Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Forestry in China

ISSN 1673-3517

ISSN 1673-3630(Online)

CN 11-5728/S

Front Fore Chin    2009, Vol. 4 Issue (1) : 46-52    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11461-009-0019-1
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Nutrient cycle of planted forest of Pinus tabulaeformisin the Miyun Reservoir Watershed, Beijing
Shihai LIU1(), Xinxiao YU2
1. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China; 2. School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
 Download: PDF(113 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

We studied the nutrient cycle of a planted forest of Pinus tabulaeformis in the Miyun Reservoir Watershed, Beijing. Results show that the total biomass of P. tabulaeformis stands at age 29 in the experimental area is 92627 kg/hm2, and the total nutrient store is 695.17 kg/hm2 including nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), kalium (K), calium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg). The sequence of their contents in different organs was given as follows: needle>branch>trunk>root. The annual amount of 85.37 kg/hm2 of five nutrient elements were assimilated by P. tabulaeformis, about 0.34% of the total store in soil, and 3.30% of available nutrient store in soil depth from 0 to 30 cm. The nutrient annual retention is 35.92 kg/hm2, annual returning 49.46 kg/hm2, the rain input 26.04 kg/hm2 to the five nutrient elements. The parameter absorption coefficient, utilization coefficient, cycle coefficient and turnover period were cited to describe the nutrient elements cycle characteristic of the planted forest ecosystem of P. tabulaeformis. The absorption coefficient is the ratio of plant nutrient element content to soil nutrient element content, and its sequence of five nutrient elements was given as follows: N>P>K>Ca>Mg. Utilization coefficient is the ratio of the nutrient element annual uptake amount to the nutrient element storage in standing crops, and its sequence of five nutrient elements was: Mg>K>P>N>Ca. The big utilization coefficient means more nutrients stored in the plant. The cycle coefficient is the ratio of the nutrient element annual return amount to the nutrient element annual uptake amount, its sequence: Ca>N>P>K>Mg. Turnover period is the ratio of the nutrient storage in the crops to the annual returning, its sequence: Mg>K>P>N>Ca.

Keywords Miyun Reservoir      planted forest of P. tabulaeformis      nutrient elements      nutrient cycle     
Corresponding Author(s): LIU Shihai,Email:environmental@sina.com   
Issue Date: 05 March 2009
 Cite this article:   
Shihai LIU,Xinxiao YU. Nutrient cycle of planted forest of Pinus tabulaeformisin the Miyun Reservoir Watershed, Beijing[J]. Front Fore Chin, 2009, 4(1): 46-52.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/ffc/EN/10.1007/s11461-009-0019-1
https://academic.hep.com.cn/ffc/EN/Y2009/V4/I1/46
no.density/(tree·hm-2)age/yearcanopy densityaspectslope/oslope positionslope typessoil thickness/cmdiameter /cmtree height /mlitter thickness/cm
011850320.83NE30middlestraight4011.837.212
022025320.86NE25middlestraight4011.517.910
031125250.68N25middleconvex2512.596.48
041175300.68NW27mid-upperconvex2212.466.39
052355260.90NW26middle-lowerconvex3510.075.810
Tab.1  Basic situation of plantation plots
sample plot no.standard strain dry weight/kgstand density/(tree·hm-2)biomass dry weight at different organ/(kg·hm-2)sum
trunkbranchleafroottrunkbranchleafroot
0129.5411.278.634.6618505464920850159668621100086
0230.407.566.426.58202561560153091300113325103195
0337.8818.3710.3413.3311254261520666116331499689910
0427.3411.214.427.26117532125131725194853159022
0524.967.777.656.72235558781182981801615826110921
average30.0211.247.497.7117064994617659127621226092627
Tab.2  Biomass distribution in different organs of trees
itemorganNPKCaMg
aerial partleaf1-year-old0.950.1310.620.420.197
2-year-old0.890.1130.550.700.162
3-year-old0.860.0990.420.630.119
branch0.490.0560.340.180.083
trunk0.070.0100.110.060.022
underground part<2mm0.440.0750.800.410.147
2-10mm0.380.0680.320.260.030
>10mm0.300.0340.260.080.021
main root0.150.0100.190.070.017
Tab.3  Nutrient concentration of different organs of trees (unit: %)
elementleafbranchtrunkrootsum
N115.0686.9834.3134.26270.61
P14.579.915.144.6034.22
K67.4632.7428.5228.52157.24
Ca74.5162.0931.1016.63184.33
Mg20.3414.6111.022.8048.77
Sum291.94206.33110.0986.81695.17
Tab.4  Nutrient contained in different organs of trees (unit: kg·hm)
elementleafbranchtrunkrootsum
N29.383.001.181.1834.74
P4.040.340.180.164.72
K19.011.130.980.9822.10
Ca12.972.141.070.5716.75
Mg6.080.500.380.107.06
Sum71.487.113.792.9985.37
Tab.5  Nutrient uptake in the different organs of trees (unit: kg·hm·a)
elementretentionlitter returnuptake
leafbranchtrunkrootsubtotal
N9.393.001.181.1814.7519.9934.74
P1.740.340.180.162.422.304.72
K9.211.130.980.9812.309.7922.09
Ca–1.652.141.070.572.1314.6216.75
Mg3.320.500.380.104.302.767.06
sum22.027.113.792.9935.9149.4685.37
Tab.6  Nutrient cycle in trees (unit: kg·hm·year)
itemelement
NPKCaMg
absorption coefficienta0.0084060.0019550.0004020.0002400.000098
utilization coefficientb0.12840.13780.14060.09090.1447
cycle coefficientc0.57530.48780.44310.87230.3905
turnover periodd /year13.5414.8816.0612.6117.70
Tab.7  Characteristic parameter of nutrient cycle in forest
itemelementsoil layersum storage/(kg·hm-2)
0-15 cm15-30 cm
concentration/%storage/(kg·hm-2)concentration/%storage/(kg·hm-2)
available nutrient storageN0.002550.250.002145.9396.18
P0.000918.090.00012.1920.28
K0.0208418.080.0154336.80754.88
Ca0.46519348.510.39688678.0218026.53
Mg0.05361077.360.04881067.262144.62
sum10912.2910130.1821042.47
total nutrient storage in soilN0.09822062.200.09472071.094133.29
P0.05681192.800.05571218.162410.96
K1.357228501.201.210326469.2654970.46
Ca1.688535458.501.570834353.4069811.90
Mg1.736236460.201.629335632.7972092.99
sum103674.9099744.70203419.60
Tab.8  Nutrient storage in the soil reservoir of a forest
1 Bernard T B (1993). Rapid N fixation in pines, alder, and locust: evidence from the sandbox ecosystem study. Ecology , 74(2): 538–598
2 Chen L Z, Hu Y H, Kong F Z (1987). The chemical elements of planted forest of Pinus tabulaeformis. Acta Bot Sin , 29(3): 302–308 (in Chinese)
3 Dong M, Wang Y F, Kong F Z (1996). Survey, Observation and Analysis of Terrestrial Biocmmunities. Beijing: Standards Press of China (in Chinese)
4 Lin P, He J Y, Li Z J (1998). Wuyishan Research Series Forest Ecosystem (I). Xiamen: Xiamen University Press (in Chinese)
5 Liu G Q, Tu X N, Zhao S T (2001a). Degradation and control of soil organic matter and nutrient elements of pine-Quercus liaotungensis forest in MT, Qingling. Sci Silv Sin , 37(1): 28–36 (in Chinese)
6 Liu G S, Jiang N H, Zhang L D (1996). Soil Physical and Chemical Analysis Description of Soil Profiles. Beijing: Standards Press of China (in Chinese)
7 Liu S H, Yu X X, Yu Z M (2001b). Property of precipitation of chemical elements of the Pinus tabulaeformis water resource protection forest in the Miyun reservoir watershed. Chin J App Ecol , 12(5): 697–700 (in Chinese)
8 Shen G F, Dong S R, Nie D P (1985). Studies on the nutrient element cycling in the Pinus tabulaeformis plantation I, Content and distribution of nutrient elements. J Beijing For Univ , 7(4): 1–14 (in Chinese)
9 Wang G H (2002). Plant traits and soil chemical variable during a secondary vegetation succession in abandoned filed on the Loess Plateau. Acta Bot Sin , 44(8): 990–998 (in Chinese)
10 Wu Z Y (1980). Vegetation of China. Beijing: Science Press (in Chinese)
11 Xie X Q, Wang L J, Wang S S (1998). Observation and Analysis of Water Environment Factors. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 100–294 (in Chinese)
12 Yan C R, Wang Y F, Huang J H (1993). A study on nutrient cycling of pine stands in eastern part of China. Acta Phytoecol Sin , 23(4): 351–360 (in Chinese)
13 Yu X X, Yu Z M, Wang L X (2001). Forest for Water Resources Protection Silviculture, Management and Evaluation. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House (in Chinese)
14 Zhang X B, Shangguan Z P (2006). Nutrient distributions and bio-cycle patterns in both natural and artificial Pinus tabulaeformis forests in hilly loess regions. Acta Ecol Sin , 26(2): 373–382 (in Chinese)
[1] Xiaojuan ZHANG, Tianxing WEI, Libo JING, Na YIN, Yanhui LIU. Nutrient distribution and accumulation patterns of natural secondary forests in the Loess Plateau of Shanxi Province, northern China[J]. Front Fore Chin, 2009, 4(2): 159-164.
[2] NIE Lishui, WANG Dengzhi, LI Jiyue. Transfer characteristics of nutrient elements through hydrological process of a Pinus tabulaeformis stand in the West Mountain of Beijing[J]. Front. For. China, 2007, 2(3): 329-334.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed