Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng.    2021, Vol. 15 Issue (2) : 33    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1325-y
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Economics analysis of food waste treatment in China and its influencing factors
Ting Chen1,2,3(), Yingying Zhao1,2,3, Xiaopeng Qiu4, Xiaoyan Zhu1,2,3, Xiaojie Liu5, Jun Yin1,2,3, Dongsheng Shen1,2,3, Huajun Feng1,2,3
1. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
2. Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Solid Waste Treatment and Recycling, Hangzhou 310018, China
3. Instrumental Analysis Center of Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
4. Huadong Engineering Corporation Limited of Power China, Hangzhou 311122, China
5. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resource Research, Beijing 100101, China
 Download: PDF(677 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

• Economics of food waste treatment projects at 29 pilot cities in China was examined.

• Roles of location, population size, processing technique, and income were studied.

• Economic benefits were limited with a profit to cost ratio of 0.08±0.37.

• Service population size affects construction economics significantly (P = 0.016).

• Choice of food waste processing technique affects operating economics notably.

This study examines the economic benefits of food waste treatment projects in China and factors affecting them. National-level pilot projects for food waste treatment located in 29 cities were selected as samples. The economics of food waste recycling from the investors’ perspective, in terms of investment during the construction phase and cost and benefit during the operation phase, was assessed. Results indicate that the average tonnage investment of food waste treatment projects was RMB 700.0±188.9 thousand yuan, with a profit to cost ratio of 0.08±0.37. This ratio increased to 0.95±0.57 following the application of government subsidies. It highlights the limited economic benefits of food waste treatment facilities, which rely on government subsidies to maintain their operations in China. Further analysis using a multi-factor analysis model revealed that regional location, service population size, processing techniques, and urban income exerted varying impacts on the economy of food waste treatment. Population size exerted the highest impact (P = 0.016) during the construction stage, and processing techniques notably influenced the project economy during the operation stage. The study highlights the need to prioritize service population size and processing techniques during economic decision-making and management of food waste recycling projects. The results of this study can serve as a valuable practical reference for guiding future policies regarding food waste treatment and related planning.

Keywords Recycling economics      Cost-benefit      Food waste treatment      Subsidy      Food waste economy      Circular economy     
Issue Date: 09 September 2020
 Cite this article:   
Ting Chen,Yingying Zhao,Xiaopeng Qiu, et al. Economics analysis of food waste treatment in China and its influencing factors[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(2): 33.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-020-1325-y
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y2021/V15/I2/33
No. City Affiliation GL a) ER b) No. City Affiliation GL a) ER b)
1 Chifeng Inner Mongolia North-west MYCEZ 16 Mianyang Sichuan Southern GSEZ
2 Dali Yunnan Southern GSEZ 17 Shanghai Shanghai Southern ECEZ
3 Daqing Heilongjiang Northern NEZ 18 Qiqihar Heilongjiang Northern NEZ
4 Dongguan Guangdong Southern SCEZ 19 Chongqing
Qijiang
Chongqing Southern GSEZ
5 Ganzhou Jiangxi Southern MYREZ 20 Shizuishan Ningxia North-west GNEZ
6 Handan Hebei Northern NCEZ 21 Wuzhong Ningxia North-west GNEZ
7 Hangzhou Zhejiang Southern ECEZ 22 Xi’an Shanxi Northern MYCEZ
8 Hulun Buir Inner Mongolia North-west MYCEZ 23 Xiangyang Hubei Southern MYREZ
9 Huaibei Anhui Northern MYREZ 24 Xuzhou Jiangsu Southern ECEZ
10 Huangshi Hubei Southern MYREZ 25 Zhenjiang Jiangsu Southern ECEZ
11 Jilin Jilin Northern NEZ 26 Yingchang Hubei Southern MYREZ
12 Jinan Shandong Northern NCEZ 27 Qingdao Shandong Northern NCEZ
13 Jinzhong Shanxi North-west MYCEZ 28 Quzhou Zhejiang Southern ECEZ
14 Liaocheng Shandong Northern NCEZ 29 Suzhou Jiangsu Southern ECEZ
15 Luoyang Henan Northern MYCEZ
Tab.1  Survey sample cities and their numbers
Fig.1  Economic parameters of the pilot projects (the red circle means that the value deviation exceeds 50% of the average): (a) Investment cost per ton food waste, (b) Operating costs per ton food waste, (c) Operating income per ton food waste.
Fig.2  The profit to cost ratio of pilot projects: (a) R excluding government subsidies, (b) R including government subsidies
Items Tonnage investment (ten thousand yuan /ton) Tonnage cost (yuan /ton) Tonnage income (yuan /ton) Profits to cost ratio
Minimum 41.39 88.34 78.40 -0.67
Maximum 122.43 709.30 749.93 0.83
Average 70.00 256.26 266.62 0.08
Standard Deviation 18.89 144.78 165.35 0.37
Tab.2  Statistical analysis of economic data of the pilot projects
Fig.3  Factor-wise assessment of FW treatment projects: (a) the average tonnage investment during the construction phase; and (b) average tonnage cost and tonnage income during the operation phase
Source Dependent variable Type III sum of squares df Mean square F Sig.
Construction period Tonnage investment Processing technique 994.291 1 994.291 4.125 0.065
Regional location 30.058 2 15.029 0.062 0.940
Urban income 567.051 2 283.525 1.176 0.342
Population size* 2854.270 2 1427.135 5.921 0.016*
Operation period Tonnage cost Processing technique* 240807.169 1 240807.169 27.505 0.000*
Regional location 14961.552 2 7480.776 0.854 0.450
Urban income 4032.568 2 2016.284 0.230 0.798
Population size 20628.465 2 10314.233 1.178 0.341
Tonnage income Processing techniques* 262776.387 1 262776.387 17.904 0.001*
Regional location 4090.907 2 2045.453 0.139 0.871
Urban income 5654.746 2 2827.373 0.193 0.827
Population size 64233.263 2 32116.631 2.188 0.155
Tab.3  Correlation between economic indicators and influencing factors
1 M K Awasthi, A K Pandey, J Khan, P S Bundela, J W Wong, A Selvam (2014). Evaluation of thermophilic fungal consortium for organic municipal solid waste composting. Bioresource Technology, 168: 214–221
2 S K Awasthi, S Sarsaiya, M K Awasthi, T Liu, J C Zhao, S Kumar, Z Q Zhang (2020). Changes in global trends in food waste composting: Research challenges and opportunities. Bioresource Technology, 299: 122555
3 H M Baksh, T O Dauda, M S S Anuar (2017). Statistical assessment of water quality of a Ramsar site wetland. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, 17(5): 1400–1409
4 A Cerda, A Artola, X Font, R Barrena, T Gea, A Sanchez (2018). Composting of food wastes: Status and challenges. Bioresource Technology, 248: 57–67
5 T Chen, D S Shen, Y Y Jin, H L Li, Z X Yu, H J Feng, Y Y Long, J Yin (2017). Comprehensive evaluation of environ-economic benefits of anaerobic digestion technique in an integrated food waste-based methane plant using a fuzzy mathematical model. Applied Energy, 208: 666–677
6 Z J Chu, Y G Wu, A Zhou, W C Huang (2016). Analysis of influence factors on municipal solid waste generation based on athe multivariable adjustment. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 35(6): 1629–1633
7 D De Clercq, Z G Wen, F Fei (2017). Economic performance evaluation of bio-waste treatment technique at the facility level. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 116: 178–184
8 W Y Guo, Y Zhou, N W Zhu, H G Hu, W H Shen, X X Huang, T P Zhang, P X Wu, Z B Li (2018). On site composting of food waste: A pilot scale case study in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 132: 130–138
9 X P Guo, X Y Yang (2019). The economic and environmental benefits analysis for food waste anaerobic treatment: a case study in Beijing. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 26 (10): 10374–10386
10 K Jindo, T Sonoki, K Matsumoto, L Canellas, A Roig, A Miguel, M A Sanchez-Monedero (2016). Influence of biochar addition on the humic substances of composting manures. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 49: 545–552
11 N Juul, M Munster, H Ravn, M L Soderman (2013). Challenges when performing economic optimization of waste treatment: A review. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 9(13): 1918–1925
12 M H Kim, Y E Song, H B Song, J W Kim, S J Hwang (2011). Evaluation of food waste disposal options by LCC analysis from the perspective of global warming: Jungnang case, South Korea. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 31(9–10): 2112–2120
13 H Li, X P Qiu, T Chen (2015). Analysis of the necessity and strategy of public financial intervention in restaurant garbage treatment. Ecological Economics, 31(02): 155–158
14 Y Y Li, Y Y Jin, A Borrion, H L Li (2019). Current status of food waste generation and management in China. Bioresource Technology, 273: 654–665
15 C H Liao, J Hong, D T Zhao, S Zhang, C H Chen (2018). Confucian culture as determinants of consumers’ food leftover generation: evidence from Chengdu,China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 25 (15): 14919–14933
16 T T Liu, Y R Liu, S Y Wu, J Xue, Y F Wu, Y M Li, X W Kang (2018). Restaurants’ behaviour, awareness, and willingness to submit waste cooking oil for biofuel production in Beijing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 204: 636–642
17 J Liu, S Yu, Y Shang (2020). Toward separation at source: Evolution of Municipal Solid Waste management in China. Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering, 14(2): 36
18 D Malamis, A Bourka, E Stamatopoulou, K Moustakas, O Skiadi, M Loizidou (2017). Study and assessment of segregated biowaste composting: the case study of Attica municipalities. Journal of Environmental Management, 203: 664–669
19 M Malinowski, K Wolny-Koładka, M D Vaverková (2019). Effect of biochar addition on the OFMSW composting process under real conditions. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 84: 364–372
20 V Martinez-Sanchez, D Tonini, F Moller, T F Astrup (2016). Life-cycle costing of food waste management in Denmark: importance of indirect effects. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(8): 4513–4523
21 MOHURD (2012). Technical code on food waste treatment (CJJ184–2012). Beijing: Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of China (in Chinese)
22 A P Ribeiro, J Rok, R Harmsen, J R Carreon, E Worrell (2019). Food waste in an alternative food network- A case-study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 149: 210–219
23 J Ryue, L Lin, F L Kakar, E Elbeshbishy, A Al-Mamun, B R Dhar (2020). A critical review of conventional and emerging methods for improving process stability in thermophilic anaerobic digestion. Energy for Sustainable Development, 54: 72–84
24 R Salemdeeb, E K H J zu Ermgassen, M H Kim, A Balmford, A Al-Tabbaa (2017). Environmental and health impacts of using food waste as animal feed: A comparative analysis of food waste management options. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140: 871–880
25 F Septianto, J A Kemper, G Northey (2020). Thanks, but no thanks: The influence of gratitude on consumer awareness of food waste. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258: 120591
26 P C Slorach, H K Jeswani, R Cuéllar-Franca, A Azapagic (2019). Environmental and economic implications of recovering resources from food waste in a circular economy. Science of the Total Environment, 693: 133516
27 V Stancu, P Haugaard, L Lahteenmaki (2016). Determinants of consumer food waste behaviour: Two routes to food waste. Appetite, 96: 7–17
28 K L Thyberg, D J Tonjes (2016). Drivers of food waste and their implications for sustainable policy development. Resource Conservation and Recycle, 106: 110–123
29 P Wang, L H Ren, X Gan (2013). Investigation and output factors analysis of restaurant garbage for cities in China. Environmental Science & Technology, 36(03): 181–185
30 X Wang, A Selvam, S S S Lau, J W C Wong (2018). Influence of lime and struvite on microbial community succession and odour emission during food waste composting. Bioresource Technology, 247: 652–659
31 M Waqas, A S Nizami, A S Aburiazaiza, M A Barakat, Z Z Asam, B Khattak, M I Rashid (2019). Untapped potential of zeolites in optimization of food waste composting. Journal of Environmental Management, 241: 99–112
32 S T Wen, M Buyukada, F Evrendilek, J Y Liu (2020). Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses of co-combustion/pyrolysis of textile dyeing sludge and incense sticks: Regression and machine-learning models. Renewable Energy, 151: 463–474
33 Z G Wen, Y J Wang, D De Clercq (2016). What is the true value of food waste? A case study of technique integration in urban food waste treatment in Suzhou City, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 118: 88–96
34 J D Zhang (2017). Research on the spatial-temporal differentiation of China’s urban-rural income at different scales. Disseration for the Master Degree. Wuhan: Wuhan University (in Chinese)
35 X Zhang, J Qiao, X Q Shen (2019). Economic performance of livestock and poultry breeding waste treatment and influencing factors: Based on data of farms in Beijing. Resources Science, 41(7): 1250–1261 (in Chinese)
36 Y Zhao, W J Deng (2014). Environmental impacts of different food waste resource technologies and the effects of energy mix. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 92: 214–221
37 L Zou , H Li, S Wang, K Zheng, Y Wang, G Du, J Li (2019). Characteristic and correlation analysis of influent and energy consumption of wastewater treatment plants in Taihu Basin. Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering, 13(6): 83
[1] FSE-20100-OF-CT_suppl_1 Download
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed