Please wait a minute...
Shopping Cart Email List Chinese
Advanced Search Fig/Tab
Frontiers of Earth Science

ISSN 2095-0195

ISSN 2095-0209(Online)

CN 11-5982/P

Postal Subscription Code 80-963

2018 Impact Factor: 1.205

Featured Articles  |  Most Downloaded  |  Most Reading
Online Submission Subscribe to Our RSS Content Feed
Front. Earth Sci.    2021, Vol. 15 Issue (3) : 553-579    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-020-0832-2
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Quantifying the spatiotemporal characteristics of ecosystem services and livelihoods in China’s poverty-stricken counties
Lilei ZHOU1,2,3, Dongjie GUAN4(), Xingzhong YUAN1, Mengjie ZHANG1,2, Weijun GAO3
1. Faculty of Architecture and Urban planning, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China
2. Key Lab of Three Gorges Reservoir Region Eco-Environment (Ministry of Education), Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China
3. Faculty of Environmental Engineering, University of Kitakyushu, Kitakyushu 808-0135, Japan
4. College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China
 Download: PDF(12238 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Understanding the coupling relationship between ecosystem services and poverty livelihoods is a prerequisite for poverty eradication and ecological protection in China. In this paper, we intended to quantify the coupling relationship between ecosystem services and poverty livelihoods in 717 poverty-stricken counties in China. First, we identified distinct levels of ecosystem services and poverty respectively in the poverty-stricken areas based on the ecosystem services subsystem index and poverty livelihoods subsystem index. Then, we calculated the coupling degree and coupling coordination degree between the ecosystem services and the poverty livelihoods in China’s poverty-stricken counties from 2000 to 2015. Finally, we analyzed the temporal and spatial evolution of the coupling between ecosystem services and poverty livelihoods. The results indicate that the ecosystem services showed a trend of first decreasing and then increasing, while the poverty level showed an increased trend. In addition, the coupling relationship between ecosystem services and poverty livelihoods in poverty-stricken counties was also improved from 2000 to 2015. However, the coupling degree value or coupling coordination degree values in some counties or contiguous impoverished areas showed a decreased trend, the coupling relationship between ecosystem services and poverty livelihoods in those counties or areas was higher conflict. Future more, the coupling relationship in China’s poverty-stricken counties was mainly intermediate conflict and low conflict, which need to improve in the future. Thus, it is suggested that effective measures are required to lift ecosystem services out of the poverty trap and into sustainable livelihoods.
Keywords ecosystem services      poverty livelihoods      coupling degree      coupling coordination degree      coupling relationship      spatiotemporal characteristic     
Corresponding Author(s): Dongjie GUAN   
Online First Date: 02 June 2021    Issue Date: 17 January 2022
 Cite this article:   
Lilei ZHOU,Dongjie GUAN,Xingzhong YUAN, et al. Quantifying the spatiotemporal characteristics of ecosystem services and livelihoods in China’s poverty-stricken counties[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2021, 15(3): 553-579.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/10.1007/s11707-020-0832-2
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/Y2021/V15/I3/553
1 B Ai, C Ma, J Zhao, R Zhang (2020). The impact of rapid urban expansion on coastal mangroves: a case study in Guangdong Province, China. Front Earth Sci, 14(1): 37–49
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-019-0768-6
2 S Akwetaireho, M Getzner (2010). Livelihood dependence on ecosystem services of local residents: a case study from Mabamba Bay wetlands (Lake Victoria, Uganda). Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag, 6(1–2): 75–87
https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2010.521139
3 A C Auler, S L Galetto, F S Hennipman, E D Guntzel, N F Giarola, A F Fonseca (2017). Soil structural quality degradation by the increase in grazing intensity in integrated crop-livestock system. Bragantia, 76(4): 550–556
https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.2016.310
4 T Berchoux, G R Watmough, C Hutton, P M Atkinson (2019). Agricultural shocks and drivers of livelihood precariousness across indian rural communities. Landsc Urban Plan, 189: 307–319
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.04.014
5 R Chambers, G R Conway (1991). Sustainable rural livelihoods: practical concepts for the 21st Century. Brighton, Institute of Development Studies 296
6 Y Chen, Y Ge (2015). Spatial point pattern analysis on the villages in China’s poverty-stricken areas. Procedia Environ Sci, 27: 98–105
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2015.07.098
7 R Costanza, R d’Arge, R de Groot, S Farber, M Grasso, B Hannon, K Limburg, S Naeem, R V O’Neill, J Paruelo, R G Raskin, P Sutton, M van den Belt (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630): 253–260
https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
8 R Costanza, R de Groot, L Braat, I Kubiszewski, L Fioramonti, P Sutton, S Farber, M Grasso (2017). Twenty years of ecosystem services: how far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosyst Serv, 28: 1–16
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008
9 A Cuni-Sanchez, A S Ngute, B Sonké, M Sainge, N Burgess, J Klein, R Marchant (2019). The importance of livelihood strategy and ethnicity in forest ecosystem services’ perceptions by local communities in north-western Cameroon. Ecosyst Serv, 40: 101000
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.101000
10 D D’Amato, M Rekola, M Wan, D Cai, A Toppinen (2017). Effects of industrial plantations on ecosystem services and livelihoods: perspectives of rural communities in China. Land Use Policy, 63: 266–278
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.01.044
11 G C Daily (1997). Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington DC: Island Press
12 T Daw, K Brown, S Rosendo, R Pomeroy, D Brockington (2011). Applying the ecosystem services concept to poverty alleviation: the need to disaggregate human well-being. Environ Conserv, 38(4): 370–379
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892911000506
13 C D Elvidge, P C Sutton, T Ghosh, B T Tuttle, K E Baugh, B Bhaduri, E Bright (2009). A global poverty map derived from satellite data. Comput and Geosci, 35: 1652–1660
14 J A Fisher, G Patenaude, K Giri, K Lewis, P Meir, P Pinho, M D A Rounsevell, M Williams (2014). Understanding the relationships between ecosystem services and poverty alleviation: a conceptual framework. Ecosyst Serv, 7: 34–45
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.08.002
15 Q Gong, J Zhang (2007). Relations between agricultural natural disasters and rural poverty based on analysis of panel data in Anhui Province, China. Chinese J Population Resour Environ, 17: 92–95
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-583X(08)60004-2
16 P J Gregory, S N Johnson, A C Newton, J S I Ingram (2009). Integrating pests and pathogens into the climate change/food security debate. J Exp Bot, 60(10): 2827–2838
https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp080 pmid: 19380424
17 G K Heilig, M Zhang, H Long, X Li, X Wu (2006). Poverty alleviation in China: a lesson for the developing world? Geogr Rundsch, 2: 4–13
18 K Homewood, K Schreckenberg (2018). Sharing data from the Ecosystem Services for Poverty Alleviation programme. Sci Data, 5(1): 180137
https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.137 pmid: 29969118
19 X Hu, H Zhang, H Hao, D Feng, H Liu, Q Zhang (2020). Understanding the relationships between poverty alleviation and ecosystem conservation: empirical evidence from western China. Front Earth Sci, 14(1): 209–220
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-019-0764-x
20 N Huq, R Pedroso, A Bruns, L Ribbe, S Huq (2020). Changing dynamics of livelihood dependence on ecosystem services at temporal and spatial scales: an assessment in the southern wetland areas of Bangladesh. Ecol Indic, 110: 105855
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105855
21 J Ibáñez, J Martínez, S Schnabel (2007). Desertification due to overgrazing in a dynamic commercial livestock–grass–soil system. Ecol Modelling, 205: 277–288
22 V Illingworth (1996). The Penguin dictionary of physics. Beijing: Foreign Languages Press
23 W Jogo, R Hassan (2010). Determinants of rural household labour allocation for wetland and other livelihood activities: the case of the Limpopo wetland in Southern Africa. Agrekon, 49(2): 195–216
https://doi.org/10.1080/03031853.2010.491289
24 F K Kalaba, C H Quinn, A J Dougill (2013). Contribution of forest provisioning ecosystem services to rural livelihoods in the Miombo woodlands of Zambia. Popul Environ, 35(2): 159–182
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-013-0189-5
25 S R Khan, S R Khan (2009). Assessing poverty-deforestation links: evidence from Swat, Pakistan. Ecol Econ, 68(10): 2607–2618
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.04.018
26 H Kumar, B W Pandey, S Anand (2019). Analyzing the impacts of forest ecosystem services on livelihood security and sustainability: a case study of Jim Corbett National Park in Uttarakhand. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 7(2): 45–55
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2019.05.003
27 C Li, S Li, M W Feldman, J Li, H Zheng, G C Daily (2018). The impact on rural livelihoods and ecosystem services of a major relocation and settlement program: a case in Shaanxi, China. Ambio, 47(2): 245–259
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-0941-7 pmid: 28983793
28 Y Li, Y Li, Y Zhou, Y Shi, X Zhu (2012). Investigation of a coupling model of coordination between urbanization and the environment. Journal of Environmental Management, 98: 127–133
29 Y Li, B Su, Y Liu (2016). Realizing targeted poverty alleviation in China: People’s voices, implementation challenges and policy implications. China Agric Econ Rev, 8(3): 443–454
https://doi.org/10.1108/CAER-11-2015-0157
30 N Liu, C Liu, Y Xia, B Da (2018). Examining the coordination between urbanization and eco-environment using coupling and spatial analyses: a case study in China. Ecol Indic, 93: 1163–1175
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.013
31 Y Liu, J Liu, Y Zhou (2017). Spatio-temporal patterns of rural poverty in china and targeted poverty alleviation strategies. J Rural Stud, 52: 66–75
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.04.002
32 L Ma, F Jin, Z Song, Y Liu (2013). Spatial coupling analysis of regional economic development and environmental pollution in China. J Geogr Sci, 23(3): 525–537
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-013-1026-6
33 M C Meehan (1969). General system theory: foundations, development, applications. JAMA, 208(5): 870
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1969.03160050124033
34 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (EMA) (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington DC
35 Z Ouyang, H Zheng, Y Xiao, S Polasky, J Liu, W Xu, Q Wang, L Zhang, Y Xiao, E Rao, L Jiang, F Lu, X Wang, G Yang, S Gong, B Wu, Y Zeng, W Yang, G C Daily (2016). Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital. Science, 352(6292): 1455–1459
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2295 pmid: 27313045
36 W J Parton, J M O Scurlock, D S Ojima, D S Schimel, D O Hall, S G Members (1995). Impact of climate change on grassland production and soil carbon worldwide. Glob Change Biol, 1(1): 13–22
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.1995.tb00002.x
37 T A Quine, D E Walling (1993). Assessing recent rates of soil loss from areas of arable cultivation in the UK. Farm Land Erosion: 357–371
38 J Reed, J Van Vianen, S Foli, J Clendenning, K Yang, M MacDonald, G Petrokofsky, C Padoch, T Sunderland (2017). Trees for life: the ecosystem service contribution of trees to food production and livelihoods in the tropics. For Policy Econ, 84: 62–71
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.01.012
39 Z Ren, Y Ge, J Wang, J Mao, Q Zhang (2017). Understanding the inconsistent relationships between socioeconomic factors and poverty incidence across contiguous poverty-stricken regions in China: multilevel modelling. Spat Stat, 21: 406–420
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2017.02.009
40 B E Robinson, H Zheng, W Peng (2019). Disaggregating livelihood dependence on ecosystem services to inform land management. Ecosyst Serv, 36: 100902
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100902
41 T L Saaty (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. New York: McGraw
42 T L Saaty (2003). Decision-making with the AHP: why is the principal eigenvector necessary. Eur J Oper Res, 145(1): 85–91
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00227-8
43 D Saha, R C Sundriyal (2012). Utilization of non-timber forest products in humid tropics: implications for management and livelihood. For Policy Econ, 14(1): 28–40
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.07.008
44 G Sen (1999). Engendering poverty alleviation: challenges and opportunities. Dev Change, 30(3): 685–692
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00133
45 P Shaffer (2013). Poverty and development in China: alternative approaches to poverty assessment. J Dev Stud, 49(7): 1030–1031
https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2012.739745
46 A Shemshadi, H Shirazi, M Toreihi, M J Tarokh (2011). A fuzzy VIKOR method for supplier selection based on entropy measure for objective weighting. Expert Syst Appl, 38(10): 12160–12167
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.03.027
47 C Song, Z Chen, W Zhai (2015). Analysis of sequential characteristic of coupling coordination degree between urbanization and resources-environment in Hubei Province. Adv Mat Res, 1073–1076: 1380–1386
https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1073-1076.1380
48 A Sumner (2012). Where do the poor live? World Dev. 40(5): 865–877
49 Y Sun, S Liu, Y Dong, Y An, F Shi, S Dong, G Liu (2019). Spatio-temporal evolution scenarios and the coupling analysis of ecosystem services with land use change in China. Sci Total Environ, 681: 211–225
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.136 pmid: 31103659
50 J Tao, Y Zhang, J Dong, Y Fu, J Zhu, G Zhang, Y Jiang, L Tian, X Zhang, T Zhang, Y Xi (2015). Elevation-dependent relationships between climate change and grassland vegetation variation across the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Int J Climatol, 35(7): 1638–1647
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4082
51 The Development for International Development (1999). Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets. London: DFID
52 The Ecosystem Services for Poverty Alleviation (ESPA) programme (2018). An environment for wellbeing: pathways out of poverty. In: Policy messages from the ESPA Programme
53 The State Council Information Office, PRC. (2016). China’s Progress in Poverty Reduction and Human Rights. Human Rights, 15: 625–627
https://doi.org/10.16696/j.cnki.11-4778/d.2016.06.005
54 C Wang, W Pang, J Hong (2017). Impact of a regional payment for ecosystem service program on the livelihoods of different rural households. J Clean Prod, 164: 1058–1067
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.002
55 J Wang (2010). Sustainable development, poverty reduction, and infrastructure in western China. Chin Econ, 43(3): 6–30
https://doi.org/10.2753/CES1097-1475430301
56 S Wang, H Ma, Y Zhao (2014). Exploring the relationship between urbanization and the eco-environment—a case study of Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region. Ecol Indic, 45: 171–183
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.006
57 W Xiong, E Lin, H Ju, Y Xu (2007). Climate change and critical thresholds in China’s food security. Clim Change, 81(2): 205–221
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9123-5
58 W Yang, T Dietz, W Liu, J Luo, J Liu (2013). Going beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: an index system of human dependence on ecosystem services. PLoS One, 8(5): e64581
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064581 pmid: 23717634
59 X Yu, Y Li, M Xi, F Kong, M Pang, Z Yu (2019). Ecological vulnerability analysis of Beidagang National Park, China. Front Earth Sci, 13(2): 385–397
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-018-0726-8
60 J Zhang, A D Iwaasa, G Han, C Gu, H Wang, P G Jefferson, J Kusler (2018). Utilizing a multi-index decision analysis method to overall assess forage yield and quality of C3 grasses in the western Canadian prairies. Field Crops Res, 222: 12–25
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.03.007
61 L Zhang, Y Zhang, J Yan, Y Wu (2008). Livelihood diversification and cropland use pattern in agro-pastoral mountainous region of eastern Tibetan Plateau. J Geogr Sci, 18(4): 499–509
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-008-0499-1
62 Z Zhang, F Xia, D Yang, J Huo, G Wang, H Chen (2020). Spatiotemporal characteristics in ecosystem service value and its interaction with human activities in Xinjiang, China. Ecol Indic,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105826.
63 Y Zhao, S Wang, Y Ge, Q Liu, X Liu (2017). The spatial differentiation of the coupling relationship between urbanization and the eco-environment in countries globally: a comprehensive assessment. Ecol Modell, 360: 313–327
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.07.009
64 Y Zhao, S Wang, C Zhou (2016). Understanding the relation between urbanization and the eco-environment in China’s Yangtze River Delta using an improved EKC model and coupling analysis. Sci Total Environ, 571: 862–875
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.067 pmid: 27450244
65 J Zhen (2015). Analysis on coupling relations between industrialization and ecological environmental in Inner Mongolia. App Mechanics and Mater, 3817: 989–993
66 Y Zhou, N Li, W Wu, H Liu, L Wang, G Liu, J Wu (2014). Socioeconomic development and the impact of natural disasters: some empirical evidences from China. Nat Hazards, 74(2): 541–554
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1198-0
67 D Zhou, J Xu, Z Lin (2017). Conflict or coordination? Assessing land use multi-functionalization using production-living-ecology analysis. Sci Total Environ, 577: 136–147
68 L Zhou, D Guan, X Yuan (2018a). Coupling correlation analysis of ecosystem services and livelihoods in the perspective of targeted poverty alleviation. Acta Ecological Sinica, 38(18): 6391–6401 (in Chinese)
69 Y Zhou, Y Guo, Y Liu, W Wu, Y Li (2018b). Targeted poverty alleviation and land policy innovation: Some practice and policy implications from China. Land Use Policy, 74: 53–65
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.037
[1] Xujun HU, Huiyuan ZHANG, Haiguang HAO, Danyang FENG, Haiyan LIU, Qiang ZHANG. Understanding the relationships between poverty alleviation and ecosystem conservation: empirical evidence from western China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2020, 14(1): 209-220.
[2] Wujun WEN, Geng XU, Xingjie WANG. Spatial transferring of ecosystem services and property rights allocation of ecological compensation[J]. Front Earth Sci, 2011, 5(3): 280-287.
[3] Stephen J. MORREALE, Kristi L. SULLIVAN, . Community-level enhancements of biodiversity and ecosystem services[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2010, 4(1): 14-21.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed