Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Earth Science

ISSN 2095-0195

ISSN 2095-0209(Online)

CN 11-5982/P

Postal Subscription Code 80-963

2018 Impact Factor: 1.205

Front. Earth Sci.    2018, Vol. 12 Issue (4) : 808-817    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-016-0653-0
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Interpretation of gravity data for fault distribution near the Mongolia–Hinggan metallogenic belt in the eastern China-Mongolia frontier area
Jun WANG1,2(), Xiaohong MENG1,2(), Zhaoxi CHEN1,2, Fang LI3
1. Key Laboratory of Geo-detection (China University of Geosciences, Beijing), Ministry of Education, Beijing 100083, China
2. School of Geophysics and Information Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
3. China Aero Geophysical Survey and Remote Sensing Center for Land and Resources, Beijing 100083, China
 Download: PDF(2540 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB) is a giant suture zone produced by the reduction of the Paleo-Asian Ocean between the Siberian, North China, and Tarim cratons. The CAOB formed in three main stages, including continental accretion, late collision, and intracontinental orogeny. Strong crust-mantle interaction also occurred during these stages. The eastern China-Mongolia frontier area is an important part of the CAOB. Since the Caledonian period, this region has frequently experienced polycyclic tectonic reformation and intense magmatic activities. All of these geological activities lay the foundation for abundant metal resources. In the past, several large metal ore deposits have been founded there. However, the deep structure of different tectonic units and the fault distribution in the eastern China-Mongolia border frontier area are still not clear owing to the complex geological environment. Existing works in that region are insufficient for an in-depth understanding of the metallogenic deposits. The work discussed in this paper was carried out in the eastern China-Mongolia frontier area with measured gravity data along a profile and gravity data extracted from the WGM2012 earth’s gravity model for detailed fault distribution. In this study, empirical mode decomposition (EMD) and tilt angle analysis (TDR) were utilized for processing the gridded gravity data. The measured gravity data were inverted with a 2D inversion algorithm for density distribution along the survey line. The inversion result was used to verify the existence of known faults and describe their deeper extensions. Meanwhile, new faults were also identified along the survey line and then marked on the gridded data to get their horizontal distribution. These results provide significant information for the in-depth understanding of the tectonic units in the study area.

Keywords the CAOB      China-Mongolia frontier area      gravity data      processing and inversion      fault distribution     
Corresponding Author(s): Jun WANG,Xiaohong MENG   
Online First Date: 13 August 2018    Issue Date: 20 November 2018
 Cite this article:   
Jun WANG,Xiaohong MENG,Zhaoxi CHEN, et al. Interpretation of gravity data for fault distribution near the Mongolia–Hinggan metallogenic belt in the eastern China-Mongolia frontier area[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2018, 12(4): 808-817.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/10.1007/s11707-016-0653-0
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/Y2018/V12/I4/808
Fig.1  Map showing location of the research area.
Number Name Description
F1 Sauron–Ulanhot fault ?Scale: Deep fault;
? Strike ( northeast): Sauron aobao of Urad Middle Banner–Chagan hada of Damao Banner–Sonid Right Banner–Silas MuLun River–Jarud Banner–Ulanhot;
? Dip: East-west in the west and middle part, gradually changes to the north-east
F2 Gaojia kiln–White City fault ?Scale: Deep fault;
?Strike (west to east): The north mountain–the Cut well–Langshan–Bayan Obo–Huade–Ongniud Banner–Kailu–the White City;
?Dip: East-west
F3 Wuyuan–Chifeng fault ?Scale: Deep fault;
?Strike (west to east): Wuyuan–Taipusi Banner–Weichang–Chifeng;
?Dip: East-west
F4 Linhe–Harqin Banner fault ?Scale: Deep fault;
?Strike (northeast then turning east-west): Linhe–Urad Front Banner–Wuchuan–Chahar Right Middle Banner–Jining;
?Dip: East-west
Tab.1  Descriptions of the existing major faults
Fig.2  (a) Bouguer gravity along the settled profile; (b)?(e) various intrinsic mode functions of the empirical mode decomposition of the measured gravity anomaly. The ‘Res’ can be expressed as Res=Original data – (IMF1+IMF2+…+IMF7).
Fig.3  (a) Bouguer gravity data extracted from the WGM2012 earth's gravity model; (b) The separated residual gravity data based EMD; (c) The separated regional gravity data based EMD.
Fig.4  Flow chart of the researches conducted in this study.
Fig.5  (a) TDR analysis of the residual gravity data; (b) TDR analysis of the regional gravity data. In these two figures, the black lines denote existing faults.
Fig.6  Integrated analysis of the inversion results of gravity data and MT data.
Number Reliability Description
F1 High Obvious characteristics in both of the inversion results
F2 High Obvious characteristics in both of the inversion results
F3 High Obvious characteristics in both of the inversion results
F4 High Obvious characteristics in both of the inversion results
SF1 / Not applicable along the observation line
SF2 Lower No obvious characteristics in the two-inversion result
SF3 / Not applicable along the observation line
SF4 / Not applicable along the observation line
SF5 Relatively low Obvious characteristics just in the gravity inversion result
SF6 High Obvious characteristics in both of the inversion results
SF7 High Obvious characteristics in both of the inversion results
SF8 High Obvious characteristics in both of the inversion results
Tab.2  Reliability assessment of these existing faults
Fig.7  Analysis of the TDR result for new potential faults in the study area.
1 Ali-Rahim M A (2016). Separating the gravity field of Iraq by using bidimensional empirical mode decomposition technique. Arab J Geosci, 9(1): 1–9
2 Amante C, Eakins B W (2009). ETOPO1 1 Arc-Minute Global Relief Model: Procedures, Data Sources and Analysis. NOAA Technical Memorandum NESDIS NGDC-24
3 Balmino G, Vales N, Bonvalot S, Briais A (2012). Spherical harmonic modeling to ultra-high degree of Bouguer and isostatic anomalies. J Geod, 86(7): 499–520
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-011-0533-4
4 Blakely R J, Simpson R W (1986). Approximating edges of source bodies from magnetic or gravity anomalies. Geophysics, 51(7): 1494–1498
https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442197
5 Chen Y, Ma J (2014). Random noise attenuation by f-x empirical mode decomposition predictive filtering. Geophysics, 79(3): V81–V91
https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2013-0080.1
6 Didenko A N, Kaplun V B, Malyshev Y F, Shevchenko B F (2010). Lithospheric structure and Mesozoic geodynamics of the Eastern Central Asian orogeny. Russ Geol Geophys, 51(5): 492–506
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgg.2010.04.006
7 Fedi M, Florio G (2001). Detection of potential fields source boundaries by enhanced horizontal derivative method. Geophys Prospect, 49(1): 40–58
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00235.x
8 Ghosh G K (2016). Interpretation of gravity data using 3D euler deconvolution, tilt angle, horizontal tilt angle and source edge approximation of the North-West Himalaya. Acta geophysics, 64(4): 1112–1138
9 Guo L H, Meng X H, Zhang G L (2014). Three-dimensional correlation imaging for total amplitude magnetic anomaly and normalized source strength in the presence of strong remnant magnetization. J Appl Geophys, 111: 121–128
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.10.007
10 Huang N E, Shen Z, Long S R, Wu M C, Shih H H, Zheng Q, Yen N C, Tung C C, Liu H H (1998). The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proc R Soc Lond A, 454(1971): 903–995
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1998.0193
11 Jahn B, Capdevila R, Liu D, Vernov A, Badarch G (2004). Sources of Phanerozoic granitoids in the transect Bayanhongor-Ulan Baator, Mongolia: geochemical and Nd isotopic evidence, and implications of Phanerozoic crustal growth. J Asian Earth Sci, 23(5): 629–653
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1367-9120(03)00125-1
12 Li L, Ji H B (2009). Signal feature extraction based on an improved EMD method. Measurement, 42(5): 796–803
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2009.01.001
13 Li Y G, Oldenburg D W (1998). 3-D inversion of gravity data. Geophysics, 63(1): 109–119
https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444302
14 Liu Y, Lü Q T, Li X B, Qi G, Zhao J H, Yan J Y, Deng Z (2015). 3D gravity inversion based on Bayesian method with model order reduction. Chin J Geophys, 58(12): 4727–4739
16 Metcalfe I (2006). Paleozoic and Mesozoic tectonic evolution and paleogeography of East Asian crustal fragments: the Korean Peninsula in context. Gondwana Res, 9(1‒2): 24–46
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2005.04.002
17 Miller H G, Singh V (1994). Potential field tilt – A new concept for location of potential field sources. J Appl Geophys, 32(2): 213–217
https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-9851(94)90022-1
18 Mossakovsky A A, Ruzhentsev S V, Samygin S G, Kheraskova T N (1993). The Central Asian fold belt: geodynamic evolution and formation history. Geotectonics, 26: 455–473
19 Nabighian M N, Ander M E, Grauch V J S, Hansen R O, Lafehr T R, Li Y, Pearson W C, Peirce J W, Phillips J D, Ruder M E (2005). Historical development of the gravity method in exploration. Geophysics 70(6): 63ND–89ND
20 Nie F J, Jiang S H, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Hu P (2004). Geological features and origin of porphyry copper deposits in China-Mongolia border region and its neighboring areas. Mineral deposits, 23(2): 176–189
21 Nunes J C, Guyot S, Deléchelle E (2005). Texture analysis based on local analysis of the bidimensional empirical mode decomposition. Mach Vis Appl, 16(3): 177–188
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00138-004-0170-5
22 Oru Bç (2011). Edge detection and depth estimation using a tilt angle map from gravity gradient data of the Kozaklı-Central Anatolia Region, Turkey. Pure Appl Geophys, 168(10): 1769–1780
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-010-0211-0
23 Perello J, Cox D, Garamjav D, Sanjdorj S, Diakov S, Schissel D, Munkhbat T O, Oyun G (2001). Oyu Tolgoi, Mongolia: Siluro-Devonian Porphyry Cu-Au-(Mo) and High-Sulfidation Cu Mineralization with a Cretaceous chalcocite blanket. Econ Geol, 96(6): 1407–1428
https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.96.6.1407
24 Phillips J D, Hansen R O, Blakely R J (2007). The use of curvature in potential-field interpretation. Explor Geophys, 38(2): 111–119
https://doi.org/10.1071/EG07014
25 Uieda L, Barbosa V C F (2012). Robust 3D gravity gradient inversion by planting anomalous densities. Geophysics, 77(4): G55–G66
https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2011-0388.1
26 Verduzco B, Fairhead J D, Green C M, MacKenzie C (2004). New insights into magnetic derivatives for structural mapping. Leading Edge (Tulsa Okla), 23(2): 116–119
https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1651454
27 Wang J, Meng X H, Guo L H, Chen Z X, Li F (2014). A correlation-based approach for determining the threshold value of singular value decomposition filtering for potential field data denoising. Journal of Geophys and Engineering, 11 (5): 055007
28 Wang J, Meng X H, Li F (2015a). Improved curvature gravity gradient tensor with principal component analysis and its application in edge detection of gravity data. J Appl Geophys, 118: 106–114
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2015.04.013
29 Wang J, Meng X H, Li F (2015b). A computationally efficient scheme for the inversion of large scale potential field data: application to synthetic and real data. Comput Geosci, 85: 102–111
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2015.09.005
30 Williams S E, Fairhead J D, Flanagan G (2005). Comparison of grid Euler deconvolution with and without 2D constraints using a realistic 3D magnetic basement model. Geophysics, 70(3): L13–L21
https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1925745
31 Xiao W J, Huang B C, Han C M, Sun S, Li J L (2010). A review of the western part of the Altaids: a key to understanding the architecture of accretionary orogens. Gondwana Res, 18(2‒3): 253–273
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2010.01.007
32 Yan J Y, Lu Q T, Wu M A, Chen X B, Zhang K, Qi G (2014). Prospecting indicator of Anhui Shaxi porphyry copper deposits based on regional gravity and magnetic 3D inversion. Acta Geol Sin, 88(4): 507–518
33 Yarmolyuk V V, Kuzmin M I, Ernst R E (2014). Intraplate geodynamics and magmatism in the evolution of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt. J Asian Earth Sci, 93: 158–179
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2014.07.004
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed