Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of History in China

ISSN 1673-3401

ISSN 1673-3525(Online)

CN 11-5740/K

Postal Subscription Code 80-980

Front Hist Chin    2012, Vol. 7 Issue (3) : 330-343    https://doi.org/10.3868/s020-001-012-0018-7
research-article
Marx and Modernity: Rethinking Labour, Capital, and Capitalism
Moishe Postone()
Department of History, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
 Download: PDF(210 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

This article argues that China’s modern historical development and, more generally, modern global developments can be illuminated by a renewed encounter with Marx’s critical analysis of capitalism. This renewed encounter entails a fundamental critique of traditional Marxism’s understanding of capitalism and of socialism. It seeks to explain the historically dynamic character of capitalist society as a system of ongoing constraints. This central feature of the contemporary world cannot be grasped adequately by intellectual paradigms, such as theories of identity or of politics, which have been dominant in recent decades. The approach outlined here analyzes capitalist modernity as structured by a historically unique social function of labour, and is based on a fundamental reevaluation of the meaning of labour in Marx’s analysis as the object, rather than the standpoint of his critique. The focus on the historical specificity of Marx’s analytic categories also calls into question any conception of a transhistorically valid social science.

Keywords Marx      historical dynamic      labour      capital      historical specificity     
Corresponding Author(s): Moishe Postone,Email:m-postone@uchicago.edu   
Issue Date: 05 September 2012
 Cite this article:   
Moishe Postone. Marx and Modernity: Rethinking Labour, Capital, and Capitalism[J]. Front Hist Chin, 2012, 7(3): 330-343.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fhc/EN/10.3868/s020-001-012-0018-7
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fhc/EN/Y2012/V7/I3/330
[1] Robert Stern. Rethinking the History and Theory of Jus Publicum Universal: The Formation of China as a “Semi-Civilized” Legal Subject[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2017, 12(2): 181-261.
[2] Zhihang Qiao. Imagining a Different Future—Anarchist Equality and the Form of Labour in the Journal of Natural Justice[J]. Front Hist Chin, 2012, 7(3): 376-403.
[3] Stacie Hanneman. Marx and Modernity: Rethinking Labour, Capital, and Capitalism[J]. Front Hist Chin, 2012, 7(3): 344-375.
[4] Viren Murthy. The Strange Fate of Marxist Civil Society Discourse in Japan and China[J]. Front Hist Chin, 2012, 7(3): 442-472.
[5] Morris L. Bian. Interpreting Enterprise, State, and Society: A Critical Review of the Literature in Modern Chinese Business History, 1978–2008[J]. Front Hist Chin, 2011, 6(3): 423-462.
[6] DONG Qi. Early capital cities—The key symbols of early Chinese civilization[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2008, 3(1): 1-14.
[7] ZHAO Yifeng. The historical trend of Ming China: An imperial agric-mercantile society[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2007, 2(1): 78-66.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed