Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Earth Science

ISSN 2095-0195

ISSN 2095-0209(Online)

CN 11-5982/P

Postal Subscription Code 80-963

2018 Impact Factor: 1.205

Front. Earth Sci.    2021, Vol. 15 Issue (2) : 256-271    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-021-0917-6
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Coalbed methane enrichment model of low-rank coals in multi-coals superimposed regions: a case study in the middle section of southern Junggar Basin
Haihai HOU1,2(), Guodong LIANG1, Longyi SHAO2(), Yue TANG3, Guangyuan MU2
1. College of Mining, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin 123000, China
2. College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China
3. Oil & Gas Resource Survey Center, China Geological Survey, Ministry of Land and Resource, Beijing 100029, China
 Download: PDF(20258 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The Middle Jurassic Xishanyao Formation in the central section of the southern Junggar Basin has substantial amounts of low-ranked coalbed methane (CBM) recourses and is typically characterized by multi superimposed coal seams. To establish the CBM enrichment model, a series of experimental and testing methods were adopted, including coal maceral observation, pro-ximate analysis, low temperature nitrogen adsorption (LTNA), methane carbon isotope determination, porosity/permeability simulation caused by overburden, and gas content testing. The controlling effect of sedimentary environment, geological tectonic, and hydrogeological condition on gas content was analyzed in detail. The results demonstrate that the areas with higher gas content (an average of 8.57 m3/t) are mainly located in the Urumqi River-Santun River (eastern study area), whereas gas content (an average of 3.92 m3/t) in the Manasi River-Taxi River (western study area) is relatively low. Because of the combined effects of strata temperature and pressure, the gas content in coal seam first increases and then decreases with increasing buried depth, and the critical depth of the inflection point ranges from 600 m to 850 m. Affected by the changes in topography and water head height, the direction of groundwater migration is predicted from south to north and from west to east. Based on the gas content variation, the lower and middle parts of the Xishanyao Formation can be divided into three independent coal-bearing gas systems. Within a single gas-bearing system, there is a positive correlation between gas content and strata pressure, and the key mudstone layers separating each gas-bearing system are usually developed at the end of each highstand system tract. The new CBM accumulation model of the multi-coals mixed genetic gas shows that both biological and thermal origins are found in a buried depth interval between 600 m and 850 m, suggesting that the coals with those depths are the CBM enrichment horizons and favorable exploration regions in the middle section of the southern Junggar Basin. An in-depth discussion of the low-rank CBM enrichment model with multi-coal seams in the study region can provide a basis for the optimization of CBM well locations and favorable exploration horizons.

Keywords Xishanyao Formation      multi-coal seams superimposed region      low rank coal      main controlling factors      enrichment model     
Corresponding Author(s): Haihai HOU,Longyi SHAO   
Online First Date: 13 August 2021    Issue Date: 26 October 2021
 Cite this article:   
Haihai HOU,Guodong LIANG,Longyi SHAO, et al. Coalbed methane enrichment model of low-rank coals in multi-coals superimposed regions: a case study in the middle section of southern Junggar Basin[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2021, 15(2): 256-271.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/10.1007/s11707-021-0917-6
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/Y2021/V15/I2/256
Fig.1  (a) Geotectonic sketch map of the Junggar Basin. (b) Structural characteristics of the study area showing the locations of CBM wells, coal mines, coal samples and horizontal maximum stress directions.
Fig.2  The coal-bearing strata of the Middle Jurassic Xishanyao Formation showing lithology, depositional environment, sequence stratum, core pictures and main aquifers in Well ZK101 close to Hutubi River.
Fig.3  Gas content variation of the Xishanyao coals in the middle part of southern Junggar Basin.
Well Coal seam Burial depth/m Reservoir pressure/MPa Pressure gradient/ (kPa·m–1) Permeability/mD Gas content/ (m3·t–1) Roof lithology Floor lithology
WXC-1 B7 396.14 2.85 7.8 7.28 11.33 Silty mudstone Mudstone
B6 613.7 5.15 8.65 0.13 17.06 Muddy siltstone Mudstone
WXC-2 B8 546.95 3.96 7.55 0.16 4.53 Muddy siltstone Silty mudstone
B7 589.15 5.76 10 14.49 4.93 Medium sandstone Siltstone
B5 714.45 4.93 7.04 9.92 5.0 Muddy siltstone Mudstone
MM-1 B10 1056.8 10.51a) n n 3.33 Silty mudstone Siltstone
B5 1183 11.98a) n n 4.07 Silty mudstone Mudstone
B2 1256.2 12.84a) n n 5.95 Silty mudstone Mudstone
MM-2 B10 1185.68 12.21 10.3 1.929 1.82 Coarse sandstone Mudstone
B5 1388.23 14.02 10.1 0.269 2.61 Silty mudstone Siltstone
B2 1473.86 15.18 10.3 0.004 4.18 Mudstone Silty mudstone
MM-3 B9 784.04 7.84 9.9 0.024 4.35 Muddy siltstone Mudstone
B5 880.53 8.5 9.7 0.091 3.49 Muddy siltstone Siltstone
B2 939.88 10.43 11.1 0.027 5.45 Silty mudstone Mudstone
Tab.1  The well testing data, gas content, roof and floor lithology of major coal seams in several CBM parameter wells, southern Junggar Basin
Fig.4  Typcial surrounding rock combinations of Xishanyao coals in the middle part of southern Junggar Basin.
Fig.5  The division of multi-superimposed gas system of the Xishanyao Formation in the MM-3 well (R.P.—Reservoir pressure; R.P.G.—Reservoir pressure gradient; R.Pe.—Reservoir permeability; S.S.A.—Specific surface area; T.P.V.—Total pore volume).
Fig.6  The synclinal axis of Qingshuihe nearby Hububi River (a) and the characteristics of fracture and permeability of Xishanyao coals in different zones (b), (c), (d).
Fig.7  Relationships between porosity, permeability and overburden pressure of low-rank coals in the middle part of southern Junggar Basin.
Fig.8  The total dissolved solids (TDS) values and flow pathways of groundwater in the middle section of the southern Junggar Basin.
Number Coal
mine
H/m Specific yield/
(L·s–1·m–1)
K/
(m·d–1)
Cl/
(mg·L–1)
HCO3/
(mg·L–1)
SO42–/
(mg·L–1)
Water type TDS/
(mg·L–1)
3 DBYG 1345.0 0.098 0.130 306.3 1015.7 238.7 HCO3·SO4-Na 3075.0
5 XBYG 1457–1463 n n 304.9 675.8 931.8 SO4·HCO3·Cl-Na 2318.3
8 TW 1660.0 n n 85.1 604.1 941.4 SO4·HCO3-Na·Mg 1975.4
10 DX 1609.0 0.00067–0.008 0.001–0.0436 57.3 647.8 256.2 HCO3·SO4-Na 983.9
11 XD n 0.003 0.002 48.2 469.9 1025.4 SO4·HCO3-Na·Ca·Mg 1886.8
12 TXH* 1409–1415 1.240 n 104.0 893.7 306.4 HCO3·SO4-Na 3808.0
13 LBW 1784.3 0.051 0.048 118.8 970.2 701.2 HCO3·SO4-Na 1995.3
15 XG1 n n n 37.2 524.8 3769.3 SO4·HCO3-Na·Mg 1354.0
17 XGG 1670.0 n n 92.2 571.5 896.6 SO4·HCO3-Na 1878.2
18 XDG 1745.2 0.206 0.233 59.4 538.1 420.3 SO4·HCO3-Na·Mg 1119.2
20 BYS* 1643–1656 0.853 1.318 184.0 646.2 306.4 HCO3·SO4-Na 1324–1663
21 FY n 0.855 1.469 184.0 646.2 306.4 HCO3·SO4-Na n
22 SHG n n n 96.2 813.9 58.4 HCO3-Na 922.0
23 KG 1482.6 0.234 0.142 335.9 467.6 720.4 SO4·HCO3·Cl-Na 2024.5
24 106T1 1344.1 0.005 0.0 1054.7 260.9 576.4 Cl·SO4-Na 2819.1
25 106T2 1413.4 0.005 0.003 735.9 171.3 723.0 SO4·ClNa 2450.3
26 WZG* 1599–1723 n n 47.0 370.7 461.1 SO4·HCO3-Na·Ca·Mg 1010–1100
27 STZXG 1534–1569 n n 24.8 265.4 216.1 SO4·HCO3-Ca·Na 338–558
28 STZDG n n n 17.7 329.5 163.3 HCO3·SO4-Na·Ca·Mg n
29 MDG 1571.1 0.008 0.009 102.8 433.2 403.5 SO4·HCO3-Na·Ca 1109.8
35 JY 1184.4 0.004 0.007 n n n Cl·SO4-Na 4464.0
36 LJM* n 0.001 0.027 36–430 336–756 769–1896 SO4·HCO3·Cl-Na n
37 DHG* 712.0 n n 1666–3414 3001–4144 563–702 HCO3·Cl·SO4-Na 7449–11980
38 MQ* 723.0 n n 9146–14,514 3898–4984 933–1096 Cl·HCO3·SO4-Na 20,024–30,509
Tab.2  Hydrogeological parameter statistics for the middle section of the southern Junggar Basin
Fig.9  Relationship between coal depth and δ13C1 of methane from three CBM wells.
Fig.10  The CBM enrichment model for a multi-coal seams superimposed region in the middle part of southern Junggar Basin.
1 W B J Ayers (2002). Coalbed gas systems, resources, and production and a review of contrasting cases from the San Juan and Powder River basins. AAPG Bull, 86(11): 1853–1890
2 B T Chen, X H Yu, T Q Wang, S X Pan, L S Yang, C P Tan, S L Li (2014). Characteristics of sequence stratigraphy and coal enrichment controlling factors of lower-middle Jurassic coal-bearing series, south margin of Junggar Basin, NW China. Acta Sedimentol Sin, 32(1): 61–67 (in Chinese)
3 Y Chen, D M Ma, S Y Fang, C Guo, F Yang, D Z Hou (2019). Enrichment and high-yield models of coalbed methane influenced by geologic structures and hydrologic conditions. J Xi’an Univ Sci Tech, 39(4): 644–655 (in Chinese)
4 Y Chen, D Z Tang, H Xu, Y Li, Y J Meng (2015). Structural controls on coalbed methane accumulation and high production models in the eastern margin of Ordos Basin, China. J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 23: 524–537
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2015.02.018
5 P Cienfuegos, J Loredo (2010). Coalbed methane resources assessment in Asturias (Spain). Int J Coal Geol, 83(4): 366–376
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2010.05.002
6 H J Fu, D Z Tang, Z J Pan, D T Yan, S G Yang, X G Zhuang, G Q Li, X Chen, G Wang (2019). A study of hydrogeology and its effect on coalbed methane enrichment in the southern Junggar Basin, China. AAPG Bull, 103(1): 189–213
https://doi.org/10.1306/06071817190
7 H J Fu, D Z Tang, H Xu, T Xu, B L Chen, P Hu, Z Y Yin, P Wu, G J He (2016). Geological characteristics and CBM exploration potential evaluation: a case study in the middle of the southern Junggar Basin, NW China. J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 30: 557–570
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.02.024
8 H J Fu, D Z Tang, T Xu, H Xu, S Tao, J L Zhao, B L Chen, Z Y Yin (2017). Preliminary research on CBM enrichment models of low-rank coal and its geological controls: a case study in the middle of the southern Junggar Basin, NW China. Mar Pet Geol, 83: 97–110
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.03.007
9 H J Fu, D T Yan, S G Yang, X M Wang, Z Zhuang, M D Sun (2020). Characteristics of in situ stress and its influence on coalbed methane development: a case study in the eastern part of the southern Junggar Basin, NW China. Energy Sci Eng, 8(2): 515–529
https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.533
10 S K Hamilton, J S Esterle, S D Golding (2012). Geological interpretation of gas content trends, Walloon Subgroup, eastern Surat Basin, Queensland, Australia. Int J Coal Geol, 101: 21–35
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2012.07.001
11 H H Hou, L Y Shao, S Q Guo, Z Li, Z J Zhang, M L Yao, S Zhao, C Z Yan (2017). Evaluation and genetic analysis of coal structures in deep Jiaozuo Coalfield, northern China: investigation by geophysical logging data. Fuel, 209: 552–566
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.08.020
12 H H Hou, L Y Shao, Y Tang, Y N Li, G D Liang, Y L Xin, J Q Zhang (2021). Coal seam correlation in terrestrial basins by sequence stratigraphy and its implications for palaeoclimate and palaeoenvironment evolution. J Earth Sci
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-020-1069-4
13 H H Hou, L Y Shao, Y Tang, S Zhao, Y Yuan, Y N Li, G Y Mu, Y Zhou, G D Liang, J Q Zhang (2020). Quantitative characterization of low-rank coal reservoirs in the southern Junggar Basin, NW China: Implications for pore structure evolution around the first coalification jump. Mar Pet Geol, 113: 104165
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.104165
14 H H Hou, L Y Shao, S Wang, Z H Xiao, X T Wang, Z Li, G Y Mu (2019). Influence of depositional environment on coalbed methane accumulation in the Carboniferous-Permian coal of the Qinshui Basin, northern China. Front Earth Sci, 13(3): 535–550
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-018-0742-8
15 G H Li (2016). Coal reservoir characteristics and their controlling factors in the eastern Ordos Basin in China. Int J Min Sci Technol, 26(6): 1051–1058
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2016.09.013
16 G H Li, H Zhang (2013). The origin mechanism of coalbed methane in the eastern edge of Ordos Basin. Sci China Earth Sci, 56(10): 1701–1706
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-013-4616-3
17 M H Li, Z D Li, J D Liao (2005). Analysis of ground stress in the southern part of the Junggar Basin and discussion of the related issues. Xinjiang Geol, 23(4): 343–346 (in Chinese)
18 M Li, B Jiang, S F Lin, F J Lan, J L Wang (2013). Structural controls on coalbed methane reservoirs in Faer coal mine, southwest China. J Earth Sci, 24(3): 437–448
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-013-0340-3
19 W Li, X K Wang, B J Zhang, Z X Chen, S Q Pei, Z C Yu (2020). Large-scale gas accumulation mechanisms and reservoir-forming geological effects in sandstones of central and western China. Pet Explor Dev, 47(4): 714–725
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1876-3804(20)60087-8
20 X Li, X H Fu, X S Yang, Y Y Ge, F K Quan (2018a). Coalbed methane accumulation and dissipation patterns: a case study of the Junggar Basin, NW China. J Asian Earth Sci, 160: 13–26
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2018.04.003
21 Y J Li, L Y Shao, K A Eriksson, X Tong, C X Gao, Z S Chen (2014a). Linked sequence stratigraphy and tectonics in the Sichuan continental foreland basin, Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation, southwest China. J Asian Earth Sci, 88: 116–136
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2014.02.025
22 Y N Li, L Y Shao, H H Hou, Y Tang, Y Yuan, J Q Zhang, X X Shang, J Lu (2018b). Sequence stratigraphy, palaeogeography, and coal accumulation of the fluvio-lacustrine Middle Jurassic Xishanyao Formation in central segment of southern Junggar Basin, NW China. Int J Coal Geol, 192: 14–38
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2018.04.003
23 Y Li, D Z Tang, Y Fang, H Xu, Y J Meng (2014b). Distribution of stable carbon isotope in coalbed methane from the east margin of Ordos Basin. Sci China Earth Sci, 57(8): 1741–1748
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-014-4900-x
24 Y Li, J H Yang, Z J Pan, S Z Meng, K Wang, X L Niu (2019). Unconventional natural gas accumulations in stacked deposits: a discussion of Upper Paleozoic coal-bearing strata in the east margin of the Ordos Basin, China. Acta Geolo Sin-Engl, 93(1): 111–129
https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-6724.13767
25 D M Liu, Y J Wang, Y D Cai (2018). Main controlling geological factors and accumulation model analysis of low-rank CBM enrichment. Coal Sci Tech, 46(6): 1–8 (in Chinese)
26 Y M Lv, D Z Tang, H Xu, H H Luo (2012). Production characteristics and the key factors in high-rank coalbed methane fields: a case study on the Fanzhuang Block, Southern Qinshui Basin, China. Int J Coal Geol, 96–97: 93–108
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2012.03.009
27 T A Moore (2012). Coalbed methane: a review. Int J Coal Geol, 101: 36–81
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2012.05.011
28 Y L Ouyang, B Sun, B Wang, W G Tian, Y Zhao, H X Cao (2017). CBM sealing system and its relationship with CBM enrichment. Nat Gas Ind B, 4(1): 39–47
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ngib.2017.07.006
29 J N Pan, Y Q Zhao, Q L Hou, Y Jin (2015). Nanoscale pores in coal related to coal rank and deformation structures. Transp Porous Media, 107(2): 543–554
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-015-0453-5
30 J C Pashin, R H Groshong Jr (1998). Structural control of coalbed methane production in Alabama. Int J Coal Geol, 38(1–2): 89–113
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-5162(98)00034-2
31 J C Pashin, M R Mcintyre-Redden, S D Mann, D C Kopaska-Merkel, M Varonka, W Orem (2014). Relationships between water and gas chemistry in mature coalbed methane reservoirs of the Black Warrior Basin. Int J Coal Geol, 126(2): 92–105
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2013.10.002
32 Y Qin, T A Moore, J Shen, Z B Yang, Y L Shen, G Wang (2018). Resources and geology of coalbed methane in China: a review. Int Geol Rev, 60(5–6): 777–812
https://doi.org/10.1080/00206814.2017.1408034
33 M Scheltens, L F Zhang, W J Xiao, J J Zhang (2015). Northward subduction-related orogenesis of the southern Altaids: constraints from structural and metamorphic analysis of the HP/UHP accretionary complex in Chinese southwestern Tianshan, NW China. Geoscience Frontiers, 6(2): 191–209
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2014.08.002
34 L Y Shao, H H Hou, Y Tang, J Lu, H J Qiu, X T Wang, J Q Zhang (2015). Selection of strategic replacement areas for CBM exploration and development in China. Nat Gas Ind B, 2(2–3): 211–221
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ngib.2015.07.013
35 Y L Shen, Y Qin, G G X Wang, Y H Guo, J Shen, J Y Gu, Q Xiao, T Zhang, C L Zhang, G C Tong (2017). Sedimentary control on the formation of a multi-superimposed gas system in the development of key layers in the sequence framework. Mar Pet Geol, 88: 268–281
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.08.024
36 G Song (2015). Simulation research on biogenic and thermogenic gas from brown coal in Dananhu depression of Tuha Basin. Dissertation for Master’s Degree. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology (in Chinese)
37 Y Song, Z Li, L Jiang, F Hong (2015). The concept and the accumulation characteristics of unconventional hydrocarbon resources. Petrol Sci, 12(4): 563–572
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-015-0060-7
38 Y Song, H L Liu, F Hong, S F Qin, S B Liu, G Z Li, M J Zhao (2012). Syncline reservoir pooling as a general model for coalbed methane (CBM) accumulations: mechanisms and case studies. J Petrol Sci Eng, 88–89: 5–12
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2012.02.003
39 Y Song, S B Liu, B Z Ma, J W Li, Y W Ju, G Z Li, Z Y Yang (2016). Research on formation model and geological evaluation method of the middle to high rank coalbed methane enrichment and high production area. Earth Sci Front, 23(3): 1–9 (in Chinese)
40 D Sun, X Z Liu, H J Yang, N Cao, Z P Zhang, Y S Chen, D M Li (2019). Analysis of hydrogeological characteristics and water environmental impact pathway of typical shale gas exploration and development zones in Sichuan Basin, China. J Groundw Sci Eng, 7(3): 195–213
41 Z M Sun, J Shen (2014). Bogda nappe structure and its relations to hydrocarbon in Xinjiang. Petrol Geol & Exp, 36(4): 429–434 (in Chinese)
42 Y Tang (2020). Research on layer selection method for fracturing of multi-layer superimposed CBM system in the southern Junggar Basin. Dissertation for Doctor’s Degree. Beijing: China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (in Chinese)
43 K X Wang (2019). Research on main geological controls and enrichment model of coalbed methane distribution in China. Earth Env Sci, 300: 022071
https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/300/2/022071
44 D A Wood, B Hazra (2017). Characterization of organic-rich shales for petroleum exploration & exploitation: a review. Part 3: applied geomechanics, petrophysics and reservoir modeling. J Earth Sci, 28(5): 779–803
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-017-0734-8
45 X M Xiao, Q Wei, H F Gai, T F Li, M L Wang, L Pan, J Chen, H Tian (2015). Main controlling factors and enrichment area evaluation of shale gas of the Lower Paleozoic marine strata in south China. Petrol Sci, 12(4): 573–586
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-015-0057-2
46 Z B Yang, Y Qin, G X Wang, H An (2015). Investigation on coal seam gas formation of multi-coalbed reservoir in Bide-Santang Basin, Southwest China. Arab J Geosci, 8(8): 5439–5448
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1640-3
47 Y B Yao, D M Liu, T Yan (2014). Geological and hydrogeological controls on the accumulation of coalbed methane in the Weibei field, southeastern Ordos Basin. Int J Coal Geol, 121: 148–159
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2013.11.006
48 Y Yuan, Y S Shan, Y Tang, D Y Cao (2020). Coalbed methane enrichment regularity and major control factors in the Xishanyao Formation in the western part of the southern Junggar Basin. Acta Geolo Sin-Engl, 94(2): 485–500
https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-6724.14339
49 Y Yuan, Y Tang, Y S Shan, J Q Zhang, D Y Cao, A M Wang (2018). Coalbed methane reservoir evaluation in the Manas Mining area, Southern Junggar Basin. Energ Explor Exploit, 36(1): 114–131
https://doi.org/10.1177/0144598717728026
50 Z Zhang, Y Qin, X H Fu, Z B Yang, C Guo (2015). Multi-layer superposed coalbed methane system in southern Qinshui Basin, Shanxi Province, China. J Earth Sci, 26(3): 391–398
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-015-0541-z
51 C N Zou, Z Yang, R K Zhu, G S Zhang, L H Hou, S T Wu, S Z Tao, X J Yuan, D Z Dong, Y M Wang, L Wang, J L Huang, S F Wang (2015). Progress in China’s unconventional oil & gas exploration and development and theoretical technologies. Acta Geolo Sin-Engl, 89(3): 938–971
https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-6724.12491
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed