Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Earth Science

ISSN 2095-0195

ISSN 2095-0209(Online)

CN 11-5982/P

Postal Subscription Code 80-963

2018 Impact Factor: 1.205

Front. Earth Sci.    2014, Vol. 8 Issue (2) : 282-290    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-013-0396-5
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Ecologically-friendly operation scheme for the Jinping cascaded reservoirs in the Yalongjiang River, China
Duan CHEN1,2,Qiuwen CHEN1,3,*(),Ruonan LI1,Koen BLANCKAERT1,Desuo CAI4
1. Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
2. Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan 430010, China
3. Nanjing Hydraulics Research Institute, Nanjing 210023, China
4. Guangxi Water Conservancy Department, Nanning 530023, China
 Download: PDF(194 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Ecologically-friendly reservoir operation procedures aim to conserve key ecosystem properties in the rivers, while minimizing the sacrifice of socioeconomic interests. This study focused on the Jinping cascaded reservoirs as a case study. An optimization model was developed to explore a balance between the ecological flow requirement (EFR) of a target fish species (Schizothorax chongi) in the dewatered natural channel section, and annual power production. The EFR for the channel was determined by the Tennant method and a fish habitat model, respectively.βThe optimization model was solved by using an adaptive real-coded genetic algorithm. Several operation scenarios corresponding to the ecological flow series were evaluated using the optimization model. Through comparisons, an optimal operational scheme, which combines relatively low power production loss with a preferred ecological flow regime in the dewatered channel, is proposed for the cascaded reservoirs. Under the recommended scheme, the discharge into the Dahewan river reach in the dry season ranges from 36 to 50 m3/s. This will enable at least 50% of the target fish habitats in the channel to be conserved, at a cost of only 2.5% annual power production loss. The study demonstrates that the use of EFRs is an efficient approach to the optimization of reservoir operation in an ecologically friendly way. Similar modeling, for other important fish species and ecosystem functions, supplemented by field validation of results, is needed in order to secure the long-term conservation of the affected river ecosystem.

Keywords ecologically-friendly operation      optimization model      ecological flow      Jinping cascaded reservoirs      Schizothorax chongi     
Corresponding Author(s): Qiuwen CHEN   
Issue Date: 24 June 2014
 Cite this article:   
Duan CHEN,Qiuwen CHEN,Ruonan LI, et al. Ecologically-friendly operation scheme for the Jinping cascaded reservoirs in the Yalongjiang River, China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2014, 8(2): 282-290.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/10.1007/s11707-013-0396-5
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/Y2014/V8/I2/282
Fig.1  Sketch of the JP cascade project together with over-wintering and spawning fields of Schizothorax chongi fish in the Dahewan Reach.
Fig.2  Flowchart of the GA optimization procedure.
Narrative description of flows% of the average flowJanFebMarAprMayJunJulyAugSepOctNovDec
Severe degradation0000000000000
Poor5616161616161616161616161
Fair15122122122122122244244244244244122122
Good30244244244244244488488488488488244244
Excellent40366366366366366610610610610610366366
Outstanding50488488488488488732732732732732488488
Optimum range10035832132843569515902810259025001620809488
Tab.1  Habitat status and corresponding discharges into the Dahewan Reach using the Tennant method
Percentage of WUAJanFebMarAprMayJunJulyAugSepOctNovDec
0%000000000000
10%3332224313332595743
20%76.56.7434865696810810477
30%13121268751071131131591521313
40%222121961071591691682172062423
50%4036381101121521081691681583850
60%6461621671923043283263773516968
70%7874752012172521863133102617598
80%139128130271323556625620734644157156
90%22516817033034236628812401230850170370
100%35832132843569515902810259025001620809488
Tab.2  Habitat status and corresponding discharge in the Dahewan Reach using the habitat model
Narrative description of flowsSevere degradationPoorFairGoodExcellentOutstandingOptimum range
Satisfaction degree of EFR0%5%15%30%40%50%100%
Scenario notationT1T2T3T4T5T6T7
Power loss rate0.0%–5.0%–9.1%–12.7%–18.1%–21.1%–39.4%
Tab.3  Operation schemes constrained by the eco-hydrograph from the Tennant method
Fig.3  Relation between percentage of average flow and power production loss.
Percentage of WUA0%30%50%70%90%100%
Scenario notationH1H2H3H4H5H6
Power loss rate0.0%–1.5%–2.5%–4.9%–15.7%–39.4%
Tab.4  Operation schemes constrained by the eco-hydrograph from habitat method
Fig.4  Relation between percentage of WUA and power production loss.
Fig.5  Operational water levels upstream of the cascaded reservoirs.
Fig.6  Discharge from JP-1 reservoir under the proposed operation scheme.
Fig.7  Discharge from JP-2 reservoir under the proposed operation scheme.
Fig.8  Discharge in the dewatered river reach under proposed operation scheme.
1 BoveeK D (1982). A Guide to Stream Habitat Analyses Using the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology. Instream Flow Information. Washington: US Fish and Wildlife Service, 67–73
2 CastellettiA, PianosiF, Soncini-SessaR (2008). Water reservoir control under economic, social and environmental constraints. Automatica, 44(6): 1595–1607
doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2008.03.003
3 ChenB, ChenG, HaoF, YangZ (2009). Exergy-based water resource allocation of the mainstream Yellow River. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul, 14(4): 1721–1728
doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2007.05.033
4 ChenD, HuangG, ChenQ, JinF (2010). Implementing Eco-friendly reservoir operation by using genetic algorithm with dynamic mutation operator. Lect Notes Comput Sci, 6330: 509–516
doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-15615-1_59
5 ChenQ, ChenD, HanR, LiR, MaJ, BlanckaertK (2012). Optimizing the operation of the Qingshitan Reservoir in the Lijiang River for multiple human interests and quasi-natural flow maintenance. J Environ Sci (China), 24(11): 1923–1928
doi: 10.1016/S1001-0742(11)61029-2 pmid: 23534224
6 ChenQ, ChenD, LiR, MaJ, BlanckaertK (2013). Adapting the operation of two cascaded reservoirs for ecological flow requirement of a de-watered river channel due to diversion-type hydropower stations. Ecol Modell, 252: 266–272
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.03.008
7 ECIDI (2005). Report of Environmental Impact Assessmentβon Jinping-II Hydropower Project. Hangzhou: East China Investigation and Design Institute (in Chinese)
8 HomaE S, VogelR M, SmithM P, ApseC D, Huber-LeeA, SieberJ (2005). An optimization approach for balancing human and ecological flow needs. In: EWRI 2005: Impacts of Global Climate Change, Proceedings of the 2005 World Water and Environmental Resources Congress, Anchorage, Alaska
9 JagerH I, RoseK A (2003). Designing optimal flow patterns for fall chinook salmon in a Central Valley river. N Am J Fish Manage, 23(1): 1–21
doi: 10.1577/1548-8675(2003)023<0001:DOFPFF>2.0.CO;2
10 LabadieJ W (2004). Optimal operation of multi-reservoir systems: state-of-the-art review. J Water Resour Plan Manage, 130(2): 93–111
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2004)130:2(93)
11 LiR, ChenQ, ChenD (2011). Ecological hydrograph based on Schizothorax chongi habitat conservation in the dewatered river channel between Jinping Cascaded Dams. Science China, 54(S1): 54–63
doi: 10.1007/s11431-011-4614-7 pmid: 21253871
12 MeiY, YangN, ZhaiY (2009). Optimal ecological sound operation of the cascade reservoirs in the lower Yalongjiang River. Advances in Water Science, 20(5): 721–725 (in Chinese)
13 ReiserD W, WescheT A, EstesC (1989). Status of instream flow legislation and practices in North America. Fisheries (Bethesda, Md), 14(2): 22–29
doi: 10.1577/1548-8446(1989)014<0022:SOIFLA>2.0.CO;2
14 RenöfältB M, JanssonR, NilssonC (2010). Effects of hydropower generation and opportunities for environmental flow management in Swedish riverine ecosystems. Freshw Biol, 55: 49–67
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02241.x
15 RichterB D, BaumgartnerJ V, WigingtonR, BraunD P (1997). How much water does a river need? Freshw Biol, 37(1): 231–249
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.1997.00153.x
16 ShiauJ T, WuF C (2006). Compromise programming methodology for determining instream flow under multi objective water allocation criteria. J Am Water Resour Assoc, 42(5): 1179–1191
doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2006.tb05605.x
17 SmithB T, JagerH I, SaleM J (2007). Optimization of Hydropower Resources: Current Practices and Opportunities for Improvement. ORNL/TM-2006/91. Oak Ridge National Laboratory
18 SuenJ P, EheartJ W (2006). Reservoir management to balance ecosystem and human needs: incorporating the paradigm of the ecological flow regime. Water Resour Res, 42(3): W03417
doi: 10.1029/2005WR004314
19 TennantD L (1976). Instream flow regimens for fish, wildlife, recreation, and related environmental resources. In: OrsbornJ F, AllmanC H, eds. Proceedings of the Symposium and Speciality Conference on Instream Flow Needs II. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, 359–373
20 TharmeR E (2003). A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Res Appl, 19(5–6): 397–441
doi: 10.1002/rra.736
21 TuZ, YuanX, HanJ, ShiX, HuangY, JohnsonD (2011). Aerobic swimming performance of juvenile Schizothorax chongi (Pisces, Cyprinidae) in the Yalong River, southwestern China. Hydrobiologia, 675(1): 119–127
doi: 10.1007/s10750-011-0809-y
22 WangJ, GuoX (2011). The ecological water demand reducing reach of Yalong river downstream of Jinping waterpower station calculated based On R2CROSS. Jilin Water Resources, 351(8): 25–28 (in Chinese)
23 WangS (2004). Discussion on dam and ecosystem. Hydropower, 30(4): 1–4 (in Chinese)
24 WhitingP J (2002). Stream flow necessary for environmental maintenance. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci, 30(1):181–206
doi: 10.1146/annurev.earth.30.083001.161748
25 WohlE, AngermeierP L, BledsoeB, KondolfM, MacDonnellL, MerrittD M, PalmerM A, PoffN L, TarbotonD (2005). River restoration. Water Resour Res, 41(10): WR003985
26 WurbsR A (1993). Reservoir-system simulation and optimization models. J Water Resour Plan Manage, 119(4): 455–472
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1993)119:4(455)
27 YangZ, SunT, CuiB, ChenB, ChenG (2009). Environmental flow requirements for integrated water resources allocation in the Yellow River Basin, China. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul, 14(5): 2469–2481
doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2007.12.015
28 YehW (1985). Reservoir management and operation models: a state-of-the-art review. Water Resour Res, 21(12): 1797–1818
doi: 10.1029/WR021i012p01797
29 YinX, YangZ (2011). Development of a coupled reservoir operation and water diversion model: balancing human and environmental flow requirements. Ecol Modell, 222(2): 224–231
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.06.025
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed