Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng.    2021, Vol. 15 Issue (1) : 16    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1308-z
REVIEW ARTICLE
Novel perspective for urban water resource management: 5R generation
Lijie Zhou1,2,3, Hongwu Wang1,2, Zhiqiang Zhang1,2, Jian Zhang4, Hongbin Chen5, Xuejun Bi6, Xiaohu Dai1,2, Siqing Xia1,2(), Lisa Alvarez-Cohen7, Bruce E. Rittmann8
1. State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
2. Shanghai Institute of Pollution Control and Ecological Security, Shanghai 200092, China
3. College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
4. EnviroSystems Engineering and Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100083, China
5. National Engineering Research Center for Urban Pollution Control, Shanghai 200092, China
6. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266033, China
7. Department of Civil and Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1500, USA
8. Biodesign Swette Center for Environmental Biotechnology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-5701, USA
 Download: PDF(2447 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

5R (Recover, Reduce, Recycle, Resource and Reuse) approaches to manage urban water.

5R harvests storm water, gray water and black water in several forms.

5R offers promise for moving solutions for urban water scarcity in practice.

Demand for water is expanding with increases in population, particularly in urban areas in developing countries. Additionally, urban water system needs a novel perspective for upgradation with urbanization. This perspective presents a novel 5R approach for managing urban water resources: Recover (storm water), Reduce (toilet flushing water), Recycle (gray water), Resource (black water), and Reuse (advanced-treated wastewater). The 5R generation incorporates the latest ideas for harvesting storm water, gray water, and black water in its several forms. This paper has briefly demonstrated each R of 5R generation for water treatment and reuse. China has the chance to upgrade its urban water systems according to 5R principles. Already, a demonstration project of 5R generation has been installed in Qingdao International Horticultural Exposition, and Dalian International Convention Center (China) has applied 5R, achieving over 70% water saving. The 5R offers promise for moving solutions for urban water scarcity from “hoped for in the future” to “realistic today”.

Keywords 5R generation      Recover      Reduce      Recycle      Resource      Reuse     
Corresponding Author(s): Siqing Xia   
Issue Date: 11 August 2020
 Cite this article:   
Lijie Zhou,Hongwu Wang,Zhiqiang Zhang, et al. Novel perspective for urban water resource management: 5R generation[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(1): 16.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-020-1308-z
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y2021/V15/I1/16
Fig.1  Distribution of water availability (bottle size representing annual water stock m3/person).
Fig.2  (a) The present (red line) and ideal (blue line) management of urban water; (b) the framework of 5R generation (black water is treated with multiple anaerobic digestion, such as UASB, in situ digestion).
Fig.3  (a) Jiading campuses of Tongji University (Shanghai, China) for storm water storage and (b) mobile treatment and storage for storm water.
Water COD (mg/L) TN (mg/L) TP (mg/L) pH
Grey water
Kitchen and bathroom sinks, showers, bathtubs, laundry discharges, parts of toilet discharges (less polluted section)
100–700 1.7–34.3 0.11–22.8 6.3–8.1
Black water
Parts of toilet discharges (polluted section), mainly containing feces with some urine and flushing water
990–1850 45–269 11.4–97 7.4–8.6
Tab.1  Sources and characteristics of gray water and black water (De Gisi et al., 2016; Gao et al., 2019a; Prado et al., 2020; Welling et al., 2020)
Conventional/advanced technologies Grey water origin Removal efficiency of COD
Coagulation Showers, sinks 64%
Electro-coagulation (EC) Showers, sinks, kitchen 90%–95%
EC/O3/UV Showers, sinks 95%
Filtration Shower, washing machine 20%
Rotating biological contactor Laundry, bath, kitchen 21%–60%
Moving bed biofilm reactor Laundry, bath 70%
MBR Shower 86%
SBR Shower 90%
UASB Shower 51%
Tab.2  Conventional/advanced technologies for gray water recycle (Boano et al., 2020)
Fig.4  (a) (1) A vacuum toilet which is being promoted for public restrooms in Nanning city (Guangxi Province, China), Haikou city (Hainan Province, China) and Beijing (China) (which has been widely applied in China high-speed railway train); (2) Toilet with urine (yellow water, which could be gray water after treatment, such as RO) and excrement (black water) separation from EnviroSystems Company; (b) Grey water treatment in Tongji University (Shanghai, China): (1) membrane bioreactor; (2) membrane module; (3) UF system; (4) Ion exchange system; (5) effluent; and (6) Membrane bioreactor performance; (c) a demonstration for Recycle and Resource in Zao Jia Cheng (Tianjin, China).
Fig.5  (a) automatic grid-disinfection; (b) automatic water pressure balance control system; (c) Reclaimed water station in Meicun municipal wastewater treatment plant (Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, China).
Fig.6  (a) Vacuum toilet and the central vacuum station in the community center of Hedian (Shandong Province, China); Demonstration project of 5R generation in Qingdao (China): (b) Community and hotel; (c) Recovery and Reuse system in Licun (Qingdao, China).
1 J M Aberilla, A Gallego-Schmid, L Stamford, A Azapagic (2020). Environmental assessment of domestic water supply options for remote communities. Water Research, 175: 115687
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.115687
2 Y H Ahn, A R Pearce (2013). Green Luxury: a case study of two green hotels. Journal of Green Building, 8(1): 91–119
https://doi.org/10.3992/jgb.8.1.90
3 A D Alsulaili, M F Al-Matrouk, R A Al-Baghli, A F Al-Enezi (2020). Environmental and economic benefits of applying green building concepts in Kuwait. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22(4): 3371–3387
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00352-1
4 Z Bai, W Y Yu, Y Zhang, T Y Dong, G X Lin (2018). From an ignored grey place to a resilient urban wetland—Dong’an Wetland Park in Sanya, Hainan Province. Landscape Architecture Frontiers, 6(3): 91–103 (in Chinese)
https://doi.org/10.15302/J-LAF-20180309
5 B B Beler (2019). Recycling/reusing grey water and yellow water (human urine): motivations, perspectives and reflections into the future. Desalination and Water Treatment, 172: 212–223
https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2019.24667
6 F Boano, A Caruso, E Costamagna, L Ridolfi, S Fiore, F Demichelis, A Galvao, J Pisoeiro, A Rizzo, F Masi (2020). A review of nature-based solutions for greywater treatment: Applications, hydraulic design, and environmental benefits. Science of the Total Environment, 711: 134731
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134731
7 Y N Cheng, R J Wang (2018). A novel stormwater management system for urban roads in China based on local conditions. Sustainable Cities and Society, 39: 163–171
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.09.001
8 D Dai, M D Sun, X Q Xu, K Lei (2019). Assessment of the water resource carrying capacity based on the ecological footprint: a case study in Zhangjiakou City, North China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 26(11): 11000–11011
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04414-9
9 S De Gisi, P Casella, M Notarnicola, R Farina (2016). Grey water in buildings: a mini-review of guidelines, technologies and case studies. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 33(1): 35–54
https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2015.1124868
10 H M Deng, C Wang, W J Cai, Y Liu, L X Zhang (2020). Managing the water-energy-food nexus in China by adjusting critical final demands and supply chains: An input-output analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 720: 137635
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137635
11 G Dunn, J J Bos, R R Brown (2018). Mediating the science-policy interface: Insights from the urban water sector in Melbourne, Australia. Environmental Science & Policy, 82: 143–150
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.02.001
12 H Eakin, A M Lerner, D Manuel-Navarrete, B Hernández Aguilar , A Martínez-Canedo, B Tellman, L Charli-Joseph, R Fernández Álvarez, L Bojórquez-Tapia(2016). Adapting to risk and perpetuating poverty: Household’s strategies for managing flood risk and water scarcity in Mexico City. Environmental Science & Policy, 66: 324–333
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.006
13 T Eichenseher (2008). Just add (gray) water. Environmental Science & Technology, 42(7): 2210
14 A E Ercin, A Y Hoekstra (2014). Water footprint scenarios for 2050: A global analysis. Environment International, 64(3): 71–82
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2013.11.019
15 K S Fielding, S Dolnicar, T Schultz (2019). Public acceptance of recycled water. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 35(4): 551–586
https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2017.1419125
16 M S Fountoulakis, N Markakis, I Petousi, T Manios (2016). Single house on-site grey water treatment using a submerged membrane bioreactor for toilet flushing. Science of the Total Environment, 551: 706–711
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.057
17 M J Gao, B Guo, L Zhang, Y D Zhang, Y Liu (2019a). Microbial community dynamics in anaerobic digesters treating conventional and vacuum toilet flushed blackwater. Water Research, 160: 249–258
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.05.077
18 M J Gao, B Guo, L Zhang, Y D Zhang, N J W Yu, Y Liu (2020). Biomethane recovery from source-diverted household blackwater: Impacts from feed sulfate. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 136: 28–38
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.01.010
19 M J Gao, L Zhang, A P Florentino, Y Liu (2019b). Performance of anaerobic treatment of blackwater collected from different toilet flushing systems: Can we achieve both energy recovery and water conservation? Journal of Hazardous Materials, 365: 44–52
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.10.055
20 X Hao, V Novotny, V Nelson (2010). Water Infrastructure for Sustainable Communities: China and the World. Beijing: IWA, 1–7
21 B Holmatov, J Lautze, H Manthrithilake, I Makin (2017). Water security for productive economies: Applying an assessment framework in southern Africa. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 100: 258–269
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2017.04.007
22 B Hong, Q Y Lin, S Yu, Y S Chen, Y M Chen, P C Chiang (2018). Urbanization gradient of selected pharmaceuticals in surface water at a watershed scale. Science of the Total Environment, 634: 448–458
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.392
23 N Jagtap, T H Boyer (2018). Integrated, multi-process approach to total nutrient recovery from stored urine. Environmental Science. Water Research & Technology, 4(10): 1639–1650
https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EW00004B
24 O Jensen, H J Wu (2018). Urban water security indicators: Development and pilot. Environmental Science & Policy, 83: 33–45
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.02.003
25 X S Jiang, Y X Qu, L Q Liu, Y He, W C Li, J Huang, H W Yang, G Yu (2019). PPCPs in a drinking water treatment plant in the Yangtze River Delta of China: Occurrence, removal and risk assessment. Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering, 13(2): 27
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-019-1109-4
26 Y Jiang (2009). China’s water scarcity. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(11): 3185–3196
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.04.016
27 S J Judd (2017). Membrane technology costs and me. Water Research, 122: 1–9
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.05.027
28 J Kim, J Kim, J Lee, H Yoo (2018). Prediction of transverse settlement trough considering the combined effects of excavation and groundwater depression. Geomechanics and Engineering, 15(3): 851–859
29 Y C Kog (2020). Water reclamation and reuse in Singapore. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 146(4): 03120001
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001675
30 T Koottatep, P Prapasriket, T Pussayanavin, C Polprasert (2020). Performance of up-flow thermophilic septic tank treating blackwater. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22(4): 3691–3700
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00362-z
31 P Krzeminski, L Leverette, S Malamis, E Katsou (2017). Membrane bioreactors- A review on recent developments in energy reduction, fouling control, novel configurations, LCA and market prospects. Journal of Membrane Science, 527: 207–227
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.12.010
32 M Kummu, P J Ward, H De Moel, O Varis (2010). Is physical water scarcity a new phenomenon? Global assessment of water shortage over the last two millennia. Environmental Research Letters, 5(3): 034006
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/3/034006
33 T A Larsen, S Hoffmann, C Luthi, B Truffer, M Maurer (2016). Emerging solutions to the water challenges of an urbanizing world. Science, 352(6288): 928–933
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad8641
34 F Li, K Wichmann, R Otterpohl (2009). Review of the technological approaches for grey water treatment and reuses. Science of the Total Environment, 407(11): 3439–3449
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.02.004
35 W W Li, H Q Yu, B E Rittmann (2015). Chemistry: Reuse water pollutants. Nature, 528(7580): 29–31
https://doi.org/10.1038/528029a
36 T E Lorenzo, A P Kinzig (2019). Double exposures: future water security across urban Southeast Asia. Water, 12(1): 116
https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010116
37 Y L Lu, Y Q Huang, S Y Zeng, C Wang (2020). Scenario-based assessment and multi-objective optimization of urban development plan with carrying capacity of water system. Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering, 14(2): 21
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-019-1200-x
38 L Lundy, M Revitt, B Ellis (2018). An impact assessment for urban stormwater use. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 25(20): 19259–19270
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0547-4
39 D R Marlow, M Moglia, S Cook, D J Beale (2013). Towards sustainable urban water management: A critical reassessment. Water Research, 47(20): 7150–7161
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.07.046
40 R I Mcdonald, K Weber, J Padowski, M Flörke, C Schneider, P A Green, T Gleeson, S Eckman, B Lehner, D Balk, T Boucher, G Grill, M Montgomery (2014). Water on an urban planet: Urbanization and the reach of urban water infrastructure. Global Environmental Change, 27: 96–105
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.022
41 M M Mekonnen, A Y Hoekstra (2016). Four billion people facing severe water scarcity. Science Advances, 2(2): e1500323
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500323
42 L G Mendoza-Espinosa, J E Burgess, L Daessle, M Villada-Canela (2019). Reclaimed water for the irrigation of vineyards: Mexico and South Africa as case studies. Sustainable Cities and Society, 51: 101769
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101769
43 E Nolde (2000). Greywater reuse systems for toilet flushing in multi-storey buildings: Over ten years experience in Berlin. Urban Water, 1(4): 275–284
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-0758(00)00023-6
44 K S Oh, J Y C Leong, P E Poh, M N Chong, E V Lau (2018). A review of greywater recycling related issues: Challenges and future prospects, in Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171: 17–29
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.267
45 A C D Paiva, N Nascimento, D A Rodriguez, J Tomasella, F Carriello, F S Rezende (2020). Urban expansion and its impact on water security: The case of the Paraiba do Sul River Basin, Sao Paulo, Brazil. Science of the Total Environment, 720: 137509
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137509
46 M Pidou, L Avery, T Stephenson, P Jeffrey, S A Parsons, S Liu, F A Memon, B Jefferson (2008). Chemical solutions for greywater recycling. Chemosphere, 71(1): 147–155
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.10.046
47 L O Prado, H H S Souza, G M Chiquito, P L Paulo, M A Boncz (2020). A comparison of different scenarios for on-site reuse of blackwater and kitchen waste using the life cycle assessment methodology. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 82: 106362
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106362
48 J H Qu, H C Wang, K J Wang, G Yu, B Ke, H Q Yu, H Q Ren, X C Zheng (2019). Municipal wastewater treatment in China: Development history and future perspectives. Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering, 13(6): 88
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-019-1172-x
49 D M Revitt, E Eriksson, E Donner (2011). The implications of household greywater treatment and reuse for municipal wastewater flows and micropollutant loads. Water Research, 45(4): 1549–1560
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.11.027
50 J Rockström, M Falkenmark, T Allan, C Folke, L Gordon, A Jägerskog, M Kummu, M Lannerstad, M Meybeck, D Molden (2015). The unfolding water drama in the Anthropocene: Towards a resilience‐based perspective on water for global sustainability. Ecohydrology, 7(5): 1249–1261
51 J L Ruan, Y U Feng, H B Chen, Q Liang, S Y Wang, Q B He (2010). Discussion on categorized collection and quality-based treatment of domestic sewage. China Water & Wastewater, 26(8): 25–29 (in Chinese)
52 S Saumya, S Akansha, J Rinaldo, M A Jayasri, K Suthindhiran (2015). Construction and evaluation of prototype subsurface flow wetland planted with Heliconia angusta for the treatment of synthetic greywater. Journal of Cleaner Production, 91: 235–240
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.019
53 J K Silva, L G C F Nunes, A E P Soares, S R Da Silva (2017). Assessment of water-saving equipment to support the urban management of water. Rbrh-Revista Brasileira De Recursos Hidricos, 22(0): e44
https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0331.0217170013
54 A Solanki, T H Boyer (2019). Physical-chemical interactions between pharmaceuticals and biochar in synthetic and real urine. Chemosphere, 218: 818–826
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.179
55 X Y Song, W H Luo, F I Hai, W E Price, W S Guo, H H Ngo, L D Nghiem (2018). Resource recovery from wastewater by anaerobic membrane bioreactors: Opportunities and challenges. Bioresource Technology, 270: 669–677
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.001
56 V J Taguchi, P T Weiss, J S Gulliver, M R Klein, R M Hozalski, L A Baker, J C Finlay, B L Keeler, J L Nieber (2020). It is not easy being green: recognizing unintended consequences of green stormwater infrastructure. Water (Basel), 12(2): 522
https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020522
57 W Tao, K Sauba, K P Fattah, J R Smith (2017). Designing constructed wetlands for reclamation of pretreated wastewater and stormwater. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology, 16(1): 37–57
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-016-9419-5
58 C J Vörösmarty, P Green, J Salisbury, R B Lammers (2000). Global water resources: Vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science, 289(5477): 284–288
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5477.284
59 L Ward, M Page, J Jurevis, A Nelson, M Rivera, M Hernandez, M Chappell, J Dusenbury (2015). Assessment of biologically active GAC and complementary technologies for gray water treatment. Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination, 5(3): 239–249
https://doi.org/10.2166/wrd.2015.088
60 Y G Wei, Z C Wang, H W Wang, T Yao, Y Li (2018). Promoting inclusive water governance and forecasting the structure of water consumption based on compositional data: A case study of Beijing. Science of the Total Environment, 634: 407–416
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.325
61 C M Welling, S Sasidaran, P Kachoria, S Hennessy, B J Lynch, S Teleski, H Chaudhari, K L Sellgren, B R Stoner, S Grego, B T Hawkins (2020). Field testing of a household-scale onsite blackwater treatment system in Coimbatore, India. Science of the Total Environment, 713: 136706
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136706
62 D Wu, T P Lam, H Y Chan, K F Lam, X D Zhou, J Y Xu, K S Sun, P L Ho (2019). A mixed-methods study on toilet hygiene practices among Chinese in Hong Kong. BMC Public Health, 19(1): 1654
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-8014-4
63 W C Xue, M Zaw, X C An, A S Tabucanon (2020). Sea salt bittern-driven forward osmosis for nutrient recovery from black water: A dual waste-to-resource innovation via the osmotic membrane process. Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering, 14(2): 32
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-019-1211-7
64 J Zhang, S B Gao, J Zhang (2008). Application of vacuum toilet pan and vacuum sewer line for water saving and wastewater separation. Water and Wastewater Treatment Engineering, 34(2): 96–99 (in Chinese)
65 Q Y Zhang, L Zhang, B Guo, Y Liu (2020). Mesophiles outperform thermophiles in the anaerobic digestion of blackwater with kitchen residuals: Insights into process limitations. Waste Management, 105: 279–288
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.02.018
[1] Mengjun Chen, Oladele A. Ogunseitan. Zero E-waste: Regulatory impediments and blockchain imperatives[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(6): 114-.
[2] Guoliang Zhang, Liang Zhang, Xiaoyu Han, Shujun Zhang, Yongzhen Peng. Start-up of PN-anammox system under low inoculation quantity and its restoration after low-loading rate shock[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(2): 32-.
[3] Kuo Fang, Fei Peng, Hui Gong, Huanzhen Zhang, Kaijun Wang. Ammonia removal from low-strength municipal wastewater by powdered resin combined with simultaneous recovery as struvite[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(1): 8-.
[4] Xiling Li, Tianwei Hao, Yuxin Tang, Guanghao Chen. A “Seawater-in-Sludge” approach for capacitive biochar production via the alkaline and alkaline earth metals activation[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(1): 3-.
[5] Lingchen Kong, Xitong Liu. Emerging electrochemical processes for materials recovery from wastewater: Mechanisms and prospects[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(5): 90-.
[6] Linlin Cai, Xiangyang Sun, Dan Hao, Suyan Li, Xiaoqiang Gong, Hao Ding, Kefei Yu. Sugarcane bagasse amendment improves the quality of green waste vermicompost and the growth of Eisenia fetida[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(4): 61-.
[7] Wenchao Xue, May Zaw, Xiaochan An, Yunxia Hu, Allan Sriratana Tabucanon. Sea salt bittern-driven forward osmosis for nutrient recovery from black water: A dual waste-to-resource innovation via the osmotic membrane process[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(2): 32-.
[8] Zhen Wang, Jiazhen Huo, Yongrui Duan. The impact of government incentives and penalties on willingness to recycle plastic waste: An evolutionary game theory perspective[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(2): 29-.
[9] Tiezheng Tong, Kenneth H. Carlson, Cristian A. Robbins, Zuoyou Zhang, Xuewei Du. Membrane-based treatment of shale oil and gas wastewater: The current state of knowledge[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(4): 63-.
[10] Biswajit Debnath, Ranjana Chowdhury, Sadhan Kumar Ghosh. Sustainability of metal recovery from E-waste[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(6): 2-.
[11] Yi Chen, Shilong He, Mengmeng Zhou, Tingting Pan, Yujia Xu, Yingxin Gao, Hengkang Wang. Feasibility assessment of up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket treatment of sulfamethoxazole pharmaceutical wastewater[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(5): 13-.
[12] Yan-Shan Wang, Dao-Bo Li, Feng Zhang, Zhong-Hua Tong, Han-Qing Yu. Algal biomass derived biochar anode for efficient extracellular electron uptake from Shewanella oneidensis MR-1[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(4): 11-.
[13] Lin Lin, Ying-yu Li, Xiao-yan Li. Acidogenic sludge fermentation to recover soluble organics as the carbon source for denitrification in wastewater treatment: Comparison of sludge types[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(4): 3-.
[14] Akshay Jain, Zhen He. “NEW” resource recovery from wastewater using bioelectrochemical systems: Moving forward with functions[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(4): 1-.
[15] Zhi-Long Ye, Yujun Deng, Yaoyin Lou, Xin Ye, Shaohua Chen. Occurrence of veterinary antibiotics in struvite recovery from swine wastewater by using a fluidized bed[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(3): 7-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed