Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng.    2024, Vol. 18 Issue (9) : 112    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-024-1872-8
Unraveling the role of formate in improving nitrogen removal via coupled partial denitrification-anammox
Wanlu Zhu1, Rui Xiao2(), Min Xu1, Wenbo Chai1, Wenlong Liu3, Zhengyu Jin4, David Ikumi5, Huijie Lu1,6()
1. Key Laboratory of Environmental Remediation and Ecological Health (Ministry of Education), College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
2. China National Nuclear Corporation, Beijing Research Institute of Chemical Engineering and Metallurgy, Beijing 100029, China
3. College of Environment, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China
4. Key Laboratory of Ecology and Environment in Minority Areas, National Ethnic Affairs Commission, College of Life & Environmental Sciences, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China
5. Water Research Group, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7700, South Africa
6. Key Laboratory of Water Pollution Control and Environmental Safety, Hangzhou 310058, China
 Download: PDF(2702 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

● Formate addition led to more abundant and active anammox bacteria in community.

● FISH–NanoSIMS identified Ca. Brocadia and Desulfobacillus as main formate utilizers.

● Anammox bacteria were key players in formate uptake and partial denitrification.

● Formate was assimilated by Ca. Brocadia via the Wood–Ljungdahl and rGly pathways.

Desulfobacillus could provide necessities e.g., folate to support Ca. Brocadia growth.

The addition of traditional carbon sources (e.g., acetate) could favor heterotrophic overgrowth in partial denitrification coupled with anammox (PD–A) systems, thus hindering the performance and stability of this novel wastewater nitrogen removal technology. Therefore, it is necessary to develop an effective, environmentally friendly, and inexpensive alternative. This study demonstrated the potential of formate to enhance the performance and community stability of PD–A under mainstream conditions. In a laboratory-scale biofilm reactor, formate addition (COD/NO3–N = 1.75) improved nitrogen removal efficiency (from 72.1 ± 3.5% to 81.7 ± 2.7%), EPS content (from 106.3 ± 8.1 to 163.0 ± 15.5 mg/gVSS) and increased anammox bacteria growth (predominantly Candidatus Brocadia, from 29.5 ± 0.7% to 34.5 ± 5.4%) while maintaining stable heterotrophs dominated by methylotrophic Desulfobacillus. FISH–NanoSIMS revealed a formate uptake using Ca. Brocadia and Desulfobacillus, with Ca. Brocadia being the major contributor to partial nitrate reduction to nitrite. Desulfobacillus can synthesize diverse hydrophobic amino acids and provide key nutrients for Ca. Brocadia. To achieve comparable nitrogen removal, the cost of the formate-driven PD–A process should be 11.2% lower than that of acetate. These results greatly enrich our understanding of C1 metabolism represented by formate in anammox communities and its application in the context of coupling partial denitrification–anammox toward enhanced nitrogen removal in global wastewater treatment systems.

Keywords Formate      Mixotrophic growth      Partial denitrification-anammox      Metabolic interaction      FISH–NanoSIMS     
Corresponding Author(s): Rui Xiao,Huijie Lu   
Issue Date: 14 August 2024
 Cite this article:   
Wanlu Zhu,Rui Xiao,Min Xu, et al. Unraveling the role of formate in improving nitrogen removal via coupled partial denitrification-anammox[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2024, 18(9): 112.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-024-1872-8
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y2024/V18/I9/112
Fig.1  (a) Performance of the laboratory-scale MBBR in two phases; (b) SAA, SDA, and EPS content of biofilm samples in two phases. Error bars represent standard deviations from biological triplicate.
Fig.2  Abundances of the top 10 populations in the biofilm community in Phase I (Day 60) and II (Day 90 and Day 150). Bubble size and number denote the relative abundance (%) of populations as calculated based on metagenomic data. Bubble color indicates functional classifications. Taxonomy is assigned at the lowest level possible. The three columns at each time point represent biological replicates.
Carbon source Influent N (mg /L) Influent COD/N TN removal (%) Main AnAOB (%) Main heterotrophs (%) Reference
NH4+–N NO3–N
Formate 20.0 20.0 1.75 81.7 Ca. Brocadia, 34.5 Desulfobacillus, 8.5 This study
Acetate 49.9 52.6 2.8–4.0 81.9 Ca. Brocadia, 1.6–7.8 Thaurea, 9.5–43.6 Zhang et al. (2022b)
Acetate 27.6 28.6 2.9 84.9 Ca. Brocadia, 1 Thaurea, 1.2 Zhang et al. (2022b)
Acetate 45.9 62.2 2.25–2.5 90.0 Ca.Brocadia, 1.08 Thaurea, 32.49 Su et al. (2023)
Acetate 40.0 3.0 80.0 Ca. Brocadia, 0.85 Denitratisoma, 5.47;Thauera, 1.60 Lu et al. (2021)
Methanol 5.1 7.0 7.0 81.0 Fofana et al. (2023)
Ethanol 48.38 51.68 3.0 85.2 Ca. Kuenenia, 2.02 Thaurea, 45.17 Du et al. (2017)
Glycerol 60.0 60.0 2.0 76.6 Ca. Jettenia, 2.2 Saccharimonadales_norank, 36.3 Xue et al. (2022)
Glycerol 5.3 7.0 7.5 82.0 Fofana et al. (2023)
Tab.1  Comparisons of different carbon sources for PD–A under mainstream conditions
Fig.3  FISH–NanoSIMS images indicating 13C–formate and 15N–nitrate uptake by AnAOB, Desulfobacillus, and other bacteria at the single-cell level. (a) Representative FISH images of samples collected at t = 0, 10, 20, and 30 h of incubation (left column). Red: AnAOB (probe: Amx568), Blue: Desulfobacillus (probe: PRO405). Small squares denote AnAOB–enriched regions that are enlarged in the NanoSIMS images (right columns). Scale bar: 2 μm; Color bar: carbon isotope ratios (13C/12C), nitrogen isotope ratios (15N/14N) and 12C counts for AnAOB. (b) Correlations between 13C atom% and 15N atom% for AnAOB, Desulfobacillus, and other bacteria. Error bars indicate standard deviations from multiple single–cell scans. Symbol colors represent samples collected at t = 0 (light), 10, 20, and 30h (dark).
Fig.4  (a) Relative abundances of the nitrogen metabolic genes narG, nirS, and hzo and the anammox 16S rRNA gene in the two phases (Day 60 and Day 90); (b) Relative expression levels of the nitrogen metabolic genes narG, nirS, and hzo and the anammox 16S rRNA gene. Error bars represent standard deviations of biological triplicates according to RT–qPCR assays. Statistically significant differences between the two phases are indicated by * p < 0.05. (c) Relative expression levels of the nitrate reductase genes narG and napA in the top 8 bacterial groups (Day 150).
Fig.5  Expression levels of biosynthesis pathways of the selected amino acids (blue) and cofactors (orange) in the top 10 abundant populations (Phase II, Day 150). Detailed information of key genes involved in amino acid biosynthesis pathways can be found in Table S3. TPM values were calculated based on the metatranscriptomic data. Lines inside circles indicate absent or incomplete synthetic pathways.
Fig.6  Key metabolic pathways, gene expression, and metabolic exchanges between Ca. Brocadia and Desulfobacillus. Pathway color codes: yellow, Wood–Ljungdahl pathway in Ca. Brocadia; blue, rGly pathway in Ca. Brocadia; orange, roTCA cycle in Desulfobacillus; purple, CBB cycle in Desulfobacillus. Expression levels (log2 TPM) of key genes were visualized as colored dots placed adjacent to the gene names (averaged for biological triplicates).
1 A S Agarwal, Y Zhai, D Hill, N Sridhar. (2011). Corrigendum: the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to formate/formic acid: engineering and economic feasibility. ChemSusChem, 4(12): 1705
https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201100752
2 H E Al-Hazmi, D Grubba, J Majtacz, A Ziembińska-Buczyńska, J Zhai, J Mąkinia. (2023a). Combined partial denitrification/anammox process for nitrogen removal in wastewater treatment. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 11(1): 108978
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.108978
3 H E Al-Hazmi, G K Hassan, M Maktabifard, D Grubba, J Majtacz, J Mąkinia. (2022). Integrating conventional nitrogen removal with anammox in wastewater treatment systems: microbial metabolism, sustainability and challenges. Environmental Research, 215: 114432
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114432
4 H E Al-Hazmi, X Lu, D Grubba, J Majtacz, M Badawi, J Mąkinia. (2023b). Sustainable nitrogen removal in anammox–mediated systems: microbial metabolic pathways, operational conditions and mathematical modelling. Science of the Total Environment, 868: 161633
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161633
5 H E Al-Hazmi, X Lu, J Majtacz, P Kowal, L Xie, J Makinia. (2021). Optimization of the aeration strategies in a deammonification sequencing batch reactor for efficient nitrogen removal and mitigation of N2O production. Environmental Science & Technology, 55(2): 1218–1230
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c04229
6 S Bachleitner, Ö Ata, D Mattanovich. (2023). The potential of CO2-based production cycles in biotechnology to fight the climate crisis. Nature Communications, 14(1): 6978
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467–023–42790–6
7 L Calzadiaz-Ramirez, A S Meyer. (2022). Formate dehydrogenases for CO2 utilization. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 73: 95–100
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2021.07.011
8 Y Cao, M C M van Loosdrecht, G T Daigger. (2017). Mainstream partial nitritation-anammox in municipal wastewater treatment: status, bottlenecks, and further studies. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 101(4): 1365–1383
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253–016–8058–7
9 C Chen, F Sun, H Zhang, J Wang, Y Shen, X Liang. (2016). Evaluation of COD effect on anammox process and microbial communities in the anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR). Bioresource Technology, 216: 571–578
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.115
10 G Chen, L Lin, Y Wang, Z Zhang, W Cao, Y Zhang. (2023). Unveiling the interaction mechanisms of key functional microorganisms in the partial denitrification-anammox process induced by COD. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 17(8): 103
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783–023–1703–3
11 H Chen, Z Tu, S Wu, G Yu, C Du, H Wang, E Yang, L Zhou, B Deng, D Wang. et al.. (2021). Recent advances in partial denitrification-anaerobic ammonium oxidation process for mainstream municipal wastewater treatment. Chemosphere, 278: 130436
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130436
12 Z Chen, Y Meng, B Sheng, Z Zhou, C Jin, F Meng. (2019). Linking exoproteome function and structure to anammox biofilm development. Environmental Science & Technology, 53(3): 1490–1500
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b04397
13 A Dietl, T R M Barends. (2022). Dynamics in an unusual acyl carrier protein from a ladderane lipid-synthesizing organism. Proteins, 90(1): 73–82
https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.26187
14 N Dong, Z Zeng, M Russenberger, L Zhou, W Q Zhuang. (2024). Investigating cake layer development and functional genes in formate- and acetate-driven heterotrophic denitrifying AnMBRs. Chemical Engineering Journal, 485: 149623
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.149623
15 R Du, S Cao, B Li, M Niu, S Wang, Y Peng (2020). Corrigendum to “Performance and microbial community analysis of a novel DEAMOX based on partial-denitrification and anammox treating ammonia and nitrate wastewaters” Water Research, 173: 115659
16 R Fofana, M Parsons, M Bachmann, K Jones, Vela J Delgado, B Akyon, W Liu, S Klaus, C deBarbadillo, C Bott. et al.. (2023). Robustness of partial denitrification–anammox (PdNA) in filters with methanol and glycerol as carbon sources. Environmental Science. Water Research & Technology, 9(4): 1124–1136
https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EW00360K
17 R Gao, Y Peng, J Li, R Du, L Yang, M Wang, L Deng. (2021). Nitrogen removal from low COD/TIN real municipal sewage by coupling partial denitrification with anammox in mainstream. Chemical Engineering Journal, 410: 128221
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.128221
18 D Grubba, Z Yin, J Majtacz, H E Al-Hazmi, J Mąkinia. (2022). Incorporation of the sulfur cycle in sustainable nitrogen removal systems: a review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 372: 133495
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133495
19 Y Guo, Z Luo, J Shen, Y Li. (2022). The main anammox-based processes, the involved microbes and the novel process concept from the application perspective. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 16(7): 84
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-021-1487-1
20 A Kallistova, Y Nikolaev, V Grachev, A Beletsky, E Gruzdev, V Kadnikov, A Dorofeev, J Berestovskaya, A Pelevina, I Zekker. et al.. (2022). New insight into the interspecies shift of anammox bacteria Ca. “Brocadia” and Ca. “Jettenia” in reactors fed with formate and folate. Frontiers in Microbiology, 12: 802201
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.802201
21 B Kartal, J G Kuenen, M C M van Loosdrecht. (2010). Sewage treatment with anammox. Science, 328(5979): 702–703
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185941
22 B Kartal, M M M Kuypers, G Lavik, J Schalk, H J M Op den Camp, M S M Jetten, M Strous. (2007). Anammox bacteria disguised as denitrifiers: nitrate reduction to dinitrogen gas via nitrite and ammonium. Environmental Microbiology, 9(3): 635–642
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462–2920.2006.01183.x
23 C E Lawson, G H L Nuijten, Graaf R M de, T B Jacobson, M Pabst, D M Stevenson, M S M Jetten, D R Noguera, K D McMahon, D Amador–Noguez. et al.. (2021). Autotrophic and mixotrophic metabolism of an anammox bacterium revealed by in vivo 13C and 2H metabolic network mapping. ISME Journal, 15(3): 673–687
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396–020–00805–w
24 C E Lawson, S Wu, A S Bhattacharjee, J J Hamilton, K D McMahon, R Goel, D R Noguera. (2017). Metabolic network analysis reveals microbial community interactions in anammox granules. Nature Communications, 8(1): 15416
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15416
25 C Lechene, F Hillion, G McMahon, D Benson, A M Kleinfeld, J P Kampf, D Distel, Y Luyten, J Bonventre, D Hentschel. et al.. (2006). High-resolution quantitative imaging of mammalian and bacterial cells using stable isotope mass spectrometry. Journal of Biology, 5(6): 20
https://doi.org/10.1186/jbiol42
26 Y Li, Z Huang, W Ruan, H Ren, M Zhao. (2015). Anammox performance, granulation, and microbial response under COD disturbance. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 90(1): 139–148
https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4298
27 W Lu, Y Zhang, Q Wang, Y Wei, Y Bu, B Ma. (2021). Achieving advanced nitrogen removal in a novel partial denitrification/anammox–nitrifying (PDA–N) biofilter process treating low C/N ratio municipal wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 340: 125661
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125661
28 B Ma, W Qian, C Yuan, Z Yuan, Y Peng. (2017). Achieving mainstream nitrogen removal through coupling anammox with denitratation. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(15): 8405–8413
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01866
29 W J Ma, G F Li, B C Huang, R C Jin. (2020). Advances and challenges of mainstream nitrogen removal from municipal wastewater with anammox-based processes. Water Environment Research, 92(11): 1899–1909
https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.1342
30 M Maktabifard, H E Al-Hazmi, P Szulc, M Mousavizadegan, X Xu, E Zaborowska, X Li, J Mąkinia. (2023). Net-zero carbon condition in wastewater treatment plants: a systematic review of mitigation strategies and challenges. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 185: 113638
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113638
31 T Okubo, H Takami. (2021). Metabolic potential of the imperfect denitrifier Candidatus Desulfobacillus denitrificans in an anammox bioreactor. MicrobiologyOpen, 10(4): e1227
https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.1227
32 C Pan, L Guo, Y Yu, W Li, D Xu, W Chen, L Zhu, B Hu, P Zheng, M Zhang. (2023a). Enhanced resuscitation of anammox granular sludge by adding folate: a perspective from the growth factor. Chemical Engineering Journal, 478: 147470
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.147470
33 Y Pan, R Z Sun, Y Wang, G L Chen, Y Y Fu, H Q Yu. (2023b). Carbon source shaped microbial ecology, metabolism and performance in denitrification systems. Water Research, 243: 120330
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2023.120330
34 M F Romine, D A Rodionov, Y Maezato, L N Anderson, P Nandhikonda, I A Rodionova, A Carre, X Li, C Xu, T R W Clauss. et al.. (2017). Elucidation of roles for vitamin B12 in regulation of folate, ubiquinone, and methionine metabolism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(7): E1205–E1214
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1612360114
35 M Sakarika, P Candry, M Depoortere, R Ganigué, K Rabaey. (2020). Impact of substrate and growth conditions on microbial protein production and composition. Bioresource Technology, 317: 124021
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124021
36 R L Smith, D N Miller, M H Brooks, M A Widdowson, M W Killingstad. (2001). In situ stimulation of groundwater denitrification with formate to remediate nitrate contamination. Environmental Science & Technology, 35(1): 196–203
https://doi.org/10.1021/es001360p
37 L Steffens, E Pettinato, T M Steiner, A Mall, S König, W Eisenreich, I A Berg. (2021). High CO2 levels drive the TCA cycle backwards towards autotrophy. Nature, 592(7856): 784–788
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586–021–03456–9
38 T O Strohm, B Griffin, W G Zumft, B Schink. (2007). Growth yields in bacterial denitrification and nitrate ammonification. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 73(5): 1420–1424
https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02508–06
39 M Strous, J J Heijnen, J G Kuenen, M S M Jetten. (1998). The sequencing batch reactor as a powerful tool for the study of slowly growing anaerobic ammonium–oxidizing microorganisms. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 50(5): 589–596
https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530051340
40 M Strous, E Pelletier, S Mangenot, T Rattei, A Lehner, M W Taylor, M Horn, H Daims, D Bartol-Mavel, P Wincker. et al.. (2006). Deciphering the evolution and metabolism of an anammox bacterium from a community genome. Nature, 440(7085): 790–794
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04647
41 Y Su, Y Peng, J Wang, Q Zhang, X Li, S Wang, X Xue, R Du. (2023). Rapid enrichment of anammox bacteria and transformation to partial denitrification/anammox with nitrification/denitrification sludge. Science of the Total Environment, 856: 158973
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158973
42 Y Sun, Y Guan, H Wang, G Wu. (2019). Autotrophic nitrogen removal in combined nitritation and anammox systems through intermittent aeration and possible microbial interactions by quorum sensing analysis. Bioresource Technology, 272: 146–155
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.10.017
43 C J Tang, P Zheng, L Y Chai, X B Min. (2013). Thermodynamic and kinetic investigation of anaerobic bioprocesses on anammox under high organic conditions. Chemical Engineering Journal, 230: 149–157
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.06.047
44 Y Tao, X Huang, D Gao, X Wang, C Chen, H Liang, M C M van Loosdrecht. (2019). NanoSIMS reveals unusual enrichment of acetate and propionate by an anammox consortium dominated by Jettenia asiatica. Water Research, 159: 223–232
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.05.006
45 L van Niftrik, M S M Jetten. (2012). Anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing bacteria: unique microorganisms with exceptional properties. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 76(3): 585–596
https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.05025–11
46 R Xiao, B J Ni, S Liu, H Lu. (2021). Impacts of organics on the microbial ecology of wastewater anammox processes: recent advances and meta-analysis. Water Research, 191: 116817
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.116817
47 R Xiao, W Zhu, S Xu, W Chai, Y Tong, P Zheng, H Lu. (2022a). Low strength wastewater anammox start-up by stepwise decrement in influent nitrogen: biofilm formation mechanism and mathematical modelling. Environment International, 158: 106929
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106929
48 R Xiao, W Zhu, Y Zheng, S Xu, H Lu. (2022b). Active assimilators of soluble microbial products produced by wastewater anammox bacteria and their roles revealed by DNA-SIP coupled to metagenomics. Environment International, 164: 107265
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2022.107265
49 Z Xue, T Zhang, Y Sun, T Yin, J Cao, F Fang, Q Feng, J Luo. (2022). Integrated moving bed biofilm reactor with partial denitrification–anammox for promoted nitrogen removal: layered biofilm structure formation and symbiotic functional microbes. Science of the Total Environment, 839: 156339
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156339
50 O Yishai, S N Lindner, J Gonzalez de La Cruz, H Tenenboim, A Bar-Even. (2016). The formate bio-economy. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, 35: 1–9
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2016.07.005
51 Z Yu, S Xu, P Wang, D Liu, H Lu. (2023). Phosphorus removal and storage polymer synthesis by tetrasphaera-related bacteria with different carbon sources. ACS ES&T Water, 3(5): 1374–1384
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.3c00046
52 J Zhang, Y Peng, X Li, R Du. (2022a). Feasibility of partial-denitrification/anammox for pharmaceutical wastewater treatment in a hybrid biofilm reactor. Water Research, 208: 117856
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117856
53 L Zhang, Q Zhang, X Li, T Jia, S Wang, Y Peng. (2022b). Enhanced nitrogen removal from municipal wastewater via a novel combined process driven by partial nitrification/anammox (PN/A) and partial denitrification/anammox (PD/A) with an ultra-low hydraulic retention time (HRT). Bioresource Technology, 363: 127950
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127950
54 W Zhong, H Li, Y Wang (2023). Design and construction of artificial biological systems for one-carbon utilization. BioDesign Research, 5, 0021
[1] FSE-24054-OF-ZWL_suppl_1 Download
[1] GENG Bing, ZHU Yanfang, JIN Zhaohui, LI Tielong, KANG Haiyan, WANG Shuaima. Studies on catalytic reduction of nitrate in groundwater[J]. Front.Environ.Sci.Eng., 2007, 1(3): 357-361.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed