Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Earth Science

ISSN 2095-0195

ISSN 2095-0209(Online)

CN 11-5982/P

Postal Subscription Code 80-963

2018 Impact Factor: 1.205

Front Earth Sci    0, Vol. Issue () : 283-290    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-012-0296-0
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Vegetation distribution pattern in the dam areas along middle-low reach of Lancang-Mekong River in Yunnan Province, China
Jinpeng LI1, Shikui DONG1(), Mingchun PENG2, Xiaoyan LI1, Shiliang LIU1
1. School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China; 2. Institute of Ecology and Geobotany of Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China
 Download: PDF(1613 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Lancang-Mekong River Basin is one of eco-regions with rich biodiversity and high ecological values in the world. The basin has been strongly affected by human activities, particularly by dam construction. This study was conducted to investigate the vegetation distribution patterns in the dam areas along middle-low reach of the Lancang-Mekong River in Yunnan Province of China, where eight cascade dams have been planned or are being constructed. To identify the vegetation composition and structure, we sampled 126 quadrats along the transects arrayed vertically to both side of river channel from the year of 2004 to 2010. We found that the forest, shrub and grass communities were widely spread along the riverside. In low reach watershed of the Lancang-Mekong River, the dominated vegetations were grasses and shrubs which were severely disturbed by human activity. In middle reach of the Lancang-Mekong River, the dry-hot valley vegetation was found in the low valley. At high altitude, the pine forest and semi-evergreen seasonal forest were found. As a result of dam construction and operation, the structure and compositions of riparian vegetation were strongly changed. Some plants declined or disappeared due to the alteration of their habitats. The protection or restoration interventions are urgently needed to mitigate the risk of vegetation damage associated with dam projects along middle and low reach of the Lancang-Mekong River.

Keywords vegetation distribution pattern      Lancang-Mekong River      vegetation classification      DCCA analysis     
Corresponding Author(s): DONG Shikui,Email:dongshikui@sina.com   
Issue Date: 05 September 2012
 Cite this article:   
Jinpeng LI,Shikui DONG,Mingchun PENG, et al. Vegetation distribution pattern in the dam areas along middle-low reach of Lancang-Mekong River in Yunnan Province, China[J]. Front Earth Sci, 0, (): 283-290.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/10.1007/s11707-012-0296-0
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/Y0/V/I/283
Fig.1  Middle and low reach of Lancang-Mekong River
Fig.2  Tree-diagram of vegetation types classification along Lancang-Mekong River. Tree communities include No.1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14; shrub communities include No. 3, 4, 10, 15, 16, 18, 19; grass communities include No. 5, 17, 20, 21
Characteristic valuesAxis 1Axis 2Axis 3Axis 4
Eigenvalue0.5800.2800.1450.070
Lengths of gradient3.8483.1791.5511.835
Species-environment correlations0.9260.8020.6960.645
Cumulative percentage variance of species data3.75.46.36.8
Cumulative percentage variance of species-environment relation35.251.600
Tab.1  Characteristic values and species-environment correlation coefficients on DCCA axis
Fig.3  DCCA ordination diagram of 126 quadrats along Lancang-Mekong River. (a) DCCA ordination diagram of quadrats; (b) DCCA ordination diagram of plant species; (c) DCCA ordination of environment feature
Axis 1Axis 2Axis 3Axis 4LatLonAltSlpAspDis
Axis 11
Axis 2-0.231**1
Axis 30.085-0.1561
Axis 4-0.0990.351**-0.1081
Lat0.960**-0.0880.008-0.0301
Lon-0.837**-0.269**0.034-0.103-0.824**1
Alt0.967**-0.230**0.106-0.205*0.907**-0.780**1
Slp-0.1630.624**0.273**-0.307**-0.031-0.009-0.0521
Asp-0.0020.065-0.930**-0.1370.056-0.0110.0590.1101
Dis0.517**-0.594**0.259**-0.708**0.306**-0.281**0.588**-0.192*-0.0721
Tab.2  Correlation analysis between values of axises and environment factors
1 Braak C J F ter, ?milauer P (2002). CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User’s Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4.5)
2 Chen L H, He D M (2000). The ecological impacts of hydropower cascade development in Lancang-Mekong River. Acta Geogr Sin , 55(5): 577-586 (in Chinese)
3 Dong M, Wang Y F, Kong F Z (1997). Survey and Analysis Methods for Terrestrial Biocommunity. Beijing: China Standard Press,. (in Chinese)
4 Grumbine R E, Xu J (2011). Mekong hydropower development. Science , 332(6026): 178-179
doi: 10.1126/science.1200990 pmid:21474740
5 He D M, Zhao W, Chen L H (2004). The ecological changes in Manwan Reservoir Area and its causes. Journal of Yunnan University , 26(3): 220-226
6 Hill M O, ?milauer P (2005). TWINSPAN for Windows Version 2.3. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology & University of South Bohemia, Huntingdon & Ceske Budejovice
7 Hu B, Cui B S, Yang Z F, Wang J, Zhai H J, Yao M (2006). Calculation of ecological water requirements for in-stream in the Lancang River, Yunnan Province, China. Acta Ecol Sin , 26(1): 163-173 (in Chinese)
8 Kummu M, Varis O (2007). Sediment-related impacts due to upstream reservoir trapping, the Lower Mekong River. Geomorphology , 85(3-4): 275-293
doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.03.024
9 Liu S C, Lu P L, Liu D H, Jin P (2007). Pinpointing source of Mekong and measuring its length through analysis of satellite imagery and field investigations. Geo-Spatial Information Science , 10(1): 51-56
doi: 10.1007/s11806-007-0011-6
10 Mallik A U,Richardson J S (2009). Riparian vegetation change in upstream and downstream reaches of three temperate rivers dammed for hydroelectric generation in British Columbia, Canada. Ecol Eng , 35(5): 810-819
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.12.005
11 Mekong River Commission (MRC) 2010. State of Basin Report 2010. Vientiane: Mekong River Commission.
12 Nilsson C, Reidy C A, Dynesius M, Revenga C (2005). Fragmentation and flow regulation of the world’s large river systems. Science , 308(5720): 405-408
doi: 10.1126/science.1107887 pmid:15831757
13 Poff N L RPoff N L R, Allan J D, Bain M B, Karr J R, Prestegaard K L, Richter B D, Sparks R E, Stromberg J C (1997). The natural flow regime: a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. Bioscience , 47(11): 769-784
doi: 10.2307/1313099
14 Rabeni C F (2000). Evaluating physical habitat integrity in relation to the biological potential of streams. Hydrobiologia , 422-423(0): 245-256
doi: 10.1023/A:1017022300825
15 Silva D, de Marco P, Resende D C (2010). Adult odonate abundance and community assemblage measures as indicators of stream ecological integrity: a case study. Ecological Indicators , 10(3): 744-752
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.12.004
16 Wu Z Y (1980). China Vegetation. Beijing: Science Press (in Chinese)
17 Wu Z Y, Zhu Y C (1987). Yunnan Vegetation. Beijing: Science Press (in Chinese)
18 Zhao Q H, Liu S L, Deng L, Yang Z F, Dong S K, Wang C,Zhang Z L (2011). Spatio-temporal variation of heavy metals in fresh water after dam construction: a case study of the Manwan Reservoir, Lancang River. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment . Publlish on line http://www.springerlink.com/content/6354771543845712/
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed