Experimental and computational assessment of 1,4-Dioxane degradation in a photo-Fenton reactive ceramic membrane filtration process

doi:10.1007/s11783-020-1341-y

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng.

2021, Vol. 15

Issue (5) : 95 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1341-y

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Experimental and computational assessment of 1,4-Dioxane degradation in a photo-Fenton reactive ceramic membrane filtration process

Shan Xue^1,³, Shaobin Sun^2,³, Weihua Qing³, Taobo Huang⁴, Wen Liu⁴, Changqing Liu¹(

), Hong Yao², Wen Zhang³(

)

¹. School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266033, China
². Beijing Key Laboratory of Aqueous Typical Pollutants Control and Water Quality Safeguard, Department of Municipal and Environmental Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
³. John A. Reif, Jr. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ 07102, USA
⁴. College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Key Laboratory of Water and Sediment Sciences (Ministry of Education), Beijing 100871, China

Download: PDF(1523 KB) HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

Abstract

• 1,4-Dioxane was degraded via the photo-Fenton reactive membrane filtration.

• Degradation efficiency and AQY were both enhanced in photocatalytic membrane.

• There is a tradeoff between photocatalytic degradation and membrane permeation flux.

• Degradation pathways of 1,4-Dioxane is revealed by DFT analysis.

The present study evaluated a photo-Fenton reactive membrane that achieved enhanced 1,4-Dioxane removal performance. As a common organic solvent and stabilizer, 1,4-Dioxane is widely used in a variety of industrial products and poses negative environmental and health impacts. The membrane was prepared by covalently coating photocatalyst of goethite (α-FeOOH) on a ceramic porous membrane as we reported previously. The effects of UV irradiation, H₂O₂ and catalyst on the removal efficiency of 1,4-Dioxane in batch reactors were first evaluated for optimized reaction conditions, followed by a systematical investigation of 1,4-Dioxane removal in the photo-Fenton membrane filtration mode. Under optimized conditions, the 1,4-Dioxane removal rate reached up to 16% with combination of 2 mmol/L H₂O₂ and UV₃₆₅ irradiation (2000 µW/cm²) when the feed water was filtered by the photo-Fenton reactive membrane at a hydraulic retention time of 6 min. The removal efficiency and apparent quantum yield (AQY) were both enhanced in the filtration compared to the batch mode of the same photo-Fenton reaction. Moreover, the proposed degradation pathways were analyzed by density functional theory (DFT) calculations, which provided a new insight into the degradation mechanisms of 1,4-Dioxane in photo-Fenton reactions on the functionalized ceramic membrane.

Keywords Photo-Fenton Ceramic membrane 1,4-Dioxane Goethite

Corresponding Author(s): Changqing Liu,Wen Zhang

Issue Date: 18 January 2021

Cite this article:

Shan Xue,Shaobin Sun,Weihua Qing, et al. Experimental and computational assessment of 1,4-Dioxane degradation in a photo-Fenton reactive ceramic membrane filtration process[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(5): 95.

URL:

https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-020-1341-y
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y2021/V15/I5/95

Fig.1 Schematic photo of the photo-Fenton reactive membrane filtration setup.

Tab.1 Rate constants obtained from linear regression analysis of 1,4-Dioxane removal data in Fig. 2

Fig.2 The ratio of the residual concentration (C) to the initial concentration (C₀) of 1,4-Dioxane (a) and TOC after 12 h (b) under different reaction conditions. Initial 1,4-Dioxane concentration: 10.8 mg/L; Initial TOC concentration: 5.3 mg/L; UV₃₆₅ intensity: 2000 µW/cm²; H₂O₂ concentration: 2 mmol/L; and catalyst dosage: 1 g/L. (c) First order plot for 1,4-Dioxane. Line is fitting curve. The red solid lines in Fig. 2(b) show the comparison pairs with the corresponding p values. p values of<0.05 indicate significant differences.

Fig.3 The ratio of the remaining concentration (C) to the initial concentration (C₀) of 1,4-Dioxane (a) and TOC after 12 h (b) under different initial H₂O₂ concentration. Initial 1,4-Dioxane concentration: 10.8 mg/L; Initial TOC concentration: 5.3 mg/L; UV₃₆₅ intensity: 2000 µW/cm²; and catalyst dosage: 1 g/L. The red solid lines in Fig. 3(b) show the comparison pairs with the corresponding p values. p values of<0.05 indicate significant differences.

Fig.4 The ratio of the remaining concentration (C) to the initial concentration (C₀) of 1,4-Dioxane (a) and TOC after 12 h (b) under different initial 1,4-Dioxane concentration. UV₃₆₅ intensity: 2000 µW/cm²; H₂O₂ concentration: 2 mmol/L; and catalyst dosage: 1 g/L. The black solid lines in Fig. 4(b) show the comparison pairs with the corresponding p values. p values of<0.05 indicate significant differences.

Fig.5 The ratio of the residual concentration (C) to the initial concentration (C₀) of 1,4-Dioxane and TOC under different filtration conditions. Initial 1,4-Dioxane concentration: 10.8 mg/L; Initial TOC concentration: 5.3 mg/L; UV intensity: 2000 µW/cm²; H₂O₂ concentration: 2 mmol/L; and the catalyst coating density on the ceramic membrane was 2 µg/g. CM denotes for coated membrane, and UCM denotes for uncoated membrane. The black solid lines (1,4-Dioxane concentration) and blue solid lines (TOC concentration) show the comparison pairs with the corresponding p values. p values of<0.05 indicate significant differences.

Fig.6 (a) The theoretical and actual removal rates of 1,4-Dioxane and actual removal rates of TOC of coated ceramic membranes under different influent flux. (b) The 1,4-Dioxane removal rates under different initial 1,4-Dioxane concentration. Initial 1,4-Dioxane concentration: 10.8 mg/L; Initial TOC concentration: 5.3 mg/L; UV intensity: 2000 µW/cm²; H₂O₂ concentration: 2 mmol/L; and the catalyst coating density on the ceramic membrane was 2 µg/g.

Tab.2 Comparison of 1,4-Dioxane removal rates in different photocatalytic systems

Fig.7 Predicted Gibbs free energy changes of 1,4-Dioxane that underwent the hypothetical degradation pathway.

1	D T Adamson, E A Piña, A E Cartwright, S R Rauch, R H Anderson, T Mohr, J A Connor (2017). 1,4-Dioxane drinking water occurrence data from the third unregulated contaminant monitoring rule. Science of the Total Environment, 596: 236–245 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.085
2	R Ahmad, J K Kim, J H Kim, J Kim (2019). Diethylene glycol-assisted organized TiO2 nanostructures for photocatalytic wastewater treatment ceramic membranes. Water, 11(4): 750
3	N H Alias, J Jaafar, S Samitsu, T Matsuura, A Ismail, M Othman, M A Rahman, N H Othman, N Abdullah, S H Paiman (2019). Photocatalytic nanofiber-coated alumina hollow fiber membranes for highly efficient oilfield produced water treatment. Chemical Engineering Journal, 360: 1437–1446
4	R Aryal, C Xia, J Liu (2019). 1,4-Dioxane-contaminated groundwater remediation in the anode chamber of a microbial fuel cell. Water Environment Research, 91(11): 1537–1545 https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1002/wer.1155
5	A Aziz, S Ibrahim (2018). Preparation of activated carbon/N-doped titania composite for synergistic adsorption-photocatalytic oxidation of batik dye. MS&E, 358(1): 012014 https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/358/1/012014
6	H Barndõk, L Blanco, D Hermosilla, Á Blanco (2016a). Heterogeneous photo-Fenton processes using zero valent iron microspheres for the treatment of wastewaters contaminated with 1,4-dioxane. Chemical Engineering Journal, 284: 112–121 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.08.097
7	H Barndõk, D Hermosilla, C Han, D D Dionysiou, C Negro, Á Blanco (2016b). Degradation of 1,4-Dioxane from industrial wastewater by solar photocatalysis using immobilized NF-TiO2 composite with monodisperse TiO2 nanoparticles. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 180: 44–52 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.06.015
8	H Barndõk, L Cortijo, D Hermosilla, C Negro, Á Blanco (2014). Removal of 1,4-Dioxane from industrial wastewaters: Routes of decomposition under different operational conditions to determine the ozone oxidation capacity. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 280: 340–347 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.07.077
9	M A Beckett, I Hua (2000). Elucidation of the 1,4-Dioxane decomposition pathway at discrete ultrasonic frequencies. Environmental Science & Technology, 34(18): 3944–3953 https://doi.org/10.1021/es000928r
10	M A Beckett, I Hua (2003). Enhanced sonochemical decomposition of 1,4-Dioxane by ferrous iron. Water Research, 37(10): 2372–2376 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00005-8
11	T Berger, C Regmi, A Schäfer, B Richards (2020). Photocatalytic degradation of organic dye via atomic layer deposited TiO2–ceramic membranes in single-pass flow-through operation. Journal of Membrane Science: 118015
12	P Biniaz, M A Makarem, M R Rahimpour (2019). Membrane reactors. In: Benaglia M, Puglisi A, eds. Catalyst Immobilization: Methods and Applications. Hoboken: Wiley, 307–324
13	M B Chabalala (2016). Preparation of doped nanotitanium dioxide (TIO2) immobilized on polyethersulphone (PES) nanofiberes for photocatalytic degradation of water pollutants. Master’s thesis. Johannesburg: University of Johannesburg
14	S Chakraborty, S Loutatidou, G Palmisano, J Kujawa, M O Mavukkandy, S Al-Gharabli, E Curcio, H A Arafat (2017). Photocatalytic hollow fiber membranes for the degradation of pharmaceutical compounds in wastewater. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 5(5): 5014–5024
15	N P Cheremisinoff (2017). Groundwater Remediation: A Practical Guide for Environmental Engineers and Scientists. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons
16	C H Chiou, C Y Wu, R S Juang (2008). Influence of operating parameters on photocatalytic degradation of phenol in UV/TiO2 process. Chemical Engineering Journal, 139(2): 322–329 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2007.08.002
17	S Chitra, K Paramasivan, M Cheralathan, P K Sinha (2012). Degradation of 1,4-Dioxane using advanced oxidation processes. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 19(3): 871–878 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-011-0619-9
18	J Y Choi, Y J Lee, J Shin, J W Yang (2010). Anodic oxidation of 1,4-Dioxane on boron-doped diamond electrodes for wastewater treatment. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 179(1–3): 762–768 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.03.067
19	H Coleman, V Vimonses, G Leslie, R Amal (2007). Degradation of 1,4-Dioxane in water using TiO2 based photocatalytic and H2O2/UV processes. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 146(3): 496–501 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.04.049
20	L De Angelis, M M F De Cortalezzi (2016). Improved membrane flux recovery by Fenton-type reactions. Journal of Membrane Science, 500: 255–264 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.11.042
21	J De Clercq, E Van De Steene, K Verbeken, M Verhaege (2010). Electrochemical oxidation of 1,4-Dioxane at boron-doped diamond electrode. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology (Oxford, Oxfordshire), 85(8): 1162–1167 https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.2415
22	Y Ding, W Sun, L Cao, J Yang (2016). A spontaneous catalytic membrane reactor to dechlorinate 2,4,6-TCP as an organic pollutant in wastewater and to reclaim electricity simultaneously. Chemical Engineering Journal, 285: 573–580 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.10.034
23	U.S. EPA, (2006). Treatment Technologies for 1,4-Dioxane: Fundamentals and Field Applications. Cincinnati: Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, EPA
24	EPA, U.S. (2017). Technical Fact Sheet for 1, 4-dioxane: EPA 505-F-17-011. Washington: Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office, EPA
25	W Fu, W Zhang (2018). Microwave-enhanced membrane filtration for water treatment. Journal of Membrane Science, 568: 97–104 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.09.064
26	Y Gu, I Favier, C Pradel, D L Gin, J F Lahitte, R D Noble, M Gómez, J C Remigy (2015). High catalytic efficiency of palladium nanoparticles immobilized in a polymer membrane containing poly (ionic liquid) in Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling reaction. Journal of Membrane Science, 492: 331–339 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.05.051
27	Y Guo, B Xu, F Qi (2016). A novel ceramic membrane coated with MnO2–Co3O4 nanoparticles catalytic ozonation for benzophenone-3 degradation in aqueous solution: fabrication, characterization and performance. Chemical Engineering Journal, 287: 381–389 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.11.067
28	J He, W Ma, W Song, J Zhao, X Qian, S Zhang, C Y Jimmy (2005). Photoreaction of aromatic compounds at α-FeOOH/H2O interface in the presence of H2O2: Evidence for organic-goethite surface complex formation. Water Research, 39(1): 119–128 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.09.006
29	M Hwangbo, E C Claycomb, Y Liu, T E Alivio, S Banerjee, K H Chu (2019). Effectiveness of zinc oxide-assisted photocatalysis for concerned constituents in reclaimed wastewater: 1,4-Dioxane, trihalomethanes, antibiotics, antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB), and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs). Science of the Total Environment, 649: 1189–1197 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.360
30	J R Jasmann, T Borch, T C Sale, J Blotevogel (2016). Advanced electrochemical oxidation of 1,4-Dioxane via dark catalysis by novel titanium dioxide (TiO2) pellets. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(16): 8817–8826 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02183
31	M M Johns, W E Marshall, C A Toles (1998). Agricultural by-products as granular activated carbons for adsorbing dissolved metals and organics. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology Biotechnology, 71(2): 131–140 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4660(199802)71:2<131::AID-JCTB821>3.0.CO;2-K
32	R Kamaludin, A S M Puad, M H D Othman, S H S A Kadir, Z Harun (2019). Incorporation of N-doped TiO2 into dual layer hollow fiber (DLHF) membrane for visible light-driven photocatalytic removal of reactive black 5. Polymer Testing, 78: 105939
33	U Karges, J Becker, W Püttmann (2018). 1,4-Dioxane pollution at contaminated groundwater sites in western Germany and its distribution within a TCE plume. Science of the Total Environment, 619: 712–720 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.043
34	G M Klečka, S J Gonsior (1986). Removal of 1,4-Dioxane from wastewater. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 13(2): 161–168 https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3894(86)80016-4
35	J Kleine, K V Peinemann, C Schuster, H J Warnecke (2002). Multifunctional system for treatment of wastewaters from adhesive-producing industries: Separation of solids and oxidation of dissolved pollutants using doted microfiltration membranes. Chemical Engineering Science, 57(9): 1661–1664
36	K C Lee, H J Beak, K H Choo (2015). Membrane photoreactor treatment of 1, 4-Dioxane-containing textile wastewater effluent: Performance, modeling, and fouling control. Water Research, 86: 58–65 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.017
37	K C Lee, K H Choo (2013). Hybridization of TiO2 photocatalysis with coagulation and flocculation for 1,4-Dioxane removal in drinking water treatment. Chemical Engineering Journal, 231: 227–235 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.07.023
38	S Li, G Zhang, W Peng, H Zheng, Y Zheng (2016). Microwave-enhanced Mn-Fenton process for the removal of BPA in water. Chemical Engineering Journal, 294: 371–379 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.03.006
39	Y Li, K L Yeung (2019). Polymeric catalytic membrane for ozone treatment of DEET in water. Catalysis Today, 331: 53–59 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2018.06.005
40	L Liang, J Zhang, P Feng, C Li, Y Huang, B Dong, L Li, X Guan (2015). Occurrence of bisphenol A in surface and drinking waters and its physicochemical removal technologies. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 9(1): 16–38 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-014-0697-2
41	G Liu, D Zhu, W Zhou, S Liao, J Cui, K Wu, D Hamilton (2010). Solid-phase photocatalytic degradation of polystyrene plastic with goethite modified by boron under UV-vis light irradiation. Applied Surface Science, 256(8): 2546–2551 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.10.102
42	H Liu, T Chen, R L Frost (2014). An overview of the role of goethite surfaces in the environment. Chemosphere, 103: 1–11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.11.065
43	W J Lyman, W F Reehl, D H Rosenblatt (1990). Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Methods.Washington, DC: American Chemical Society
44	J Maekawa, K Mae, H Nakagawa (2016). Degradation of 1,4-Dioxane by the ferrioxalate-mediated photo-Fenton process using UV or white LED irradiation. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 49(3): 305–311 https://doi.org/10.1252/jcej.14we272
45	J Mao, X Quan, J Wang, C Gao, S Chen, H Yu, Y Zhang (2018). Enhanced heterogeneous Fenton-like activity by Cu-doped BiFeO3 perovskite for degradation of organic pollutants. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 12(6): 10 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-018-1060-9
46	A V Marenich, C J Cramer, D G Truhlar (2009). Universal solvation model based on solute electron density and on a continuum model of the solvent defined by the bulk dielectric constant and atomic surface tensions. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 113(18): 6378–6396 https://doi.org/10.1021/jp810292n
47	B J Martijn, A L Fuller, J P Malley, J C Kruithof (2010). Impact of IX-UF pretreatment on the feasibility of UV/H2O2 treatment for degradation of NDMA and 1,4-Dioxane. Ozone Science and Engineering, 32(6): 383–390 https://doi.org/10.1080/01919512.2010.515507
48	V Maurino, P Calza, C Minero, E Pelizzetti, M Vincenti (1997). Light-assisted 1,4-dioxane degradation. Chemosphere, 35(11): 2675–2688 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(97)00322-6
49	A C Mcelroy, M R Hyman, D R Knappe (2019). 1,4-Dioxane in drinking water: Emerging for forty years and still unregulated. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 7: 117–125 https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2019.01.003
50	M J Mcguire, I H Suffet, J V Radziul (1978). Assessment of unit processes for the removal of trace organic compounds from drinking water. Journal-American Water Works Association, 70(10): 565–572 https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.1978.tb04244.x
51	N Merayo, D Hermosilla, L Cortijo, Á Blanco (2014). Optimization of the Fenton treatment of 1,4-Dioxane and on-line FTIR monitoring of the reaction. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 268: 102–109 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.01.008
52	X Miao, H Dai, J Chen, J Zhu (2018). The enhanced method of hydroxyl radical generation in the heterogeneous UV-Fenton system with α-FeOOH as catalyst. Separation and Purification Technology, 200: 36–43 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.02.012
53	Y Miao, N W Johnson, P B Gedalanga, D Adamson, C Newell, S Mahendra (2019). Response and recovery of microbial communities subjected to oxidative and biological treatments of 1,4-Dioxane and co-contaminants. Water Research, 149: 74–85 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.070
54	T K Mohr, J A Stickney, W H Diguiseppi (2016). Environmental investigation and remediation: 1,4-Dioxane and other solvent stabilizers. Florida: CRC Press
55	N Moustakas, F Katsaros, A Kontos, G E Romanos, D Dionysiou, P Falaras (2014). Visible light active TiO2 photocatalytic filtration membranes with improved permeability and low energy consumption. Catalysis Today, 224: 56–69
56	Y Nomura, S Fukahori, T J J O H M Fujiwara (2020). Removal of 1,4-Dioxane from landfill leachate by a rotating advanced oxidation contactor equipped with activated carbon/TiO2 composite sheets. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 383: 121005 https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121005
57	T A Otitoju, D Jiang, Y Ouyang, M A M Elamin, S Li (2020). Photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B using CaCu3Ti4O12 embedded polyethersulfone hollow fiber membrane. Journal of industrial and engineering chemistry, 83: 145–152
58	M Otto, S Nagaraja (2007). Treatment technologies for 1,4-Dioxane: Fundamentals and field applications. Remediation Journal: The Journal of Environmental Cleanup Costs, Technologies & Techniques, 17(3): 81–88 https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1002/rem.20135
59	S Papageorgiou, F Katsaros, E Favvas, G E Romanos, C Athanasekou, K Beltsios, O Tzialla, P Falaras (2012). Alginate fibers as photocatalyst immobilizing agents applied in hybrid photocatalytic/ultrafiltration water treatment processes. Water Research, 46(6): 1858–1872
60	W Qing, X Li, S Shao, X Shi, J Wang, Y Feng, W Zhang, W Zhang (2019). Polymeric catalytically active membranes for reaction-separation coupling: A review. Journal of Membrane Science, 583: 118–138 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.04.053
61	W Qing, F Liu, H Yao, S Sun, C Chen, W Zhang (2020). Functional catalytic membrane development: A review of catalyst coating techniques. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 282: 102207 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2020.102207
62	G Romanos, C Athanasekou, V Likodimos, P Aloupogiannis, P Falaras (2013). Hybrid ultrafiltration/photocatalytic membranes for efficient water treatment. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 52(39): 13938–13947
63	G E Romanos, C Athanasekou, F Katsaros, N Kanellopoulos, D Dionysiou, V Likodimos, P Falaras (2012). Double-side active TiO2-modified nanofiltration membranes in continuous flow photocatalytic reactors for effective water purification. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 211: 304–316
64	E J Rosenfeldt, K G Linden, S Canonica, U Von Gunten (2006). Comparison of the efficiency of OH radical formation during ozonation and the advanced oxidation processes O3/H2O2 and UV/H2O2. Water Research, 40(20): 3695–3704 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.09.008
65	G Scaratti, A Basso, R Landers, P J Alvarez, G L Puma, R F Moreira (2018). Treatment of aqueous solutions of 1,4-Dioxane by ozonation and catalytic ozonation with copper oxide (CuO). Environmental Technology, 39: 1–13 https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2018.1538259
66	H S Son, S B Choi, E Khan, K D Zoh (2006). Removal of 1,4-Dioxane from water using sonication: Effect of adding oxidants on the degradation kinetics. Water Research, 40(4): 692–698 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.11.046
67	H S Son, J K Im, K D Zoh (2009). A Fenton-like degradation mechanism for 1,4-Dioxane using zero-valent iron (Fe0) and UV light. Water Research, 43(5): 1457–1463 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.12.029
68	M I Stefan, J R Bolton (1998). Mechanism of the degradation of 1,4-Dioxane in dilute aqueous solution using the UV/hydrogen peroxide process. Environmental Science & Technology, 32(11): 1588–1595 https://doi.org/10.1021/es970633m
69	D K Stepien, P Diehl, J Helm, A Thoms, W Püttmann (2014). Fate of 1,4-Dioxane in the aquatic environment: From sewage to drinking water. Water Research, 48(1): 406–419 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.09.057
70	J H Suh, M Mohseni (2004). A study on the relationship between biodegradability enhancement and oxidation of 1,4-Dioxane using ozone and hydrogen peroxide. Water Research, 38(10): 2596–2604 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.03.002
71	M Sun, C Lopez-Velandia, D R Knappe (2016). Determination of 1,4-Dioxane in the Cape Fear River watershed by heated purge-and-trap preconcentration and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(5): 2246–2254 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05875
72	S Sun, H Yao, W Fu, L Hua, G Zhang, W Zhang (2018). Reactive photo-Fenton ceramic membranes: Synthesis, characterization and antifouling performance. Water Research, 144: 690–698 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.08.002
73	S Sun, H Yao, W Fu, S Xue, W Zhang (2020). Enhanced degradation of antibiotics by photo-Fenton reactive membrane filtration. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 386: 121955 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121955
74	G P Tian, Q Y Wu, A Li, W L Wang, H Y Hu (2017). Promoted ozonation for the decomposition of 1,4-Dioxane by activated carbon. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, 17(2): 613–620 https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2016.071
75	D H Tseng, L C Juang, H H Huang (2012). Effect of oxygen and hydrogen peroxide on the photocatalytic degradation of monochlorobenzene in aqueous suspension. International Journal of Photoenergy, 2012: 328526 https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/328526
76	L Varanasi, E Coscarelli, M Khaksari, L R Mazzoleni, D Minakata (2018). Transformations of dissolved organic matter induced by UV photolysis, Hydroxyl radicals, chlorine radicals, and sulfate radicals in aqueous-phase UV-Based advanced oxidation processes. Water Research, 135: 22–30 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.02.015
77	J Wang, Z Wu, T Li, J Ye, L Shen, Z She, F Liu (2018). Catalytic PVDF membrane for continuous reduction and separation of p-nitrophenol and methylene blue in emulsified oil solution. Chemical Engineering Journal, 334: 579–586 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.055
78	S Wei, C Zeng, Y Lu, G Liu, H Luo, R Zhang (2019). Degradation of antipyrine in the Fenton-like process with a La-doped heterogeneous catalyst. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 13(5): 66 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-019-1149-9
79	T Westermann, T Melin (2009). Flow-through catalytic membrane reactors: Principles and applications. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 48(1): 17–28 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2008.07.001
80	X Xu, S Liu, Y Cui, X Wang, K Smith, Y Wang (2019). Solar-driven removal of 1,4-Dioxane using WO3/ng-Al2O3 nano-catalyst in water. Catalysts, 9(4): 389 https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9040389
81	Y Yabuki, G Yoshida, T Daifuku, J Ono, A J J O W Banno, E Technology (2018). Biological treatment of 1,4-Dioxane in wastewater from landfill by indigenous microbes attached to flowing carriers. Journal of Water and Environment Technology, 16(6): 245–255
82	N K Youn, J E Heo, O S Joo, H Lee, J Kim, B K Min (2010). The effect of dissolved oxygen on the 1,4-Dioxane degradation with TiO2 and Au–TiO2 photocatalysts. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 177(1–3): 216–221 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.020
83	Q Zeng, H Dong, X Wang, T Yu, W Cui (2017). Degradation of 1, 4-Dioxane by hydroxyl radicals produced from clay minerals. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 331: 88–98 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.01.040
84	S Zhang, P B Gedalanga, S Mahendra (2017). Advances in bioremediation of 1,4-Dioxane-contaminated waters. Journal of Environmental Management, 204: 765–774 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.05.033
85	Y Zhao, D G Truhlar (2008). The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: Two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functionals. Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, 120(1–3): 215–241 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x

[1]

FSE-20155-OF-XS_suppl_1

Download

[1]	Wenyue Li, Min Chen, Zhaoxiang Zhong, Ming Zhou, Weihong Xing. Hydroxyl radical intensified Cu₂O NPs/H₂O₂ process in ceramic membrane reactor for degradation on DMAc wastewater from polymeric membrane manufacturer[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 102-.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed