Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Forestry in China

ISSN 1673-3517

ISSN 1673-3630(Online)

CN 11-5728/S

Front Fore Chin    2009, Vol. 4 Issue (2) : 140-145    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11461-009-0033-3
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Carbon sink in Phoebe bournei artificial forest ecosystem
Mingdong MA1(), Chengde LUO2, Hong JIANG3, Yuejian LIU1, Xi LI4
1. Sichuan Agricultural University, Dujiangyan 611830, China; 2. International Center of Ecology, Zhejiang Forestry University, Hangzhou 311300, China; 3. The International Institute of Earth System Science, Nanjing University,Nanjing 210093, China The Key Laboratory of Three Gorges in Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China; 4. Institute of Earth System Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210093, China
 Download: PDF(117 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Biomass, carbon content, carbon storage and spatial distribution in the 32-year-old Phoebe bournei artificial forest were measured. The mean biomass of the forest stand was 174.33 t/hm2, among which the arbor layer was 166.73 t/hm2, which accounted for 95.6%. Carbon contents of stems, barks, branches, leaves, root, shrub layer, herb layer, lichen layer and litter layer were 0.5769 g C/g, 0.4654 g C/g, 0.5232 g C/g, 0.4958 g C/g, 0.4931 g C/g, 0.4989 g C/g, 0.4733 g C/g, 0.4143 g C/g, 0.3882 g C/g, respectively. The mean carbon content of soil was 0.0139 g C/g, which reduced gradually along with soil depth. Total carbon storage of the P. bournei stand ecosystem was 227.59 t/hm2, among which the arbor layer accounted for 40.13% (91.33 t/hm2), the shrub layer accounted for 0.17% (0.38 t/hm2), the herb layer accounted for 0.76% (1.71 t/hm2), the lichen layer accounted for 0.28% (0.63 t/hm2), and the litter layer accounted for 0.29% (0.66 t/hm2). Carbon content (0-80 cm) of the forest soil was 58.40% (132.88 t/hm2). Spatial distribution ranking of carbon storage was: soil layer (0-80 cm)>arbor layer>herb layer>litter layer>lichen layer>shrub layer. Net production of the forest stand was 8.5706 t/(hm2·a), in which the arbor layer was 6.6691 t/(hm2·a), and it accounted for 77.82%. Net annual carbon sequestration of the P. bournei stand was 4.2536 t/(hm2·a), and the arbor layer was 3.5736 t/(hm2·a), which accounted for 84.01%.

Keywords Phoebebournei plantation      carbon sink      biomass      carbon content      net productivity      carbon storage     
Corresponding Author(s): MA Mingdong,Email:mmingdong@scfc.edu   
Issue Date: 05 June 2009
 Cite this article:   
Mingdong MA,Chengde LUO,Hong JIANG, et al. Carbon sink in Phoebe bournei artificial forest ecosystem[J]. Front Fore Chin, 2009, 4(2): 140-145.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/ffc/EN/10.1007/s11461-009-0033-3
https://academic.hep.com.cn/ffc/EN/Y2009/V4/I2/140
organregression equationrSD
stem timberslgW=0.9419lg(D2H)-1.42990.9680**0.0632
barklgW=1.0106lg(D2H)-2.84520.9744**0.0613
brancheslgW=0.9952lg(D2H)-2.32620.9488**0.0701
leaveslgW=1.0108lg(D2H)-2.86320.9194**0.0754
above-groundlgW=0.9599lg(D2H)-1.36950.9352**0.0716
stump rootslgW=1.5745lg(D2H)-4.41540.9355**0.0715
coarse rootslgW=2.2478lg(D2H)-7.29740.9637**0.0636
medium rootslgW=1.2446lg(D2H)-4.27090.9012**0.0789
small rootslgW=2.0241lg(D2H)-7.45460.9015**0.0787
fine rootslgW=1.7216lg(D2H)-6.71770.9048**0.0781
under-groundlgW=1.7222lg(D2H)-4.76290.9879**0.0526
Tab.1  Regression equations of organ dry weight as a function of DHB and tree height
stemsbarkbranchesleavesrootstotal
102.02 (61.17)6.98 (4.19)20.51 (12.31)6.67 (4.00)30.55 (18.32)166.73 (100)
Tab.2  Biomass and proportion allocated to each organ in tree layer (unit: t·hm)
itemstump rootscoarse rootsmedium rootssmall rootsfine rootstotal
dominant tree27.61 (48.68)19.35 (34.11)4.75 (8.37)3.65 (6.44)1.36 (2.40)56.72 (100)
average tree18.10 (49.37)13.99 (38.16)2.68 (7.311.17 (3.19)0.72 (1.96)36.66 (100)
suppressed tree11.44 (56.63)6.52 (32.28)1.40 (6.93)0.59 (2.92)0.24 (1.22)20.20 (100)
Tab.3  Root biomass and proportion allocated to dominant, average and suppressed trees (unit: kg)
herb layerlichen layerlitter layertotal
above-groundunder-groundtotal
2.1491.4703.6201.5131.7136.846
Tab.4  Biomass of herb, lichen and litter layers (unit: t?hm)
itemtrunksbranchesleavesbarksstump rootscoarse rootsmedium rootssmall rootsfine rootsaverage
average value0.57690.52320.49580.46540.51670.52050.50790.46210.45830.4931
coefficient of variation8.259.3410.755.035.706.036.227.487.90
Tab.5  Carbon content of different organs of (unit: g C·g)
vegetationlayercarbon content
shrubsabove-ground0.5078
under-ground0.4900
average0.4989
herbsabove-ground0.4856
under-ground0.4610
average0.4733
lichens0.4143
Tab.6  Carbon content of undergrowth vegetation (unit: g C·g)
layercomponentcarbon content
litterundecomposed litter0.4827
semi-decomposed litter0.4424
decomposed litter0.2396
average0.3882
soil layer0-20 cm soil layer0.0217
0-20 cm soil layer0.0132
0-20 cm soil layer0.0119
0-20 cm soil layer0.0102
average0.0143
Tab.7  Soil carbon content under stands (unit: g C·g)
diameter class/cmnumber of treesstemsbarksbranchesleavesrootstotal
biomasscarbonstoragebiomasscarbonstoragebiomasscarbonstoragebiomasscarbonstoragebiomasscarbonstoragebiomasscarbonstorage
14815.002.890.370.180.760.400.330.171.530.767.994.40
1610210.155.860.600.282.251.180.630.323.061.5116.699.15
1831735.6120.552.371.117.393.872.191.0910.405.1257.9631.75
2020027.6115.931.970.924.692.451.870.938.224.0644.3624.29
228314.618.431.040.492.771.450.810.404.592.2723.8213.05
24509.045.220.630.302.651.390.840.422.751.3615.918.69
total833102.0258.886.983.2820.5110.746.673.3330.5515.08166.7391.33
Tab.8  Distribution of number of trees, biomass and carbon storage of tree layer by diameter class (unit: t·hm)
componentcarbon content /(g C·g-1)carbon storage /(t·hm-2)
tree layer0.546791.33
shrub layer0.49890.38
herb layer0.47331.71
lichen layer0.41430.63
litter layer0.38820.66
0-20 cm soil layer0.021748.09
20-40 cm soil layer0.013230.23
40-60 cm soil layer0.011929.31
60-80 cm soil layer0.010225.25
total227.59
Tab.9  Spatial distribution of carbon storage of forest ecosystems
componentmean annual net production/(t·hm-2)annual net sequestration/(t C·hm-2)
trunks3.18811.8393
bark0.21810.1015
branches0.64060.3352
leaves1.66750.8268
roots0.95470.4708
tree layers6.66913.5736
shrub layers0.19000.0948
herb layers0.90500.4284
ground cover layers0.37830.1568
total8.14234.2536
Tab.10  Average net production and net annual carbon sequestration of each component of stand
1 Bao X C (1984). Biomass of oriental oak forest. Acta Phytoecol Geobot Sin , 8: 313-320 (in Chinese)
Bao X C (1984). Biomass of oriental oak forest. Acta Phytoecol Geobot Sin, 8: 313―320 (in Chinese)
2 Chen L Z (1986). Biomass research of Robinia pseudoacacia L. in Xishan, Beijing. Acta Bot Sin , 28: 201-208 (in Chinese)
Chen L Z (1986). Biomass research of Robiniapseudoacacia L. in Xishan, Beijing. Acta Bot Sin, 28: 201―208 (in Chinese)
3 Fang J Y, Chen A P (2001). Dynamic forest biomass carbon pools in China and their significance. Acta Bot Sin , 43(9): 967-973 (in Chinese)
Fang J Y, Chen A P (2001). Dynamicforest biomass carbon pools in China and their significance. Acta Bot Sin, 43(9): 967―973 (in Chinese)
4 Fang X, Tian D L, Xiang W H (2002). Density, storage and distribution of Chinese fir plantation at fast growing stage. Sci Silv Sin , 38(3): 14-19 (in Chinese)
Fang X, Tian D L, Xiang W H (2002). Density, storage and distributionof Chinese fir plantation at fast growing stage. Sci Silv Sin, 38(3): 14―19 (in Chinese)
5 Fang X, Tian D L (2003). Productivity and carbon dynamics of Masson pine plantation. J South For Univ , 23(2): 11-15 (in Chinese)
Fang X, Tian D L (2003). Productivityand carbon dynamics of Masson pine plantation. J South For Univ, 23(2): 11―15 (in Chinese)
6 Feng Z W (1982). Determination of biomass of Pinus massoniana stand in Huitong County Hunan Province. Sci Silv Sin , 18(2): 127-134 (in Chinese)
Feng Z W (1982). Determination of biomass of Pinus massoniana stand in Huitong County Hunan Province. Sci Silv Sin, 18(2): 127―134 (in Chinese)
7 Feng Z W, Zhang J W, Chen C Y (1983). Biological productivity and nutrient distribution in artificial Michelia maccurei stand. J North-Eastern For Inst , 11(2): 13-19 (in Chinese)
Feng Z W, Zhang J W, Chen C Y (1983). Biological productivity and nutrientdistribution in artificial Michelia maccurei stand. J North-Eastern For Inst, 11(2): 13―19 (in Chinese)
8 Feng Z W, Wang X K, Wu G (1999). Forest Ecosystem Biomass and Productivity in China. Beijing: Science Press (in Chinese)
Feng Z W, Wang X K, Wu G (1999). Forest Ecosystem Biomass and Productivityin China. Beijing: Science Press (in Chinese)
9 Jiang H, Apps M, Peng C, Zhang Y, Lin J (2002). Modeling the influence of harvesting on Chinese boreal forest carbon dynamics. For Ecol Manag , 169: 65-82
Jiang H, Apps M, Peng C, Zhang Y, Lin J (2002). Modeling the influenceof harvesting on Chinese boreal forest carbon dynamics. For Ecol Manag, 169: 65―82
10 Kang H N, Ma Q Y, Yuan J Z (1996). Estimation of carbon sink function of forests in China. J Chin Appl Ecol , 7(3): 230-234 (in Chinese)
Kang H N, Ma Q Y, Yuan J Z (1996). Estimation of carbon sink functionof forests in China. J Chin Appl Ecol, 7(3): 230―234 (in Chinese)
11 Kimmins J P (2004). Forest Ecology. 3rd ed. New York: Pearson education, Inc
Kimmins J P (2004). Forest Ecology. 3rd ed. New York: Pearson education, Inc
12 Lei P F, Xiang W H, Tian D L, Fang X (2004). Carbon storage and distribution in Cinnamomum camphor plantation. Chin J Ecol , 23(4): 25-30 (in Chinese)
Lei P F, Xiang W H, Tian D L, Fang X (2004). Carbon storage and distribution in Cinnamomumcamphor plantation. Chin J Ecol, 23(4): 25―30 (in Chinese)
13 Li X M (1984). Biomass measure of Larix kaempferi. J Sichuan For Sci Technol , 5(1): 27-29 (in Chinese)
Li X M (1984). Biomass measure of Larix kaempferi. J Sichuan For Sci Technol, 5(1): 27―29 (in Chinese)
14 Li Y D, Wu Z M, Zeng Q B (1998). Estimation of community productivity and net CO2 accumulation of a tropical mountain rain forest in Jianfengling, Hainan Island, China. J Plant Ecol , 22(2): 127-134 (in Chinese)
Li Y D, Wu Z M, Zeng Q B (1998). Estimation of community productivityand net CO2 accumulation of a tropical mountain rain forest in Jianfengling,Hainan Island, China. J Plant Ecol, 22(2): 127―134 (in Chinese)
15 Liu G S (1996). Standard Method of Network Observation and Analysis of Ecosystem of China—Analysis of Soil Physical and Chemical Features and Section Characterization. Beijing:Standard Press of China (in Chinese)
Liu G S (1996). Standard Method of Network Observation and Analysisof Ecosystem of China—Analysis of Soil Physical and ChemicalFeatures and Section Characterization. Beijing:Standard Press of China (in Chinese)
16 Ma M D, Jiang H, Liu Y J (2007). Preliminary study of carbon density, net production and carbon stock in natural spruce forests of northwest subalpine Sichuan, China. J Plant Ecol , 31(2): 305-312 (in Chinese)
Ma M D, Jiang H, Liu Y J (2007). Preliminary study of carbon density,net production and carbon stock in natural spruce forests of northwestsubalpine Sichuan, China. J Plant Ecol, 31(2): 305―312 (in Chinese)
17 Pan W C (1981). Study on nutrient cycle of Chinese fir. J Centr South For Univ , 1(1): 1-21 (in Chinese)
Pan W C (1981). Study on nutrient cycle of Chinese fir. J Centr South For Univ, 1(1): 1―21 (in Chinese)
18 Post W M, Emanuel W R, Zinke P J, Stangenberger A G (1982). Soil pools and world life zone. Nature , 298: 156-159
doi: 10.1038/298156a0
Post W M, Emanuel W R, Zinke P J, Stangenberger A G (1982). Soil pools and world life zone. Nature, 298: 156―159

doi: 10.1038/298156a0
19 Shi G S, Ding Y H (1996). Evaluation on CO2 emission and absorption of forest resource of china. In: Ding Y H, ed. Study on Climatic Change and Effects of China . Beijing: China Meteorological Press, 85-94 (in Chinese)
Shi G S, Ding Y H (1996). Evaluationon CO2 emission and absorption of forest resource of china. In: Ding Y H, ed. Study on Climatic Change and Effectsof China. Beijing: China Meteorological Press, 85―94 (in Chinese)
20 Wang X K, Feng Z W (2000). The potential to sequester atmospheric carbon through forest ecosystems in China. Chin J Ecol , 19(4): 72-74 (in Chinese)
Wang X K, Feng Z W (2000). The potentialto sequester atmospheric carbon through forest ecosystems in China. Chin J Ecol, 19(4): 72―74 (in Chinese)
21 Waring R H, Running S W (1998). Forest Ecosystems, Analysis at Multiple Scales. New York: AcademicPress
Waring R H, Running S W (1998). ForestEcosystems, Analysis at Multiple Scales. New York: AcademicPress
22 Woodwell G M, Whittaker R H, Reine A, Likens G E, Delwiche C C, Botkin D B (1978). The biota and the world carbon budget. Science , 199: 141-146
doi: 10.1126/science.199.4325.141
Woodwell G M, Whittaker R H, Reine A, Likens G E, Delwiche C C, Botkin D B (1978). The biota and the world carbon budget. Science, 199: 141―146

doi: 10.1126/science.199.4325.141
23 Yao Y J, Kang W X, Tian D L (2003). Study of the biomass and productivity of Cinnamomum camphora plantation. J Centr South For Univ , 23(1): 1-5 (in Chinese)
Yao Y J, Kang W X, Tian D L (2003). Study of the biomass and productivityof Cinnamomum camphora plantation. J Centr South For Univ, 23(1): 1―5 (inChinese)
24 Zhou G M, Jiang P K (2004). Density storage and spatial distribution of carbon in Phyllostachys pubescens forest. Sci Silv Sin , 40(6): 20-24 (in Chinese)
Zhou G M, Jiang P K (2004). Densitystorage and spatial distribution of carbon in Phyllostachys pubescens forest. Sci Silv Sin, 40(6): 20―24 (in Chinese)
[1] Yuanguang WEN, Fang CHEN, Shirong LIU, Hongwen LIANG, Chang'an YUAN, Hongguang ZHU. Relationship between species diversity and biomass of eucalyptus plantation in Guangxi, south China[J]. Front Fore Chin, 2009, 4(2): 146-152.
[2] Lishan SHAN, Ximing ZHANG, Yonghui HUA, Tingting XIE, Hailong YAN, Hua FAN. Response of root distribution of Haloxylon ammodendron seedlings to irrigation amounts in the hinterlands of the Taklimakan Desert, China[J]. Front Fore Chin, 2009, 4(1): 60-67.
[3] Hui WANG, Jiangming MO, Xiankai LU, Jinghua XUE, Jiong LI, Yunting FANG. Effects of elevated nitrogen deposition on soil microbial biomass carbon in major subtropical forests of southern China[J]. Front Fore Chin, 2009, 4(1): 21-27.
[4] XUE Sha, LIU Guobin, ZHANG Chao, DAI Quanhou, YU Na. Evolution of soil microbial biomass in restoration process of plantations in an eroded environment[J]. Front. For. China, 2008, 3(3): 293-299.
[5] XIAN Junren, HU Tingxing, ZHANG Yuanbin, WANG Kaiyun. Effects of forest canopy gap on biomass of seedlings and its allocation in subalpine coniferous forests of western Sichuan[J]. Front. For. China, 2008, 3(3): 271-278.
[6] PENG Lihua, LIU Yunxia, WANG Jin, CHEN Shuang. Application of CITYgreen model in benefit assessment of Nanjing urban green space in carbon fixation and runoff reduction[J]. Front. For. China, 2008, 3(2): 177-182.
[7] FANG Chuan, LI Xianwei, ZHANG Jian, FANG Bing, DONG Huixia. Biomass of fine roots and its relationship with water-stable aggregates in a composite ecosystem of triploid in the conversion of farmland to forest[J]. Front. For. China, 2008, 3(2): 158-164.
[8] CHENG Tangren, FENG Jing, MA Qinyan, FENG Zhongke, LUO Xu, WANG Yutao, ZHANG Yanlin. Forest biomass at Xiaolong Mountain in Gansu Province, China[J]. Front. For. China, 2008, 3(2): 206-212.
[9] LI Mingshi, TAN Ying, PAN Jie, PENG Shikui. Modeling forest aboveground biomass by combining spectrum, textures and topographic features[J]. Front. For. China, 2008, 3(1): 10-15.
[10] LI Xuanran, LIU Qijing, CHEN Yongrui, YANG Fengting, HU Lile. Aboveground biomass of three conifers in the Qianyanzhou plantation, Jiangxi Province, China[J]. Front. For. China, 2008, 3(1): 16-23.
[11] SUN Zhigao, QIN Shengjin, LIU Jingshuang, WANG Jinda. Biomass structure and nitrogen, phosphorus nutrient of Calamagrostis angustifolia populations in different communities of Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China[J]. Front. For. China, 2007, 2(4): 366-375.
[12] XUE Sha, LIU Guobin, DAI Quanhou, YU Na, LAN Xue. Effects of different vegetation restoration models on soil microbial biomass in eroded hilly Loess Plateau, China[J]. Front. For. China, 2007, 2(4): 376-381.
[13] HE Youjun, WANG Qingkui, WANG Silong, YU Xiaojun. Characteristics of carbon and nitrogen of soil microbial biomass and their relationships with soil nutrients in Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations[J]. Front. For. China, 2007, 2(3): 266-271.
[14] MEI Li, YU Shuiqiang, SHI Jianwei, WANG Zhengquan, HAN Youzhi. Impact factors on fine root seasonal dynamics in Fraxinus mandshurica plantations[J]. Front. For. China, 2007, 2(3): 298-304.
[15] ZHOU Biao, ZHU Shengying, MAO Zijun, WANG Xiuwei, SUN Yuanfa, ZHAO Xizhu. Space-time dynamics of fine root biomass of six forests in the Maoershan forest region, northeast China[J]. Front. For. China, 2007, 2(2): 136-142.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed