Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng.    2024, Vol. 18 Issue (9) : 106    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-024-1866-6
Synergetic pathways of water-energy-carbon in ecologically vulnerable regions aiming for carbon neutrality: a case study of Shaanxi, China
Yingying Liu1, Hanbing Li1, Sha Chen1(), Lantian Zhang1, Sumei Li1, He Lv2, Ji Gao3, Shufen Cui4, Kejun Jiang5
1. Department of Environmental Science, Key Laboratory of Beijing on Regional Air Pollution Control, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
2. China Metallurgical Industry Planning and Research Institute, Beijing 100711, China
3. Environmental Defense Fund, Beijing 100007, China
4. Department of Financial Management, Lishui University, Lishui 323000, China
5. Energy Research Institute, Beijing 100038, China
 Download: PDF(4781 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

● A WECA model evaluates water withdrawal and WEQ of typical EVRs’ transition.

● Synergetic pathways of water-energy-carbon to carbon neutrality are proposed.

● Electricity production can escalate WEQ due to industrial transition.

● Limited effects from zero-carbon transition on improving water environment quality.

Synergetic energy-water-carbon pathways are key issues to be tackled under carbon-neutral target and high-quality development worldwide, especially in ecologically vulnerable regions (EVRs). In this study, to explore the synergistic pathways in an EVR, a water-energy-carbon assessment (WECA) model was built, and the synergistic effects of water-energy-carbon were comprehensively and quantitatively analyzed under various scenarios of regional transition. Shaanxi Province was chosen as the representative EVR, and Lower challenge (LEC) and Greater challenge (GER) scenarios of zero-carbon transition were set considering the technological maturity and regional energy characteristics. The results showed that there were limited effects under the zero-carbon transition of the entire region on reducing water withdrawals and improving the water quality. In the LEC scenario, the energy demand and CO2 emissions of Shaanxi in 2060 will decrease by 70.9% and 99.4%, respectively, whereas the water withdrawal and freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity potential (FAETP) will only decrease by 8.9% and 1.6%, respectively. This could be attributed to the stronger demand for electricity in the energy demand sector caused by industrial transition measures. The GER scenario showed significant growth in water withdrawals (16.0%) and FAETP (36.0%) because of additional biomass demand. To promote the synergetic development of regional transition, EVRs should urgently promote zero-carbon technologies (especially solar and wind power technologies) between 2020 and 2060 and dry cooling technology for power generation before 2030. In particular, a cautious attitude toward the biomass energy with carbon capture and storage technology in EVRs is strongly recommended.

Keywords Carbon neutrality      Water withdrawals      Water environment quality      Ecologically vulnerable region      Typical regional transition     
Corresponding Author(s): Sha Chen   
Issue Date: 13 June 2024
 Cite this article:   
Yingying Liu,Hanbing Li,Sha Chen, et al. Synergetic pathways of water-energy-carbon in ecologically vulnerable regions aiming for carbon neutrality: a case study of Shaanxi, China[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2024, 18(9): 106.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-024-1866-6
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y2024/V18/I9/106
Fig.1  Modeling framework of the WECA model.
Fig.2  Scenarios setting (length of the color bar represents technical proportions).
Sectors Formula Notes Data sources
Agriculture WFa gr=i= 1nPOPa ni ,i×wfa ni ,i+i =1 nAreac rop,i×wfc ro p,i POPani,i: number of livestock i (unit)wfani,i: unit water withdrawal of livestock i (m3/unit)Areacrop,i: acreage of crop i (m2)wfcorp,i: unit water withdrawal of crop (m3/m2) 1) Statistical yearbooksShaanxi Statistical Yearbook (SBBS, 2021)2) Government PlanningThe 14th Five-Year Plan for Ecological and Environmental Protection (SDEE, 2021)Notice of the General Office of the State Council on the Issuance of the Most Strict Water Resources Management System (State Council, 2013)3) ReportsEIA reportsSurvey reports of the enterpriseInnovation Outlook Renewable Methanol (IRENA, 2021)Water in the energy industry (BP, 2013)4) Industry StandardsNorm of water intake for industries in Shaanxi (SXWRD, 2021)5) Eco-invent datasets v3.8 (GaBi, 2022)
Resident Life WFr es=i=1nP OP res u,i×wfr es u,i + i=1n POPr es r,i× wf re sr,i POPresu,I i: urban population (person)Wfresu,ii: per capita water withdrawal of urban residents (m3/person)POPresr,i i: rural population (person)Wfresr,ii: per capita water withdrawal of rural residents (m3/person)
Public Life WFr es=i=1nP OP car,i×wfc ar ,i+ i=1nAreas er ,i×wfs er ,i POPcar,i: number of vehicles i (unit)Wfcar,i: unit water withdrawal of vehicles i (m3/unit)Areaser,i: service area (m2)Wfser,i: water withdrawal per unit area (m3/m2)
Industry WF ind= i=1n POPi nd,i× wf in d,i POPind,i: number of industrial product i (t)Wfind,i: unit water withdrawal of product i (m3/t)
Energy transformation sectors WF ene= i=1n POPe ne,i× wf en e,i POPene,i: number of energy product i (unit)Wfene,i: unit water withdrawal of energy product i (m3/unit)
Ecosystem recharge WF env= i=1n Areae nv,i× wf en v,i POPind,i:area of Environmental greening i (m2)Wfind,i: water withdrawal per unit area (m3/m2)
Tab.1  The calculations of water withdrawal
Sectors Formula Notes Data sources
Agriculture EPa gr=i=1nj=1nP OP ani,i×epa ni ,i,j + i=1n j=1nARi,j× Areac ro p,i× α c or p,j POPani,i: number of livestock i (unit)epani,i: unit emissions of pollutant i about livestock i (kg/unit)Areacrop,i: acreage of crop i (m2)ARi,i,i: fertilizer and pesticide use in category j for crop i (kg/ m2)acorp,j,i: fertilizer and pesticide leaching rate (%) 1) Statistical yearbooksChina Environmental Statistical Yearbook (NBS, 2021)Shaanxi Statistical Yearbook (SBBS, 2021)2) ReportsEIA reportsEnterprise monitoring data3) Environmental StandardsIntegrated wastewater discharge standard of Yellow river basin in Shaanxi province (SXDEE, 2019)Manual of production and emission accounting methods and coefficients for statistical surveys of emission sources (MEE, 2021)4) Government PlanningNotice of the General Office of the State Council on the Issuance of the Most Strict Water Resources Management System (State Council, 2013)5) Eco-invent datasets v3.8 (GaBi, 2022)
Resident Life EPr es=i=1nj=1nC i,j×PO Pr esu,i×wwr es u,i + i=1n j=1nCi ,j×P OP res r,i×wwr es r,i POPresu,I i: urban population (person)wwresu,ii: Discharge per capita of urban residents (m3/person)POPresr,i i: rural populationwwresr,ii: discharge per capita of rural residents (m3/person)Ci,j: the concentration of water pollutant j in the sector i (mg/L)
Public Life EPser=i=1nj=1nC i,j×PO Pc ar,i× ww ca r,i + i=1n j=1nCi ,j×Areas er,i× ww se r,i POPcar,i: number of vehicles i (unit)wwcar,i: unit wastewater emissions of vehicles i (m3/unit)Areaser,i: service area (m2)wwser,i: wastewater emissions per unit area (m3/ m2)
Industry EP ind= i=1nj=1n Ci,j ×POP in d,i× ww in d,i POPind,i: number of industrial product i (t)wwind,i: unit wastewater emissions of product i (m3/ t)
Energy transformation sectors EP ene= i=1nj=1n Ci,j× POPe ne ,i×wwe ne ,i POPene,i: number of energy product i (unit)wwene,i: unit wastewater emissions of energy product i (m3/unit)
Tab.2  The calculations for water pollutant emissions
Synergetic criteria Indicators and weights Definition formula Notes
Energy Non-fossil energy consumption (Ri, 25%) Ri=Rr ,iRp,i Rr,i: non-fossil energy demand of region i (tce)Rp,i: total energy demand of region i (tce)
CO2 emission CO2 emission (Pi, 25%) Pi= P2020,iPj,iP2020, i P2020,i: CO2 emissions of region i in 2020 (t)Pj,i: CO2 emissions of region i in year j (t)
Water quantity Water withdrawal (Wi,25%) Wi= W2020 ,iWj,i W2020 ,i W2020,i: water withdrawal of region i in 2020 (m3)Wj,i: water withdrawal of region i in year j (m3)
Water environment Water environment impacts (Ei, 25%) Ei= E2020,iEj,iE2020, i E2020,i: environmental impacts of region i in 2020 (FAETP, kg DCB eq/kg; EP, kg phosphate eq/kg ; AP, kg SO2 eq/kg),Ej,i: environmental impacts of region i in year j (FAETP, kg DCB eq/kg; EP, kg phosphate eq/kg; AP, kg SO2 eq/kg)
Tab.3  Definition formula, hierarchy and weights for assessing synergetic effects
Fig.3  Energy demand (a) and CO2 emissions (b).
Fig.4  Water withdrawal (a) and water environmental quality (b, EP; c, AP; d, FAETP).
Fig.5  Water pollutant emissions (a, BOD; b, NH3–N; c, COD; d, oil; e, TN; f, TP; g, sulphide; h, fluoride; i, total lead; j, total mercury; k, cyanide; l, total arsenic; m, volatile phenols; n, total nickel; o, hexavalent chromium; p, total chromium).
Fig.6  The SI (a) and its specific indicators (b) under the three scenarios.
1 BP (2013). Water in the energy industry. BP. 2013. Available online at the website of bp.com (accessed March 13, 2023)
2 CEADs (2022). Carbon emission accounts and datasets. CEADs. 2022. Available online at the website of ceads.net (accessed March 25, 2023)
3 S Chen, Y Liu, J Lin, X D Shi, K J Jiang, G L Zhao. (2021a). Coordinated reduction of CO2 emissions and environmental impacts with integrated city-level LEAP and LCA method: a case study of Jinan, China. Advances in Climate Change Research, 12(6): 848–857
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2021.08.008
4 S Chen, H Lv, S Li, X Shi, K Jiang, G Zhao (2021b). Methods of comprehensive water footprint assessment for sustainable utilization of water resources. Water Resources Protection, 37(4): 22–28 (in Chinese)
5 H Duan, S Zhou, K Jiang, C Bertram, M Harmsen, E Kriegler, Vuuren D P Van, S Wang, S Fujimori, M Tavoni. et al.. (2021). Assessing China’ s efforts to pursue the 1.5 °C warming limit. Science, 372(6540): 378–385
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba8767
6 Energy Research Institute (2017). Earliest Peaking the Carbon Emission of China. Beijing: China Economic Publishing House (in Chinese)
7 J Fan, L Kong, X Zhang. (2018). Synergetic effects of water and climate policy on energy-water nexus in China: a computable general equilibrium analysis. Energy Policy, 123: 308–317
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.09.002
8 Y Feng, A Zhu. (2022). Spatiotemporal differentiation and driving patterns of water utilization intensity in Yellow River Basin of China: comprehensive perspective on the water quantity and quality. Journal of Cleaner Production, 369: 133395
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133395
9 GaBi (2022). GaBi Software. 2022. Available online at the website of gabi.sphera.com (accessed March 1, 2023)
10 A K Gain, C Giupponi, Y Wada. (2016). Measuring global water security towards sustainable development goals. Environmental Research Letters, 11(12): 124015
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/124015
11 A Gupta, M Davis, A Kumar. (2021). An integrated assessment framework for the decarbonization of the electricity generation sector. Applied Energy, 288: 116634
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116634
12 B Hu, Y Zhang, Y Li, Y Teng, W Yue (2020). Can bioenergy carbon capture and storage aggravate global water crisis? Science of the Total Environment, 714: 136856 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136856
13 K Huang, M J Eckelman. (2022). Appending material flows to the National Energy Modeling System (NEMS) for projecting the physical economy of the United States. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 26(1): 294–308
https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13053
14 IRENA (2021). Innovation Outlook Renewable Methanol. 2021. Available online at the website of irena.org (accessed March 13, 2023)
15 A I Martinez, M F Pellicer, L C Fernandez. (2018). Pharmaceutical grey water footprint: accounting, influence of wastewater treatment plants and implications of the reuse. Water Research, 135: 278–287
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.02.033
16 C Jia, P Yan, P Liu, Z Li. (2021). Energy industrial water withdrawal under different energy development scenarios: a multi-regional approach and a case study of China. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 135: 110224
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110224
17 Y Jiang, B Shi, G Su, Y Lu, Q Li, J Meng, Y Ding, S Song, L Dai. (2021). Spatiotemporal analysis of ecological vulnerability in the Tibet Autonomous Region based on a pressure-state-response-management framework. Ecological Indicators, 130: 108054
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108054
18 P Kyle, E Davies, J Dooley, S J Smith, L E Clarke, J A Edmonds, M Hejazi. (2013). Influence of climate change mitigation technology on global demands of water for electricity generation. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 17: 549–552
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.12.006
19 Leiden University (2002). The CML2001 Method. Leiden University. 2002. Available online at the website of gabi.sphera.com (accessed November 13, 2023)
20 H Li, Y Liang, Q Chen, S Liang. (2022). Pollution exacerbates interregional flows of virtual scarce water driven by energy demand in China. Water Research, 223: 118980
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118980
21 S Liang, Q Zhong. (2023). Reducing environmental impacts through socioeconomic transitions: critical review and prospects. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 17(2): 24
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-023-1624-1
22 C Lin, J Qi, S Liang, C Feng, T O Wiedmann, Y Liao, X Yang, Y Li, Z Mi, Z Yang. (2020). Saving less in China facilitates global CO2 mitigation. Nature Communications, 11: 1358
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15175-2
23 G Liu, J Hu, C Chen, L Xu, N Wang, F Meng, B F Giannetti, F Agostinho, C M V B Almeida, M Casazza. (2021). LEAP-WEAP analysis of urban energy-water dynamic nexus in Beijing (China). Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 136: 110369
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110369
24 S Liu, C Wang, L Shi, W Cai, L Zhang. (2018). Water conservation implications for decarbonizing non-electric energy supply: a hybrid life-cycle analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 219: 208–217
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.119
25 X Lu, D Tong, K He. (2023). China’s carbon neutrality: an extensive and profound systemic reform. Environmental Science & Engineering, 17(2): 14
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-023-1614-3
26 MEE (2021). Manual of production and emission accounting methods and coefficients for statistical surveys of emission sources. 2021. Available online at the website of mee.gov.cn (accessed Mar 13, 2023)
27 NBS (2021). China Statistical Yearbook on Environment 2021. Beijing: China Statistics Press (in Chinese)
28 SBBS (2021). Shaanxi Statistical Yearbook 2021. Beijing: China Statistics Press (in Chinese)
29 SDEE (2021). Implementation Programme on Strengthening Efforts to Address Climate Change and Ecological and Environmental Protection. SDEE.2021. Available online at the website of shaanxi.gov.cn (accessed November 26, 2023)
30 Shaanxi(2018). Shaanxi Province Iron hand to control haze to win the Blue Sky Battle. Shaanxi. 2018. Available online at the website of shaanxi.gov.cn (accessed March 13, 2023)
31 Shaanxi(2021a). Shaanxi Province 14th Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development and Outline of Vision 2035. Shaanxi. 2021. Available online at the website of shaanxi.gov.cn (accessed March 13, 2023)
32 Shaanxi(2021b). Shaanxi Province Comprehensive Transportation Development Plan. Shaanxi. 2021. Available online at the website of shaanxi.gov.cn (accessed March 19, 2023)
33 Shaanxi (2021c). Shaanxi Province 14th Five-Year Plan for High-Quality Development of Manufacturing Industry. 2021. Available online at the website of shaanxi.gov.cn (accessed March 19, 2023)
34 State Council (2013). Notice of the General Office of the State Council on the Issuance of the Most Strict Water Resources Management System. State Council.2013. Available online at the website of shaanxi.gov.cn (accessed April 16, 2023)
35 SXDEE (2019). Integrated wastewater discharge standard of Yellow river basin in Shaanxi province. SXDEE. 2021. Available online at the website of sthjj.shangluo.gov.cn (accessed March 13, 2023)
36 SXWRD (2021). Norm of water intake for industries in Shaanxi. Shaanxi. 2021. Available online at the website of slt.shaanxi.gov.cn(accessed March 13, 2023)
37 J Teng, Y Deng, X Zhou, W Yang, Z Huang, H Zhang, M Zhang, H Lin. (2023). A critical review on thermodynamic mechanisms of membrane fouling in membrane-based water treatment process. Environmental Science & Engineering, 17(10): 129
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-023-1729-6
38 The State Council (2023). Planning of Major Function Regions Zoning. The State Council. 2023. Available online at shaanxi.gov.cn (accessed August 15, 2023)
39 Tsinghua University (2019). Annual development report of building energy efficiency in China. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press (in Chinese)
40 D Wang, D Xu, N Zhou, Y Cheng. (2022). The asymmetric relationship between sustainable innovation and industrial transformation and upgrading: evidence from China’s provincial panel data. Journal of Cleaner Production, 378: 134453
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134453
41 S Wang, C Shi, C Fang, K S Feng. (2019). Examining the spatial variations of determinants of energy-related CO2 emissions in China at the city level using Geographically Weighted Regression Model. Applied Energy, 235: 95–105
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.083
42 X Xie, X Jiang, T Zhang, Z Huang. (2020). Study on impact of electricity production on regional water resource in China by water footprint. Renewable Energy, 152: 165–178
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.01.025
43 Y Xie, Z Hou, H Liu, C Cao, J Qi. (2021). The sustainability assessment of CO2 capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) and the conversion of cropland to forestland program (CCFP) in the Water–Energy–Food (WEF) framework towards China’s carbon neutrality by 2060. Environmental Earth Sciences, 80(14): 468
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09762-9
44 Y Zhou, Y Kong, J Sha, H Wang. (2019). The role of industrial structure upgrades in eco-efficiency evolution: spatial correlation and spillover effects. Science of the Total Environment, 687: 1327–1336
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.182
[1] FSE-24042-OF-LYY_suppl_1 Download
[1] Xi Lu, Dan Tong, Kebin He. China’s carbon neutrality: an extensive and profound systemic reform[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(2): 14-.
[2] Xianlai Zeng. Win-Win: Anthropogenic circularity for metal criticality and carbon neutrality[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(2): 23-.
[3] Hong Yang, Xianjin Huang, Jianlin Hu, Julian R. Thompson, Roger J. Flower. Achievements, challenges and global implications of China’s carbon neutral pledge[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(8): 111-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed