Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Earth Science

ISSN 2095-0195

ISSN 2095-0209(Online)

CN 11-5982/P

Postal Subscription Code 80-963

2018 Impact Factor: 1.205

Front. Earth Sci.    0, Vol. Issue () : 419-430    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-009-0054-0
Research articles
Study on sustainable water use of the Haihe River Basin using ecological network analysis
Yuan LI,Bin CHEN,
State Key Laboratory of Water Environment Simulation, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
 Download: PDF(328 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract Sustainable water use of the Haihe River Basin is studied by using the ecological network analysis (ENA) approach. Two related aspects including socioeconomic and environmental water uses sustainability and network organization inherent in system structures are analyzed. For the study of sustainable water use from each single aspect including water use intensity, water use pressure, and environmental protection, a series of new indicators termed as total system throughput water use intensity (TSTUI), total system throughput pressure (TSTP), and environmental flow indicator (EFI) are set up by incorporating parameters of GDP, population, and environmental flow. Based on these three indices, a new integrated index, intensity-pressure-environment (IPE) is established for synthesized measure of sustainable socioeconomic and environmental water uses. The indices of ascendency and overhead are applied for analyzing and characterizing water use network organization. The four subbasins of the Haihe River during 1999–2002, 2005–2007 are studied. The results show that (i) the water use intensity in subbasin II is the best, while that in subbasins I and III are the worst; (ii) subbasin II and subbasins I and III suffer the highest and lowest water use pressure, respectively; (iii) the environmental flow situations in subbasins II and III are the worst and that of subbasin I is the best; (iv) as for the integrated socioeconomic and environmental water uses sustainability, subbasin III is the best, and subbasins I and IV are the worst; (v) the organization level of subbasin I is better than the others’, in which that of subbasin IV is the worst. It can be concluded that the application of ENA in sustainable water use study can provide new angles for water resources management to address the challenges of assessing and optimizing options to obtain more sustainable water use.
Keywords ecological network analysis      sustainable water use      environmental flow      the Haihe River Basin      
Issue Date: 05 December 2009
 Cite this article:   
Yuan LI,Bin CHEN. Study on sustainable water use of the Haihe River Basin using ecological network analysis[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 0, (): 419-430.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/10.1007/s11707-009-0054-0
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/Y0/V/I/419
Bodini A, Bondavalli C (2002). Towardsa sustainable use of water resources. InternationalJournal of Environment and Pollution, 18: 463―485

doi: 10.1504/IJEP.2002.002340
Borrett S R, Fath B D, Patten B C (2007). Functional integration of ecologicalnetworks through pathway proliferation. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 245: 98―111

doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.09.024
Christensen V, Pauly D (1993). Trophicmodels of aquatic ecosystems. International Center for Living AquaticResources Management. Conference Proceeding Number 26. Manilla, Phillipines
Fath B D (2007). Community-level relations and network mutualism. Ecological Modelling, 208: 56―67

doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.04.021
Fath B D, Halnes G (2007). Cyclicenergy pathways in ecological food webs. Ecological Modelling, 208: 17―24

doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.04.020
Fath B D, Patten B C (1999). Reviewof the foundations of network environ analysis. Ecosystems, 2: 167―179

doi: 10.1007/s100219900067
Heymans J J, Shannon L J, Jarre A (2004). Changes in the northern Benguela ecosystemover three decades: 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s. Ecological Modelling, 172: 175―195

doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.09.006
Ho M W, Ulanowicz R (2005). Sustainablesystems as organisms. Biosystems, 82: 39―51

doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2005.05.009
Li Y, Chen B, Yang Z F (2009a). Ecological network analysis for wateruse systems’a case study of the Yellow River Basin. Ecological Modelling,

doi: doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.08.007
Li Y, Yang Z F, Chen B (2009b). Ecological network analysis for wateruse systems: the revised model considering environmental flow andits application in the Haihe River Basin. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulations, inpress
Patten B C, Bosserman R W, Finn J T, Cale W G (1976). Propagation of cause in ecosystems. In: Patten B C, ed. Systems Analysis and Simulation in Ecology, Vol. IV. New York: Academic Press, 457―579
Ren X S (2007). Water Resources Assessment of the Haihe River Basin. Beijing: China Waterpower Press
Rutledge R W, Basore B L, Mulholland R J (1976). Ecological stability:An information theory viewpoint. Journalof Theoretical Biology, 57: 355―371

doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(76)90007-2
Ulanowicz R E (1980). An hypothesis on the development of natural communities. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 85: 223―245

doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(80)90019-3
Ulanowicz R E (1986). Growth and Development: Ecosystems Phenomenology. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Ulanowicz R E (1989). A phenomenology of evolving networks. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 6: 209―217
Ulanowicz R E (1997). Ecology, the ascendent perspective. In: Allen T F H, Roberts D W , ed. Complexity in EcologicalSystems Series. New York: Columbia University Press, 201
Ulanowicz R E (1998). Network orientors: theoretical and philosophical considerationswhy ecosystems may exhibit a propensity to increase ascendency. In: Muller F, Leupelt M , eds. Eco Targets, Goal Functions, and Orientors. New York: Springer-Verlag, 177―192
Ulanowicz R E, Goerner S J, Lietaer B, Gomez R (2009). Quantifying sustainability: resilience, efficiency and the returnof information theory. Ecological Complexity, 6: 27—36

doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2008.10.005
Ulanowicz R E, Norden J S (1990). Symmetricaloverhead in flow networks. InternationalJournal of Systems Science, 21: 429―437

doi: 10.1080/00207729008910372
Ulanowicz R E, Wolff W F (1990). Ecosystemflow networks: loaded dice? MathematicalBiosciences, 103: 45―68

doi: 10.1016/0025-5564(91)90090-6
Wulff F, Field J G, Mann K H (1989). Network Analysis in Marine Ecology:Methods and Applications. Coastal and EstuarineStudies 32. New York: Springer-Verlag, 284
Zorach A C, Ulanowicz R E (2003). Quantifyingthe complexity of flow networks: how many roles are there? Complexity, 8: 68―76

doi: 10.1002/cplx.10075
[1] Menglu ZHANG, Baoshan CUI, Zhiming ZHANG, Xuelian JIANG. Salinity-oriented environmental flows for keystone species in the Modaomen Estuary, China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2017, 11(4): 670-681.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed