|
|
|
A discussion of the concept of “feudal” |
| HOU Jianxin |
| College of History and Culture, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China; |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The Western terms feudal and feudalism have been widely and improperly translated as fengjian in contemporary China. The early Western Sinologists and Chinese scholars, including Yan Fu, did not originally make such a translation. Yan initially transliterated the term feudalism as fute zhi in his early translations. It was not until the 20th century, when Western classical evolutionism found its way into China, that feudalism was reduced to an abstract concept, and the Western European model was generalized as a framework for understanding development in China and the whole world. Only then did Yan Fu first equate feudalism with fengjian, and China was believed to have experienced a feudal society in the same sense as Europe. From the perspective of intellectual history, using evidential and theoretical analyses, this article attempts to show that feudalism was a historical product in the development of Western Europe and existed only in Europe, fengjian is a system appropriate only in discussions of pre-Qin China, and China from the Qin to the Qing experienced instead a system of imperial autocracy. The medieval periods in the West and in China evidence widely divergent social forms and hence should not be confused with the same label.
|
|
Issue Date: 05 March 2007
|
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
