the right approach. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press
33 D J, Teece G, Pisano A, Shuen (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18( 7): 509–533
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
34 S, Vinayavekhin R, Phaal (2019). Synchronization in strategic planning: A roadmapping framework. International Journal of Innovation & Technology Management, 16( 6): 1–21
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877019500445
35 S, Vinayavekhin R, Phaal T, Thanamaitreejit K, Asatani (2023). Emerging trends in roadmapping research: A bibliometric literature review. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 35( 5): 558–572
https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1979210
36 R, Vogel W H, Güttel (2013). The dynamic capability view in strategic management: A bibliographic review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15( 4): 426–446
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12000
37 C H, Willyard C W, McClees (1987). Motorola’s technology roadmapping process. Research Management, 30( 5): 13–19
https://doi.org/10.1080/00345334.1987.11757057
[1] Zhen-you Li, Ji-shan He, Meng-jun Wang. Improving Internationally Core Competences Based on the Capabilities of Precise and Accurate Project Management[J]. Front. Eng, 2016, 3(3): 231-238.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed