Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Engineering Management

ISSN 2095-7513

ISSN 2096-0255(Online)

CN 10-1205/N

Postal Subscription Code 80-905

Front. Eng    2017, Vol. 4 Issue (3) : 315-324    https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FEM-2017031
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Connecting the Belt and Road through sea-rail collaboration
Chenhao ZHOU1(), Haobin LI1, Wencheng WANG2, Loo Hay LEE1, Ek Peng CHEW1
1. Industrial Systems Engineering and Management, National University of Singapore, Singapore
2. School of Management Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
 Download: PDF(890 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

As part of China’s “the Belt and Road” strategy, China Railway Express provides alternative shipping routes and transportation modes from Asia to Europe and creates new opportunities for intermodal transportation in the shipping industry. A time–distance-based cost (time cost) function was proposed to compare China Railway Express with traditional transportation modes. Time cost was related to different types of cargoes, which exhibit distinct sensitivity to time. Using the proposed cost function as basis, we identified the cost indifference area where total costs are equal. Further analysis was performed for selecting the transportation mode and supply area for a specific cargo. This study provides various parties, such as business owners, the government, and the shipping industry, with many valuable insights.

Keywords China Railway Express      the Belt and Road      shipping industry      combined transportation     
Corresponding Author(s): Chenhao ZHOU   
Just Accepted Date: 29 August 2017   Online First Date: 28 September 2017    Issue Date: 30 October 2017
 Cite this article:   
Chenhao ZHOU,Haobin LI,Wencheng WANG, et al. Connecting the Belt and Road through sea-rail collaboration[J]. Front. Eng, 2017, 4(3): 315-324.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fem/EN/10.15302/J-FEM-2017031
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fem/EN/Y2017/V4/I3/315
Manufacturing industryEastern regionsCentral regionsWestern regions
Coal processing- 35.5112.079.7
Food processing- 28.7219.814.45
Textile industry- 27.286.236.56
Feather processing- 25.2414.869.88
Instrumentation- 24.7614.518.43
Other industry- 24.0911.619.79
Condiments & fermentations- 22.85- 3.0321.17
Tea processing- 22.8410.9111.72
Soft drink producing- 22.49.178.82
Tab.1  Index of Manufacturing Industry Migration from 2003 to 2009
From Xiamen to EuropeBy airBy CREBy sea
Time needed (days)3–714–1635–45
Cost per TEU (USD)40,000–80,0009,000–11,0002,000–3,000
Tab.2  Timing and cost comparison between different transportation modes (Source: Port of Xiamen)
Fig.1  ASEAN investment on a growth momentum (billions of USD)
Fig.2  Illustration of two transportation modes
Setup cost by seaUSD per TEUSetup cost by railUSD per TEU
Booking charge40Weighing fee4
Warehouse charge74Cooling cost89
Document charge22Empty rail returning freight59
Terminal handling charge70Container usage charge37
Port construction charge12
Weight due3
Other59Other30
Total cost280Total cost220
Tab.3  Setup costs by sea and rail
CargoValue of cargo per TEU
(,000 $)
Time cost factors
Plastic box328ρ1=0.014%,ρ2=0.014%,ρ3=0
Clothing7,296ρ1=0.014%,ρ2=0.014%,ρ3=1%
Electronic blender936ρ1=0.027%,ρ2=0.027%,ρ3=3%,t'=35
Tab.4  Time cost for different cargoes
By railTotal distance
(km)
Total time
(day)
Price
(USD per TEU per km)
Setup cost
(USD per TEU)
ShanghaiAntwerp962413.190.5220
Rotterdam10,40614.01
Hamburg991213.49
ShenzhenAntwerp10,47114.07
Rotterdam11,50115.14
Hamburg10,46114.06
Tab.5  Shipping distance, time, and price by rail
By seaTotal distance
(km)
Total time
(day)
Price
(per TEU per km)
Setup cost
(per TEU)
ShanghaiAntwerp19,36333.030.05500
Rotterdam19,37033.04
Hamburg19,83633.79
ShenzhenAntwerp18,04930.920.06
Rotterdam18,05630.94
Hamburg18,52231.68
Tab.6  Shipping distance, time, and price by sea
Fig.3  a-cost plots for three cargoes
Reducing sea shipping time (day)Plastic box
(Non-time-sensitive cargo)
Clothing
(High-time-sensitive cargo)
AntwerpRotterdamHamburgAntwerpRotterdamHamburg
22.47%2.04%2.43%5.25%5.20%5.14%
44.94%4.80%4.85%10.51%10.39%10.28%
67.41%7.20%7.28%15.76%15.59%15.42%
Tab.7  Total transportation cost reduction of RSCT by reducing the sea shipping time
Reducing sea shipping time (day)Plastic box
(Non-time-sensitive cargo)
Clothing
(High-time-sensitive cargo)
Range of α0Average difference
20.78–0.84- 1.6%α0is larger than 1. Thus, CRE is still preferred
40.76–0.82- 3.2%
60.75–0.81- 5.1%
Tab.8  Sensitivity of a by reducing sea shipping time
Fig.4  Illustration of two alternative transportation modes
Fig.5  a-cost plots for three cargoes in ST and SRCT
Reducing sea shipping time (day)Plastic box
(Non-time-sensitive cargo)
Clothing
(High-time-sensitive cargo)
Range of α0Average difference
2α0is larger than 1. Thus, sea transport is still preferred0.71–0.761.8%
40.72–0.793.9%
60.73–0.805.8%
Tab.9  Sensitivity of a by reducing the sea shipping time
ASEANAssociation of South-east Asian Nations
CCost indifference area
CREChinese Railway Express
DDestination area of the sea and rail transport
FDIForeign direct investment
OOrigin area of the sea and rail transport
RSCTRail-sea combined transportation
RTRail transportation
SSupply area for a specific cargo
SRCTSea-rail combined transportation
STSea transportation
TEUTwenty-foot equivalent unit
CmTotal transportation cost of shipping modem{RT,RSCT,ST,SRCT}
TmTotal transportation time of shipping mode m
CFmFreight cost
CTmTime cost
CSmSetup cost
dr,dsRail/sea distance between O and D
dSDr,dSDsRail/sea distance from S to D
pr,psUnit freight cost by rail/sea (USD per TEU per km)
ρ1,ρ2,ρ3Time cost factors, including the cost of service, transit inventory risk, and obsolescence
cpValue of cargo (USD)
  
1 Cai W (2015). Multimodal Transport Path Optimization on Silk Road of Land and Sea. Dissertation for the Master degree.Dalian: Dalian Maritime University
2 Drewry Research (2016). Container Forecaster & Annual Review 2016/17. London
3 Gao Y (2016). Economical Route in Transportation Network of the Belt and Road. Dissertation for the Master Degree.Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University
4 Lee L H, Chew E P, Lee L S (2006). Multicommodity network flow model for Asia’s container ports. Maritime Policy & Management, 33(4): 387–402
https://doi.org/10.1080/03088830600895626
5 Li J (2016). Study on countermeasures of optimizing China-Europe block trains under “the Belt and Road” strategy. Railway Transport and Economy, (5): 41–45
6 Miao Q (2014). Measuring the Value of Time in Highway Freight Transportation. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Texas: Texas A&M University
7 Verny J, Grigentin C (2009). Container shipping on the northern sea route. International Journal of Production Economics, 122(1): 107–117
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.03.018
8 Wang Y (2015). Status, problems and suggestions on development of Sino-Europe block trains. China Transportation Review (S1), 70–75, 89
9 Wang Z (2014). Resrarch on corridor development strategy of “The Silk Road Economic Belt” railway. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 184(1): 24–31
10 Yang L, Zheng B, Zhang Y (2015). Study on cargo transport time cost. Value Engineering, (22): 189–190
https://doi.org/10.14018/j.cnki.cn13-1085/n.2015.22.072
11 Yang X, Liu L (2015). China-Europe sea-land express passages and the balkans as the pivot of the Belt-and-Road transportation network. Contemporary International Relations, 28–46
[1] Jishan HE. Xinjiang energy-based desert management project[J]. Front. Eng, 2019, 6(4): 587-591.
[2] Yu-pu Wang, He Liu. New Challenges, New Opportunities and New Measures for Oil and Gas Cooperation in the Belt and Road[J]. Front. Eng, 2016, 3(4): 301-313.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed