Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Earth Science

ISSN 2095-0195

ISSN 2095-0209(Online)

CN 11-5982/P

Postal Subscription Code 80-963

2018 Impact Factor: 1.205

Front Earth Sci    2013, Vol. 7 Issue (1) : 34-42    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-012-0343-x
RESEARCH ARTICLE
How many probe vehicles are enough for identifying traffic congestion?—a study from a streaming data perspective
Handong WANG1,3, Yang YUE1,2(), Qingquan LI1,2
1. State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China; 2. Engineering Research Center for Smart Acquisition and Applications of Spatiotemporal Data, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430079, China; 3. Changjiang Institute of Survey, Planning, Design and Research, Changjiang Water Resources Commission, Wuhan 430010, China
 Download: PDF(471 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Many studies have been carried out using vehicle trajectory to analyze traffic conditions, for instance, identifying traffic congestion. However, there is a lack of a systematic study on the appropriate number of probe vehicles and their sampling interval in order to identify traffic congestion accurately. Moreover, most of related studies ignore the streaming feature of trajectory data. This paper first represents a novel method of identifying traffic congestion considering the stream feature of vehicle trajectories. Instead of processing the whole data stream, a series of snapshots are extracted. Congested road segments can be identified by analyzing the clusters’ evolution among a series of adjacent snapshots. We then calculated a series of parameters and their corresponding congestion identification accuracy. The results have implications for related probe vehicle deployment and traffic analysis; for example, when 5% of probe vehicles are available, 85% identification accuracy can be reached if the sampling time interval is 10 s.

Keywords vehicle trajectory data      floating car data      streaming data      traffic congestion     
Corresponding Author(s): YUE Yang,Email:yueyang@whu.edu.cn   
Issue Date: 05 March 2013
 Cite this article:   
Handong WANG,Yang YUE,Qingquan LI. How many probe vehicles are enough for identifying traffic congestion?—a study from a streaming data perspective[J]. Front Earth Sci, 2013, 7(1): 34-42.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/10.1007/s11707-012-0343-x
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/Y2013/V7/I1/34
Fig.1  An example of a cluster snapshot
Fig.2  Flowchart of our proposed method
Fig.3  The sketch of simulated urban road network
Average speed/(km·h-1)Traffic state
[0, 15]Serious congestion
(15, 25]Congestion
(25, 35]Light congestion
(35, 45]Smooth
>45Very smooth
Tab.1  Vehicle speed and traffic state ()
Percentage/%Sampling interval/sMinPtEps/m
51033645
1053938
101053181
151031077
20103948
202032014
Tab.2  DBSCAN parameters
Fig.4  Identified congestions under different values of cluster overlap and snapshot time interval. (a) Number of identified traffic congested areas, (b) Queue length, (c) Traffic congestion duration
Fig.5  The impact of different cluster overlap. Snapshot time interval= 10 s. (a) Overlap value= 0.5; (b) overlap value= 0.6; (c) overlap value= 0.7; (d) overlap value= 0.8; (e) overlap value= 0.9
Fig.6  The impact of different snapshot time interval. Cluster overlap value= 0.7. (a) Time interval= 5 s; (b) time interval= 10 s; (c) time interval= 15 s; (d) time interval= 20 s
Fig.7  Identification accuracy under different parameter settings
Sampling time interval/spercentage of probes/%Identification rate/%
1≥3≥98.72
5≥3≥89.74
10≥5≥84.62
15≥10≥80.77
20≥15≥78.21
Tab.3  Relationship between percentage of probe vehicle and sampling interval with identification rate
Fig.8  The impact of DBSCAN parameters (Minpt) to identification accuracy
1 Aggarwal C C (2007). An introduction to data streams. Data Streams , 31: 1–8
doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-47534-9_1
2 Ankerst M, Breunig M M, Kriegel H P, Sander J (1999). OPTICS: ordering points to identify the clustering structure. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD’99 International Conference on Management of Data , New York: ACM
doi: 10.1145/304182.304187
3 Barbará D (2002). Requirements for clustering data streams. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter , 3(2): 23–27
doi: 10.1145/507515.507519
4 Cheu R L, Xie C, Lee D (2002). Probe vehicles population and sample size for arterial speed estimation. Computer Aided Civil and Infrastruct Engineering , 17(1): 53–60
doi: 10.1111/1467-8667.00252
5 Chi C (2007). The research about the traffic congestion evaluation system of sections in Beijing. Dissertation for Master Degree , Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University
6 Ester M, Kriegel H P, Sander J, Xu X (1996). A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In: Proceedings of ACM KDD’96, Menlo Park, CA:βAAAI Press
7 Fabritiis C D, Ragona R, Valenti G (2008). Traffic estimation and prediction based on real time floating car data. In: Proceedings of International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems , 12–15Oct. 2008, Beijing, China
8 Guha S, Meyerson A, Mishra N, Motwani R, O’Callaghan L (2003). Clustering data streams: theory and practice. IEEE TransactionsβonβKnowledgeβandβData Engineering, 15(3): 515–528
doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2003.1198387
9 Hartigan J, Wong M (1979). Algorithm as136: a k-means clustering algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society,βSeries Cβ(Applied Statistics) , 28(1): 100–108
doi: 10.2307/2346830
10 Hong J, Zhang X, Wei Z, Li L, Ren Y (2007). Spatial and temporal analysis of probe vehicle-based sampling for real-time traffic information system. In: Proceedings of International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Vehicles Symposium , 13–15Jun. 2007, Istanbul, Turkey
11 Kerner B S, Demir C, Herrtwich R G, Klenov S L, Rehborn H, Aleksic M, Haug A (2005). Traffic state detection with floating car data in road networks. In: Proceedings of International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems , 13–16Sept. 2005, Vienna, Austria
12 Kong Q J, Li Z P, Chen Y K, Liu Y C (2009). An approach to urban traffic state estimation by fusing multisource information. IEEE Transactionsβon IntelligentβTransportation Systems , 10(3): 499–511
doi: 10.1109/TITS.2009.2026308
13 Lu H P, Zhu J (2001). Analysis of the Urban Traffic. Beijing: China Water Power Press (in Chinese)
14 Nanthawichit C, Nakatsuji T, Suzuki H (2003). Application of probe vehicle data for real-time traffic state estimation and short-term travel time prediction on a freeway. In: TRB 2003 Annual Meeting CD-ROM , 11–15Jan. 2003, Washington, DC, USA
15 Pattara-atikom W, Pongpaibool P, Thajchayapong S (2006). Estimating road traffic congestion using vehicle velocity. In: Proceedings of International Conference ITS Telecommunications , 21–23Jun.2006, Chengdu, China
16 Sananmongkhonchai S, Tangamchit P, Pongpaibool P (2008). Road traffic estimation from multiple GPS data using incremental weighted update. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference ITS Telecommunications , 24Oct. 2008, Phuket, Thailand
17 Shi W, Kong Q (2008). A GPS/GIS integrated system for urban traffic flow analysis. In: Proceedings of International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems , 12–15Oct. 2008, Beijing, China
18 Srinivasan K, Jovanis P (1996). Determination of the number of probe vehicles required for reliable travel time measurement in an urban network. Transportation Research Record , 1537: 15–22
19 Wang W, Yang J, Muntz R (1997). STING: a statistical information grid approach to spatial data mining. In: Proceedings of the 23rd VLDB Conference , 25–29Aug., 1997, Athens, Greece
20 Yoon J, Noble B, Liu M (2007). Surface street traffic estimation. In: Proceedings of International Conference Mobile Systems, Applications and Services , 11–14Jun. 2007, San Juan, Puerto Rico
21 Zhang C B, Yang X, Yan X (2007a). Probe vehicles sample size for mobile traffic detection system. China Journal of Highway and Transport , 20(1): 96–101 (in Chinese)
22 Zhang C B, Yang X, Yan X (2007b). Method for floating cars sampling cycle optimization. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information , 7(3): 100–104
23 Zou H X, Yue Y, Li Q Q, Yeh A G O (2012). An improved distance metric for the interpolation of link-based traffic data using Kriging: a case study of a large-scale urban road network. International Journal of Geographical Information Science , 26(4): 667–689
doi: 10.1080/13658816.2011.609488
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed