Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng.    2022, Vol. 16 Issue (9) : 116    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-022-1548-1
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Water-dispersible nano-pollutions reshape microbial metabolism in type-specific manners: A metabolic and bacteriological investigation in Escherichia coli
Shuqin Liu1, Rui Wu1, Xi Yang1, Shuting Fang1, Zhangmin Xiang1(), Shenghong Yang2(), Gangfeng Ouyang1,3
1. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Chemical Measurement and Emergency Test Technology, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Research Center for Ambient Mass Spectrometry, Institute of Analysis, Guangdong Academy of Sciences (China National Analytical Center Guangzhou), Guangzhou 510070, China
2. Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Molecular Engineering, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250353, China
3. KLGHEI of Environment and Energy Chemistry, School of Chemistry, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
 Download: PDF(1904 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

• Water-dispersible nano-pollutions exhibit type-specific toxic effects on E. coli.

• Global metabolite profiling was used to characterize metabolic disruption patterns.

• Key dysregulated metabolites responsive to nano-pollution exposures were found.

• Amino acid metabolism and purine metabolism are perturbed at nano-pollutions.

Incomplete separation and recycling of nanoparticles are causing undesirable nanopollution and thus raising great concerns with regard to nanosafety. Since microorganisms are important regulator of physiological processes in many organisms, the interaction between nanopollution and microbial metabolomics and the resultant impact on the host’s health are important but unclear. To investigate how typical nanopollution perturbs microbial growth and metabolism, Escherichia coli (E. coli) in vitro was treated with six water-dispersible nanomaterials (nanoplastic, nanosilver, nano-TiO2, nano-ZnO, semiconductor quantum dots (QDs), carbon dots (CDs)) at human-/environment-relevant concentration levels. The nanomaterials exhibited type-specific toxic effects on E. coli growth. Global metabolite profiling was used to characterize metabolic disruption patterns in the model microorganism exposed to different nanopollutants. The percentage of significant metabolites (p<0.05, VIP>1) accounted for 6%–38% of the total 293 identified metabolites in each of the nanomaterial-contaminated bacterial groups. Metabolic results also exhibited significant differences between different nanopollutants and dose levels, revealing type-specific and untypical concentration-dependent metabolic responses. Key metabolites responsive to nanopollution exposures were mainly involved in amino acid and purine metabolisms, where 5, 4, and 7 significant metabolic features were included in arginine and proline metabolism, phenylalanine metabolism, and purine metabolism, respectively. In conclusion, this study horizontally compared and demonstrated how typical nanopollution perturbs microbial growth and metabolomics in a type-specific manner, which broadens our understanding of the ecotoxicity of nanopollutants on microorganisms.

Keywords Nano-toxicity      Nano-plastics      Quantum dots      Microbial metabolite      Metabolic dysregulation     
Corresponding Author(s): Zhangmin Xiang,Shenghong Yang   
About author:

Tongcan Cui and Yizhe Hou contributed equally to this work.

Issue Date: 14 February 2022
 Cite this article:   
Shuqin Liu,Rui Wu,Xi Yang, et al. Water-dispersible nano-pollutions reshape microbial metabolism in type-specific manners: A metabolic and bacteriological investigation in Escherichia coli[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(9): 116.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-022-1548-1
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y2022/V16/I9/116
Fig.1  Growth curves of E. coli after exposure to six nanopollutants at different doses. All error bars represent the SD determined from eight independent assays. SD, standard deviation. Growth curves of E. coli after exposure to (a) PS nanoplastics; (b) nano-Ag; (c) nano-TiO2; (d) nano-ZnO; (e) CDs; and (f) QDs.
Fig.2  TEM images of E. coli after exposure to six nanopollutants at different doses. PS-L, Ag-L, TiO2-L, ZnO-L, CDs-L, and QDs-L represent microbial groups cultured with each nanomaterial at a low dose (1 mg/L), while PS-H, Ag-H, TiO2-H, ZnO-H, CDs-H, and QDs-H represent microbial groups cultured with each nanomaterial at a high dose (20 mg/L).
Fig.3  Zeta potentials of six investigated nanomaterials in the TSB culture medium from 0 h to 30 h.
Fig.4  Up- and downregulated significant metabolic features (p<0.05, VIP>1, |log2 fold-change|>1) detected by global metabolomic profiling of Escherichia coli after exposure to different nanopollutants (the percentage was calculated based on the total detected metabolic feature numbers for each condition). PS-L, Ag-L, TiO2-L, ZnO-L, CDs-L, and QDs-L represent microbial groups cultured with each nanomaterial at a low dose (1 mg/L), while PS-H, Ag-H, TiO2-H, ZnO-H, CDs-H, and QDs-H represent microbial groups cultured with each nanomaterial at a high dose (20 mg/L).
Fig.5  Classic Venn diagram summarizing the number of shared and distinct metabolic features of E. after exposure to six nanomaterials at a (a) low and a (b) high dose. PS-L, Ag-L, TiO2-L, ZnO-L, CDs-L, and QDs-L represent microbial groups cultured with each nanomaterial at a low dose (1 mg/L), while PS-H, Ag-H, TiO2-H, ZnO-H, CDs-H, and QDs-H represent microbial groups cultured with each nanomaterial at a high dose (20 mg/L).
Fig.6  Pathway impact analysis of significant metabolic pathways in E. coli after high-dose nanomaterial exposure. Data analysis was conducted using the open source platform MetaboAnalyst. Significant metabolites (p<0.05, VIP>1) of each exposure group were used for pathway analysis. The size of the bubble implies the pathway impact, and the color intensity indicates the significance of the impact. Pathway impact analysis of significant metabolic pathways in Escherichia coli after exposure to (a) PS nanoplastics; (b) nano-Ag; (c) nano-TiO2; (d) nano-ZnO; (e) CDs; and (f) QDs.
Fig.7  Metabolites involved in arginine and proline metabolism in E. coli. The values in red are fold-changes of metabolites (*p<0.05). NS means the metabolite in the contaminated E. coli is not significant (p>0.05) compared with the control group. Metabolites in gray are undetected compounds.
1 N S Ahmad, N Abdullah, F M Yasin (2020). Toxicity assessment of reduced graphene oxide and titanium dioxide nanomaterials on gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria under normal laboratory lighting condition. Toxicology Reports, 7: 693–699
2 R C Castro, D S M Ribeiro, J L M Santos (2021). Visual detection using quantum dots sensing platforms. Coordination Chemistry Reviews, 429: 213637
3 R K Choudhary, S Choudhary, D Pathak, R Udehiya, R Verma, S Kaswan, A Sharma, D Gupta, M Honparkhe, A V Capuco (2018a). Evaluation of xanthosine treatment on gene expression of mammary glands in early lactating goats. Journal of Dairy Research, 85(3): 288–294
4 S Choudhary, W Li, D Bickhart, R Verma, R S Sethi, C S Mukhopadhyay, R K Choudhary (2018b). Examination of the xanthosine response on gene expression of mammary epithelial cells using RNA-seq technology. Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 60(1): 18
5 M J D Clift, G J S Jenkins, S H Doak (2020). An alternative perspective towards reducing the risk of engineered nanomaterials to human health. Small, 16(36): 2002002
6 K D Cox, G A Covernton, H L Davies, J F Dower, F Juanes, S E Dudas (2019). Human consumption of microplastics. Environmental Science & Technology, 53(12): 7068–7074
7 B Daignan-Fornier, B Pinson (2019). Yeast to study human purine metabolism diseases. Cells, 8(1): 67
8 I Y Goryacheva, A V Sapelkin, G B Sukhorukov (2017). Carbon nanodots: Mechanisms of photoluminescence and principles of application. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 90: 27–37
9 M F Horst, V Lassalle, M L Ferreira (2015). Nanosized magnetite in low cost materials for remediation of water polluted with toxic metals, azo- and antraquinonic dyes. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 9(5): 746–769
10 X Hu, Y Li, Y Xu, Z Gan, X Zou, J Shi, X Huang, Z Li, Y Li (2021). Green one-step synthesis of carbon quantum dots from orange peel for fluorescent detection of Escherichia coli in milk. Food Chemistry, 339: 127775
11 R Jalili, A Khataee (2020). Application of molecularly imprinted polymers and dual-emission carbon dots hybrid for ratiometric determination of chloramphenicol in milk. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 146: 111806
12 Q Ji, C Zhang, D Li (2020). Influences and mechanisms of nanofullerene on the horizontal transfer of plasmid-encoded antibiotic resistance genes between E. coli strains. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 14(6): 108
13 B Jia, X Liao, C Sun, L Fang, L Zhou, W Kong (2021). Development of a quantum dot nanobead-based fluorescent strip immunosensor for on-site detection of aflatoxin B1 in lotus seeds. Food Chemistry, 356: 129614
14 J I Joo, M Choi, S H Jang, S Choi, S M Park, D Shin, K H Cho (2020). Realizing cancer precision medicine by integrating systems biology and nanomaterial engineering. Advanced Materials, 32(35): 1906783
15 A Kaphle, P N Navya, A Umapathi, H K Daima (2018). Nanomaterials for agriculture, food and environment: applications, toxicity and regulation. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 16(1): 43–58
16 T P Keerthisinghe, M Wang, Y Zhang, W Dong, M Fang (2019). Low-dose tetracycline exposure alters gut bacterial metabolism and host-immune response: “Personalized” effect? Environment International, 131: 104989
17 A G Levine (2014). Biosystems nanotechnology: Big opportunities in the science of the small. Science, 346(6211): 870
18 W Lin, R Jiang, S Hu, X Xiao, J Wu, S Wei, Y Xiong, G Ouyang (2019a). Investigating the toxicities of different functionalized polystyrene nanoplastics on Daphnia magna. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 180: 509–516
19 W Lin, R Jiang, Y Xiong, J Wu, J Xu, J Zheng, F Zhu, G Ouyang (2019b). Quantification of the combined toxic effect of polychlorinated biphenyls and nano-sized polystyrene on Daphnia magna. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 364: 531–536
20 S Liu, S Fang, Y Huang, Z Xiang, G Ouyang (2020). A heterogeneous pore decoration strategy on a hydrophobic microporous polymer for high-coverage capture of metabolites. Chemical Communications, 56(52): 7167–7170
21 S Liu, S Fang, Z Xiang, X Chen, Y Song, C Chen, G Ouyang (2021). Combined effect of microplastics and DDT on microbial growth: A bacteriological and metabolomics investigation in Escherichia coli. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 407: 124849
22 Y Liu, P Bhattarai, Z Dai, X Chen (2019). Photothermal therapy and photoacoustic imaging via nanotheranostics in fighting cancer. Chemical Society Reviews, 48(7): 2053–2108
23 J Ma, G D Sheng, Q L Chen, P O’Connor (2020). Do combined nanoscale polystyrene and tetracycline impact on the incidence of resistance genes and microbial community disturbance in Enchytraeus crypticus? Journal of Hazardous Materials, 387: 122012
24 J C Montet, L Salmon, F X Caroli-Bosc, J F Demarquay, A M Montet, J P Delmont (2000). L-arginine infusion protects against hyperammonemia and hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhotic patients with variceal haemorrhage. Gastroenterology, 118(4): A978
25 S Mura, G Seddaiu, F Bacchini, P P Roggero, G F Greppi (2013). Advances of nanotechnology in agro-environmental studies. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 8(3): 18
26 U M Musazzi, S Franzè, P Minghetti, A Casiraghi (2018). Emulsion versus nanoemulsion: How much is the formulative shift critical for a cosmetic product? Drug Delivery and Translational Research, 8(2): 414–421
27 T Parsai, A Kumar (2020). Tradeoff between risks through ingestion of nanoparticle contaminated water or fish: Human health perspective. Science of the Total Environment, 740: 140140
28 S Ranjan, N Dasgupta, S Singh, M Gandhi (2019). Toxicity and regulations of food nanomaterials. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 17(2): 929–944
29 M C Rillig, A Lehmann (2020). Microplastic in terrestrial ecosystems. Science, 368(6498): 1430–1431
30 B S Sekhon (2010). Food nanotechnology: An overview. Nanotechnology, Science and Applications, 3: 1–15
31 R Trevisan, C Voy, S Chen, R T Di Giulio (2019). Nanoplastics decrease the toxicity of a complex PAH mixture but impair mitochondrial energy production in developing zebrafish. Environmental Science & Technology, 53(14): 8405–8415
32 M van der Zande, A Jemec Kokalj, D J Spurgeon, S Loureiro, P V Silva, Z Khodaparast, D Drobne, N J Clark, N W van den Brink, M Baccaro, C A M van Gestel, H Bouwmeester, R D Handy (2020). The gut barrier and the fate of engineered nanomaterials: A view from comparative physiology. Environmental Science. Nano, 7(7): 1874–1898
33 A Weir, P Westerhoff, L Fabricius, K Hristovski, N von Goetz (2012). Titanium dioxide nanoparticles in food and personal care products. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(4): 2242–2250
34 W Yuan, Y Wei, Y Zhang, L Riaz, Q Yang, Q Wang, R Wang (2021). Resistance of multidrug resistant Escherichia coli to environmental nanoscale TiO2 and ZnO. Science of the Total Environment, 761: 144303
35 Y Zhang, T P Keerthisinghe, Y Han, M Liu, E R Wanjaya, M Fang (2018). “Cocktail” of xenobiotics at human relevant levels reshapes the gut bacterial metabolome in a species-specific manner. Environmental Science & Technology, 52(19): 11402–11410
36 Z Zhang, R Zhang, H Xiao, K Bhattacharya, D Bitounis, P Demokritou, D J McClements (2019). Development of a standardized food model for studying the impact of food matrix effects on the gastrointestinal fate and toxicity of ingested nanomaterials. NanoImpact, 13: 13–25
37 J Zhou, L Rao, G Yu, T R Cook, X Chen, F Huang (2021). Supramolecular cancer nanotheranostics. Chemical Society Reviews, 50(4): 2839–2891
[1] FSE-21131-OF-LSQ_suppl_1 Download
[1] Ling-Li Li, Yin-Hua Cui, Jie-Jie Chen, Han-Qing Yu. Roles of glutathione and L-cysteine in the biomimetic green synthesis of CdSe quantum dots[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2017, 11(6): 7-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed