Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of History in China

ISSN 1673-3401

ISSN 1673-3525(Online)

CN 11-5740/K

Postal Subscription Code 80-980

Front. Hist. China    2018, Vol. 13 Issue (1) : 28-46    https://doi.org/10.3868/s020-007-018-0003-9
Orginal Article
Changing Conceptions of the Opium War as History and Experience
Xin ZHANG()
Department of History, Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
 Download: PDF(244 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Academic and popular accounts of the Opium War have gone through nearly two centuries of change in focus, view, and scope. My study probes this extensive historiography by tracing the evolvement of our understanding of the war through various phases among which we saw the rise of the “China-centered approach” and the beginning of a new trend towards combining government archives with personal records such as memoirs, personal correspondence, and private journals in research. Based on the observation, I will indicate, despite their undeniable achievements, most of the existing scholarships have paid little attention to the ordinary people in China whose lives were deeply affected by the war. It is high time that we pay more attention to human experience of the Chinese people in order to understand not only the war itself but also the history it helped shape.

Keywords Opium War      imperialism      modernization      China-centered approach      global study     
Issue Date: 13 June 2018
 Cite this article:   
Xin ZHANG. Changing Conceptions of the Opium War as History and Experience[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2018, 13(1): 28-46.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fhc/EN/10.3868/s020-007-018-0003-9
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fhc/EN/Y2018/V13/I1/28
[1] Jie Gao. United with the Countrymen: Folklore Studies at Peking University, 1918–26[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2020, 15(4): 552-578.
[2] John D. Wong. Fidelity and Sacrifice: The Gender Discourse of Traders in Pre- and Post-Opium War Canton[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2019, 14(4): 473-507.
[3] Fu Zheng. Shifting Narratives: Modern Chinese History since the Economic Reform and a Critique of Popular Opinion[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2018, 13(4): 577-604.
[4] Charles W. Hayford. New Chinese Military History, 1839–1951: What’s the Story?[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2018, 13(1): 90-126.
[5] Gary Chi-hung Luk. Occupied Space, Occupied Time: Food Hawking and the Central Market in Hong Kong’s Victoria City during the Opium War[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2016, 11(3): 400-430.
[6] HE Ping. Ideas of revolution in China and the West[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2008, 3(1): 139-148.
[7] WANG Tiangen. Construction of Yan Fu’s view on social history and the turning of modern history[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2007, 2(4): 547-565.
[8] Wu Songdi, Fan Rusen. The impact of the opening of Tianjin on economic changes in its hinterland[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2006, 1(2): 307-327.
[9] Dong Zhenghua. The modernization paradigm based on monistic multi-linear theory: a response to some comments[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2006, 1(2): 159-198.
[10] Wei Guangqi, Ding Haixiu. Township/Village Administration from the Late Qing to the Warlord Period[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2006, 1(1): 97-123.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed