Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Earth Science

ISSN 2095-0195

ISSN 2095-0209(Online)

CN 11-5982/P

Postal Subscription Code 80-963

2018 Impact Factor: 1.205

Front. Earth Sci.    0, Vol. Issue () : 465-478    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-008-0048-3
Using GIS-based distributed soil loss modeling and morphometric analysis to prioritize watershed for soil conservation in Bago river basin of Lower Myanmar
HLAING Kay Thwe1, HARUYAMA Shigeko1, AYE Maung Maung2
1.Institute of Environmental Studies, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 5-1-5 Kashiwa no ha, Kashiwa-shi; 2.Yangon University of Distance Education, No. 47, A, Inya Rd., Ward (9);
 Download: PDF(734 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract Bago River is an important river in Myanmar. Although shorter than other rivers, it has its own river system, and people along the river rely heavily on it for their daily lives. The upper part of the watershed has changed rapidly from closed forest to open forest land in the 1990s. Since the recent degradation of the forest environment, annual flooding has become worse during the rainy season in Bago City. This paper aims at determining soil conservation prioritization of watershed based on soil loss due to erosion and morphometric analysis in the Bago Watershed by integrating remote sensing and geographic information system (GIS) techniques. In this study, soil erosion of the Bago watershed was determined using the Universal Soil Loss Equation. Such factor maps as rainfall, soil erodibility, slope length gradient, and crop management were compiled as input parameters for the modeling; and the soil loss from 26 sub-watersheds were estimated. Then, the soil erosion maps of the Bago watershed for 2005 were developed. The resulting Soil Loss Tolerance Map could be utilized in developing watershed management planning, forestry management planning, etc.
Issue Date: 05 December 2008
 Cite this article:   
HLAING Kay Thwe,HARUYAMA Shigeko,AYE Maung Maung. Using GIS-based distributed soil loss modeling and morphometric analysis to prioritize watershed for soil conservation in Bago river basin of Lower Myanmar[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 0, (): 465-478.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/10.1007/s11707-008-0048-3
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/Y0/V/I/465
1 Andrew A, Millward A L, Janet E, et al. (1999). Adapting the RUSLE to modelsoil erosion potential in a mountainous tropical watershed. Catena, 38: 109–129.
doi:10.1016/S0341-8162(99)00067-3
2 Angima S D, Stott D E, Neill M K O, et al. (2003). Soil erosion predictionusing RUSLE for central Kenyan highland conditions. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 97: 295–308.
doi:10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00011-2
3 Aung H T (2003). Myanmar: The Processes and Patterns. National Centre for Human Resource Development, published, Ministryof Education, Myanmar
4 Aye K M M (1999). Climate of Eastern and Western Bago Division. Dissertation for the M A Degree. Myanmar: University of Yangon, 24–44
5 Aye N (2004). Developing Hydrologic Flood Control Model for ChindwinWatershed Conservation Planning and Management. Dissertation for the M A Degree. Myanmar: Yangon Institute of Technology, 92–93
6 Biswas S, Sudhakar S, Desai V R (1999). Prioritization of sub-watershedsbased on morphometric analysis of drainage basin-remote sensing andGIS approach. J of Ind Soc of Rem Sens, 27(3): 155–166
7 Cholrley R J, Dunn A J, Beckinsale R P (1964). The history of the study of landforms. Landon: Methuen, 678–678
8 Cohen M J, Shepherd K D, Walsh M G (2005). Empirical reformulation of the universalsoil loss equation for erosion risk assessment in a tropical watershed. Geoderma, 124: 235–252.
doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.05.003
9 Eagleson P S (1970). Dynamic Hydrology. NewYork: McGraw-Hill, 462–462
10 Harden C P (2006). Human impacts on headwater fluvial systems in the northernand central Andes. Geomorphology, 7: 249–263.
doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.06.021
11 Harmel R D, Richardson C W, King K W (2006). Runoff and soil loss relationshipsfor the Texas Blackland Prairies ecoregion. Journal of Hydrology, 31: 471–483.
doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.05.033
12 Horton R E (1945). Erosional development of streams and their drainagebasins: Hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology, Bull. America: Geol Soc, 56: 275–370
13 Hudson N W (1981). Soil Conservation. NewYork: Cornell University Press, 312–324
14 Hudson. (2004). Soil erosion modeling using the revised Universal SoilLoss Equation (RUSLE) in a drainage basin in eastern Mexico, EnvironmentalGIS: GRG 360G. http://www.utexas.edu/depts/grg/hudson/grg360g/EGIS/labs_04/Lab9/lab9_soil_erosion_NEW_spr04.htm
15 Lufafa A, Tenywa M M, Isabirye M, et al. (2003). Prediction of soil erosionin a Lake Victoria basin catchment using a GIS-based Universal SoilLoss model. Agricultural Systems, 76: 883–894.
doi:10.1016/S0308-521X(02)00012-4
16 McCaullagh P (1979). Modern Concepts in Geomorphology. London: Oxford University Press, 11–25
17 Miller V C (1953). Quantitative geomorphological study of drainage basincharacteristics in Clinch Mountain area, Tennessee. Dept Geol ColumbiaUniversity. ONR Project Teach. Report NR389-042,No.3, 189–200
18 Millward A A, Mersey J E (1999). Adaptingthe RUSLE to model soil erosion potential in a mountainous tropicalwatershed.Catena, 38: 109–129.
doi:10.1016/S0341-8162(99)00067-3
19 Morgan R P C, Morgan D D V, Finney H J (1984). A predictive model for assessmentof erosion, risk. J Agricultural EngineeringResearch, 30: 245–253.
doi:10.1016/S0021-8634(84)80025-6
20 Morgan R P C (1986). Soil Erosion and Conservation. London: Longman group UK Ltd,London, 1–107
21 Morgan R P C (1995). Soil Erosion and Conservation. 2nd ed. Essex: Longman Group, UK Ltd, London, 1–191
22 Özhan S, Balc A N, Özyuvaci N, et al. (2005). Cover and management factorsfor the Universal Soil Loss Equation for forest ecosystems in theMarmara region, Turkey. Journal of forestecology & management, 214: 118–123.
doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.03.050
23 Renard K G, Foster G R, Weesies G A, et al. (1997). Predicting Soil Erosionby Water: A Guide to Conservation Planning With the Revised UniversalSoil Loss Equation (RUSLE). U.S. Department of Agriculture, AgricultureHandbook No.703
24 Schwab G O, Fangmeier D D, Elliot W J, et al. (1993). Soil and Water ConservationEngineering. 4th ed . New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 131-138
25 Schumm S A (1965). Quaternary Palaeohydrology. Princeton: Princeton UniversityPress, 789–794
26 Singh R K, Saha S K, Kumar S (2005). Soil conservation prioritizationof watershed based on erosional soil loss and morphometric analysisusing Satellite Remote Sensing & GIS–A case study. Indian Institute of Remote Sensing (NRSA), Dehradun: Map India 2005
27 Sonneveld B G J S, Nearing M A (2003). A nonparametric/parametricanalysis of the Universal Soil Loss Equation. Catena, 52: 9–21.
doi:10.1016/S0341-8162(02)00150-9
28 Strahler A N (1964). Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basin and channelnetworks. Handbook of applied hydrology, New York: McGraw Hill section 4–11
29 Strahler A N (1964). Quantitative Geomorphology drainage basins and channelnetworks Handbook of Applied Hydrology, McGraw-Hill Publishing Co., 4: 39–76
30 Strahler A N (1975). Quantitative Analysis of Erosional Landforms, PhysicalGeography. 4th ed. New York: John Wiley, 454–470
31 Wischmeier W H, Smith D D (1978). PredictingRainfall Runoff Losses, A Guide to Conservation Planning US Departmentof Agriculture. Agriculture Handbook, No. 537
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed