Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng.    2022, Vol. 16 Issue (7) : 93    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-021-1501-8
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Product identification and toxicity change during oxidation of methotrexate by ferrate and permanganate in water
Shengqi Zhang1, Chengsong Ye1, Wenjun Zhao2, Lili An1, Xin Yu1, Lei Zhang3,4, Hongjie Sun2, Mingbao Feng1()
1. College of the Environment & Ecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China
2. College of Geography and Environmental Science, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China
3. State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, Innovation Center for Cell Signaling Network, School of Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China
4. Core Facility of Biomedical, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China
 Download: PDF(2093 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

• Oxidation of methotrexate by high-valent metal-oxo species was first explored.

• Fe(VI) presented a higher reactivity to MTX than Mn(VII) at pH 8.0.

• Ketonization and cleavage of peptide bond were two initial reaction pathways.

• Products of MTX were not genotoxic, neurotoxic, or endocrine-disrupting chemicals.

• The less biodegradable products exhibited developmental and acute/chronic toxicity.

Accompanying an annual increase in cancer incidence, the global use of anticancer drugs has remarkably increased with their worldwide environmental prevalence and ecological risks. In this study, the oxidation of methotrexate (MTX), a typical anticancer drug with ubiquitous occurrence and multi-endpoint toxicity, by ferrate(VI) (Fe(VI)) and permanganate (Mn(VII))) was investigated in water. Fe(VI) exhibited a higher reactivity with MTX (93.34 M−1 s−1) than Mn(VII) (3.01 M−1 s−1) at pH 8.0. The introduction of Cu(II) and Fe(III) at 1.0 mM improved the removal efficiency of 5.0 μM MTX by 100.0 μM Fe(VI) from 80% to 95% and 100% after 4 min, respectively. Seven oxidized products (OPs) were identified during oxidative treatments, while OP-191 and OP-205 were characterized as specific products for Fe(VI) oxidation. Initial ketonization of the L-glutamic acid moiety and cleavage of the peptide bond of MTX were proposed. Additionally, a multi-endpoint toxicity evaluation indicated no genotoxicity, neurotoxicity, or endocrine-disrupting effects of MTX and its OPs. Particularly, serious developmental toxicity in zebrafish larvae was observed in the treated MTX solutions. Based on the acute and chronic aquatic toxicity prediction, OP-190, OP-192, OP-206, and OP-208 were deemed toxic or very toxic compared to harmful MTX. Furthermore, the reduced biodegradability index from 0.15 (MTX) to −0.5 to −0.2 (OP-192, OP-206, and OP-468) indicated the formation of lower biodegradable OPs. Overall, this study suggests that Fe(VI) and Mn(VII) oxidation are promising treatments for remediating anticancer drug-contaminated water. However, the environmental risks associated with these treatments should be considered in the evaluation of water safety.

Keywords Anticancer drugs      High-valent metal-oxo species      Oxidation kinetics      Reaction mechanisms      Multi-endpoint toxicity     
Corresponding Author(s): Mingbao Feng   
Issue Date: 23 November 2021
 Cite this article:   
Shengqi Zhang,Chengsong Ye,Wenjun Zhao, et al. Product identification and toxicity change during oxidation of methotrexate by ferrate and permanganate in water[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(7): 93.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-021-1501-8
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y2022/V16/I7/93
Fig.1  Removal of MTX by Fe(VI) (a) and Mn(VII) (b) as a function of reaction time in water, and the effect of five different water components (i.e., Cu(II), Fe(III), HCO3, Cl, and HA) on the removal of MTX by Fe(VI) ((c) reaction time= 4 min) and Mn(VII) ((d) reaction time= 1 h). (Experimental conditions: [MTX]0 = 5.0 μM, [Fe(VI)]0 = [Mn(VII)]0 = 100.0 μM, pH 8.0 (10.0 mM phosphate buffer), [Cu(II)] = [Fe(III)] = [HCO3] = [Cl] = 1.0 mM, and [HA] = 10.0 mg/L).
Compound Rt
(min)
Molecular
formula
ESI positive ESI negative Fe(VI) Mn(VII)
Experimental
mass (m/z)
Calculated
mass (m/z)
Error
(ppm)
Experimental
mass (m/z)
Calculated
mass (m/z)
Error
(ppm)
MTX 4.86 C20H22N8O5 455.1789 455.1786 0.66 453.1638 453.1640 −0.44
OP-468 1.50 C20H20N8O6 469.1577 469.1579 −0.43 467.1435 467.1433 0.43
OP-325 4.85 C15H15N7O2 326.1361 326.1360 0.31
OP-208 1.43 C7H8N6O2 209.0783 209.0782 0.48 207.0638 207.0636 0.97
OP-205 1.40 C8H11N7 206.1150 206.1149 0.49 ×
OP-191 1.35 C7H9N7 192.0991 192.0992 −0.52 ×
OP-190 1.43 C7H6N6O 191.0678 191.0676 1.05
OP-122 5.07 C7H6O2 121.0295 121.0295 0
Tab.1  Accurate mass measurements of MTX and its OPs by Fe(VI) and Mn(VII), which were determined by LC-MS/MS (ESI positive and ESI negative)
Fig.2  (a) The proposed reaction pathways of MTX by Fe(VI) and Mn(VII) in water. (Experimental conditions: [MTX]0 = 5.0 μM, [Fe(VI)]0 = [Mn(VII)]0 = 100.0 μM, pH 8.0 (10.0 mM phosphate buffer); specifically, the reaction time for Fe(VI) and MTX was 4 min, and the reaction time for Mn(VII) and MTX was 1 h, which corresponded to 20%-40% removal of MTX), (b) the predicted biodegradability of different OPs generated from MTX oxidation by Fe(VI) and Mn(VII) using Biowin 5, and (c) the predicted acute/chronic toxicity of different OPs on fish, daphnid, and green algae using ECOSAR.
Fig.3  The genotoxicity evaluation of the reaction solutions of MTX by Fe(VI) and Mn(VII) at pH 8.0 using the SOS/umu tests ((a) the positive control with 4-NQO at 50, 100, 150, and 200 ng/L; (b) MTX at different concentrations (i.e., 10.0 ng/L−1.0 mg/L); (c) the reaction solutions of MTX by Fe(VI) at different time; (d) the reaction solutions of MTX by Mn(VII) at different time).
Fig.4  Morphological abnormalities in zebrafish larvae at 96 hpf. (a) the well-developed larvae for control; (b) the well-developed larvae for Fe(VI)-decayed sample; (c) the well-developed larvae for Mn(VII)-decayed sample; (d) the deformity of zebrafish larvae for MTX; (e) the deformity of zebrafish larvae for Fe(VI) + MTX; and (f) the deformity of zebrafish larvae for Mn(VII) + MTX. Notably, the red arrow indicated that edema appeared in the hearts and yolk sac area, while the blue arrow suggested the scoliosis deformity and tail. Scale bars correspond to 250 μm.
Fig.5  Moving distance of zebrafish larvae at 120 hpf after 9 min of exposure to control and MTX before and after oxidation of Fe(VI) and Mn(VII). All samples obtained from the degradation experiments were diluted 100-time into the exposure media.
Comp. SMILES code In silico QSAR predictions
QSAR Toolbox CompTox
A B C D E F G
MTX C1= CC(N(C)CC2N = C3C( = NC= 2)N = C(N)N = C3N)
= CC= C1C( = O)NC(C( = O)O)CCC( = O)O
PriAm NA PriAm H/PriAm Yes No No
OP-122 C1= CC= C(C( = O)O)C= C1 NA NA NA NA No No No
OP-190 N1= C2C( = NC= C1C= O)N = C(N)N = C2N PriAm/SA NA PriAm/SA H/PriAm/SA Yes No No
OP-191 N1= C2C( = NC= C1CN)N = C(N)N = C2N PriAm NA PriAm H/PriAm Yes No Nd
OP-205 N1= C2C( = NC= C1CNC)N = C(N)N = C2N PriAm NA PriAm H/PriAm Yes No No
OP-208 N1= C2C( = NC(O) = C1CO)N = C(N)N = C2N PriAm NA PriAm H/PriAm Yes No No
OP-325 C1= CC(N(C)CC2N = C3C( = NC= 2)N = C(N)
N = C3N) = CC= C1C( = O)O
PriAm NA PriAm H/PriAm Yes No No
OP-468 C1= CC(N(C)CC2N = C3C( = NC= 2)N = C(N)N = C3N)
= CC= C1C( = O)NC(C( = O)O)C( = O)CC( = O)O
PriAm NA PriAm H/PriAm Yes No No
Tab.2  In silico QSAR predictions of MTX and its OPs for multi-endpoint toxicity
1 S Barışçı, O Turkay, E Ulusoy, M G Şeker, E Yüksel, A Dimoglo (2018). Electro-oxidation of cytostatic drugs: Experimental and theoretical identification of by-products and evaluation of ecotoxicological effects. Chemical Engineering Journal, 334: 1820–1827
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.105
2 P Calza, C Medana, M Sarro, V Rosato, R Aigotti, C Baiocchi, C Minero (2014). Photocatalytic degradation of selected anticancer drugs and identification of their transformation products in water by liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography. A, 1362: 135–144
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2014.08.035 pmid: 25169721
3 J Chen, Y Qi, X Pan, N Wu, J Zuo, C Li, R Qu, Z Wang, Z Chen (2019). Mechanistic insights into the reactivity of Ferrate(VI) with phenolic compounds and the formation of coupling products. Water Research, 158: 338–349
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.04.045 pmid: 31051378
4 J Chen, N Wu, X Xu, R Qu, C Li, X Pan, Z Wei, Z Wang (2018). Fe(VI)-mediated single-electron coupling processes for the removal of chlorophene: A combined experimental and computational study. Environmental Science & Technology, 52(21): 12592–12601
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01830 pmid: 30299936
5 A Della-Flora, M L Wilde, I D F Pinto, É C Lima, C Sirtori (2020). Degradation of the anticancer drug flutamide by solar photo-Fenton treatment at near-neutral pH: Identification of transformation products and in silico (Q)SAR risk assessment. Environmental Research, 183: 109223
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109223 pmid: 32045729
6 E Evgenidou, A Ofrydopoulou, N Malesic-Eleftheriadou, C Nannou, N M Ainali, E Christodoulou, D N Bikiaris, G Z Kyzas, D A Lambropoulou (2020). New insights into transformation pathways of a mixture of cytostatic drugs using Polyester-TiO2 films: Identification of intermediates and toxicity assessment. Science of the Total Environment, 741: 140394
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140394 pmid: 32886989
7 M Feng, R Qu, X Zhang, P Sun, Y Sui, L Wang, Z Wang (2015). Degradation of flumequine in aqueous solution by persulfate activated with common methods and polyhydroquinone-coated magnetite/multi-walled carbon nanotubes catalysts. Water Research, 85: 1–10
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.08.011 pmid: 26281959
8 M Feng, X Wang, J Chen, R Qu, Y Sui, L Cizmas, Z Wang, V K Sharma (2016). Degradation of fluoroquinolone antibiotics by ferrate(VI): Effects of water constituents and oxidized products. Water Research, 103: 48–57
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.07.014 pmid: 27429354
9 Y Feng, W Qing, L Kong, H Li, D Wu, Y Fan, P H Lee, K Shih (2019). Factors and mechanisms that influence the reactivity of trivalent copper: A novel oxidant for selective degradation of antibiotics. Water Research, 149: 1–8
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.090 pmid: 30408631
10 Y Gao, Y Zhou, S Y Pang, J Jiang, Z Yang, Y Shen, Z Wang, P X Wang, L H Wang (2019). New insights into the combination of permanganate and bisulfite as a novel advanced oxidation process: Importance of high valent manganese-oxo species and sulfate radical. Environmental Science & Technology, 53(7): 3689–3696
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05306 pmid: 30888798
11 A Garcia-Ac, R Broséus, S Vincent, B Barbeau, M Prévost, S Sauvé (2010). Oxidation kinetics of cyclophosphamide and methotrexate by ozone in drinking water. Chemosphere, 79(11): 1056–1063
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.03.032 pmid: 20403630
12 T Haddad, E Baginska, K Kümmerer (2015). Transformation products of antibiotic and cytostatic drugs in the aquatic cycle that result from effluent treatment and abiotic/biotic reactions in the environment: An increasing challenge calling for higher emphasis on measures at the beginning of the pipe. Water Research, 72: 75–126
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.12.042 pmid: 25600206
13 M H Hsu, C J Tsai, A Y C Lin (2019). Mechanism and pathways underlying the self-sensitized photodegradation of methotrexate under simulated solar irradiation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 373: 468–475
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.03.095 pmid: 30939429
14 L Hu, H M Martin, O Arce-Bulted, M N Sugihara, K A Keating, T I Strathmann (2009). Oxidation of carbamazepine by Mn(VII) and Fe(VI): Reaction kinetics and mechanism. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(2): 509–515
https://doi.org/10.1021/es8023513 pmid: 19238987
15 Z Hua, D Li, Z Wu, D Wang, Y Cui, X Huang, J Fang, T An (2021). DBP formation and toxicity alteration during UV/chlorine treatment of wastewater and the effects of ammonia and bromide. Water Research, 188: 116549
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116549 pmid: 33152588
16 T Y Jeong, M J Simpson (2019). Daphnia magna metabolic profiling as a promising water quality parameter for the biological early warning system. Water Research, 166: 115033
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.115033 pmid: 31505309
17 W Jiang, L Chen, S R Batchu, P R Gardinali, L Jasa, B Marsalek, R Zboril, D D Dionysiou, K E O’Shea, V K Sharma (2014). Oxidation of microcystin-LR by ferrate(VI): kinetics, degradation pathways, and toxicity assessments. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(20): 12164–12172
https://doi.org/10.1021/es5030355 pmid: 25215438
18 X Jiang, D Song, D Wang, R Zhang, Q Fang, H Sun, F Kong (2020). Eliminating imidacloprid and its toxicity by permanganate via highly selective partial oxidation. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 191: 110234
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110234 pmid: 32006869
19 M Jureczko, J Kalka (2020). Cytostatic pharmaceuticals as water contaminants. European Journal of Pharmacology, 866: 172816
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.172816 pmid: 31758938
20 M I Kanjal, M Muneer, A Abdelhaleem, W Chu (2020). Degradation of methotrexate by UV/peroxymonosulfate: Kinetics, effect of operational parameters and mechanism. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 28(10): 2658–2667
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2020.05.033
21 C D Kinch, K Ibhazehiebo, J H Jeong, H R Habibi, D M Kurrasch (2015). Low-dose exposure to bisphenol A and replacement bisphenol S induces precocious hypothalamic neurogenesis in embryonic zebrafish. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(5): 1475–1480
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1417731112 pmid: 25583509
22 G Laera, D Cassano, A Lopez, A Pinto, A Pollice, G Ricco, G Mascolo (2012). Removal of organics and degradation products from industrial wastewater by a membrane bioreactor integrated with ozone or UV/H2O2 treatment. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(2): 1010–1018
https://doi.org/10.1021/es202707w pmid: 22136062
23 W W P Lai, Y C Chuang, A Y C Lin (2017a). The effects and the toxicity increases caused by bicarbonate, chloride, and other water components during the UV/TiO2 degradation of oxazaphosphorine drugs. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 24(17): 14595–14604
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9005-6 pmid: 28452030
24 W W P Lai, M H Hsu, A Y C Lin (2017b). The role of bicarbonate anions in methotrexate degradation via UV/TiO2: Mechanisms, reactivity and increased toxicity. Water Research, 112: 157–166
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.01.040 pmid: 28157604
25 D Li, H Chen, H Liu, D Schlenk, J Mu, S Lacorte, G G Ying, L Xie (2021). Anticancer drugs in the aquatic ecosystem: Environmental occurrence, ecotoxicological effect and risk assessment. Environment International, 153: 106543
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106543 pmid: 33813231
26 J Li, J Jiang, S Y Pang, Y Gao, S Sun, Z Wang, P Wang, L Wang, Y Zhou (2019). Transformation of bisphenol AF and bisphenol S by permanganate in the absence/presence of iodide: Kinetics and products. Chemosphere, 217: 402–410
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.011 pmid: 30439654
27 C A Lutterbeck, E Baginska, Ê L Machado, K Kümmerer (2015a). Removal of the anti-cancer drug methotrexate from water by advanced oxidation processes: Aerobic biodegradation and toxicity studies after treatment. Chemosphere, 141: 290–296
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.07.069 pmid: 26298026
28 C A Lutterbeck, M L Wilde, E Baginska, C Leder, Ê L Machado, K Kümmerer (2015b). Degradation of 5-FU by means of advanced (photo)oxidation processes: UV/H2O2, UV/Fe2+/H2O2 and UV/TiO2-Comparison of transformation products, ready biodegradability and toxicity. Science of The Total Environment, 527-528: 232–245
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.111 pmid: 25965036
29 Y Meng, W Liu, H Fiedler, J Zhang, X Wei, X Liu, M Peng, T Zhang (2021). Fate and risk assessment of emerging contaminants in reclaimed water production processes. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 15(5): 104
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-021-1392-8
30 M Mišík, M Filipic, A Nersesyan, M Kundi, M Isidori, S Knasmueller (2019). Environmental risk assessment of widely used anticancer drugs (5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, etoposide, imatinib mesylate). Water Research, 164: 114953
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.114953 pmid: 31404901
31 S Mukherjee, D Mehta, K Dhangar, M Kumar (2021). Environmental fate, distribution and state-of-the-art removal of antineoplastic drugs: A comprehensive insight. Chemical Engineering Journal, 407: 127184
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.127184
32 I Oller, S Malato, J A Sánchez-Pérez (2011). Combination of Advanced Oxidation Processes and biological treatments for wastewater decontamination: A review. Science of the Total Environment, 409(20): 4141–4166
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.08.061 pmid: 20956012
33 A Pieczyńska, A Fiszka Borzyszkowska, A Ofiarska, E M Siedlecka (2017). Removal of cytostatic drugs by AOPs: A review of applied processes in the context of green technology. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 47(14): 1282–1335
https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2017.1370990
34 B Roig, B Marquenet, I Delpla, V Bessonneau, A Sellier, C Leder, O Thomas, R Bolek, K Kummerer (2014). Monitoring of methotrexate chlorination in water. Water Research, 57: 67–75
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.03.008 pmid: 24704904
35 P Sanabria, D Scunderlick, M L Wilde, D S Lüdtke, C Sirtori (2021). Solar photo-Fenton treatment of the anti-cancer drug anastrozole in different aqueous matrices at near-neutral pH: Transformation products identification, pathways proposal, and in silico (Q)SAR risk assessment. Science of the Total Environment, 754: 142300
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142300 pmid: 33254902
36 I W T Selderslaghs, R Blust, H E Witters (2012). Feasibility study of the zebrafish assay as an alternative method to screen for developmental toxicity and embryotoxicity using a training set of 27 compounds. Reproductive Toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.), 33(2): 142–154
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2011.08.003 pmid: 21871558
37 B Shao, H Dong, B Sun, X Guan (2019a). Role of ferrate(IV) and ferrate(V) in activating ferrate(VI) by calcium sulfite for enhanced oxidation of organic contaminants. Environmental Science & Technology, 53(2): 894–902
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b04990 pmid: 30570262
38 B Shao, J Qiao, Z Zhao, X Guan (2019b). Advances in contaminants abatement by ferrate(VI). Chinese Science Bulletin, 64: 3401–3411
39 V K Sharma, R Zboril, R S Varma (2015). Ferrates: Greener oxidants with multimodal action in water treatment technologies. Accounts of Chemical Research, 48(2): 182–191
https://doi.org/10.1021/ar5004219 pmid: 25668700
40 E M Siedlecka, A Ofiarska, A F Borzyszkowska, A Białk-Bielińska, P Stepnowski, A Pieczyńska (2018). Cytostatic drug removal using electrochemical oxidation with BDD electrode: Degradation pathway and toxicity. Water Research, 144: 235–245
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.07.035 pmid: 30032020
41 D Slade, S Eustermann (2020). Tuning drug binding. Science, 368(6486): 30–31
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb1462 pmid: 32241937
42 Y Song, J Jiang, W Qin, J Li, Y Zhou, Y Gao (2021). Enhanced transformation of organic pollutants by mild oxidants in the presence of synthetic or natural redox mediators: A review. Water Research, 189: 116667
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116667 pmid: 33271411
43 H J Sun, Y Zhang, J Y Zhang, H Lin, J Chen, H Hong (2019). The toxicity of 2,6-dichlorobenzoquinone on the early life stage of zebrafish: A survey on the endpoints at developmental toxicity, oxidative stress, genotoxicity and cytotoxicity. Environmental pollution, 245: 719–724
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.11.051 pmid: 30500751
44 S Sun, Y Gui, Y Wang, L Qian, X Liu, Q Jiang, H Song (2009). Effects of methotrexate on the developments of heart and vessel in zebrafish. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica, 41(1): 86–96
https://doi.org/10.1093/abbs/gmn010 pmid: 19129954
45 A Tkaczyk, A Bownik, J Dudka, K Kowal, B Ślaska (2021). Daphnia magna model in the toxicity assessment of pharmaceuticals: A review. Science of the Total Environment, 763: 143038
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143038 pmid: 33127157
46 A P Toolaram, K Kümmerer, M Schneider (2014). Environmental risk assessment of anti-cancer drugs and their transformation products: A focus on their genotoxicity characterization-state of knowledge and short comings. Mutation research. Reviews in mutation research, 760: 18–35
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2014.02.001 pmid: 24556194
47 D L van der Velden, L R Hoes, H van der Wijngaart, J M van Berge Henegouwen, E van Werkhoven, P Roepman, R L Schilsky, W W J de Leng, A D R Huitema, B Nuijen, P M Nederlof, C M L van Herpen, D J A de Groot, L A Devriese, A Hoeben, M J A de Jonge, M Chalabi, E F Smit, A J de Langen, N Mehra, M Labots, E Kapiteijn, S Sleijfer, E Cuppen, H M W Verheul, H Gelderblom, E E Voest (2019). The Drug Rediscovery protocol facilitates the expanded use of existing anticancer drugs. Nature, 574(7776): 127–131
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1600-x pmid: 31570881
48 S Wang, B Shao, J Qiao, X Guan (2021). Application of Fe(VI) in abating contaminants in water: State of art and knowledge gaps. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 15(5): 80
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1373-3
49 CP Wild, E Weiderpass, BW Stewart (2020). World Cancer Report: Cancer Research for Cancer Prevention. Lyon Int. Agency Research Cancer 23–33
50 A M Wormington, M De María, H G Kurita, J H Bisesi Jr, N D Denslow, C J Martyniuk (2020). Antineoplastic agents: Environmental prevalence and adverse outcomes in aquatic organisms. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 39(5): 967–985
https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.4687 pmid: 32266737
51 D Wu, F Zhang, W Lou, D Li, J Chen (2017). Chemical characterization and toxicity assessment of fine particulate matters emitted from the combustion of petrol and diesel fuels. Science of the Total Environment, 605-606: 172–179
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.058 pmid: 28666172
52 X Xu, J Chen, S Wang, J Ge, R Qu, M Feng, V K Sharma, Z Wang (2018). Degradation kinetics and transformation products of chlorophene by aqueous permanganate. Water Research, 138: 293–300
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.03.057 pmid: 29614457
53 T Yang, L Wang, Y Liu, Z Huang, H He, X Wang, J Jiang, D Gao, J Ma (2019). Comparative study on ferrate oxidation of BPS and BPAF: Kinetics, reaction mechanism, and the improvement on their biodegradability. Water Research, 148: 115–125
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.018 pmid: 30359941
54 J Yin, Y Niu, B Shao (2017). Products of methotrexate during chlorination. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 55: 100–108
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2016.06.024 pmid: 28477802
55 L Yuan, L Qian, Y Qian, J Liu, K Yang, Y Huang, C Wang, Y Li, X Mu (2019). Bisphenol F-induced neurotoxicity toward zebrafish embryos. Environmental Science & Technology, 53(24): 14638–14648
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b04097 pmid: 31702913
56 J Zhang, B Sun, X Guan (2013). Oxidative removal of bisphenol A by permanganate: Kinetics, pathways and influences of co-existing chemicals. Separation and Purification Technology, 107: 48–53
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2013.01.023
57 T Zhang, H Liu, Y Zhang, W Sun, X Ao (2020). Comparative genotoxicity of water processed by three drinking water treatment plants with different water treatment procedures. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 14(3): 39
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1214-4
58 X Zhang, M Feng, C Luo, N Nesnas, C H Huang, V K Sharma (2021). Effect of metal ions on oxidation of micropollutants by ferrate(VI): Enhancing role of FeIV species. Environmental Science & Technology, 55(1): 623–633
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c04674 pmid: 33326216
59 Q Zheng, N Wu, R Qu, G Albasher, W Cao, B Li, N Alsultan, Z Wang (2021). Kinetics and reaction pathways for the transformation of 4-tert-butylphenol by ferrate(VI). Journal of Hazardous Materials, 401: 123405
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123405 pmid: 32659589
[1] FSE-21107-OF-ZSQ_suppl_1 Download
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed